Outgoing GOP Representative Thomas Massie is planning to introduce an impeachment resolution against Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth.
asserted
Massie → plan → Hegseth
Soon-to-be Democratic Speaker of the House Hakeem Jeffries says he's a "hard yes" on the idea.
asserted
he → say → idea
That makes it very likely it will happen.
asserted
it → make → ?
If not now, then when Democrats take control of Congress in January, after their big win in the midterm election.
asserted
Democrats → take → election
Hegseth richly deserves it, and should be convicted on at least two major charges: his role in starting an unconstitutional war and over 200 cases of outright murder.
asserted
Hegseth → deserve → murder
On September 15, Rep. Massie outlined eight articles of impeachment against Hegseth (see here for his more detailed description).
asserted
Massie → outline → description
The two most compelling are these:
Article I - Waging War in Contravention of the War Powers Resolution of 1973 Section 2(c): Charges Secretary Hegseth with waging the Iran war despite no declaration of war, statutory authorization, attack on the United States, or imminent threat.
asserted
Section → wag → States
It establishes that the war was unlawful from its inception….
Article V - Extrajudicial Killings: Charges Secretary Hegseth with replacing maritime law enforcement with unauthorized lethal military targeting of suspected drug traffickers, resulting in at least 221 deaths.
asserted
Article → establish → deaths
It also addresses denial of quarter, secondary strikes on survivors, failure to rescue shipwrecked persons, and the creation of artificial legal authorities for the campaign.
asserted
It → address → campaign
It has now killed an estimated 244 people, virtually all of them civilians (Massie's September figure of 221 is now somewhat outdated).
asserted
figure → kill → 221
I have previously written about why these strikes are illegal (see here and here).
asserted
strikes → write → ?
If you illegally order the deliberate killing of civilians - especially outside the context of a war - that's outright murder.
asserted
that → order → war
And that's exactly what Pete Hegseth has done.
asserted
Hegseth → do → what
This would be true even if those killed were all would-be drug dealers seeking to transport illegal drugs for sale in the US.
asserted
those → kill → US
I have previously explained why it is unjust and illegal to kill suspected drug dealers out of hand and why they are not the legal or moral equivalent of terrorists or enemy combatants in a war.
asserted
they → explain → war
As GOP Sen. Rand Paul pointed out when the drug boat strikes began, "The reason we have trials and we don't automatically assume guilt is what if we make a mistake and they happen to be people fleeing the Venezuelan dictator? …
asserted
they → point → dictator
off our coast it isn't our policy just to blow people up … even the worst people in our country, they still get a trial."
asserted
they → blow → trial
But, in fact, the evidence indicates most were not on their way to the US and many were not transporting drugs at all.
asserted
many → indicate → drugs
The Constitution allows impeachment and removal of executive branch officials for "high crimes and misdemeanors."
asserted
Constitution → allow → crimes
You don't have to be a lawyer or legal scholar to figure out that complicity in over 200 murders qualifies as a "high crime."
asserted
complicity → have → crime
In previous writings, I have explained why that war is illegal, violating both the Constitution, and the War Powers Act of 1973.
asserted
war → explain → 1973
Such a war requires congressional authorization, and Trump and Hegseth did not even try to get it.
asserted
Trump → require → it
The war's illegality is one of the main reasons for its failure to this point, as failure to secure the broad public support needed to get congressional authorization ensured Trump lacked staying power to continue the fight effectively after the initial strikes didn't achieve a quick, decisive victory.
asserted
strikes → secure → victory
Initiating and waging an illegal war isn't a violation of criminal law (though perhaps it should be).
asserted
it → initiate → law
In fairness, Trump and Hegseth are not alone in starting illegal wars.
asserted
Trump → start → wars
Barack Obama did it, too, with his unconstitutional wars against Libya and ISIS (which, for those keeping score, I condemned at the time).
asserted
I → do → time
Obama likely deserved to be impeached, as well.
asserted
Obama → deserve → ?
But the fact that he got away with this illegality is no reason to spare Hegseth.
asserted
he → get → Hegseth
To the contrary, past laxness is all the more reason to reestablish deterrence to prevent future wrongdoing.
asserted
laxness → reestablish → wrongdoing
Furthermore, Trump and Hegseth's illegal war is on a much larger scale than Obama's were, and has had far worse results.
asserted
Obama → have → results
The only potentially valid objection to impeaching Hegseth is that it might fail, and backfire politically.
uncertain
it → impeach → Hegseth
But the Iran War is highly unpopular, and therefore impeachment on that basis is unlikely to backfire.
asserted
impeachment → backfire → basis
The administration will surely try to defend them by arguing the victims deserved it because they were trying to sell dangerous drugs.
asserted
they → try → drugs
But that can be countered by presenting the extensive evidence demonstrating that many were not on their way to the US or even transporting drugs at all.
asserted
many → counter → drugs
Testimony from members of the bereaved families of the victims can help make that point, and influence public opinion against Hegseth and the administration.
asserted
Testimony → bereave → Hegseth
Hegseth is unpopular on Capitol Hill, which makes it potentially possible to secure the needed 11 or more GOP senators' votes required for conviction (the Democrats are going to have 54-56 senators in the next Congress, depending on the results of still-ongoing vote counts in close races in Alaska and Mississippi).
asserted
Democrats → make → Mississippi
But even if he gets acquitted, the process of impeachment and trial can send a useful signal, and further publicize the administration's massive criminality and wrongdoing.
asserted
process → acquit → criminality
The former was following the latter's illegal orders (though he likely also helped influence Trump to give those orders in the first place).
asserted
he → follow → place
But sanctioning officials for obeying illegal orders is still important.
asserted
sanctioning → sanction → orders
And, hopefully, the time will come for Trump to face sanctions for his many illegal actions, as well.
asserted
Trump → come → actions
…and 7 more, not listed.