Photo via The Hindu

Two Indian nationals among 28 charged with election fraud in California

Read the original at The Hindu ↗
Cite

Two Indian nationals among 28 charged with election fraud in California. (2026, October 20). The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/news/international/two-indian-nationals-among-28-charged-with-election-fraud-in-california/article71603104.ece

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

The Hindu · collected 2026-10-20 · by PTI

Quick Summary

The U.S. Department of Justice has charged 28 green card holders, including two Indian nationals—Amandeep Kaur and Kamlesh Shah—with election fraud in California. The charges stem from fraudulent voter registration and casting ballots in the November 2024 elections, which are felonies carrying up to five years in prison. Among those charged, eleven individuals were arrested during early morning raids under "Operation Protect the Vote," aimed at combating electoral fraud.
Written by AI on 2026-10-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On October 19, 2026, the Justice Department arrested over 24 individuals in California as part of an operation targeting alleged noncitizen voters. The arrests were made during a broader effort to combat voter fraud ahead of mid-term elections. Specifically, federal authorities charged 28 people with election crimes related to voting and fraudulent registration, despite most being lawful permanent residents rather than citizens. This move escalated tensions between the federal government and California officials who argue that the Justice Department's demands are unlawful and could disenfranchise legitimate voters.

Written for “California Voter Fraud Indictments” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 16 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 California Voter Fraud Indictments
Politics · 17 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Los Angeles Times
Hedges 5 of 74 claims Outlet record 95/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 32 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses California officials refusing a DOJ request related to noncitizen voter records, while Article B reports on specific charges and arrests in an election fraud case involving Indian nationals.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 4 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses general election issues and lack of Voter ID laws, while Article B reports on a specific prosecution and arrest related to election fraud involving Indian nationals.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 4 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one is a lawsuit filed by the Trump administration against California for failing to review suspected noncitizen voters, while the other reports on specific arrests and charges of election fraud involving individuals.”
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events related to election fraud but do not refer to the same specific incident, time, or place.”
CBS News
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the Justice Department related to voter registration issues but do not describe the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different legal actions by the Justice Department, one involving a lawsuit against California for voter information, and the other involving charges of election fraud.”
Times of India
Hedges 3 of 12 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe different individuals charged with election fraud in separate states.”
New York Post
⚖️ Centre Hedges 2 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different events: one about ballots stolen from a post office, and another about individuals charged with voter fraud.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
11
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
1 of 11 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
not political
takes no side on a contested political question
Publisher signals
77/100
The Hindu's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
17
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Hindu · 774 article(s) · 2 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 2 correction(s)

Who wrote this

No reporter is named on this article, beyond the feed's “ PTI”.

Topics

California Indian U.S. the Justice Department the United States

Subjects

the Justice Department ORG · 4× U.S. GPE · 3× California GPE · 2× Indian NORP · 2× the United States GPE · 2× Amandeep Kaur PERSON · 1× Kamlesh Shah PERSON · 1× Sacramento GPE · 1× Shah PERSON · 1× the U.S. Department of Justice ORG · 1×

Narrative

Ms. Kaur, a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes, who is seeking to become a U.S. citizen, fraudulently registered to vote in December 2022 and voted in the November 2024 US election, it said. “All 28 foreign nationals charged are lawful permanent residents (LPRs), or 'green card' holders.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-20

Claims (11 extracted, 1 hedged)

Two Indian nationals are among 28 green card holders charged with election fraud in California, the U.S. Department of Justice said in a statement on Monday. asserted
Department → charge → Monday
According to the Justice Department, Amandeep Kaur (30) and Kamlesh Shah (67) have been charged with fraudulently registering as voters and casting their ballots in the November 2024 U.S. elections. uncertain
Kaur → accord → elections
It said of the 28 persons charged with election fraud, 11 have been arrested in early morning raids across the state under ‘Operation Protect the Vote’ to combat and root out fraud in U.S. elections and uphold electoral integrity. asserted
11 → say → integrity
It was not immediately clear whether the two Indian nationals were among those arrested. asserted
nationals → arrest → those
Mr. Shah is a resident of Sacramento and fraudulently registered to vote on the day of the November 2024 general election and voted that day, the Justice Department said. asserted
Department → register → election
Ms. Kaur, a resident of Rancho Palos Verdes, who is seeking to become a U.S. citizen, fraudulently registered to vote in December 2022 and voted in the November 2024 US election, it said. “All 28 foreign nationals charged are lawful permanent residents (LPRs), or 'green card' holders. asserted
nationals → seek → election
Although LPRs have legal immigration status in the United States, they are not US citizens and are not permitted to vote in US elections,” the Justice Department said. asserted
Department → have → elections
The criminal charges include making false statements in a naturalisation application and some of the defendants also are charged with fraudulent voter registration. asserted
some → include → registration
Both charges are felonies that carry a maximum penalty of five years in federal prison. asserted
that → carry → prison
“Each of the 28 defendants charged today appears on the list of more than 20,000 likely noncitizen registrants we provided to California election officials last week,” Acting Deputy Attorney General Trent McCotter told reporters in Los Angeles. asserted
McCotter → charge → Angeles
Before Monday (October 19, 2026), the Justice Department had charged about 90 people for various types of election misconduct so far this year, including 50 who are alleged to have voted as noncitizens. asserted
who → charge → noncitizens
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support