Photo via Reason

TV Networks Protested Press Bans by Declining To Cover Trump. That Might Have Been Illegal, the DOJ Says.

Read the original at Reason ↗
Cite

Sullum, J. (2026, October 12). TV Networks Protested Press Bans by Declining To Cover Trump. That Might Have Been Illegal, the DOJ Says. Reason. https://reason.com/2026/10/12/tv-networks-protested-press-bans-by-declining-to-cover-trump-that-might-have-been-illegal-the-doj-says/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Reason · collected 2026-10-12 · by Jacob Sullum

Quick Summary

President Trump banned CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House last month, prompting ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News to suspend their participation in the press pool covering presidential events. The Department of Justice has now requested communications from these networks, suggesting that their protest may have violated antitrust laws by constituting a group boycott under the Sherman Antitrust Act. This move adds another layer to Trump's ongoing conflict with media organizations he perceives as biased against him.
Written by AI on 2026-10-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The US Justice Department is investigating whether ABC, CBS, CNN, NBC, and Fox News violated federal antitrust laws by suspending their pooled coverage of President Donald Trump in September. The networks halted coverage for several days after Trump banned journalists from CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House, preventing CNN from participating in the pool. Emily Covington, a spokesperson for the Justice Department, stated that group boycotts among business competitors might violate US law. The investigation follows a pattern of tension between the Trump administration and press corps over access to information and coverage restrictions.

Written for “DOJ Investigates TV Networks Over Tru…” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 12 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 DOJ Investigates TV Networks Over Tru…
Politics · 13 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 60/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 11 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different phases of a broader issue involving press access and media relations with the White House, not one single occurrence.”
The Independent
Hedges 1 of 26 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss related events but not the exact same incident: Article A discusses Trump's administration putting CNN 'on notice' years ago, while Article B covers TV networks protesting press bans by declining to cover Trump's events.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 1 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
ABC News (AU)
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
33
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
3 of 33 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Reason's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
13
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Reason · 1082 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jacob Sullum
34 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The U.S. Constitution says "the times, places and manner of holding elections" for senators and representatives "shall be prescribed in each state by the legislature thereof," although Congress "may at any time by law make or alter such regulations."
🔮 The New York Times presents Ho's speech as evidence that he hopes Trump will nominate him to the Supreme Court, assuming that opportunity arises during the next two years.
🔮 Question 8, a.k.a. the Eliminate Recreational Marijuana Sales and Allow Limited Possession Initiative, would permit adults 21 or older to possess up to an ounce of cannabis.
🔮 In a July 16 letter to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said a "preliminary review" suggested there "may be as many as 190,832 non-citizens registered to vote" in her state.
🔮 But the Justice Department's manual for prosecutors says they should not pursue criminal charges unless "the admissible evidence will probably be sufficient" to meet the latter test.
🔮 I would tell you what I did with it, but I don't want to implicate myself in a federal felony.
🔮 The new case "would almost be funny if it weren't such an appalling abuse of the Department of Justice," Comey said in an online video on Monday.
🔮 But as two recent cases illustrate, there are limits to this license for misconduct, meaning officials may still be held accountable when they flout longstanding constitutional principles, even when they do so in novel ways.
🔮 Their divorced parents, Bart Rockett and Kami Ballard, agreed that Ballard, who at that point lived in Missouri, would have primary custody of the children, while Rockett, who was living in California, would be "responsible for them at the beginning of each month and 'during TV pilot season.'"
🔮 But in a decision that could signal a shift in the legal treatment of Flock cameras, a federal judge in Oklahoma recently recognized that they enable "a type of indiscriminate mass surveillance."
Also by Jacob Sullum
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 34 articles by Jacob Sullum →

Topics

ABC CNN MS NOW Politico the White House

Subjects

CNN ORG · 5× Trump PERSON · 4× FTC ORG · 3× MS NOW ORG · 3× Politico ORG · 3× the White House ORG · 3× ABC ORG · 2× CBS ORG · 2× Fox News ORG · 2× NBC ORG · 2×

Narrative

Since that agreement was aimed at protecting the right to counsel by ensuring adequate funding for court-appointed attorneys, the lawyers association argued, it was protected under NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware, a 1982 decision in which the Supreme Court recognized a First Amendment right to engage in politically motivated consumer boycotts.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-12
🔮 According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), which last Friday demanded network communications regarding the TV pool, that show of solidarity may have violated the Sherman Antitrust Act.

