Photo via The Independent

In Silicon Valley, AI founders cheer Trump’s calls for the industry to police itself on safety

Read the original at The Independent ↗
Cite

Burke, G. (2026, October 10). In Silicon Valley, AI founders cheer Trump’s calls for the industry to police itself on safety. The Independent. https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/donald-trump-white-house-san-francisco-federal-trade-commission-silicon-valley-b3064498.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Independent · collected 2026-10-10 · by Garance Burke

Quick Summary

During Tech Week in San Francisco, AI founders and venture capitalists are celebrating President Donald Trump's stance on artificial intelligence regulation, which favors a self-policing approach rather than government oversight. At an event organized by Andreessen Horowitz, tech leaders praised the administration’s hands-off policy, citing it as beneficial for higher company profits, especially in defense and security systems where U.S. government spending is projected to reach $13.5 billion on autonomous systems and AI alone. However, concerns about safety remain as some former OpenAI employees have criticized the lack of clear regulations, with David Robinson expressing worry over the rapid development pace without stringent legal frameworks.
Written by AI on 2026-10-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In Silicon Valley during Tech Week, venture capitalists and AI founders are enthusiastic about the U.S. government's decision not to regulate artificial intelligence tightly. This sentiment follows months of debate over leading AI companies’ potentially harmful actions, such as meddling with U.S. government websites and healthcare data. President Donald Trump recently hosted a luncheon where tech leaders signed a voluntary safety pact described by him as “almost a constitution” for "Super Intelligence." The 308-word agreement encourages labs to follow safety protocols and set up internal teams to monitor progress, but lacks specific details on enforcement mechanisms. OpenAI CEO Sam Altman emphasized the need to prevent "bad things" from happening due to unchecked AI development.

Written for “AI Industry Response To Trump” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Industry Response To Trump
Technology · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and locations related to AI regulation and development, without describing the same specific incident.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one discusses AI industry reaction to Trump's stance during Tech Week in San Francisco, while the other reports on Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella’s call for an 'emergency brake' on advanced AI.”
New York Post
Hedges 7 of 96 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe two different events: one about AI founders' reactions to Trump's stance on regulating artificial intelligence, and another about a radical group called Zizians involved in a homicidal spree.”
National Post
Hedges 4 of 38 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives and timeframes regarding AI regulation and industry response, not the same specific incident or occurrence.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different aspects of AI policy discussions involving different time frames and participants.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 62 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of a broader topic related to AI governance and its implications but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI regulation and industry reactions but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 84 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different meetings or discussions happening at different times and places.”
The states come for OpenAI Different event
Platformer
Hedges 11 of 75 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and times related to AI regulation and oversight, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
National Post
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 4 of 37 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe related events involving the White House and AI industry leaders, but they are not reporting on the exact same incident. Article A focuses on the general reaction of AI founders in Silicon Valley to Trump's stance on regulating AI, while Article B discusses a specific meeting where Elon Musk was present with President Trump at the White House.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
43
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
4 of 43 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
The Independent's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Independent · 3430 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Garance Burke
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Safety challenges were not top of mind inside a crowded event space in San Francisco on Wednesday, where founders and funders said the government’s hands-off approach would net higher profits for companies building AI-powered defense and security systems.
🔮 The soil was poor, a type of silt that would only amplify shaking in an earthquake.
🔮 — In the rush to build homes, the government disregarded dangers posed by the area’s history of mudslides and floods, which could enhance the risks posed by earthquakes.
🔮 As tech titans warned an AI-weary world that their own advanced systems could endanger humanity, the question emerged: What do they have to gain?
Also by Garance Burke
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Independent OpenAI San Francisco U.S. the White House’s

Subjects

OpenAI ORG · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× San Francisco GPE · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× Andreessen Horowitz ORG · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Independent NORP · 1× Sam Altman PERSON · 1× Washington GPE · 1× the White House’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

Log in Tech Week is in full bloom in San Francisco, packing the city’s restaurants this week with venture capitalists and AI founders ebullient about the White House’s stance on regulating artificial intelligence — namely, don’t do it. And after months of debate about leading AI companies’ unchecked AI agents meddling with everything from U.S. government websites to healthcare data, the nation now finds itself further from governing AI systems than it was a few years ago.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-10
🔮 Safety challenges were not top of mind inside a crowded event space in San Francisco on Wednesday, where founders and funders said the government’s hands-off approach would net higher profits for companies building AI-powered defense and security systems.

