Photo via CBS News

AI leaders lobby Trump health officials in government-run chat room

Read the original at CBS News ↗
Cite

Tahir, A. S. M. R. D. (2026, October 9). AI leaders lobby Trump health officials in government-run chat room. CBS News. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/ai-tech-leaders-trump-health-officials-slack/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

CBS News · collected 2026-10-09 · by Amanda Seitz; Maia Rosenfeld; Darius Tahir

Quick Summary

Elite tech and finance leaders have been lobbying Trump administration health officials over the past year through secret Slack chat rooms to promote AI in healthcare. In February, FDA officials invited major tech companies like Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, and Google to a closed listening session about conversational AI products without public notice or involvement. CMS senior policy adviser Morgan Taylor described it as an opportunity for industry to help shape future guidance on safe Conversational AI development. Legal experts say such private discussions should resemble publicly visible federal advisory panels.
Written by AI on 2026-10-09, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In February 2021, elite tech companies including Amazon, Microsoft, Apple, and Google were invited by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to a private listening session about integrating conversational AI products like chatbots into healthcare. Representatives from at least 35 industry organizations attended this closed-door meeting aimed at discussing how these technologies can access patients' sensitive medical information without public oversight or transparency. The interaction between tech firms and federal health officials occurred via a government-run Slack chat room, bypassing traditional advisory panel regulations that require public visibility. This direct line to top government officials allowed companies significant influence over the regulation of AI in healthcare, potentially shaping an unregulated future where such technologies receive reimbursement akin to medical professionals. Legal experts have noted this setup resembles federal advisory panels but lacks their required transparency measures, raising concerns about the undue influence tech firms may exert on healthcare policy during the Trump administration's push for a "Health Technology Ecosystem."

Written for “AI Lobbying In Government” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Lobbying In Government
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 26 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different issues related to healthcare regulation; one focuses on AI leaders lobbying health officials for less regulated use of AI in healthcare, while the other criticizes FDA delays and inefficiencies in approving tobacco products.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 11 of 89 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different events involving AI and government interactions but at different times and places with distinct subjects.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 4 of 32 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different lobbying efforts related to AI regulation and healthcare management, not the same specific incident.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 2 of 4 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of AI regulation and usage in healthcare, occurring at different times with distinct focuses.”
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different activities related to AI regulation and use: one focuses on a coalition's demands for AI legislation, while the other discusses lobbying efforts by tech companies with Trump administration officials.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 2 of 45 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and its regulation in the context of healthcare and government policy, but they do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 5 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI in healthcare: one focuses on lobbying efforts to integrate AI into managing health records, while the other discusses AI's role in medical debt collection.”
BBC News
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different events related to AI and Trump's administration but do not refer to the same specific incident.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 43 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different meetings or discussions happening at different times and places.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 62 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects of AI integration in government and healthcare but do not appear to be reporting on the exact same specific incident or moment.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
84
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
4 of 84 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
CBS News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-09 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

CBS News · 4356 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Amanda Seitz; Maia Rosenfeld; Darius Tahir
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Legal experts said the chat room resembles a federal advisory panel, which would be required to operate in public view.
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Americans CMS FDA HHS Slack

Subjects

CMS ORG · 5× Slack ORG · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Americans NORP · 2× FDA ORG · 2× HHS ORG · 2× Medicare ORG · 2× Apple ORG · 1× Google ORG · 1× the Food and Drug Administration ORG · 1×

Narrative

KFF Health News reviewed thousands of Slack messages, meeting transcripts, and video recordings that reveal how the Trump administration has granted the industry a direct line to top government officials — including former head of the Department of Government Efficiency .The conversation took place behind the scenes as federal health officials publicly worked to integrate AI and other technology into nearly every aspect of healthcare, a plan they've branded the "Health Technology Ecosystem."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-09
🔮 Legal experts said the chat room resembles a federal advisory panel, which would be required to operate in public view.
2026-10-09 · CBS News
AI leaders lobby Trump health officials in government-run chat room · assertive framing

Claims (84 extracted, 4 hedged)

