Photo via New York Post

A terrifying turn to antisemitism, free Palestine — from Hamas and other commentary

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Post Editorial Board. (2026, October 8). A terrifying turn to antisemitism, free Palestine — from Hamas and other commentary. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/07/opinion/a-terrifying-turn-to-antisemitism-free-palestine-from-hamas-and-other-commentary/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-08 · by Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

Shahrar Ali of Spiked criticizes the UK Green Party for declaring Zionism as racism, arguing that it aligns with Hamas's objectives and could lead to Israel's disappearance. Ahmed Alkhatib at The Free Press blames Hamas for triggering recent conflicts in Gaza and criticizes Western pro-Palestinian advocates for hiding behind misinformation and antisemitic rhetoric. Seth Mandel from Commentary argues that major news outlets are overly credulous of "NAZA," a documentary critical of Israeli military practices, despite its debunked claims about AI use by the IDF.
Written by AI on 2026-10-08, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The New York Post editorial board discusses a shift towards antisemitism with concern over statements made by the UK Green Party. The party declared Zionism as racism, which aligns with Hamas's objectives and contradicts the historical context of establishing a Jewish homeland post-Holocaust. Shahrar Ali, who served in the Green Party for two decades, expresses deep disappointment and fear about the influence of hard-left authoritarianism within the party.

Additionally, Ahmed Alkhatib writes that Hamas initiated the October 7 attack on Israel three years ago, transforming Gaza into a center of conflict. This attack has caused significant instability and devastation in the Middle East, with no explicit condemnation from pro-Palestinian groups. Many Israelis who previously believed in peace are now increasingly suspicious about coexistence with Palestinians due to these events.

Written for “Hamas Commentary And Antisemitism” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Hamas Commentary And Antisemitism
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Evening Standard
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects: Article A reports on the Green Party adopting a policy declaring 'Zionism is racism', while Article B criticizes this policy as being antisemitic.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 0 of 36 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss related political developments but describe different events, one about the Greens' policy decision on Zionism and another commenting on its implications.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A describes the vote by Britain's Green Party to classify Zionism as racism, while Article B critiques this decision and provides commentary on its implications.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 6 of 21 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes a specific incident involving an MEP throwing Israeli flags to the floor during a commemoration, while Article B discusses broader political commentary on antisemitism and Zionism without mentioning the flag-throwing incident.”
Zeteo
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 13 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of anti-semitism and support for Palestine, not the same specific incident.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 40 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics: one focuses on a critique of antisemitism and Green Party policy, while the other reports on a Palestinian playwright winning an award in London.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 29 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events and contexts related to political reactions and voter behavior before and after Oct 7 attacks, rather than a single specific incident.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe reactions to different aspects of the Green Party's policy on Zionism, rather than a single specific incident.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to the Palestinian-Israeli conflict, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different topics related to antisemitism but do not describe the same specific incident or happening.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
4 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16741 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Post Editorial Board
127 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 All this is Vladimir Putin’s tone-setter for next week’s talks in Abu Dhabi, where the likes of special envoy Steve Witkoff will again try for a full ceasefire.
🔮 Most Americans would call that a victory, but Democrats call it heartless.
🔮 The paper last month impressed its usual critics by tracking down damning details of how Democratic candidate Mary Peltola’s campaign recruited a strawman candidate sharing the same name as the Republican incumbent, a ploy that, in concert with the state’s ranked-choice-voting rules, could make her the winner even if more people meant to vote for the real Dan Sullivan.
🔮 This “project will gut the heart of the American system of government” and lead us to the brink of a new “Civil War.”
🔮 Mayor Zohran Mamdani gave away the problem with his comments on the Bronx tragedy, first calling it a “horrific reminder of the danger that lithium-ion battery fires can pose” but then simply pleading with New Yorkers to “store any micromobility devices outside rather than inside their homes.”
🔮 The “effort by the liberal establishment to undo populism” will gain new life if “Democrats regain control” of Congress,” argues UnHerd’s Alicia Nieves.
🔮 It looks like Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s getting a wish-granted monkey-paw style: MTA buses are now de-facto free — at the price of making them increasingly dangerous and blowing a disastrous hole in the agency’s finances.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · MTA bus-fare retreat could doom all NYC public transit
🔮 The recent rumor that Team Trump would push Hungarian ex-PM Viktor Orbán for the job looks to be a trial balloon by fringe MAGA freelancers, not anything President Donald Trump (nor Orbán himself!) is seriously considering — though it should serve as a warning that Trump will keep looking ever-further outside the box if the field remains nothing but business-as-usual “reformers.”
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Only a real reformer can save the United Nations
🔮 The Democratic machine, which prioritizes winning over morals, will disown her.
🔮 Meanwhile, Gov. Kathy Hochul is clearly signaling tax hikes next year to help fund Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s socialism-in-one-city, not to mention the state’s coming $32 billion budget hole.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 127 articles by Post Editorial Board →

Topics

Democrats Hamas Israel Jewish Palestinians

Subjects

Hamas ORG · 5× Democrats NORP · 4× Congress ORG · 2× Dems NORP · 2× Israel GPE · 2× Jewish NORP · 2× Palestinians NORP · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Shahrar Ali PERSON · 1× Zionism NORP · 1×

Narrative

“In initiating October 7, Hamas turned Gaza into the fulcrum for instability, devastation, and conflict in the Middle East”; Israelis “who once believed in peace are now increasingly suspicious of the prospect of coexistence with the Palestinians.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 Moderates: Can Democrats Lead America? “If the Democrats win” control of Congress next month, “what will they do to best position themselves for 2028?” ask Douglas Schoen & Carly Cooperman at The Hill.

