Photo via NPR

Both sides now? Critics slam DOJ moves to dismiss convictions of Trump allies

Read the original at NPR ↗
Cite

Johnson, C. (2026, November 11). Both sides now? Critics slam DOJ moves to dismiss convictions of Trump allies. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2026/11/11/g-s1-152713/doj-abandons-convictions-trump-allies-no-defense

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

NPR · collected 2026-11-11 · by Carrie Johnson

Quick Summary

The Biden-era Justice Department is requesting courts to dismiss and vacate the convictions of Steve Bannon and several leaders from extremist groups like the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys, citing "interests of justice." This move follows Trump's pardons for many Jan. 6 defendants and faces criticism for lack of adversarial process in court proceedings, as all involved parties agree to drop charges without opposing arguments presented. Legal experts argue this breaches traditional legal principles requiring debate from both sides before such decisions are made.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Biden-era Justice Department is now seeking to dismiss the contempt of Congress conviction against Steve Bannon, a close ally of former President Trump, in what critics see as a politically motivated move. Originally, Bannon was found guilty by a jury in Washington, D.C., after he ignored a subpoena and failed to appear before the House committee investigating the January 6th attack on the Capitol. The DOJ’s request for dismissal comes four years later, aligning with previous controversial moves involving Michael Flynn and Eric Adams, where outside lawyers were appointed by judges to evaluate bids to dismiss charges without opposition from the defendants or their legal teams. Critics argue that such actions undermine judicial independence and fairness in the U.S. legal system.

Written for “DOJ Moves on Trump Allies Cases” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly left (beta estimate) Confidence high 2 quote(s) discarded as not found in the article
Leaning: leans strongly left for article 144437 (high confidence, 2 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-11

Story

DOJ Moves on Trump Allies Cases
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

Nothing to compare against. No article is close enough to this one for the pipeline to have linked or judged the pair.
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
37
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
2 of 37 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
60/100
NPR's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NPR · 1206 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Carrie Johnson
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
And they pointed out two other controversial times that judges named outside lawyers to evaluate a bid to dismiss criminal charges: one in the case of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn; and another in the case of former New York City Mayor Eric Adams.
On Monday, the Supreme Court will hear his case, which could determine whether federal law enforcement officers can be held to account when they violate constitutional rights.
The dispute could have ramifications far beyond the climate, to other areas where states are trying to hold companies accountable for their alleged harms to local communities.
The court also said it would take up the case for full oral argument in December.
Also by Carrie Johnson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

DOJ Proud Boys U.S. Washington the Justice Department

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 6× Bannon PERSON · 5× DOJ ORG · 3× U.S. GPE · 3× the Justice Department ORG · 3× Proud Boys ORG · 2× Washington GPE · 2× Biden PERSON · 1× Congress ORG · 1× Justice Department ORG · 1×

Narrative

"No adversity remains in this serious and high-profile criminal matter between, on the one hand, the U.S. Department of Justice overtly acting at the behest of the president of the United States, and on the other hand, Bannon, the defendant, who is a close political ally and adviser to the same president," said Bruce Searby, a defense attorney in Washington and a former federal prosecutor.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11
And they pointed out two other controversial times that judges named outside lawyers to evaluate a bid to dismiss criminal charges: one in the case of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn; and another in the case of former New York City Mayor Eric Adams.

Claims (37 extracted, 2 hedged)