Claims (33 extracted, 3 hedged)

After President Donald Trump banned CNN, MS NOW, and Politico from the White House last month, ABC, CBS, NBC, and Fox News protested by suspending their participation in the press pool that provides widely used video of presidential events. asserted
that → ban → events
According to the Department of Justice (DOJ), which last Friday demanded network communications regarding the TV pool, that show of solidarity may have violated the Sherman Antitrust Act. uncertain
show → accord → Act
The antitrust investigation adds another layer of bullying to Trump's vendetta against "Fake News Media Outlets." asserted
investigation → add → Outlets
The president reflexively threatens to yank broadcast licenses in response to news coverage he views as biased against him. asserted
he → threaten → him
He has repeatedly tried to punish disfavored journalists by excluding them from the White House, culminating in last month's sanctions against CNN, MS NOW, and Politico, which irked him by running "purposely negative stories." asserted
which → try → stories
Now he is deploying the Justice Department against the TV networks that objected to his assault on freedom of the press. asserted
that → deploy → press
Under a longstanding arrangement, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, and Fox News take turns covering the president in venues where press access is limited, sharing the footage with other news outlets. asserted
access → take → outlets
But after Trump excluded CNN from that role, the other networks stopped participating. asserted
networks → exclude → role
They resumed their coverage on September 25, the day after a federal judge ordered the White House to restore press passes for employees of CNN, MS NOW, and Politico. asserted
judge → resume → CNN
The TV pool suspension was brief, lasting just four days. asserted
suspension → last → days
But it irritated Trump, who on September 24 complained that the networks "refused to cover one of the Biggest and Most Beautiful Events to take place in many years"—i.e., "the arrival at the White House of the Highly Respected President of China, Xi Jinping, and his beautiful wife, Madam Peng." asserted
networks → irritate → China
That event was "magnificent" and "made for Television," he said, but the networks "refused to be there" because "they knew how good it would be" and "didn't want credit to be given to 'TRUMP.' asserted
credit → make → TRUMP
As the DOJ tells it, the lack of network coverage was not only annoying; it was also potentially illegal. asserted
it → tell → coverage
"Members of the television press pool have boycotted covering White House events," Emily Covington, who directs the department's Office of Public Affairs, said on Saturday. asserted
who → boycott → Saturday
"Group boycotts among commercial competitors can violate the Sherman Act," she added, and "the Antitrust Division is simply investigating to determine whether these news organizations have violated the antitrust laws." asserted
organizations → violate → laws
Section 1 of the Sherman Act broadly prohibits any "contract," "combination," or "conspiracy" in "restraint of trade." asserted
Section → prohibit → trade
But it applies to group boycotts only insofar as they aim to thwart competing businesses. asserted
they → apply → businesses
William E. Kovacic, who chaired the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) during the George W. Bush administration, is skeptical that the concept applies in this case. asserted
concept → chair → case
"The critical ingredient in successful antitrust cases is to demonstrate that there is unmistakably a commercial motive and that the commercial motive predominates," Kovacic told The New York Times. asserted
Kovacic → demonstrate → Times
"And I don't think they would ever be able to do that here." asserted
they → think → that
The Supreme Court's 1990 decision in FTC v. Superior Court Trial Lawyers Association illustrates the importance of a "commercial motive." asserted
decision → illustrate → motive
The case involved attorneys in private practice who were paid to serve as court-appointed counsel for criminal defendants in the District of Columbia. asserted
who → involve → Columbia
The FTC concluded that they violated the Sherman Act when they agreed to stop accepting cases until their fees were increased. asserted
fees → conclude → cases
Since that agreement was aimed at protecting the right to counsel by ensuring adequate funding for court-appointed attorneys, the lawyers association argued, it was protected under NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware, a 1982 decision in which the Supreme Court recognized a First Amendment right to engage in politically motivated consumer boycotts. asserted
Court → aim → boycotts
But the Court saw an important distinction between the two cases. asserted
Court → see → cases
"Our reasoning in Claiborne Hardware is not applicable to a boycott conducted by business competitors who 'stand to profit financially from a lessening of competition in the boycotted market,'" Justice John Paul Stevens wrote. asserted
Stevens → conduct → market
"No matter how altruistic the motives of respondents may have been, it is undisputed that their immediate objective was to increase the price that they would be paid for their services. uncertain
they → increase → services
In Claiborne Hardware, by contrast, the boycotters were not trying to reap a financial benefit by reducing competition. asserted
boycotters → try → competition
Nor were ABC et al. when they "boycotted" the White House TV pool. asserted
they → boycott → pool
They were not trying to increase their profits by putting competitors at a disadvantage; they were standing up for freedom of the press. asserted
they → try → press
"The investigation is nonsense," Seth Stern, chief of advocacy at the Freedom of the Press Foundation, says in an emailed press release. asserted
Stern → say → release
"Trump may view the presidency as a business venture, but news outlets' standing up for their constitutional rights has nothing to do with antitrust law… uncertain
standing → view → law
.Depriving Trump of the attention he craves is not a competitive harm." asserted
he → .deprive → attention
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support