Claims (22 extracted, 4 hedged)

“Let us be clear and unequivocal: Zionism is not racism,” grumbles Shahrar Ali at Spiked, and it was “profoundly anti-Semitic and racist” for the UK Green Party to declare that it is. asserted
it → let → Spiked
Establishing a Jewish homeland, arising from the “unconscionable atrocities endured by the Jewish people,” is fundamentally “an anti-racist” project. asserted
Establishing → establish → people
The Green declaration echoes “Hamas’s stated objectives,” as “the logical endpoint of the party’s new policy is the disappearance of Israel as a sovereign state.” asserted
endpoint → echo → state
“I am deeply saddened and ashamed of what has become of the party that I have served for the best part of two decades” and “terrified of what hard-left authoritarianism, now firmly installed within the Green Party, has unleashed upon us.” asserted
authoritarianism → sadden → us
Three years ago, Hamas triggered “the most catastrophic chapter in contemporary Palestinian history,” thunders Ahmed Alkhatib at The Free Press, with no explicit condemnation from “ ‘pro-Palestine” activists, advocates, or organizations.” asserted
Alkhatib → trigger → activists
“In initiating October 7, Hamas turned Gaza into the fulcrum for instability, devastation, and conflict in the Middle East”; Israelis “who once believed in peace are now increasingly suspicious of the prospect of coexistence with the Palestinians.” asserted
believed → initiate → Palestinians
“The majority of Gazans” now “recognize that the terror group has wreaked unimaginable destruction on their lives, even if they hold grievances toward Israel.” asserted
they → recognize → Israel
Yet in the West, “the ‘pro-Palestine’ industrial complex has hidden under misinformed slogans, pushed ugly sentiments, and fueled antisemitism across the world, all while Hamas continues to run rampant over Palestinians’ futures.” Conservative: Press Fawns Over Debunked Doc “NAZA,” the documentary that purports “to show Israeli disregard for human life” has multiple serious “methodological problems,” with many of its key claims “debunked,” fumes Commentary’s Seth Mandel, yet prestige outlets review it as if that info didn’t exist. uncertain
info → hide → it
The film “provides anonymous and unverified claims” about the use of AI in targeting and collateral damage assessment “that have been picked apart by experts who have gone on the record.” uncertain
who → provide → record
E.g., it gives the “impression” that AI systems “are choosing when and where to strike” rather than “simply letting IDF officials know” when and where a target is. asserted
target → give → impression
“Major general-interest news outlets” have become “versions of the single-perspective, ideologically driven websites they once decried.” asserted
they → become → websites
Moderates: Can Democrats Lead America? “If the Democrats win” control of Congress next month, “what will they do to best position themselves for 2028?” ask Douglas Schoen & Carly Cooperman at The Hill. asserted
Schoen → lead → Hill
Their midterms victory would come “from collecting protest votes, not from offering solutions,” and polls show the Democratic brand struggling as “voters like Republicans more.” asserted
voters → come → Republicans
Dems’ advantage going into November rests on “Trump, inflation, affordability,” yet they haven’t offered “an agenda addressing these issues.” asserted
they → go → issues
Worse: “There is no true standard bearer or clear direction amid the party’s ideological split”—and winning Congress “won’t allow Democrats to do many of the things they’re campaigning on.” asserted
they → be → things
“Frustration with the president” may hand Dems the House majority, but winning the White House in 2028 requires telling “voters why they’re the right party to lead — not only that the other party can’t be trusted.” uncertain
party → hand → voters
From the right: Hope for Faster Energy OK’s “Miracle of miracles, a draft bipartisan permitting bill emerged in the Senate last week that — dare to hope — could pass,” cheers The Wall Street Journal Editorial Board. uncertain
Board → emerge → Senate
“Under the National Environmental Policy Act, projects that receive federal funds or take place on federal land typically require lengthy environmental reviews.” asserted
that → receive → reviews
The Mountain Valley Pipeline took a decade, thanks to lawsuits. asserted
Pipeline → take → lawsuits
Republicans have long sought reform; now “Democrats have finally come around,” too, to push their green-energy projects along. asserted
Democrats → seek → projects
The bill imposes strict review deadlines, requires permit challenges within 150 days instead of six years, lets agencies correct lapses rather restart the process and exempts many projects from the review requirement altogether, among other fixes. asserted
agencies → impose → fixes
“The country urgently needs permitting relief”; “if this deal sticks, it’s worth passing.” asserted
it → need → relief
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support