Photo via Washington Examiner

The 24 Democrats and one Republican who voted against advancing the Senate permitting bill

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Patteson, C. (2026, November 10). The 24 Democrats and one Republican who voted against advancing the Senate permitting bill. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/policy/energy-and-environment/4797908/24-democrats-one-republican-voted-against-advancing-senate-permitting-bill/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-10 · by Callie Patteson

Quick Summary

Senators from both parties voted against advancing a bipartisan bill on Tuesday that aims to streamline approval processes for building pipelines, power lines, power plants, and highways. The vote included 24 Democrats and one Republican, opposing the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, which would significantly alter federal agency approvals of new energy and infrastructure projects if passed.
Written by AI on 2026-11-10, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On November 10, 2026, twenty-five senators voted against advancing a bipartisan bill called the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act, which aimed to streamline the approval processes for building pipelines, power lines, power plants, and highways. The vote included 24 Democrats and one Republican. If passed, this bill would significantly alter how federal agencies approve new energy and infrastructure projects, potentially marking a major legislative achievement in President Donald Trump's second term.

Written for “Senate Permitting Bill Fails To Pass” on 2026-11-10, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans right for article 140208 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-10

Story

Senate Permitting Bill Fails To Pass
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
Leans right Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different stages of the permitting bill process: Article A reports votes against advancing the bill, while Article B discusses Trump's endorsement before the vote.”
Just The News
Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 95/100
“Article A describes senators voting against advancing the bill, while Article B reports on the successful advancement of the bill with a majority vote.”
Mother Jones
Leans left further left than this Hedges 6 of 42 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss a bipartisan permitting reform bill, ARTICLE A focuses on the potential impacts if the measure passes, while ARTICLE B details the voting results against advancing the bill.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles describe different stages of the legislative process: one focuses on senators voting against advancing the bill, while the other reports the procedural hurdle being cleared with a cloture vote.”
Toronto Star
Leans right Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes the Senate preparing to take up legislation on a particular day, while Article B reports on senators voting against advancing the bill the following day.”
The Guardian
Leans left further left than this Hedges 7 of 67 claims Outlet record 65/100
“Article A discusses the vote scheduled to take place, while Article B reports on a different but related event - the actual vote against advancing the bill that occurred after the scheduled vote.”
The Daily Caller
Hedges 3 of 39 claims Outlet record 93/100
“Article A discusses Trump urging senators to pass a bill, while Article B reports on the actual voting results against advancing the bill.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
3
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 3 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-10 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4523 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Callie Patteson
41 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Twenty-five senators voted Tuesday evening against advancing a bipartisan bill that would make it easier and faster to build pipelines, power lines, power plants, and highways.
We’ll be watching next week how the flipped chambers may influence immediate issues still before members in the lame-duck session, such as permitting reform.
By mid-May, gas prices jumped to $4.49 per gallon, and Trump’s approval rating plummeted to -17.50.
Democrats are set to try to reverse the Republican agenda of the past two years, which was to cut funding for wind and solar power while deregulating fossil fuel industries.
In today’s newsletter, we take a closer look at gas prices reaching a new record under President Donald Trump, just as some voters will be driving to the polls today.
2026-11-03 · assertive framing · Daily on Energy: Happy Election Day!
Peak color in and around D.C. is expected to hit closer to next weekend.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Daily on Energy: Permitting reform watch
There are just four days left until the midterm elections and we will be keeping tabs on several energy and climate-related ballot measures.
In today’s newsletter, Maydeen spoke with the Missouri Farm Bureau on how farmers are dealing with high fuel costs and whether recent administration actions are translating to lower prices.
Advancing these projects could be seen as a sign of good faith from the administration that it will fairly implement permitting reform for renewable energy as well as fossil fuel projects (although it is worth noting that doing so was ordered by the courts).
He will be traveling to some key Senate races, including Kansas, Iowa, North Carolina, and Florida.
Also by Callie Patteson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 41 articles by Callie Patteson →

Topics

the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act

Subjects

Donald Trump PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Twenty-five senators voted Tuesday evening against advancing a bipartisan bill that would make it easier and faster to build pipelines, power lines, power plants, and highways.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-10
Twenty-five senators voted Tuesday evening against advancing a bipartisan bill that would make it easier and faster to build pipelines, power lines, power plants, and highways.

Claims (3 extracted, 0 hedged)

Twenty-five senators voted Tuesday evening against advancing a bipartisan bill that would make it easier and faster to build pipelines, power lines, power plants, and highways. asserted
it → vote → pipelines
If passed, the Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act would be arguably the most substantial bill signed by President Donald Trump in his second term in office. asserted
Act → pass → office
It would overhaul the process for federal agency approvals of new energy and infrastructure projects. asserted
It → overhaul → projects
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support