Photo via The Guardian

US justice department sues California over alleged noncitizen voting

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Levine, S. (2026, October 15). US justice department sues California over alleged noncitizen voting. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/oct/15/justice-department-sues-california-midterms

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-15 · by Sam Levine

Quick Summary

The US Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against California on Thursday to prevent the state from counting certain ballots cast in the midterm elections, alleging that some voters are noncitizens. The department previously provided Los Angeles county with a list of more than 20,000 names it claims belong to likely noncitizen voters and demanded confirmation of their citizenship status within two days. California officials, including Secretary of State Shirley Weber, rejected the demand as unsecure and unnecessary, asserting that it could cause public distrust in elections.
Written by AI on 2026-10-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of October 18, 2026, the US Justice Department has sued California and threatened local election officials with imprisonment for counting mail ballots from over 20,000 people suspected of being noncitizens. On October 13, Acting Deputy Attorney General R. Trent McCotter sent letters to California Secretary of State Shirley Weber and Los Angeles County Registrar-Recorder Dean Logan demanding they review a list of potential noncitizen voters provided on a password-protected thumb drive by the federal government. The department warned that officials could face prosecution if they do not verify the citizenship status of these individuals before counting their ballots for the November 3 midterm elections. California and Los Angeles County have resisted opening the drive, prompting heightened tensions between state and federal authorities ahead of the election.

Written for “Trump Administration Sues California Over Noncitizen Voting” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 15 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Administration Sues California Over Noncitizen Voting
Politics · 16 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 65/100
Times of India
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 59/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 4 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses broader issues with California's voting system and mentions investigations by Team Trump, while Article B reports on a specific lawsuit filed by the US Justice Department against California.”
New York Post
⚖️ Centre Hedges 2 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one is about the US Department of Justice suing California over alleged noncitizen voting, while the other reports on stolen mail-in ballots in San Mateo County.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Centre Hedges 0 of 6 claims Outlet record 62/100
“The articles describe different events: one is about a lawsuit filed by the US DOJ against California, and the other reports on arrests made as part of an operation targeting alleged non-citizen voters.”
The Hindu
Hedges 1 of 11 claims Outlet record 77/100
“The articles describe different events related to election fraud but do not refer to the same specific incident, time, or place.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the US Department of Justice suing California over alleged noncitizen voting, while Article B reports on a separate arrest and revelation about an individual's illegal voting, indicating different specific events.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
3 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
16
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2049 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Sam Levine
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Had the districts been in place in 2024, Donald Trump would have won all but one by double digits.
🔮 A change in House control would give Democrats a perch to conduct robust oversight of the administration for its final two years.
🔮 The justice department has sent letters to a top Democratic election lawyer and other Democrats informing them they could be targets in a federal investigation into efforts to get an Alaska man with the same name as Republican senator Daniel Sullivan on to the ballot.
🔮 Donald Trump is waging a brazen effort to interfere with voting in this year’s midterm elections, escalating concerns that the federal government will try to slow down certification of election results – a strategy that could create chaos when the new Congress is seated next year.
🔮 “Never before in American history has the federal government, on the eve of an election, sought to coerce a state and local government to abandon their own Constitutional elections procedures and bend to the will of the Executive Branch.”
🔮 The department sent the county and California secretary of state the list last week and gave them a 48-hour deadline to segregate ballots cast from anyone on the list unless they could verify their citizenship.
🔮 The department asked officials to confirm the citizenship of anyone on the list and set aside ballots from those whose status could not be confirmed.
🔮 Voters could say they needed an overseas ballot because they were on active military service, living outside the US with an intent to return, or living outside the US and uncertain about their return.
🔮 Follow-up letters to each of those states weakened the claim, saying there only could be as many as 278,000 non-citizens on the rolls, including up to 15,903 in Nevada.
🔮 The reported meeting comes months ahead of the November midterm elections in which Democrats are favored to retake the US House, a development that would make Jeffries speaker.
Also by Sam Levine
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Sam Levine →

Topics

California DHS Los Angeles Nevada the Federal Government

Subjects

California GPE · 8× Nevada GPE · 3× DHS ORG · 2× Los Angeles GPE · 2× the Federal Government ORG · 2× Dean Logan PERSON · 1× Democrat NORP · 1× Shirley Weber PERSON · 1× The US Department of Justice ORG · 1× Weber ORG · 1×

