Photo via The Guardian

One Nation’s AI video is vile and tired – but the ensloppification of Australian politics doesn’t stop there

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Butler, J. (2026, October 8). One Nation’s AI video is vile and tired – but the ensloppification of Australian politics doesn’t stop there. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2026/oct/09/one-nations-ai-video-is-vile-and-tired-but-the-ensloppification-of-australian-politics-doesnt-stop-there-ntwnfb

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-08 · by Josh Butler

Quick Summary

One Nation released an AI-generated campaign video at their Victorian launch that features racist stereotypes and inflammatory imagery, drawing criticism for its unethical content. The article highlights the broader concern of unchecked use of AI in political campaigns and calls for government action to regulate such practices. Despite the controversy, major media outlets barely covered the video's controversial aspects, focusing instead on other elements like Pauline Hanson’s reception at the event.
Written by AI on 2026-10-08, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

One Nation, an Australian political party, released an AI-generated campaign video in Victoria during their election launch, depicting stereotypes of individuals from African and Middle Eastern backgrounds. The clip shows a man wielding a machete and another wearing what appears to be an explosive vest, alongside commentary about "mass migration" and welfare dependency based on identity rather than need. Despite criticism for its racist overtones, Colleen Harkin, the party's Victorian deputy leader, denied it was racist, stating that addressing issues like crime and social cohesion is necessary. The video sparked controversy and debate over AI-generated misinformation in politics and the need for government oversight to prevent such content during election periods.

Written for “One Nation's AI Video Controversy” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 One Nation's AI Video Controversy
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 2 of 28 claims Outlet record 68/100
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 0 of 27 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles describe different events: Article A is about an AI-generated campaign video by One Nation, while Article B discusses a cafe owner making a joke about One Nation's relocation.”
Fox News
Hedges 0 of 49 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI in politics: one generalizes about AI reducing costs for political ads, while the other critiques a specific AI-generated video by One Nation.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
4 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-08 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2856 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Butler
20 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Altering copyright law to allow AI companies to scrape music, books and journalism could trigger a constitutional breach, Coalition senators and the recording industry have warned, as they raise new fears it could open Australia to massive legal action and compensation claims from rights holders worldwide.
🔮 The secretary of the defence department approved a senior official’s controversial idea to tell a Senate hearing that footage of public servants giving evidence should not be shared on social media because it could invite online bullying and raise national security concerns.
🔮 The digital duty of care bill passed the House of Representatives on Wednesday and will be debated by the Senate in coming weeks.
🔮 But Australians are still not convinced One Nation or the Coalition would do a better job than the current government, with Labor still the most trusted party on the economy and managing the country.
🔮 Security agencies will review safety precautions for MPs’ homes and offices after numerous federal politicians told police and Asio in safety briefings that they were worried about widening threats after the alleged attack on Helen Haines.
🔮 At his first speech to the national press club on Wednesday, he said he wasn’t launching a bid for prime minister – no matter how much some people might like the softly spoken senator to have more say in federal politics.
🔮 Whether you agree with her or you don’t on issues, you would be proud to see how she approaches issues in the Parliament; with compassion, with rigour, everything that you would want from a politician.”
🔮 Nine newspapers reported last week that seven party members had demanded an investigation into allegations Steel-John had acted inappropriately towards women between 2017 and 2025. Steele-John, in his Sunday night statement, said he was not on leave, contrary to Shoebridge’s comments last week, and claimed he had been pressured by the leader to request leave on Thursday as Nine’s story was breaking. “I feel that he used those meetings to repeatedly pressure me to say that I would take leave,” Steele-John said on Sunday.
🔮 Australians could still “listen to manosphere podcasts” or “say the moon landing was fake” under proposed new online safety laws, Anika Wells has stressed as she rubbished claims they would lead to government censorship The communications minister also said she was considering updates to the digital duty of care laws to allow individual Australians to directly sue big tech companies flouting the new rules.
🔮 His addition to what is often a tired Coalition partyroom would certainly spice things up, and give a new weapon in their arsenal.
Also by Josh Butler
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 20 articles by Josh Butler →

Topics

African Middle Eastern One Nation One Nation’s Victorian

Subjects

One Nation ORG · 4× Hanson PERSON · 2× Labor ORG · 2× African NORP · 1× Indigenous NORP · 1× Middle Eastern NORP · 1× One Nation’s ORG · 1× Pauline Hanson PERSON · 1× South Asian NORP · 1× Victorian NORP · 1×

Narrative

Prof Terry Flew, of the Centre for AI Trust and Governance, told the inquiry on Wednesday that Australia had no single agency to address all misinformation risks, but recommended that government consider prohibiting AI-generated deepfakes during election periods. “There are real risks that AI-generated misinformation, as well as what has come to be known as ‘AI slop’, will further erode public trust in institutions and degrade the wider information ecosystem,” Flew said.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-08
🔮 It could also be pointed out how tired the gags are.