A cadre of elite techies, financiers, and high-level Trump administration officials have spent a year quietly charting an extraordinary and rapid campaign to persuade Americans to use to manage their healthcare and medical records. asserted
cadre → spend → records
As that campaign has unfolded, administration officials have granted tech companies an unusual opportunity to nudge the nation's health department toward a loosely regulated future for AI health apps in which the government reimburses them for services as it does medical professionals. asserted
it → unfold → professionals
In February, federal health officials invited those businesses — including tech giants , , , Apple, and Google — to a listening session on conversational AI products for patients, such as chatbots. asserted
officials → invite → chatbots
Representatives from at least 35 industry organizations attended the meeting held by the Food and Drug Administration, which is responsible for regulating health apps as medical devices. asserted
which → attend → devices
Companies were prompted in advance to explain their AI products and how they access patients' sensitive medical information. asserted
they → prompt → information
But the meeting did not appear on the FDA's public calendar or regulatory notices, nor was the public invited. asserted
public → appear → calendar
Rather, the invitation for a select group to help shape federal policy governing AI in healthcare was extended in a chat room on the messaging service Slack. asserted
invitation → help → service
"This is a great opportunity to support HHS' goals and share your state-of-the-art understanding of safe Conversational AI development and monitoring to help FDA shape future guidance," CMS senior policy adviser Morgan Taylor wrote in the Slack workspace. asserted
Taylor → support → workspace
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services has not formally announced the chat room through federal regulatory channels, though CMS officials have talked about it at industry conferences. asserted
officials → announce → conferences
Legal experts said the chat room resembles a federal advisory panel, which would be required to operate in public view. asserted
which → say → view
KFF Health News reviewed thousands of Slack messages, meeting transcripts, and video recordings that reveal how the Trump administration has granted the industry a direct line to top government officials — including former head of the Department of Government Efficiency .The conversation took place behind the scenes as federal health officials publicly worked to integrate AI and other technology into nearly every aspect of healthcare, a plan they've branded the "Health Technology Ecosystem." asserted
they → review → plan
"We wanted to give industry a chance to play in the sandbox of government-supported healthcare," CMS Administrator Mehmet Oz said in September at the public launch of an initiative that allows health apps to bill Medicare for AI services such as wearable device tracking. asserted
apps → want → tracking
Last week, Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. delivered an enthusiastic endorsement of AI in healthcare, claiming it is "much better informed than any doctor in the country. asserted
it → deliver → country
Meanwhile, HHS staff even promised that a recently launched Medicare App Library would serve as a lucrative pipeline for those businesses to get new users. asserted
businesses → promise → users
The library's webpage currently promotes only two dozen commercial apps to millions of American seniors and those with disabilities. asserted
webpage → promote → disabilities
As Trump officials sell it, Americans will get easier access to their medical records so apps can swiftly provide health or wellness advice. asserted
apps → sell → advice
Doctors, meanwhile, are increasingly worried about how patients use and share their medical records with the nascent technology. asserted
patients → use → technology
"Some of these tools just aren't ready for primetime," said John Whyte, CEO of the American Medical Association. asserted
Whyte → say → Association
"We don't have enough data about them. asserted
We → have → them
We don't understand how they work, how they're using the information. asserted
they → understand → information
There's no liability if these tools get things wrong." asserted
things → be → ?
CMS officials declined to answer several questions about the Slack workspace, including about its legality. asserted
officials → decline → legality
"CMS is focused on giving Medicare beneficiaries greater access to their health information and useful digital tools while promoting an open, interoperable healthcare system," Gleason, now chief product officer for the newly created Office of Health Technology and Products at CMS, wrote in an emailed statement. asserted
Gleason → focus → statement
CMS will continue working with patients, providers, payers, technology organizations, and other stakeholders to make health information more accessible and useful to the Americans it serves." asserted
it → continue → Americans
The FDA did not respond to a request for comment. asserted
FDA → respond → comment
The conversation begins The behind-the-scenes effort to funnel more Americans to AI-powered health apps began in August 2025 in the Slack workspace. asserted
effort → begin → workspace
"Welcome all!" Gleason wrote. asserted
Gleason → write → ?
"Please be sure to read the Code of Conduct and see the Channel list as well to help you find channels that are relevant to you. asserted
that → read → you
" Gleason is best known for serving as the acting administrator of Elon Musk's Department of Government Efficiency, as it gained access to millions of Americans' sensitive personal and financial data, including at the Social Security Administration. asserted
it → know → Administration
As her work with DOGE wound down last year, Gleason welcomed a variety of tech leaders, investors, and entrepreneurs to the chat room. asserted
Gleason → wind → room
The Slack workspace's participants include representatives from major digital wellness companies like Oura Health, AI companies like Palantir, and investment outfits like 8VC, a venture capital firm associated with Kennedy's son Finn. asserted
participants → include → son
While the Slack's member count has ballooned to 1,700 over the past year, only a handful of patient advocates, doctors, and hospital representatives are in it. asserted
handful → balloon → it
The code of conduct Gleason shared on Slack in August 2025 documented that CMS had quietly established a technology working group. asserted
CMS → share → group
The document also set ground rules for the Slack workspace, noting that the group does not constitute an "advisory committee," nor would it be used "to obtain advice or recommendations for HHS, CMS, or any HHS/CMS officials." asserted
it → set → HHS
The code also advises that federal employees "are prohibited from endorsing any product, service, or enterprise." asserted
employees → advise → product
Joseph Daval, a former FDA lawyer who is now a research specialist at Harvard Medical School, reviewed messages from the Slack workspace at the request of KFF Health News. asserted
who → review → News
He said the chat room in some ways resembles a federal advisory committee — an independent panel that can be formally stood up by an agency head, Congress, or the president to ensure agencies act in the best interest of the public rather than industry. asserted
agencies → say → industry
The law on advisory committees "was passed in part out of a concern about interest group capture, about anticompetitive capture of agency policymaking, about corruption," he said. asserted
he → pass → corruption
Daval said the chat group looks like a committee, with members interacting with one another and building consensus on preferred courses of action. asserted
members → say → action
If it were a formal advisory committee, though, Daval said, it would be subject to certain "membership requirements having to do with independence and fair balance. asserted
it → say → independence
…and 44 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support