Fusionism in the Twenty-First Century

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Adler, J. H. (2026, October 11). Fusionism in the Twenty-First Century. Reason. https://reason.com/volokh/2026/10/11/fusionism-in-the-twenty-first-century/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-11 · by Jonathan H. Adler

Quick Summary

Stephanie Slade's new book "Fusionism: Liberty, Virtue, and the Future of the American Right" discusses how the political philosophy that shaped post-War American conservatism should continue to influence modern conservative thought. The Civitas Outlook recently hosted a symposium featuring commentaries by five authors on Slade’s work, exploring themes like freedom's role in achieving virtue and the limitations of state involvement in moral issues.
Written by AI on 2026-10-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Stephanie Slade's book "Fusionism: Liberty, Virtue, and the Future of the American Right" discusses the political philosophy that shaped much of post-War American conservatism. Civitas Outlook recently hosted a symposium featuring commentaries from five noted authors and editors on Slade’s work. The event highlighted Frank Meyer's editorial contributions to National Review, which argued for the integration of virtue into human freedom as a fundamental condition, emphasizing that freedom is not an end in itself but rather a means to seek truth and elevate humanity. Participants included Elizabeth Corey, Richard Morrison, Paul Mueller, Veronique de Rugy, and Paul Seaton, each contributing their perspectives on the continued relevance of fusionism for modern American conservatism.

Written for “Fusionism Debate” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Fusionism Debate
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1074 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jonathan H. Adler
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The winner will receive an award plaque and be recognized at the section's program at the AALS annual meeting in January 2027.
🔮 Contributions to the symposium are: - Elizabeth Corey, Fusion: Power Is Not the Last Word; - Richard Morrison, What Fusion Will We Build; - Paul Mueller, Recovering Fusionism; - Veronique de Rugy, Fusionism and the Moral Prerequisites of Citizenship; - Paul Seaton, The Bifurcated Fusionist Regime. For more on the book, and why Fusionism remains relevant today, you can also check out this interview with Slade by James Patterson on Law & Liberty.
2026-10-11 · assertive framing · Fusionism in the Twenty-First Century
🔮 It seems to suggest that the claims made by the petitioners (and their allies) about the potentially catastrophic effects on the oil and gas industry of an adverse ruling in Suncor may have convinced Justice Alito that he needed to recuse, even though he does not own stock in any of the companies that are part of the case.
🔮 Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent This morning, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, in which fossil fuel energy companies are asking the Supreme Court to conclude that all state-law-based tort suits over damages allegedly caused by climate change are preempted.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · Unpacking the Suncor Oral Argument
🔮 That may seem a contradiction: The justice often publicly portrayed as unyielding and inflexible is, behind the scenes, the conservative who is uniquely adept at finding common ground on the most divisive issues.
🔮 On Monday the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County.
🔮 Greg Stohr of Bloomberg reports on an interview with Justice Alito explaining the justice's last-minute decision to recuse in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, the major climate change preemption case the Supreme Court will hear on Monday.
🔮 In 2025, after twenty-five years at Case Western Reserve University, I moved to William & Mary.
🔮 One week from today, the Supreme Court will open its term with oral argument in Suncor Energy v. Boulder County.
2026-09-28 · mixed framing · As Suncor Approaches, Justice Alito Recuses
🔮 Zycher's claim here that "in the context of Section 202(a), 'cause or contribute significantly' is replaced with 'reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare'" is simply wrong, as a moment's review of the relevant statutory text would have demonstrated.
Also by Jonathan H. Adler
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Jonathan H. Adler →

Topics

American Civitas Outlook National Review post-War the Fusion Symposium

Subjects

American NORP · 5× Meyer PERSON · 4× Slade PERSON · 3× Civitas Outlook ORG · 2× Stephanie Slade's PERSON · 2× Elizabeth Corey PERSON · 1× Frank Meyer PERSON · 1× National Review ORG · 1× The Volokh PERSON · 1× the Fusion Symposium ORG · 1×

Narrative

Contributions to the symposium are: - Elizabeth Corey, Fusion: Power Is Not the Last Word; - Richard Morrison, What Fusion Will We Build; - Paul Mueller, Recovering Fusionism; - Veronique de Rugy, Fusionism and the Moral Prerequisites of Citizenship; - Paul Seaton, The Bifurcated Fusionist Regime. For more on the book, and why Fusionism remains relevant today, you can also check out this interview with Slade by James Patterson on Law & Liberty.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-11
🔮 Contributions to the symposium are: - Elizabeth Corey, Fusion: Power Is Not the Last Word; - Richard Morrison, What Fusion Will We Build; - Paul Mueller, Recovering Fusionism; - Veronique de Rugy, Fusionism and the Moral Prerequisites of Citizenship; - Paul Seaton, The Bifurcated Fusionist Regime. For more on the book, and why Fusionism remains relevant today, you can also check out this interview with Slade by James Patterson on Law & Liberty.
2026-10-11 · Reason
Fusionism in the Twenty-First Century · assertive framing

Claims (14 extracted, 1 hedged)

Mostly law professors | Sometimes contrarian | Often libertarian | Always independent Stephanie Slade's new book, Fusionism: Liberty, Virtue, and the Future of the American Right, makes the case that the political philosophy that defined much of the post-War American Right should continue to guide the American conservative movement in the twenty-first century. asserted
that → make → century
As my recent essay on postliberalism suggests, I largely agree with Slade. uncertain
I → suggest → Slade
Last week, Civitas Outlook hosted a symposium on Slade's book. asserted
Outlook → host → book
Here is the description: Civitas Outlook presents the Fusion Symposium featuring commentaries from five noted authors and editors on Stephanie Slade's new book, Fusionism: Liberty, Virtue, and the Future of the American Right. asserted
presents → present → Right
This book highlights the fundamental ethos of postwar American conservatism that Frank Meyer articulated as an editor at National Review. asserted
Meyer → highlight → Review
This ethos rooted virtue in human freedom, the fundamental condition of man, but freedom asserted
ethos → root → man
Meyer stated that our choices must seek the end of truth and the ennobling of the human person. asserted
choices → state → person
Meyer argued in the 1960s that We are today historically in a situation created by thirty years of slow and insidious revolution at home and a half century of violent open revolution abroad. To conserve the true and the good under these circumstances is to restore an understanding (and a social structure reflecting that understanding) which has been all but buried; it is not to preserve the transient customs and prescriptions of the present. asserted
it → argue → present
But Meyer did not look to the federal government's power to reestablish the "true and the good." asserted
Meyer → look → true
He said that "The decisive criterion of any political order is the degree to which it establishes conditions of freedom." asserted
it → say → freedom
That freedom is meant to choose the cardinal and theological virtues. asserted
freedom → mean → virtues
But, virtue, Meyer says, "is not a political problem, it is not the concern of the state." asserted
it → say → state
We begin to see that fusionism is much more than an old political coalition and is pivotal to American conservatism. asserted
fusionism → begin → conservatism
Contributions to the symposium are: - Elizabeth Corey, Fusion: Power Is Not the Last Word; - Richard Morrison, What Fusion Will We Build; - Paul Mueller, Recovering Fusionism; - Veronique de Rugy, Fusionism and the Moral Prerequisites of Citizenship; - Paul Seaton, The Bifurcated Fusionist Regime. For more on the book, and why Fusionism remains relevant today, you can also check out this interview with Slade by James Patterson on Law & Liberty. asserted
you → build → Law
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support