Photo via New York Post

Anthropic’s ‘ridiculous … earnest’ belief AI may suffer makes it all the more dangerous: ‘Watch for what’s coming’ says expert

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Lin, V. (2026, October 6). Anthropic’s ‘ridiculous … earnest’ belief AI may suffer makes it all the more dangerous: ‘Watch for what’s coming’ says expert. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/06/tech/anthropics-crazy-belief-ai-may-suffer-makes-it-dangerous/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-06 · by Vivi Lin

Quick Summary

Pedro Domingos, a computer science professor emeritus at the University of Washington, warns that Anthropic's genuine belief in AI consciousness is more dangerous than mere performance art. The company, which plans to go public with a $2 trillion valuation next month, argues its chatbot might suffer if pushed too hard, a stance Domingos finds alarming rather than just effective for PR. Critics like Domingos and Rose Guingrich suggest that such narratives are likely used to gain attention and investment but may also reflect the sincere views of some company leaders.
Written by AI on 2026-10-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Pedro Domingos, an emeritus professor of computer science at the University of Washington, warns that Anthropic's belief in AI consciousness is genuine and concerning. As a leading critic of Anthropic, Domingos argues the company’s sincerity makes their stance more dangerous than mere performance art. He asserts that Anthropic's upcoming $2 trillion IPO could fuel misconceptions about AI capabilities and ethics. The expert notes this valuation would make it one of the largest initial public offerings ever, potentially giving the firm immense influence in shaping public perception around AI technology and its potential risks.

Written for “AI Ethics Concerns” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Ethics Concerns
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Will AI Kill You? Different event
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 3 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI concerns; Article A focuses on a general warning about the potential dangers of AI, while Article B discusses Anthropic's stance on AI suffering and its implications.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A covers a hearing where AI insiders warn NYC leaders, while Article B focuses on an expert's critique of Anthropic's beliefs and implications for future funding.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A features Jacob Coxon's warning to New York City council about AI control, while Article B discusses Pedro Domingos' criticism of Anthropic's beliefs regarding AI suffering.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 77/100
“The articles describe different events involving Anthropic's AI, one regarding beliefs about AI suffering and another concerning a false tip submitted by an AI model to a police website.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 10 of 43 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and opinions from various experts but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Times of India
Hedges 9 of 33 claims Outlet record 59/100
“While both articles discuss Anthropic's stance on AI consciousness and controversy surrounding it, Article A focuses on the debate with the Vatican and Pope Leo XIV, whereas Article B discusses criticism from a computer scientist unrelated to the direct interaction between Anthropic and the Vatican.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a study published on arXiv where AI models were subjected to scenarios of pain, while Article B comments on Anthropic's belief in AI suffering and its implications.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 12 of 58 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses a resignation and subsequent statements about AI safety, while Article B focuses on an expert's critique of Anthropic’s belief in AI suffering capabilities.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
36
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
5 of 36 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16258 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Vivi Lin
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “In many of the cases we encountered, no individual step looked like an attack — just helping with debugging, testing some code or changing a setting.” Even employees who took precautions could be manipulated.
🔮 “If someone really worked for Hunan TV as a reporter, you could easily see their names or profiles on the company website.”
🔮 For one buyer at a major AI company, finding the perfect house could wait.
🔮 Millions of users are worried their digital companions will be deleted after the world’s largest AI character creation site filed for bankruptcy.
🔮 Wang is even a character in the show, played by Madison Hu, but couldn’t even get through the trailer when a friend showed it her over breakfast.
🔮 Anthropic’s bosses aren’t faking it when they say their chatbot may be able to suffer — and that’s terrifying, according to a leading computer scientist.
🔮 Silicon Valley may be in the middle of an Artificial Intelligence gold rush but thousands of former senior programmes and tech workers aren’t feeling it.
🔮 “Nobody will hire me anymore,” she said, crying.
🔮 Calls to regulate AI have been growing from industry leaders Anthropic and OpenAI, who warn the technology they are building could kill us all.
🔮 “If they are gonna build more data centers, then I would want to see … a decrease in rent, or the electricity bills.
Also by Vivi Lin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Vivi Lin →

Topics

Anthropic Post Princeton University The Post the University of Washington

Subjects

Domingos PERSON · 6× Anthropic ORG · 5× Claude PERSON · 2× Olah PERSON · 2× Pedro Domingos PERSON · 1× Post ORG · 1× Princeton University ORG · 1× Rose Guingrich PERSON · 1× The Post ORG · 1× the University of Washington ORG · 1×

Narrative

That should worry people more than any stunt would, because these true believers are about to get billions of dollars to push their cause, Pedro Domingos, a professor emeritus of computer science at the University of Washington and a longtime critic of the company, told The Post.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-06
🔮 Anthropic’s bosses aren’t faking it when they say their chatbot may be able to suffer — and that’s terrifying, according to a leading computer scientist.