Claims (43 extracted, 4 hedged)

Log in Tech Week is in full bloom in San Francisco, packing the city’s restaurants this week with venture capitalists and AI founders ebullient about the White House’s stance on regulating artificial intelligence — namely, don’t do it. And after months of debate about leading AI companies’ unchecked AI agents meddling with everything from U.S. government websites to healthcare data, the nation now finds itself further from governing AI systems than it was a few years ago. asserted
it → log → systems
President Donald Trump brought tech titans to Washington late last month for a luncheon and ceremonial signing of a voluntary safety pact he described as “almost a constitution” surrounding “Super Intelligence,” the administration’s new preferred term for AI. asserted
he → bring → AI
The 308-word agreement lays out that advanced AI labs should follow safety protocols and set up internal teams to monitor their own progress, but the administration has yet to provide details on how, in OpenAI CEO Sam Altman’s words, to keep “bad things” from happening. asserted
administration → lay → things
Safety challenges were not top of mind inside a crowded event space in San Francisco on Wednesday, where founders and funders said the government’s hands-off approach would net higher profits for companies building AI-powered defense and security systems. asserted
approach → say → systems
Panelists praised the government’s bullish industry support at one meeting aimed at “investing in the forefront,” part of the blitz of popup events organized by Andreessen Horowitz, a venture firm whose head is a Trump science and tech adviser. asserted
head → praise → Horowitz
“I want to start with one figure that I think really emphasizes the investment opportunity of defense, and that’s $1 trillion. asserted
that → want → defense
The U.S. government, for the first time, is allocating $1 trillion to its defense spending. asserted
government → allocate → spending
And $13.5 billion of that will go to autonomous systems and AI,” said Kyle Stanford, a venture capital research director at PitchBook, a market intelligence platform. asserted
Stanford → go → PitchBook
“That has obviously brought a lot of capital into defense tech spending, more than we’ve ever seen.” asserted
we → bring → spending
New concerns emerge on AI safety A day later, three researchers at OpenAI's headquarters said the ChatGPT maker had fired them, posting that “fear and unclear rules stymie AI safety work.” uncertain
fear → emerge → work
Separately, David Robinson, a leader on OpenAI’s safety team until he recently resigned, said he was worried about letting the advanced labs police themselves. asserted
labs → resign → themselves
“This is no substitute for hard law, and it does give a lot of freedom to the companies,” Robinson said. asserted
Robinson → give → companies
“The time between model generations is measured in weeks … and I think we have some very serious safety challenges in front of us in the nearer term.” asserted
we → measure → term
Trump has staked his political capital on the AI industry’s success, saying its unbridled development is key to winning the AI race against China. asserted
development → stake → China
On the first day of his second term, the Republican president repealed a Biden-era executive order aimed in part at guarding against the risks that AI systems pose to consumers, workers and national security. asserted
systems → repeal → consumers
His administration has since reoriented federal policy away from oversight and toward rapid growth, including by canceling previous requirements for AI developers to share safety test results with the federal government. asserted
developers → reorient → government
In December, Trump signed an executive order aimed at blocking AI regulations at the state level, saying a patchwork of rules could stifle the industry. uncertain
patchwork → sign → industry
Even as Silicon Valley companies have disclosed their models’ involvement in troubling cyberattacks throughout the year, the burgeoning tech sector has continued to drive economic growth. asserted
sector → disclose → growth
Concerns about AI safety centered on existential risk, rather than current real-world harms, landed at the center of debates last month, when a relatively unknown Anthropic engineer quit and called for a pause on tech development to keep “superhuman” systems from eluding controls. asserted
engineer → center → controls
Then, Anthropic and OpenAI CEOs echoed the call to slow AI development. asserted
