Photo via The Guardian

‘Take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego? Trump is beyond irresponsible | Ted Widmer

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Widmer, T. (2026, October 7). ‘Take out’ Los Angeles and San Diego? Trump is beyond irresponsible | Ted Widmer. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2026/oct/07/trump-speech-los-angeles-san-diego

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-07 · by Ted Widmer

Quick Summary

During a rally in Nebraska, President Trump made alarming comments suggesting that Iran could launch a nuclear attack on Los Angeles or San Diego, which drew strong criticism from California officials. Governor Gavin Newsom called the president “deranged and dangerous,” while the mayors of Los Angeles and San Diego criticized Trump for threatening their cities. Critics argue that Trump’s speech was not only alarmist but also factually inaccurate, with his vague statements adding to concerns about presidential stability and credibility.
Written by AI on 2026-10-07, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

During a campaign rally in Nebraska, former President Donald Trump suggested letting Iran "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego as part of his defense for high gas prices due to the war with Iran, claiming it would be a "small price to pay for keeping the world safe." This comment drew immediate backlash from California officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, who called Trump's remarks "deranged and dangerous," and Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles, who emphasized that the role of a president is to protect the country, not threaten it. San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria also condemned the suggestion, noting that his city houses major military installations such as Naval Base San Diego and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, which collectively support 70,000 civilians and active-duty service members.

Written for “Trump Iran Comment Controversy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 30 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Iran Comment Controversy
Politics · 31 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 2 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 29 claims Outlet record 60/100
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 7 claims Outlet record 64/100
Global News
Hedges 4 of 12 claims Outlet record 63/100
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 7 of 50 claims Outlet record 95/100
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 4 of 50 claims Outlet record 95/100
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 68 claims Outlet record 59/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
43
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
3 of 43 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
31
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-07 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1844 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ted Widmer
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 In fact, a freshman seminar would have been able to puncture most of the speech’s assumptions.
🔮 The president drew fury when he suggested that Iran could launch a nuclear attack and “take out” Los Angeles or San Diego.
🔮 In recent years, that hostility has deepened into something more like a full-on assault, with frequent attacks on the International Criminal Court (perhaps out of fear that he will someday be indicted), on the UN’s climate agenda, and on Unesco (which the US decided to withdraw from in July 2025).
2026-09-22 · assertive framing · Trump invades the UN with a brutish speech | Ted Widmer
Also by Ted Widmer
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Iran Los Angeles Nebraska San Diego

Subjects

San Diego GPE · 5× Iran GPE · 3× Los Angeles GPE · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× the United States GPE · 3× American NORP · 2× Berlin GPE · 2× Nebraska GPE · 2× Bruce Springsteen PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Governor Gavin Newsom denounced Trump as “deranged and dangerous”, while the mayors of Los Angeles and San Diego, Karen Bass and Todd Gloria, objected strenuously to putting their cities in harm’s way, even if only in his feverish imagination.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-07
🔮 The president drew fury when he suggested that Iran could launch a nuclear attack and “take out” Los Angeles or San Diego.

Claims (43 extracted, 3 hedged)

