Photo via Fox News

TED JENKIN: Democrats took Congress. Don’t let your emotions make bad money moves

Read the original at Fox News ↗
Cite

Jenkin, T. (2026, November 6). TED JENKIN: Democrats took Congress. Don’t let your emotions make bad money moves. Fox News. https://www.foxnews.com/opinion/ted-jenkin-democrats-took-congress-dont-let-emotions-make-bad-money-moves

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Fox News · collected 2026-11-06 · by Ted Jenkin analysis

Quick Summary

Financial advisor Ted Jenkin discusses the implications of Democrats taking control of both houses of Congress while President Donald Trump remains in office, focusing on how this affects stock market performance based on historical data. According to RBC Wealth Management and Bloomberg, when a Republican president faces a Democratic-controlled House and Senate, the S&P 500 averages just 4.9% annually historically, which is lower than other political configurations. However, Capital Group notes that following midterm elections since 1950, the S&P 500 has averaged a 15.4% gain in the subsequent year with no negative returns recorded. This suggests that while political gridlock may cause uncertainty, market performance often improves once election outcomes are clear.
Written by AI on 2026-11-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

Story

📰 Democrat's Gain Majority Midterms
Politics · 951 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 13% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 8 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
52
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
13%
7 of 52 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
67/100
Fox News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
951
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Fox News · 6815 article(s) · 14 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 14 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Ted Jenkin
8 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Before you make a move, you might want to look at what history actually tells us.
🔮 So yes, your parents may have had a 14% mortgage.
🔮 And it may offer some of the worst bets in America.
🔮 Even if its trust fund reserves are depleted, millions of workers will still be paying Social Security taxes every payday.
🔮 Here are five more ways successful Americans could increasingly find themselves paying even more.
🔮 Cato estimates those proposals could cost somewhere between $71 trillion and $212 trillion over the next decade.
🔮 We have promised ourselves a government we aren't currently willing to pay for.
🔮 At 35 years old, you might have a mortgage, two kids, a six-figure salary and an MBA degree hanging on the wall.
Also by Ted Jenkin
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 8 articles by Ted Jenkin →

Topics

Congress Democratic Democrats House Republican

Subjects

Congress ORG · 8× Democratic NORP · 7× Republican NORP · 7× Democrats NORP · 3× House ORG · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Bloomberg ORG · 2× RBC Wealth Management ORG · 2× Washington GPE · 2× the White House ORG · 2×

Narrative

Compare that with the other combinations: - Republican president, Republican Congress: 13.3% - Republican president, split Congress: 7.3% - Republican president, Democratic Congress: 4.9% - Democratic president, Democratic Congress: 8.0% - Democratic president, split Congress: 17.0% - Democratic president, Republican Congress: 16.3% Those are historical annual price returns, excluding dividends, not predictions for 2027.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-06
🔮 Before you make a move, you might want to look at what history actually tells us.

Claims (52 extracted, 7 hedged)

Democrats have taken control of the House and Senate. asserted
Democrats → take → House
President Donald Trump remains in the White House. asserted
Trump → remain → House
Democrats are celebrating. asserted
Democrats → celebrate → ?
And millions of Americans are staring at their retirement accounts wondering one thing: What the heck does this mean for my 401(k)? asserted
this → star → 401(k
Should you sell stocks? asserted
you → sell → stocks
Before you make a move, you might want to look at what history actually tells us. uncertain
history → make → us
Because this particular combination of political power has produced some surprising stock market results. asserted
combination → produce → results
According to research from RBC Wealth Management and Bloomberg, the S&P 500 has historically averaged just 4.9% annually when a Republican president faces a Democratic-controlled House and Senate. uncertain
president → accord → House
That's the lowest average among six political configurations studied from 1953 through 2025. asserted
That → study → 2025
Compare that with the other combinations: - Republican president, Republican Congress: 13.3% - Republican president, split Congress: 7.3% - Republican president, Democratic Congress: 4.9% - Democratic president, Democratic Congress: 8.0% - Democratic president, split Congress: 17.0% - Democratic president, Republican Congress: 16.3% Those are historical annual price returns, excluding dividends, not predictions for 2027. asserted
Those → compare → 2027
But here's what should catch your attention. asserted
what → catch → attention
Not all political gridlock has produced the same stock market results. asserted
gridlock → produce → results
And anyone telling you Wall Street always loves divided government isn't looking at the complete numbers. asserted
Street → tell → numbers
But here's the midterm surprise Before you start selling everything in your retirement account, there's another statistic you need to know. asserted
you → start → account
According to Capital Group, the S&P 500 has averaged a 15.4% gain in the 12 months following midterm elections since 1950. uncertain
S&P → accord → 1950
Every post-midterm 12-month period in that study produced a positive return. asserted
period → produce → return
One explanation is that markets dislike uncertainty. asserted
markets → dislike → uncertainty
Before elections, investors worry about taxes, regulations, spending and which party will control Washington. asserted
party → worry → Washington
Once the election is over, some of that uncertainty disappears. asserted
some → disappear → uncertainty
Wall Street may not like the election results, but it often likes knowing the results. uncertain
it → like → results
Gridlock isn't always good for your money When Democrats control Congress and Trump controls the White House, passing major legislation generally becomes more difficult. asserted
passing → control → legislation
Tax changes require negotiation. asserted
changes → require → negotiation
Spending bills can become political battlegrounds. asserted
bills → become → ?
Government shutdowns and debt-ceiling fights can create uncertainty. asserted
shutdowns → create → uncertainty
Some investors welcome the reduced likelihood of sweeping policy changes. asserted
investors → welcome → changes
Others worry that Washington won't be able to address serious fiscal challenges. asserted
Washington → worry → challenges
But remember something important: The stock market doesn't rise or fall simply because politicians agree or disagree. asserted
politicians → remember → something
Corporate profits, inflation, interest rates and economic growth still drive long-term investment performance. asserted
profits → drive → performance
And historical political averages don't prove that congressional control caused those returns. asserted
control → prove → returns
Four things I'd watch in 2027 First, corporate earnings. asserted
I → watch → 2027
Companies making more money can support higher stock prices regardless of who's running Congress. asserted
who → make → Congress
Federal Reserve decisions and inflation could have a much bigger impact on your portfolio than congressional gridlock. uncertain
decisions → have → gridlock
Will see another two or three rate hikes if inflation stays stubborn? asserted
inflation → see → hikes
Major changes to corporate, capital gains or individual income taxes would face significant political hurdles. asserted
changes → face → hurdles
Budget battles could affect Treasury yields, borrowing costs and investor confidence. uncertain
battles → affect → yields
According to research from RBC Wealth Management and Bloomberg, the S&P 500 has historically averaged just 4.9% annually when a Republican president faces a Democratic-controlled House and Senate. uncertain
president → accord → House
These are the issues that can actually affect your financial future. asserted
that → affect → future
Don't let your politics destroy your portfolio I've spent decades watching investors make one of the biggest mistakes in personal finance. asserted
investors → let → finance
They confuse political disappointment with investment strategy. asserted
They → confuse → strategy
They sell stocks because they dislike the president. asserted
they → sell → president
…and 12 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

🕘History 🎫Support