CEOs → echo → development
To some critics, their public manifestos appeared aimed at currying favor with investors ahead of their public listings and the midterm elections, when the political tides could turn with many voters opposed to data centers. uncertain
voters → appear → centers
“The only control or ‘guardrails’ that AI needs is a STRONG AND SMART (High IQ!) PRESIDENT, and the U.S.A. has that, in spades!” asserted
U.S.A. → need → spades
Trump posted in response on Truth Social, warning voters not to “kill the Golden Goose,” a term he has used to refer to both AI and data centers. asserted
he → post → AI
White House pact preserves wide latitude for AI companies As calls mounted for stricter control of AI, the administration brought tech executives to the White House for lunch, followed by a ceremonial signing of the agreement on AI safety. “I'm seeing tremendous self-policing,” Trump told reporters after the event. asserted
Trump → preserve → event
The document was signed by representatives of OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta, Google, SpaceXAI and Nvidia. OpenAI is committed to embedding external assessors and finalizing contracts with third-party safety assessors, said a spokesperson, who referred AP to a company post stating that the researchers were fired for violating “clear policies on handling sensitive information. asserted
researchers → sign → information
Google referred to CEO Sundar Pichai's post that the company does appropriate testing and evaluations and is collaborating “to establish norms and build public confidence.” asserted
company → refer → confidence
Meta recently updated its standards for training, evaluating and releasing its most capable AI models, and spokesman Andy Stone pointed to the company's efforts to refine its board of directors’ governance structure. asserted
Stone → update → structure
Nvidia and SpaceXAI did not respond to requests for comment. asserted
Nvidia → respond → comment
Anthropic, which voluntarily disclosed Friday that its agents had meddled with U.S. government websites, is bringing in independent evaluators and discussing collaborations with industry groups, a spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → disclose → groups
In a statement, the White House reiterated Trump’s comments about working with industry to balance innovation and security and did not directly answer questions about how the administration plans to monitor the AI companies’ implementation. asserted
administration → reiterate → implementation
Following the new Anthropic disclosure, it added that the Trump administration expected full transparency from the company, saying notification and remediation was “not optional. asserted
notification → follow → company
Under Democratic President Joe Biden, leading AI companies also made voluntary commitments to promote “safe, secure, and transparent development” of their models that included specific guidelines for tests and transparency reports. asserted
that → lead → tests
The current accord lacks that, said Sarah Myers West, a former senior AI adviser to the Federal Trade Commission. asserted
West → lack → Commission
“Across the board, this self-regulatory approach has consistently done one thing, which is failed to work. asserted
which → do → thing
It’s failed to in any meaningful way ensure that these companies are honestly even keeping their house in order, let alone ensuring that they are compliant with existing law,” said Myers West, now co-executive director of the New York-based nonprofit AI Now. asserted
West → fail → nonprofit
“All that they’re getting is grace from this government. asserted
they → get → government
After last month's luncheon with Trump, the FTC said it had opened an investigation into OpenAI, Anthropic and other companies over dangers their technology may pose to consumers. uncertain
technology → say → consumers
The FTC didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. asserted
FTC → respond → comment
Trump recently appointed National Intelligence Director Jay Clayton and FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson to serve on his new “Super Intelligence Force,” which the president said would keep the U.S. dominant in AI development. asserted
president → appoint → development
He posted Thursday that the White House would consider anyone who does not refer to AI using his preferred term as “THE ENEMY!” asserted
who → post → ENEMY
…and 3 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support