Narrative

Richard Hasen, an election law scholar at UCLA, described the justice department’s efforts in California as “a nice publicity stunt that gets attention for [the justice department] and reinforces the notion among the president’s most ardent supporters that California is not doing enough to combat voter fraud”.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-15
🔮 The department asked officials to confirm the citizenship of anyone on the list and set aside ballots from those whose status could not be confirmed.
2026-10-15 · The Guardian
US justice department sues California over alleged noncitizen voting · assertive framing

Claims (23 extracted, 3 hedged)

The US Department of Justice sued California on Thursday, seeking a court order to prevent the state from tabulating certain ballots cast in the midterm elections. asserted
Department → sue → elections
The suit came two days after the department made a specious demand to the state. asserted
department → come → state
On Tuesday, the department sent election officials in Los Angeles county a thumb drive with a handwritten password purporting to contain the names of noncitizens registered to vote. asserted
department → send → noncitizens
The department asked officials to confirm the citizenship of anyone on the list and set aside ballots from those whose status could not be confirmed. uncertain
status → ask → those
It gave the state 48 hours – an extremely narrow window – to take action. asserted
It → give → action
It did not provide details on how it came up with the names on the list. asserted
it → provide → list
In its lawsuit, filed in federal court in the central district of California, the justice department said it had provided the state with more than 20,000 names of likely noncitizens. asserted
it → file → noncitizens
The Los Angeles county clerk and recorder, Dean Logan, said his office would not review the list, in part because it didn’t consider the USB drive secure. asserted
drive → say → part
In a statement on Wednesday, the California secretary of state, Shirley Weber, a Democrat, said the justice department had not provided the list of voters to her office. asserted
department → say → office
“The [justice department’s] relentless efforts to unlawfully gain access to states’ protected voter data and purge voter rolls serve only to cause chaos and fuel public distrust in our elections,” Weber said. asserted
Weber → gain → elections
Justice department lawyers are asking the court to order the state not to count votes from those it had flagged. asserted
it → ask → those
“This Court should enjoin California from presently tabulating vote-by-mail ballots from likely noncitizens in the upcoming federal election until the voter’s citizenship status can be determined,” the lawsuit said. asserted
lawsuit → enjoin → election
“This Court should order California (1) to set aside vote-by-mail ballots from persons identified by the Federal Government likely to be noncitizens and (2) to independently – or in collaboration with the Federal Government – verify their citizenship status (beyond relying on unverified statements of citizenship necessary to registering) before tabulating their vote-by-mail ballot. uncertain
Court → order → ballot
The request to block tabulation comes amid concerns that Donald Trump and his allies will interfere in the counting of votes in the midterm elections, in which Republicans are expected to lose seats in Congress. asserted
Republicans → block → Congress
The Trump administration’s methodology for identifying noncitizens has come under scrutiny. asserted
methodology → identify → scrutiny
Earlier this year, the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) said there could be as many as 278,000 noncitizens on the rolls in four states, including more than 190,000 in California and about 16,000 in Nevada. uncertain
Department → say → Nevada
Officials at the DHS refused to share their methodology with Nevada election officials and later turned over just 185 names of people it had a strong belief were noncitizens. asserted
it → refuse → belief
When Nevada officials investigated, they found every one of those people was a citizen. asserted
one → investigate → people
Richard Hasen, an election law scholar at UCLA, described the justice department’s efforts in California as “a nice publicity stunt that gets attention for [the justice department] and reinforces the notion among the president’s most ardent supporters that California is not doing enough to combat voter fraud”. asserted
California → describe → fraud
“The Department of Justice has no standing to tell states and localities to go in and remove voters from voting rolls in the midst of an election. asserted
Department → have → election
In fact, the National Voter Registration Act bars systematic purges of ineligible voters in the 90-day period before the election,” he wrote in a blogpost. asserted
he → bar → blogpost
“The purpose of this provision, unsurprisingly, is to stop false positives, that is the removal of eligible voters who are mistakenly flagged as noncitizens. asserted
who → stop → noncitizens
A rushed process would almost certainly lead to disenfranchisement.” asserted
process → lead → disenfranchisement
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support