Photo via New York Post

If you really want to destroy LA, just wait for the next preventable fire

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Wires, P. (2026, October 8). If you really want to destroy LA, just wait for the next preventable fire. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/07/opinion/if-you-really-want-to-destroy-la-just-wait-for-next-fire/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-08 · by Pirate Wires

Quick Summary

President Trump made a comment during a speech in Nebraska that could be interpreted as suggesting Iran should attack Los Angeles if they want to destroy the city. Democrats like Gavin Newsom and Karen Bass criticized this statement, viewing it as dangerous for LA's safety. The White House clarified that Trump was presenting nuclear attack as an extreme alternative to higher gas prices due to Iran’s potential threat. Meanwhile, the article sarcastically suggests that waiting for another preventable fire would be a more effective way to destroy Los Angeles than any external military action.
Written by AI on 2026-10-08, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

During a campaign rally in Nebraska, former President Donald Trump suggested letting Iran "take out" Los Angeles and San Diego as part of his defense for high gas prices due to the war with Iran, claiming it would be a "small price to pay for keeping the world safe." This comment drew immediate backlash from California officials, including Gov. Gavin Newsom, who called Trump's remarks "deranged and dangerous," and Mayor Karen Bass of Los Angeles, who emphasized that the role of a president is to protect the country, not threaten it. San Diego Mayor Todd Gloria also condemned the suggestion, noting that his city houses major military installations such as Naval Base San Diego and Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, which collectively support 70,000 civilians and active-duty service members.

Written for “Trump Iran Comment Controversy” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 30 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Iran Comment Controversy
Politics · 31 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 25% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 2 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 70/100
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 7 of 50 claims Outlet record 95/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 43 claims Outlet record 66/100
TIME
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 68 claims Outlet record 59/100
Times of India
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 59/100
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
BBC News
Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 68/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
16
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
25%
4 of 16 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
31
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15490 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Pirate Wires
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Finally, say NO to Prop. 40, the wealth tax endorsed by devil-spawn Ro Khanna, whose face droops like our GDP will.
🔮 , Jeff Bezos doubled down on his prediction that AI would create a labor shortage in an interview with Fox’s Bret Baier.
🔮 At least, that was the interpretation of several midterm-conscious Democrats in the state: Gavin Newsom called Trump’s words “deranged and dangerous” (kinda like his state’s homeless residents?), while Karen Bass said the comments could “potentially compromise” LA’s safety (ah yes, Skid Row, famously safe).
🔮 Streets for All, a “public transport nonprofit” backing socialist Nithya Raman in LA’s mayoral election, has declared war on an iconic fixture of the Los Angeles skyline, with a new social media campaign arguing: Palm trees are a scam.
Also by Pirate Wires
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Amazon Delta Iran Los Angeles Nebraska

Subjects

Delta ORG · 4× Elon PERSON · 3× Iran GPE · 3× Los Angeles GPE · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Amazon ORG · 2× Claude PERSON · 2× David Ellison PERSON · 1× Democrats NORP · 1× Nebraska GPE · 1×

Narrative

The White House, meanwhile, claimed Trump’s comment — “Let them (Iran) take out Los Angeles” — was merely presented as the more sinister alternative to higher gas prices, and the admin is fighting to stop Iran from being able to nuke LA … but is that really high on their priority list right now? Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters Mr. Gayatollah, sir: if you wanna destroy Los Angeles, just wait for another totally preventable brush fire.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 At least, that was the interpretation of several midterm-conscious Democrats in the state: Gavin Newsom called Trump’s words “deranged and dangerous” (kinda like his state’s homeless residents?), while Karen Bass said the comments could “potentially compromise” LA’s safety (ah yes, Skid Row, famously safe).

Claims (16 extracted, 4 hedged)

While addressing supporters in Nebraska Monday night, President Trump offered a bit of friendly military advice to Iran’s new gay ayatollah: do what David Ellison didn’t have the courage for and just nuke the city of Los Angeles already. asserted
Ellison → address → Angeles
At least, that was the interpretation of several midterm-conscious Democrats in the state: Gavin Newsom called Trump’s words “deranged and dangerous” (kinda like his state’s homeless residents?), while Karen Bass said the comments could “potentially compromise” LA’s safety (ah yes, Skid Row, famously safe). uncertain
comments → call → safety
The White House, meanwhile, claimed Trump’s comment — “Let them (Iran) take out Los Angeles” — was merely presented as the more sinister alternative to higher gas prices, and the admin is fighting to stop Iran from being able to nuke LA … but is that really high on their priority list right now? Download The California Post App, follow us on social, and subscribe to our newsletters Mr. Gayatollah, sir: if you wanna destroy Los Angeles, just wait for another totally preventable brush fire. asserted
you → claim → fire
In a certified case of Elon Derangement Syndrome, Delta CEO Ed Bastian reportedly chose the not-yet-available Amazon Leo over the fast (and very much available) Starlink for its next-gen inflight WiFi because “we do not want to be with Elon Musk, trust me” and “it’s all true what they say about him.” uncertain
they → certify → him
Bastian, who’s taken a variety of far-left positions like cancelling the NRA’s group discount after Parkland, and committing the “anti-racist” company to racial diversity goals (none of which have made my layovers more pleasant), curiously has no problem taking subsidies from the famously tolerant Saudi government for Delta’s new Riyadh route. asserted
layovers → take → route
Elon responded, “He will lose his job over this,” as it’s crazy to deny your customers the best because you hate Elon. asserted
you → respond → Elon
(Delta will get Amazon Leo in… 2028.) asserted
Delta → get → 2028
But also, Elon should just build Elon Airways at this point. asserted
Elon → build → point
Whatever, I’m on board as long as he keeps the Biscoff cookies. asserted
he → ’m → cookies
Last week, a fascinating piece by the The New York Times revealed prominent religious leaders have been meeting with Anthropic about AI consciousness. asserted
leaders → reveal → consciousness
Slides in those talks, for example, showed Claude models exhibiting signs of suffering, inviting a debate about what we might owe this new entity, basically. uncertain
we → show → entity
Many participants told the Times, in fact, that there was more focus placed on how we might impact the AI than how the AI might impact us. uncertain
AI → tell → us
I don’t want to reject the idea of AI sentience outright, but what’s clearer to me than ever is that the leading AI company is obsessed and even possessed by this question while trying to add human ethics to its creation, as one religious leader noted, “after the fact.” asserted
leader → want → fact
It’s like they’re wanting to borrow tools of optimization from religion without actually — with humility — surrendering and submitting their project to God. asserted
they → ’ → God
Because God is the thing they’re building? asserted
they → build → ?
Pirate Wires offers the wildest stories in technology, politics and culture. asserted
Wires → offer → technology
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support