Photo via Fox News

Trump scores win from liberal-leaning Ninth Circuit in ICE enforcement showdown

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Mallon, E. (2026, October 14). Trump scores win from liberal-leaning Ninth Circuit in ICE enforcement showdown. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-scores-win-from-liberal-leaning-ninth-circuit-ice-enforcement-showdown

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-10-14 · by Elaine Mallon

Quick Summary

On Wednesday, the Trump administration won a legal battle against California’s No Vigilantes Act when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a temporary injunction blocking a section requiring plainclothes federal law enforcement agents to show their badges and identification. The court ruled that this requirement violates the Constitution's supremacy clause, which prioritizes federal over state laws. This decision is significant as it comes from a circuit known for opposing Trump’s immigration policies in the past, such as restrictions on sanctuary cities and asylum eligibility.
Written by AI on 2026-10-14, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 14, 2026, the Trump administration secured a significant legal victory when the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals temporarily blocked a section of California’s No Vigilantes Act. This act required plainclothes federal law enforcement agents to show their badges and identification during operations in California. The court ruled that this requirement violates the Constitution's supremacy clause, which mandates federal law takes precedence over conflicting state laws. Judges Mark Bennett, Jacqueline Nguyen, and Daniel Collins agreed that Section 10 of the No Vigilantes Act impermissibly overrides the federal government’s authority to regulate its officers. This decision is a blow to California, which has often clashed with federal immigration policies, including previous attempts to restrict funding for sanctuary cities and tighten asylum eligibility rules.

Written for “Trump Wins ICE Enforcement Case” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Wins ICE Enforcement Case
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Reason
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 7 of 53 claims Outlet record 67/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 3 of 19 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe two different legal rulings by distinct courts on separate issues concerning the Trump administration's policies.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legal developments related to ICE enforcement rather than the same specific incident.”
Reason
Outlet record 67/100
“The articles describe different events related to legal actions but occurring on distinct dates and involving separate issues.”
New York Post
Hedges 5 of 29 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different events - one criticizes NYC's sanctuary policies, while the other reports on a legal victory for ICE in California.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 6 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legal actions and rulings related to ICE enforcement, not the same specific incident.”
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 36 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different legal rulings by distinct courts involving separate issues.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 4 of 29 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different legal cases involving the Trump administration and distinct constitutional issues.”
Los Angeles Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 58 claims Outlet record 95/100
“Article A describes a ruling by the Ninth Circuit Court regarding a California law, while Article B discusses a new lawsuit filed by California against immigration arrests near courthouses.”
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the Trump administration against California, one involving ICE enforcement and the other regarding alleged noncitizen voting.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
15
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 15 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-14 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6161 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Elaine Mallon
42 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 Sen. Elissa Slotkin's warning to young Americans not to join the Trump administration could backfire by handing Trump officials legal ammunition to derail the investigations Democrats hope to launch if they retake Congress, a former federal prosecutor warned.
🔮 Michael Heyman announced at a Friday press conference that the Justice Department has been investigating whether Daniel J. Sullivan, a retired school teacher who will appear on the ballot without a party affiliation, was colluding with Democratic operatives tied to Democratic candidate Mary Peltola's campaign.
🔮 "But there are a lot of cases that seem to be going to judges maybe based on those cases having similarities which is not what the local rules say," Wessan told Fox News Digital.
🔮 However, the appeals court ruled that the lower court's preliminary injunction could not be enforced, finding that the immigration law firm Red Eagle, which represents individuals going through the visa lottery process, did not have standing to sue the federal government.
🔮 "This would have never happened if we didn't have ranked-choice voting," Dunleavy told Fox News Digital.
🔮 U.S. District Judge Ada Brown of the Northern District of Texas, who is Black and Native American, was temporarily removed from her docket by the Fifth Circuit Judicial Council earlier this month, following a May judicial-conduct complaint filed by attorney Ezra Young, whose permission to practice before Brown had previously been revoked.
🔮 And one of its leaders is warning that young professionals could face reputational damage and steep legal bills.
🔮 The Justice Department argued that releasing the information could compromise the integrity of the investigation.
🔮 The ruling comes as the Supreme Court prepares to hear Rhoney v. Barbosa da Cunha this term, a closely related fight over whether the federal mandatory-detention statute applies at all to longtime immigrants arrested inside the country — setting up the possibility that the justices could either undercut Friday’s ruling or strengthen the government's hand.
🔮 The twin rulings come as the Supreme Court prepares to hear oral arguments in Viramontes v. Cook County, a case that could determine whether AR-15-style rifles qualify as "arms" protected by the Second Amendment.
Also by Elaine Mallon
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 42 articles by Elaine Mallon →