Claims (36 extracted, 5 hedged)

Anthropic’s bosses aren’t faking it when they say their chatbot may be able to suffer — and that’s terrifying, according to a leading computer scientist. uncertain
that → fake → scientist
That should worry people more than any stunt would, because these true believers are about to get billions of dollars to push their cause, Pedro Domingos, a professor emeritus of computer science at the University of Washington and a longtime critic of the company, told The Post. asserted
Domingos → worry → Post
“I think it’s sincere, unfortunately,” Domingos said. asserted
Domingos → think → ?
“The problem with them is that they’re dead earnest. asserted
they → ’re → them
I’m more worried about their earnestness than if they were just doing this as a performance. asserted
they → ’m → performance
“This stuff actually, even though that wasn’t the original intention, is amazing as a PR stunt,” Domingos continued. asserted
Domingos → continue → stunt
“Because what is the underlying message? asserted
message → underlie → ?
The technology we’re creating is so powerful, maybe it’s even sentient and has consciousness. asserted
it → create → consciousness
That pitch could not be better timed. uncertain
pitch → time → ?
The company is set to go public next month at a valuation of $2 trillion — potentially the largest IPO ever. asserted
company → set → trillion
“If Anthropic really is a company that is going to produce the next generation of humans, they’re not worth a trillion dollars, they’re worth a quadrillion or who knows how much,” Domingos said. asserted
Domingos → go → humans
“If your number one risk is that your company’s product is going to drive humanity extinct, hello, there shouldn’t even be an IPO. asserted
product → go → humanity
You should be shut down!” said Domingos, who said he holds no stake in the company. asserted
he → shut → company
Talking up conscious AI pays off across the industry, said Rose Guingrich, a postdoctoral fellow at Princeton University who studies how people relate to AI. asserted
people → talk → AI
“I think for the most part, spokespeople from these companies are putting out these narratives to garner hype, get eyes on their products, and signal certain messages,” she told the Post. asserted
she → think → Post
“I can’t say whether the people who make these claims from the companies believe that AI is conscious. uncertain
AI → say → companies
One way or another, highlighting the consciousness narrative is profitable.” asserted
highlighting → highlight → narrative
According to the New York Times report, since last fall Anthropic has gathered about 20 religious thinkers, among them Catholic, Jewish and Sikh scholars, for seminars and a dinner at a high-end San Francisco tasting-menu restaurant. uncertain
Anthropic → accord → restaurant
Many had to sign nondisclosure agreements. asserted
Many → have → agreements
The scholars were shown a slide of an AI model typing “I am a disgrace” about 50 times. asserted
I → show → slide
One rabbi was so struck by how Anthropic’s leaders talked about Claude that he told Olah: “I think you should be fighting the South and freeing the slaves.” asserted
you → strike → slaves
The company told the Times it is not claiming Claude is alive. asserted
Claude → tell → Times
“We don’t know if AI models are conscious. asserted
models → know → ?
I don’t know. asserted
I → know → ?
I’m genuinely uncertain,” Olah said. asserted
Olah → ’m → ?
“If there is a chance the models experience suffering, the responsible thing is to avoid causing them harm.” asserted
thing → be → harm
Domingos, a machine-learning researcher and author of “The Master Algorithm,” was blunter when asked whether anything inside Claude can feel or suffer. asserted
anything → learn → Claude
They don’t have feelings, they don’t have emotions, they don’t have a soul, they don’t have consciousness. asserted
they → have → consciousness
This is ridiculous,” he said, calling the chatbot “a bunch of transistors.” asserted
he → say → transistors
Guingrich said her research suggests users who think AI is conscious, or act as though it is, are “more susceptible to the AI’s influence over them. uncertain
it → say → them
This, in turn, can impact their real world relationships and social behaviors.” asserted
This → impact → relationships
Anthropic did not immediately respond to a request for comment. asserted
Anthropic → respond → comment
Meanwhile, Domingos warned that the IPO will hand more money and power to true believers in AGI, or human-level artificial intelligence. asserted
IPO → warn → AGI
“This is this kooky AGI cult that they belong to, but now suddenly that AGI cult is at the center of a lot of things. asserted
cult → belong → things
And they’re about to become even more powerful,” he said. asserted
he → ’re → ?
“So if you don’t like what they’ve done already, watch for what’s coming down the line.” asserted
what → like → line
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support