Photo via Washington Examiner

DOJ pursues long-shot appeal at Supreme Court over bid to isolate 20,000 California mail ballots

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Deese, K. (2026, November 2). DOJ pursues long-shot appeal at Supreme Court over bid to isolate 20,000 California mail ballots. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/justice/4787998/doj-appeal-supreme-court-isolate-20000-california-mail-ballots/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-02 · by Kaelan Deese

Quick Summary

The Justice Department is appealing to the Supreme Court for an emergency order to isolate over 20,000 mail ballots in California that are linked to suspected noncitizens, one day before Election Day. Solicitor General D. John Sauer made this request after facing defeats at both a federal district court and an appeals court. The DOJ seeks to keep these ballots separate while the case is being appealed.
Written by AI on 2026-11-02, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 2, 2026, President Donald Trump's administration has asked the Supreme Court to block over 20,000 mail-in ballots in California, claiming these voters are non-U.S. citizens. This request was made just a day before midterms and follows a series of actions by federal agencies like ICE to interfere with voter registration, particularly targeting green card holders. A recent analysis found that more than 40% of the names on a DOJ list of alleged noncitizens don't appear on California's voter rolls; at least 22 are confirmed U.S. citizens. The Justice Department is also pushing for sanctions against an immigrant rights group that disclosed these findings. Despite this, federal judges have rejected attempts to invalidate ballots, warning such moves could undermine election integrity and public trust in the democratic process.

Written for “Trump Asks Supreme Court To Block Ballots” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 22 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 123710 (high confidence, 1 verified quote) · logged 2026-11-02

Story

📰 Trump Asks Supreme Court To Block Ballots
Politics · 23 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
Hedges 3 of 14 claims Outlet record 69/100
NPR
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 34 claims Outlet record 66/100
Times of India
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 59/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 8 claims Outlet record 66/100
South China Morning Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 4 claims Outlet record 63/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 9 of 36 claims Outlet record 74/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Centre further left than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A reports on the rejection of DOJ's bid by an appeals court, while Article B discusses DOJ's subsequent pursuit at the Supreme Court after the initial rejections.”
NPR
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 4 of 27 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different legal actions taken by the DOJ in separate states, involving distinct ballot-related controversies.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
23
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-02 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3970 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kaelan Deese
47 article(s) here · 0 carrying a prediction
🔮 A federal judge grilled former FBI Director James Comey’s attorneys on Friday over whether their effort to dismiss the Justice Department’s latest criminal case could become “a great exercise in futility” if a grand jury returns an indictment alleging more recent conduct.
🔮 Alaska Democratic Senate nominee Mary Peltola’s campaign could face demands for records revealing who financed an effort to recruit a second Dan Sullivan to enter the race as the Justice Department seeks discovery in its Alaska election lawsuit — and now accuses her campaign committee and national Democrats of misleading the court about the operation.
🔮 The campaigns could offer lessons for anti-abortion groups, which have struggled to win statewide abortion votes since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
🔮 U.S. District Judge David Carter, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, rejected the department’s request to require election officials to hold the flagged voters’ ballots until their citizenship could be verified.
🔮 Voters in six states will soon decide whether to impose or expand voter identification requirements, including rules requiring mail voters to provide part of a driver’s license or Social Security number.
🔮 Just hours after issuing what a Trump administration lawyer called an “untenable” command from the bench, a federal judge withdrew her order that would have forced the Department of Justice to refile a court brief with the names of career attorneys who agreed with it, reversing course Monday after a court hearing about golf course renovations stretched beyond six hours.
🔮 The defense argued that the prosecution relies on a novel interpretation of the law and that Van Dyke lacked fair notice that trading on the information could violate federal law.
🔮 His petition arrives as Democrats in Washington are preparing investigations for a possible return to House control in January 2027, while President Donald Trump’s allies are organizing legal defenses for officials who could be called to testify or produce records.
🔮 He warned that the proposal would damage the Public Integrity Section’s reputation, adding that officials “might as well rename the damn thing the Anti-MAGA Task Force.”
🔮 “I’m not even sure that we need to reinvent the wheel,” Delangue said at Politico‘s Decoded Summit on Sept. 16, arguing that existing cybersecurity laws may still be effective at handling mishandled or out-of-control agentic models.
2026-10-04 · assertive framing · Does rogue AI require a new rulebook?
Also by Kaelan Deese
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 47 articles by Kaelan Deese →

Topics

California The Justice Department the Supreme Court

Subjects

California GPE · 2× D. John Sauer PERSON · 1× The Justice Department ORG · 1× the Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to intervene on Monday in its fight over California’s voter rolls, seeking an emergency order separating mail ballots associated with more than 20,000 suspected noncitizens one day before Election Day.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-02

Claims (3 extracted, 0 hedged)

The Justice Department asked the Supreme Court to intervene on Monday in its fight over California’s voter rolls, seeking an emergency order separating mail ballots associated with more than 20,000 suspected noncitizens one day before Election Day. asserted
Department → ask → Day
Solicitor General D. John Sauer asked the justices to order California to set those ballots aside immediately while the court weighs whether to keep them separate during the government’s appeal. asserted
court → ask → appeal
The request follows defeats before a federal district judge and a divided appeals court. asserted
request → follow → judge
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support