Topics

California The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals The Ninth Circuit the No Vigilantes Act the Trump administration

Subjects

California GPE · 7× Trump PERSON · 6× Newsom PERSON · 2× The Ninth Circuit ORG · 2× the Trump administration ORG · 2× Christina Snyder PERSON · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Gavin Newsom PERSON · 1× Muslim NORP · 1× The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1×

Narrative

"The Ninth Circuit agrees that California cannot regulate federal law enforcement," Schumate wrote on X. "Today, the Ninth Circuit again affirms what common sense makes clear: California cannot regulate how Federal law enforcement officers carry out their jobs authorized by Congress," Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward, Jr. wrote on X. "Today's decision is a huge WIN for protecting the safety of our Nation's law enforcement officers and ensuring @POTUS 's promise to enforce our Nation's immigration laws."
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-14

Claims (15 extracted, 0 hedged)

The Trump administration scored a victory at a liberal-leaning appeals court Wednesday, which temporarily blocked a section of a California law requiring plainclothes federal law enforcement agents to show their badges and identification when carrying out operations. asserted
which → score → operations
The 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled the Trump administration was "certain to succeed" in its lawsuit against California, finding that the No Vigilantes Act’s identification requirement violates the Constitution’s supremacy clause, which says federal law takes priority when it conflicts with state law. asserted
it → rule → law
"Section 10 explicitly overrides the federal government’s power to determine whether, how, and when to publicly identify its officers," the panel wrote. asserted
panel → override → officers
The preliminary injunction comes from a federal appeals court that has repeatedly clashed with the Trump administration over some of its signature immigration policies, including blocking efforts to withhold federal funding from sanctuary cities in 2018, restricting attempts to tighten asylum eligibility that same year and refusing to reinstate Trump's travel ban targeting several predominantly Muslim countries in 2017. asserted
that → come → 2017
The ruling comes as a major blow to California Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom, widely viewed as a 2028 presidential hopeful. asserted
ruling → come → hopeful
Newsom has positioned himself as a leading opponent of Trump's immigration agenda, signing a series of laws aimed at protecting immigrant communities, restricting federal immigration enforcement operations and increasing oversight of federal agents in the state. asserted
Newsom → position → state
The Trump administration sued California over provisions in the No Vigilantes Act and No Secret Police Act, which restricts law enforcement officers from wearing face coverings, in November 2025. asserted
which → sue → November
Judge Christina Snyder, a Clinton-appointed judge, initially blocked the No Secret Police Act's mask restriction for federal officers but declined to block the No Vigilantes Act's identification requirement. asserted
Snyder → appoint → requirement
The Trump administration appealed Snyder's decision on the identification requirement, and the 9th Circuit temporarily blocked its enforcement in February before granting an injunction pending appeal in April. asserted
Circuit → appeal → April
California argued that its identification requirement did not amount to an unconstitutional regulation of the federal government because a state law crosses that line only when it "impose[s] substantial burdens on federal operations. asserted
it → argue → operations
" But the appeals court ruled that the state never had the authority to directly regulate federal officials. asserted
state → rule → officials
"The burden of the regulation on federal operations, whether substantial or otherwise, is irrelevant," the court wrote. asserted
court → write → operations
The liberal appeals court ruling drew praise from Trump administration officials, including Brett Shumate, assistant attorney general for the Justice Department's Civil Division. asserted
ruling → draw → Division
"The Ninth Circuit agrees that California cannot regulate federal law enforcement," Schumate wrote on X. "Today, the Ninth Circuit again affirms what common sense makes clear: California cannot regulate how Federal law enforcement officers carry out their jobs authorized by Congress," Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward, Jr. wrote on X. "Today's decision is a huge WIN for protecting the safety of our Nation's law enforcement officers and ensuring @POTUS 's promise to enforce our Nation's immigration laws." asserted
decision → agree → laws
Fox News Digital reached out to Newsom's office for comment. asserted
Digital → reach → comment
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support