Claims (34 extracted, 4 hedged)

One Nation’s new AI-generated campaign video is a new low – even for them. asserted
video → generate → them
The video – reportedly played at the party’s Victorian campaign launch over the weekend – is an AI-generated collection of racist tropes, depicting a man who appears to be African brandishing a machete, an apparently Middle Eastern man with an explosive vest, a South Asian man in a turban talking about “mass migration” and an Indigenous elder talking about people receiving “money … on the basis of need, not identity”. uncertain
people → play → identity
But the inflammatory clip says more about the wild west of online politicking created by cheap, unrestricted access to AI videos, and why governments need to empower watchdog bodies to do more about it. asserted
governments → say → it
The video was barely mentioned in most media reporting, which otherwise largely focused on the rousing reception Pauline Hanson received from her supporters, the music that was played over loudspeakers and the Trump-esque pledge from candidate Mark Nicholson – the producer of the “Please Explain” cartoon series – to jail Daniel Andrews and Jacinta Allan. asserted
that → mention → Andrews
Guardian Australia, previously barred from One Nation events, did not attempt to attend Saturday’s launch. asserted
Australia → bar → launch
Coverage has focused on the first part of the video, an AI-generated scene of a young man “coming out” as a conservative to his leftwing family. asserted
man → focus → family
As progressive campaign group GetUp observed, it’s a scene cribbing from a similar Israeli campaign video from Benjamin Netanyahu. asserted
it → observe → Netanyahu
It could also be pointed out how tired the gags are. uncertain
gags → point → ?
Were the jokes generated by ChatGPT as well? asserted
jokes → generate → ChatGPT
There’s an argument for ignoring it entirely, so as to not give it the attention and free advertising the party obviously wants. asserted
party → ’ → attention
It is rage bait, seeking to draw a response and then complain about the response as further proof that One Nation is being “picked on” or is “riling up the lefties”. asserted
Nation → seek → lefties
The response of a Hobart cafe frequented by Hanson’s daughter Lee pledging to donate takings from One Nation customers to the Greens – and accompanied by predictable “genuine hurt” from the younger Hanson – was entirely on script. asserted
response → frequent → script
But for all the bad taste, there’s little anyone can do about it right now. asserted
anyone → ’ → it
The Australian Communications and Media Authority cannot take action, because its powers don’t extend to this kind of content, and the video thus far seems to only exist online – not promoted in broadcast forms. asserted
video → take → forms
Electoral commissions only have powers to regulate misinformation about the electoral process – not lies or distasteful content. asserted
commissions → have → process
The federal Labor government has so far shrugged off growing calls from inside and outside parliament to ban the use of AI-generated content in election periods. asserted
government → shrug → periods
As the government works to legislate around a raft of AI-related harms this year, the time would be ripe to deal with this long-ignored issue. asserted
time → work → issue
News Corp reported a One Nation spokesperson saying they were preparing “another version for broadcast”. asserted
they → report → broadcast
That could technically put it inside Acma’s remit, but the tone of the ad is unlikely to breach current broadcasting rules, one industry source said. uncertain
source → put → rules
Senator David Pocock thinks so: he’s been pushing for two years for the government to address generative AI around election campaigns, with 35,000 people signing his online petition calling for Labor to “legislate a ban on the use of deepfakes in elections before the next federal election”. asserted
Labor → think → election
This week, the parliament’s joint committee on AI heard from witnesses saying action was overdue. asserted
action → hear → witnesses
The AEC said in a submission to the inquiry that AI makes it “more difficult for people to distinguish between authentic and manipulated content, increase[s] confusion about authoritative sources of information, and create[s] challenges for [electoral agencies]”. asserted
people → say → agencies
“Inauthentic content or deepfakes circulating during the voting period, for instance, may well compromise the actual or perceived integrity of an election.” uncertain
content → circulate → election
A parliamentary report from October 2024 warned of AI “being used to adversely influence or undermine electoral and democratic processes” and “to deceive the public, create or exacerbate bias or influence public opinion or sentiment corrosively”. asserted
report → warn → opinion
No voter is being tricked into thinking a leftwing family has really changed its allegiances. asserted
family → trick → allegiances
But it should open the door to a wider discussion about whether this kind of content is appropriate for an election campaign. asserted
kind → open → campaign
AI lowers the barrier for entry for making such inflammatory videos. asserted
AI → lower → videos
Normally, it would be harder – and more expensive – to hire a film crew and actors willing to act out such rhetoric. asserted
it → hire → rhetoric
In 2024, the Macquarie Dictionary named “enshittification” as its word of the year, defining the term as: “The gradual deterioration of a service or product brought about by a reduction in the quality of service provided, especially of an online platform, and as a consequence of profit-seeking.” asserted
Dictionary → name → seeking
Australian politics, like many parts of the world economy, is enduring what I’m calling “ensloppification”: the permeation of AI-generated slop into every crevice of society – and politics is not immune. asserted
politics → endure → society
This week we have seen conservative campaign group Advance’s own Victorian AI ad, picturing a Labor election win as Daniel Andrews pops champagne corks and leads a conga line. asserted
Andrews → see → line
Liberal MP Jason Wood was factchecked by AAP for posting “a fake image of Anthony Albanese arriving at a deserted airport”, while AAP has also debunked numerous AI-generated political interview-style videos purportedly shot outside Parliament House. asserted
AAP → factchecke → House
Prof Terry Flew, of the Centre for AI Trust and Governance, told the inquiry on Wednesday that Australia had no single agency to address all misinformation risks, but recommended that government consider prohibiting AI-generated deepfakes during election periods. “There are real risks that AI-generated misinformation, as well as what has come to be known as ‘AI slop’, will further erode public trust in institutions and degrade the wider information ecosystem,” Flew said. asserted
Flew → tell → ecosystem
“[AI-generated deepfakes go] beyond the legitimate bounds of public campaigning and prove to be genuinely threatening to the individuals and groups who are the targets of them.” asserted
who → generate → them
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support