Photo via The Guardian

Tories overstate net zero cost by nearly £500bn in apparent spreadsheet error

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

correspondent, P. W. S. p. (2026, October 9). Tories overstate net zero cost by nearly £500bn in apparent spreadsheet error. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/oct/09/tories-overstate-net-zero-cost-500bn-spreadsheet-error

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-09 · by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent

Quick Summary

At the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham, Kemi Badenoch’s policy document, "The Right Way," overestimated the cost of achieving net zero emissions by nearly £500 billion due to a spreadsheet error. This mistake inflated an original estimate from the Climate Change Committee (CCC) of £478 billion to £957 billion and later to £1.4 trillion in the document, doubling the actual costs. The CCC emphasized that their most recent analysis suggests the cost would be around £110 billion, or about £4 billion annually. Carbon Brief identified the error, which may have originated from a think tank report or an article in Spectator without verification.
Written by AI on 2026-10-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In an apparent spreadsheet error, Kemi Badenoch’s flagship policy document at the Conservative Party conference in Birmingham overestimated the cost of achieving net zero emissions by nearly £500bn. The document justified scrapping the UK's 2050 net zero target set under Theresa May by citing estimates from the Climate Change Committee (CCC) that ranged widely but specifically mentioned a gross economic cost of £1.4tn, reducing to £957bn when savings were factored in. However, the actual CCC report figures total only £478bn, indicating an error due to double-counting on the spreadsheet. This mistake undermines claims about the significant economic costs associated with net zero policies and calls into question the Conservative Party's justification for abandoning their previous climate commitments.

Written for “UK Net Zero Cost Error” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 UK Net Zero Cost Error
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
19
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
1 of 19 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2714 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Peter Walker Senior political correspondent
19 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “The prime minister opened by setting out how he would shortly write to cabinet on the UK’s relationship with the EU,” it said, adding: “He said the Brexit deal left by the last government had been bad for the UK and had led to a harder Brexit than had been promised at the referendum.”
🔮 Adrian Ramsay, the former co-leader of the Greens, has urged his party’s councillors to reject the newly adopted “Zionism is racism” motion if it will help them stay in power in local government, in a fresh sign of internal dissent over the policy.
🔮 In post-byelection interviews, Polanski said he would have voted against the motion had he attended.
🔮 A low turnout of 38.7% and Abdi-Wali’s numerically modest 3,364 majority that resulted might not appear the greatest endorsement of the government, but it is also likely to have been in part due to the widespread assumption that Labour would win.
🔮 Justifying the Conservatives’ decision to scrap the target of the UK reaching net zero emissions by 2050, introduced under Theresa May, the document says that estimates of how much this would cost the economy “have varied enormously”.
🔮 Failure to win the seat by a reasonable margin could end his honeymoon period and bring renewed doubts about Labour’s ability to protect inner-city seats from the Greens, who won several London councils in May’s local elections. Holborn and St Pancras could be promising ground for the Greens, with a young and diverse population that includes many students.
🔮 It would involve a doubling of the defence budget in nominal terms from £70bn in 2026 to £151bn in 2035, according to the Transition Security Project, a research centre which was spun out of Common Wealth, a thinktank with close links to Andy Burnham.
🔮 The head of the Jewish Greens has said she may leave the party after it voted to adopt a policy that equates Zionism with racism and calls for Israel to be replaced by a single Palestinian state.
🔮 The forthcoming Conservative conference will be, almost everyone in the party agrees, notably more upbeat and unified than last year.
🔮 The Conservatives have unveiled a proposed £700m childcare giveaway for high earners ahead of their annual conference, saying they would end the “cliff edge” where free entitlement ends at salaries above £100,000.
Also by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 19 articles by Peter Walker Senior political correspondent →

Topics

Birmingham CCC Conservative Conservatives Tory

Subjects

Badenoch PERSON · 4× CCC ORG · 4× Conservatives NORP · 3× Conservative NORP · 2× Tory NORP · 2× Birmingham GPE · 1× Carbon Brief ORG · 1× Kemi Badenoch’s PERSON · 1× Theresa May PERSON · 1× the Climate Change Committee ORG · 1×

Narrative

It cites the Sixth Carbon Budget produced by the CCC, the government’s climate change advisers, saying the report put gross economic costs at £1.4tn, falling to £957bn when savings were taken into account.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-09
🔮 Justifying the Conservatives’ decision to scrap the target of the UK reaching net zero emissions by 2050, introduced under Theresa May, the document says that estimates of how much this would cost the economy “have varied enormously”.

Claims (19 extracted, 1 hedged)

Kemi Badenoch’s flagship party conference policy document overestimated the cost of net zero by nearly £500bn, seemingly after someone accidentally double-counted figures on a spreadsheet. asserted
someone → overestimate → spreadsheet
The apparent error appears in a chapter on net zero in The Right Way, a 100-page policy document produced for the Conservative conference in Birmingham. asserted
error → appear → Birmingham
Badenoch repeatedly used the phrase in her main speech. asserted
Badenoch → use → speech
Justifying the Conservatives’ decision to scrap the target of the UK reaching net zero emissions by 2050, introduced under Theresa May, the document says that estimates of how much this would cost the economy “have varied enormously”. uncertain
this → justify → economy
It goes on: “In 2020, the Climate Change Committee (CCC) estimated that its route to net zero would cost £957bn.” asserted
route → go → 957bn
It cites the Sixth Carbon Budget produced by the CCC, the government’s climate change advisers, saying the report put gross economic costs at £1.4tn, falling to £957bn when savings were taken into account. asserted
savings → cite → account
However, the figures in the report in fact total £478bn, half of what the Tory document said. asserted
document → total → what
The error appears to have arisen because a tally of all the costs in a CCC spreadsheet from the document also included the row showing totals for each individual column, thus doubling it. asserted
tally → appear → it
A CCC spokesperson said: “We don’t recognise this number. asserted
We → say → number
The committee has previously offered to meet with Ms Badenoch and talk her through our advice. asserted
committee → offer → advice
” The committee’s most recent analysis puts the expected cost of achieving net zero by 2050 at about £110bn, or about £4bn a year – 0.2% of GDP. asserted
analysis → put → GDP
The error was spotted by the publication Carbon Brief, which informed the Guardian. asserted
which → spot → Guardian
It is possible the Conservatives copied the figure without checking it. asserted
Conservatives → copy → it
It appears to have been published in a report by the rightwing thinktank the Institute of Economic Affairs and also included in an article in the Spectator. asserted
It → appear → Spectator
The Conservative document says it is intended to be a precise diagnosis of the UK’s problems. asserted
it → say → problems
It is modelled in part on The Right Approach, produced by Margaret Thatcher’s Tory party in 1976, which set out some of the economic ideas later used in the 1979 election. asserted
which → model → election
In a foreword, Badenoch notes that “as an engineer”, she is used to correctly diagnosing issues so they can be addressed. asserted
they → note → issues
A later part of the report says: “To fix a problem we must first have an accurate understanding of what is causing it.” asserted
what → say → it
The Conservatives and Badenoch’s office were contacted for comment. asserted
Conservatives → contact → comment
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support