Critics slam DOJ moves to dismiss convictions of Trump allies asserted
Critics → slam → allies
The Biden-era Justice Department portrayed the contempt of Congress case against Steve Bannon as open and shut. asserted
Department → portray → Bannon
Bannon declined to cooperate with the House committee that investigated the siege on the U.S. Capitol, flouting a subpoena and refusing to show up for an interview. asserted
that → decline → interview
A trial jury in Washington, D.C., deliberated for less than three hours before delivering a guilty verdict. asserted
jury → deliberate → verdict
A federal appeals court upheld that verdict. asserted
court → uphold → verdict
Now, four years later, the DOJ is asking a court to drop the case and erase the conviction "in the interests of justice." asserted
DOJ → ask → justice
Bannon's lawyers do not oppose the move. asserted
lawyers → oppose → move
Legal experts said it follows a pattern where the Justice Department is helping to wipe the slate clean for allies of President Trump—with no one defending the cases, and without courts hearing arguments to the contrary. asserted
courts → say → contrary
That violates the U.S. legal system's tradition of hearing views from opposing parties and comes as the Justice Department has also pursued investigations of Trump's perceived enemies. asserted
Department → violate → enemies
"No adversity remains in this serious and high-profile criminal matter between, on the one hand, the U.S. Department of Justice overtly acting at the behest of the president of the United States, and on the other hand, Bannon, the defendant, who is a close political ally and adviser to the same president," said Bruce Searby, a defense attorney in Washington and a former federal prosecutor. asserted
Searby → remain → Washington
The Justice Department did not respond to a request for comment about its decision to walk away from the conviction and the lack of adversity, or truly opposing parties, in the case. asserted
Department → respond → case
Bannon's lawyers did not return messages seeking comment. asserted
lawyers → return → comment
Searby first noticed the issue in April, when the DOJ asked to vacate the convictions of about a dozen leaders and deputies of the far-right Oath Keepers and Proud Boys groups. asserted
DOJ → notice → groups
Those seditious conspiracy trials took months to unfold, as juries heard details about how some of those extremists gathered weapons, recruited followers and even breached the Capitol in the worst attack since the War of 1812. asserted
some → take → 1812
Trump pardoned the vast majority of Jan. 6, 2021, defendants on his first day back in office, calling them "patriots." asserted
Trump → pardon → them
In a recent interview with the CBS newsmagazine 60 Minutes, Trump took credit for those pardons. asserted
Trump → take → pardons
"I don't think any group's been treated more unfairly than them, and to this day, when they see me they cry," he said. asserted
he → think → me
The administration took another route in seeking to drop the cases of more senior members of the Oath Keepers and Proud Boys—telling judges the move was in "the interests of justice." asserted
move → take → justice
That was the same rationale it went on to use in the Bannon case. asserted
it → go → case
Lawyers for Representative Jamie Raskin, D-Md., who served on the House Select Committee investigating the events of January 6, told a federal appeals court last spring this was not an ordinary set of cases—and that it should exercise its power to appoint a friend of the court, or amicus, to defend the convictions. asserted
it → serve → convictions
"The established path forward is for this Court to appoint an amicus to present opposing argument and defend the judgment being ambushed," wrote attorneys Justin Sher and Douglas Jensen. asserted
Sher → establish → judgment
Their court filing said judges have authority to take that step. asserted
judges → say → step
And they pointed out two other controversial times that judges named outside lawyers to evaluate a bid to dismiss criminal charges: one in the case of former Trump national security adviser Michael Flynn; and another in the case of former New York City Mayor Eric Adams. asserted
judges → point → Adams
Ultimately, judges reluctantly dismissed the Jan. 6 charges without appointing a friend of the court. asserted
judges → dismiss → court
"Today's epilogue diminishes the gravity of that day, denigrates the work of the prosecutors and law enforcement officers who secured these convictions, and excuses criminal acts that caused a centuries-long pillar of our democracy—the peaceful transfer of presidential power—to buckle," wrote U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta. asserted
Mehta → diminish → power
Leeway for prosecutors Now, the issue has resurfaced in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Carl Nichols, who presided over Steve Bannon's trial in 2022. asserted
who → resurface → 2022
In a court filing last week, DOJ said it would exercise its prosecutorial discretion to dismiss Bannon's indictment. asserted
it → say → indictment
Courts have recognized wide leeway for prosecutors in making decisions about their resources. asserted
Courts → recognize → resources
Deputy Associate Attorney General Michael Weisbuch wrote it was not appropriate to pursue the contempt case against Bannon because Bannon said he believed he was protected by executive privilege. asserted
he → write → privilege
Weisbuch said the judge lacked authority to reject the unopposed motion to dismiss. asserted
judge → say → motion
"But even assuming any review could be proper, the policy-laden grounds for dismissal asserted above are not susceptible to judicial second-guessing," he added. uncertain
he → assume → guessing
Searby, the former prosecutor, said the judge should not accept the DOJ argument "at face value" and dismissing the case should not be a "foregone conclusion." asserted
dismissing → say → case
An outside lawyer, he said, could assess whether the Justice Department's actions amount to an abuse of prosecutorial discretion: if they are taken in bad faith, tainted with impropriety or contrary to public interest. uncertain
they → say → interest
Critics and good government groups said the Trump administration has been exploiting the legal system, which is designed to hear views from two opposing parties. asserted
which → say → parties
The president famously sued his own government over the leak of his tax returns, and then negotiated a settlement with the Justice Department that handed him and his sons immunity from tax audits. asserted
that → sue → audits
Attorney General Todd Blanche, who previously served as a defense attorney for Trump, confronted serious questions about that deal and his sign-off during a confirmation battle in August. asserted
who → serve → August
The Senate went on to approve his nomination by a single vote. asserted
Senate → go → vote
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support