Three former OpenAI employees say they have been fired due to their efforts to ensure the safety of artificial intelligence.
asserted
they → say → intelligence
Safety researchers Mikita Balesni, Tomek Korbak and Jasmine Wang levelled the accusations on Thursday after their dismissals last week.
asserted
researchers → level → dismissals
The trio warned of a “chilling” effect on other staff concerned about the frontier technology’s risks.
asserted
trio → warn → risks
Recommended Stories
list of 4 items- list 1 of 4ICE shooting of New York man in car with five-year-old sparks protests
- list 2 of 4Northern Ireland’s Sinn Fein faces police probe as protest tensions fester
- list 3 of 4Uproar in NY after ICE shoots man with child in the car
- list 4 of 4Mexico prison clash in strife-torn Sinaloa state leaves 10 dead
OpenAI said they were let go due to misconduct involving the mishandling of company information.
asserted
they → spark → information
“I believe we were fired for prioritizing safety over the near-term interests of OpenAI as a corporation,” Balesni said in a post on X.
Korbak expressed a similar sentiment, expressing his belief that he had been terminated for raising concerns that OpenAI was “losing the ability to monitor what AI agents think, one of our best tools for catching when they misbehave”.
asserted
they → believe → tools
In an open letter published in tandem with their social media posts, Balesni, Korbak and Wang expressed concerns that their dismissal would make their former colleagues “afraid to speak and operate in ways that, until last week, were an integral part of working at OpenAI”.
asserted
that → publish → OpenAI
“We could raise safety concerns and disagree openly, and were encouraged to draw on the expertise of independent safety organizations,” they said in the letter.
uncertain
they → raise → letter
“This is part of what made OpenAI special, and why we are immensely proud to have been part of the team.”
asserted
we → make → team
The three added that “if the people closest to the risks can no longer work in high-trust, high-bandwidth ways with each other and with third parties”, then AI could not be developed safely.
uncertain
AI → add → parties
“It is that culture we are writing to defend,” they stated.
asserted
they → write → ?
The trio denied violating company policy, saying any engagement with external safety experts had been in line with the mandate of their roles.
asserted
engagement → deny → roles
“Given the significant safety concerns surrounding the development of AI, employees must not be left working in an environment where fear and unclear rules stymie AI safety work and weaken third-party accountability,” they said.
uncertain
they → give → accountability
“Terminations such as ours, executed and communicated so abruptly, are chilling the open culture OpenAI has prized in the past.”
asserted
OpenAI → execute → past
In a statement, OpenAI said it had uncovered “a significant breach of trust” by the former researchers that went beyond what was described in their letter and said it stood behind the decision to fire them.
asserted
it → say → them
“We want to be very clear that these decisions were not about raising safety concerns or speaking out,” the San Francisco-based company said.
asserted
company → want → concerns
“Safety and research debates happen every day at OpenAI, often spirited and highly critical.
asserted
debates → happen → OpenAI
We actively encourage these discussions and consider them essential to making the right decisions.
asserted
them → encourage → decisions
We cannot do the work in front of us without a high degree of trust.
asserted
We → do → trust
We will continue to be extremely forgiving of our team making good-faith mistakes.”
asserted
We → continue → mistakes
OpenAI added that it was saddened by the outcome.
asserted
it → add → outcome
“We appreciated Jasmine, Mikita, and Tomek’s contributions to AI safety at OpenAI and their willingness to speak up and challenge ideas,” the company said.
asserted
company → appreciate → ideas
“We championed their voices, supported their work, and placed enormous trust in them.
asserted
We → champion → them
These decisions were not about them raising safety concerns.
asserted
them → raise → concerns
We have always encouraged that and always will.”
The ex-employees’ intervention comes as OpenAI and other AI companies are at the centre of intense debate about how to ensure the rapidly evolving technology does not expose humanity to catastrophic harm.
asserted
technology → encourage → harm
The risk of cutting-edge AI models escaping human control has been in the spotlight since July when it emerged that autonomous agents generated by OpenAI had hacked the software start-up Hugging Face.
asserted
agents → escape → up
OpenAI and its chief rival, Anthropic, have urged the international community to work together on a coordinated slowdown in AI development.
However, that suggestion has been rebuffed by the two leading AI powers, the United States and China.
asserted
suggestion → urge → powers
Last month, OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Meta, SpaceXAI and Nvidia endorsed a voluntary accord calling for stronger internal safeguards and the engagement of external auditors to better manage safety risks.
asserted
OpenAI → endorse → risks
The accord, announced by US President Donald Trump, drew a mixed response from AI safety advocates, many of whom criticised its nonbinding nature.
asserted
many → announce → nature
OpenAI has announced a number of steps to mitigate risks in the absence of formal regulation, including scrapping the planned release of its latest-generation model, GPT-6.1 Astra.
asserted
OpenAI → announce → model
The ChatGPT creator said it decided not to go ahead with the release after its model failed to meet company standards for acting in accordance with human wishes.
asserted
model → say → wishes
The Aporia
