Photo via South China Morning Post

Trump says Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San Diego, drawing backlash

Read the original at South China Morning Post ↗
Cite

Reuters. (2026, October 6). Trump says Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San Diego, drawing backlash. South China Morning Post. https://www.scmp.com/news/world/united-states-canada/article/3369961/trump-says-iran-could-take-out-los-angeles-or-san-diego-drawing-backlash?utm_source=rss_feed

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

South China Morning Post · collected 2026-10-06 · by Reuters

Quick Summary

At a political rally in Nebraska, President Donald Trump told supporters that Iran could potentially attack major US cities like Los Angeles or San Diego, suggesting such an event would be “a very small price to pay” for keeping the country safe. This comment drew criticism from California’s Democratic leaders and some Republicans who found his remarks alarming and irresponsible.
Written by AI on 2026-10-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

During a campaign rally in Nebraska, former President Donald Trump suggested letting Iran "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego as part of his defense for high gas prices due to the war with Iran, claiming it would be a "small price to pay for keeping the world safe." This comment drew immediate backlash from California officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, who called Trump's remarks "deranged and dangerous," and Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles, who emphasized that the role of a president is to protect the country, not threaten it. San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria also condemned the suggestion, noting that his city houses major military installations such as Naval Base San Diego and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, which collectively support 70,000 civilians and active-duty service members.

Written for “Trump Iran Comment Controversy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 30 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Iran Comment Controversy
Politics · 31 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 43% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 70/100
NBC News
Hedges 4 of 27 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 68/100
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 43 claims Outlet record 66/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 60/100
Global News
Hedges 4 of 12 claims Outlet record 63/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
7
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
43%
3 of 7 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
South China Morning Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
31
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

South China Morning Post · 3451 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Reuters
786 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “Why would the Field Marshal be going twice if it is not for some positivity?
🔮 “Why would the Field Marshal be going twice if it is not for some positivity?
🔮 Meta had settled with S.J. days before the trial, so Friday’s settlement with K.D.B. means the trial is expected to proceed against Snap only.
🔮 “My duty now is not to focus on discussing whether I will remain in office, but on solving the problem, determining exactly what happened and providing clear explanations,” Puente said at a press conference on Friday.
🔮 The global crypto insurance market was valued at $9.37bn in 2025 and is projected to reach $184.98 billion by 2033, according to Data Bridge Market Research.
2026-10-30 · mixed framing · Binance's $6.3bn hack: How crypto insurance works
🔮 No further victims were expected to be found, regional authorities said.
🔮 “This was a complex attack, and we are doing all we can in coordination with law enforcement to resolve it,” Binance wrote on X. The firm earlier posted a series of sometimes contradictory messages, insisting that “user funds are completely safe” but also saying it would “cover all losses.
🔮 Now in Year 2 of the revamped format, the league will hold its first-ever Game 7 with a first-time champion awaiting on either side.
🔮 Everton will travel to League Two side Fleetwood, who stunned Premier League champions Arsenal on Tuesday.
🔮 Later on Thursday, the Republican National Committee said in a statement that it would also cancel a planned rally in Iowa, home to several competitive congressional races.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Reuters
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 786 articles by Reuters →

Topics

California Iran Los Angeles Nebraska San Diego

Subjects

Iran GPE · 3× Los Angeles GPE · 3× San Diego GPE · 3× Nebraska GPE · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× American NORP · 1× California GPE · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Republicans NORP · 1×

Narrative

“And again, remember, with the war, it’s just artificial, it’s a little bit high, it’s a small price to pay,” he told the crowd in Grand Island, Nebraska, apparently referring to rising prices of fuel, fertiliser and other products attributed to energy market disruptions from the war. “It’s a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, for keeping our country safe.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-06
🔮 Trump says Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San Diego, drawing backlash The US president said this would be a ‘very small price to pay’, as he insisted that the war with Iran was almost over
2026-10-06 · South China Morning Post
Trump says Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San Diego, drawing backlash · mixed framing

Claims (7 extracted, 3 hedged)

Trump says Iran could ‘take out’ Los Angeles or San Diego, drawing backlash The US president said this would be a ‘very small price to pay’, as he insisted that the war with Iran was almost over uncertain
war → say → Iran
President Donald Trump suggested to a crowd of his supporters in Nebraska that Iran could “take out” a major US city like Los Angeles or San Diego, drawing a swift rebuke from California’s Democratic leaders and some fellow Republicans. uncertain
Iran → suggest → leaders
Trump, speaking at a political rally in the state’s farm belt on Monday, discussed American wartime economic sacrifices and said he was determined to “see a tremendous victory, because it verifies all the things we did”. asserted
we → speak → things
“And again, remember, with the war, it’s just artificial, it’s a little bit high, it’s a small price to pay,” he told the crowd in Grand Island, Nebraska, apparently referring to rising prices of fuel, fertiliser and other products attributed to energy market disruptions from the war. “It’s a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, for keeping our country safe. asserted
It → remember → country
They could take out a city. uncertain
They → take → city
Let ’em take out Los Angeles, let ’em take out San Diego. asserted
’em → let → Diego
This is a very small price to pay, and it’s going to be over with very soon,” he said. asserted
he → pay → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support