Donald Trump was in Nebraska on Monday, and though his long rally speech had elements of a performance, this was no Bruce Springsteen album. asserted
this → have → performance
He offered another dark meditation on a world spiraling out of control, one in which the destruction of American cities is increasingly a possibility, unless Americans trust him to use the vast powers of the presidency to annihilate his foes. asserted
Americans → offer → foes
The president drew fury when he suggested that Iran could launch a nuclear attack and “take out” Los Angeles or San Diego. uncertain
Iran → draw → Angeles
California leaders reacted with scorn at Trump’s alarmism. asserted
leaders → react → alarmism
Governor Gavin Newsom denounced Trump as “deranged and dangerous”, while the mayors of Los Angeles and San Diego, Karen Bass and Todd Gloria, objected strenuously to putting their cities in harm’s way, even if only in his feverish imagination. asserted
mayors → denounce → imagination
Perhaps the worst problem with Trump’s speech – and there were many – was not that it vividly daydreamed about Armageddon-on-the-Pacific. asserted
it → be → Pacific
It was just so delusional that it had almost no basis in fact at all. asserted
it → have → fact
It is inherently destabilizing when a nation’s leader cannot be trusted to make an accurate statement, and the situation is especially troubling when the nation is the United States, the defender of the rules-based order since 1945. asserted
nation → trust → 1945
When read inside the transcript, the words don’t make a great deal of sense. asserted
words → read → sense
It’s almost like scat singing as the president goes into his famous “weave”, his word for the way he lurches from one half-formed thought to another, like a rodeo clown on a bucking bronco. asserted
he → ’ → bronco
“[Kamala] stole a lot of things that didn’t work out too well. asserted
that → steal → things
But I want, I wanna see, I wanna see a tremendous victory. asserted
I → want → victory
You wanna see a tremendous victory, because it verifies all the things we did. asserted
we → see → things
And again, remember, with the word, it’s just artificial, it’s a little bit high. asserted
it → remember → word
It’s a small price to pay for keeping the world safe, keeping our country safe. asserted
It → ’ → country
“They can take out a city. asserted
They → take → city
Let them take, let it, let them take out Los Angeles. asserted
them → let → Angeles
Let them take out San Diego. asserted
them → let → Diego
That’s, this is a very small price to pay, and it’s gonna be over very soon. asserted
it → ’ → ?
It’s essentially almost over with.” asserted
It → ’ → ?
If he was talking about the war as being “almost over with”, then he’s certainly wrong, as the conflict drags into its eighth month with no sign of resolution. asserted
conflict → talk → resolution
But if he was talking about the midterms, then he’s correct that it will end soon, and not well for him. asserted
it → talk → him
In effect, he now has to go into the reddest part of a red state to sustain his vanishing popularity. asserted
he → have → popularity
Monday night’s rally was held at the Nebraska State Fairgrounds, in Hall county, Nebraska, which had a population of 62,895 in 2020. asserted
which → hold → 2020
Even farmers are wary of this war, which has raised the price of fertilizers and diesel. asserted
which → raise → fertilizers
Presumably, he was worried that Iran’s nuclear program might be able to target LA or San Diego. uncertain
program → target → LA
But by saying “let them …” it almost sounded like he was encouraging them to, as when John F Kennedy, in Berlin, held up that city as a model of courage and said: “Let them come to Berlin,” in both English and German). asserted
them → say → English
In either case, there is no possibility of it happening, as his military advisers know, and as even he must know at some level. asserted
he → be → level
Iran does not have a nuclear weapon, nor can its missiles reach the United States, on either the east or west coast. asserted
missiles → have → coast
Furthermore, it is the height of irresponsibility to even discuss such an unimaginable threat. asserted
it → discuss → threat
All foreign leaders understand that any attack on the United States with a nuclear weapon would result in an overwhelming counterattack. asserted
attack → understand → counterattack
It’s called deterrence. asserted
It → call → ?
It is that knowledge – and the cautious way in which previous American presidents have talked about nuclear weapons – that has helped to preserve the peace all these years. asserted
that → talk → peace
We appear to be entering a new era, in which political desperation at home leads to increasingly unhinged threats abroad. asserted
desperation → appear → threats
There was a lot of red-baiting, despite the fact that the cold war ended in 1991. asserted
war → be → 1991
There were the usual schoolyard insults, in this case lobbed toward the Texas Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico (“I call him Alfred E Neuman”) and Georgia senator Jon Ossoff (“he looks like Pee-wee Herman to me”). asserted
he → be → me
Often, his claims undermined each other, as Trump claimed both that Iran has been rendered toothless (“we’re kicking Iran’s ass”) and that it remains a lethal threat, capable of destroying our second- and eighth-largest cities. uncertain
it → undermine → cities
Over and over, we have heard that Iran’s nuclear program has been “obliterated”. asserted
program → hear → ?
The rest of the speech was the usual farrago of distortions and lies, as the most casual effort to factcheck shows. asserted
effort → factcheck → distortions
“We want honest,” Trump said at one point, confusingly. asserted
Trump → want → point
…and 3 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support