Photo via The Bulwark

Congress to Trump: MORE TARIFFS, PLEASE!

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
Cite

Egger, A. (2026, September 17). Congress to Trump: MORE TARIFFS, PLEASE! The Bulwark. https://www.thebulwark.com/p/congress-to-trump-more-tariffs-please-russia-ukraine-sanctions-bill-graham

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Bulwark · collected 2026-09-17 · by Andrew Egger commentary

Quick Summary

Congress recently passed a Russia sanctions bill that includes sweeping new powers for President Donald Trump to impose tariffs on international trade. This legislation grants Trump the authority to place up to 100 percent tariffs on countries importing Russian energy, aiming to punish Russia economically while supporting Ukraine. Critics argue that these tariff powers may be more appealing to Trump than actual sanctions against Russia, potentially compromising the bill's effectiveness in curbing Russian aggression.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives passed a bipartisan sanctions bill targeting Russia, voting 262-159 to send it to President Donald Trump for signature. The legislation, championed by late Republican Senator Lindsey Graham and previously approved by the Senate, aims to restrict funds flowing to Moscow by imposing tariffs up to 100% on countries like China and India that import energy supplies from Russia. It also imposes sanctions on Russian officials, banks, and a shadow fleet of tankers facilitating Russian energy trade. Despite support from Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy, the bill faced opposition from some Democrats who were concerned about expanding Trump's tariff authority, leading to significant division within the party.

Written for “US Russia Sanctions Bill” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 37 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Russia Sanctions Bill
Politics · 38 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 5% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 126 claims
“The articles describe different events occurring on separate days and involving distinct political actions.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A focuses on the passage of the sanctions bill with a vote count, while Article B mentions it but covers multiple other events and lacks detailed specifics about the sanctions bill's passage.”
Semafor
Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different political actions involving tariffs and tax suspensions at separate times by different legislative bodies.”
Reason
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 35 claims Outlet record 67/100
“While both articles discuss a Russia sanctions bill passed by Congress, Article A mentions multiple events including impeachment articles against Pete Hegseth and debates over gas tax suspension, while Article B focuses specifically on the details of the Russia sanctions bill and its implications for presidential tariff powers.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of political events and decisions related to oil prices, tariffs, and sanctions but do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 39 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of policy responses related to fuel prices and tariffs under Trump's administration but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Letters from an American
Hedges 1 of 9 claims
“The articles discuss impeachment articles against Pete Hegseth but focus on different aspects; Article A mentions a blowup fight over gas tax suspension while Article B discusses specific war crimes allegations and avoids voting due to midterms.”
Euronews
Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of related legislative actions; Article A mentions a Russia sanctions bill passed in the House, while Article B discusses Trump signing into law a separate but similar sanctions package targeting Russian officials and economy.”
The Independent
Hedges 3 of 37 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the political situation regarding gas prices and tariffs; Article A focuses on internal disagreements within Congress about suspending the gas tax, while Article B reports on members of Congress discussing rising gas prices with constituents.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
66
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
5%
3 of 66 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
38
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Bulwark · 565 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Andrew Egger
15 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Meanwhile, as Trump has become deeply unpopular and Democrats have pushed the political map deep into red states, they’re suddenly competing for the votes of plenty of Americans who may not fully agree with them on abortion politics.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · The Top Campaign Issue of the Decade Has Vanished
🔮 Last week, one of the department’s top prosecutors argued that, in the pursuit of cracking down on criminals, eugenics could be a useful tool.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Top Trump DOJ Official Embraces Eugenics
🔮 In fact, “morbid phenomena” may describe our Trumpists more accurately than “monsters.”
2026-10-22 · assertive framing · The Monsters Among Us
🔮 All he expected in return was that Cuellar, out of gratitude, would immediately switch parties and become a Republican.
2026-10-08 · assertive framing · Our Big Fat Greek Bribery Scandal
🔮 We pray that you would draw near us today,” prayed Pastor Ernie Brown of St. John.
2026-10-05 · assertive framing · A Death. A Funeral. And the Trump Rally Down the Block.
🔮 A recording from The Bulwark’s live video Andrew Egger and Bill Kristol give their takes on Jack Smith’s testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, where Smith defended his decision to prosecute Donald Trump and said he would make the same decision regardless of whether Trump were a Republican or Democrat.
🔮 Trump’s AI Push Could Boost His Own Investments (w/ Gov. Wes Moore)
🔮 Trump’s thinking here, as with his East Wing ballroom, is that the courts will be more deferential in letting him build his arch if he can claim it’s needed for a national security reason.
2026-09-21 · assertive framing · Trump’s AI Hubris Is a Blue Opportunity
🔮 It’s an unambiguously pro-Ukraine piece of legislation that will punish Russia hard for its war of aggression.
2026-09-17 · assertive framing · Congress to Trump: MORE TARIFFS, PLEASE!
🔮 Catherine Rampell and Andrew Egger take on the pure Trumpian madness engulfing the Kennedy Center, which could close as early as Tuesday after Trump’s takeover drove away donors, performers, and audiences.
Also by Andrew Egger
The Monsters Among Us
2026-10-22 · The Bulwark
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 15 articles by Andrew Egger →

Topics

Freedom Caucus GOP Russia the House of Representatives the Washington Sun1

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 10× Russia GPE · 5× Congress ORG · 2× the House of Representatives ORG · 2× Andy Harris PERSON · 1× Freedom Caucus ORG · 1× GOP ORG · 1× Pete Hegseth PERSON · 1× Transportation and Infrastructure Committee ORG · 1× the Washington Sun1 ORG · 1×

Narrative

On Bulwark Takes, TIM MILLER, WILL SOMMER, and SAM STEIN take on a bizarre collection of stories from MAGA and the Republican party, including Milo Yiannopoulos’ messy divorce, a GOP nominee’s ties to the Unite the Right rally, Victor Marx’s latest campaign controversies, and a Republican candidate who fell for a fake Kai Trump account.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 It’s an unambiguously pro-Ukraine piece of legislation that will punish Russia hard for its war of aggression.
2026-09-17 · The Bulwark
Congress to Trump: MORE TARIFFS, PLEASE! · assertive framing

Claims (66 extracted, 3 hedged)

Freedom Caucus Chair Andy Harris wanted the suspension; Transportation and Infrastructure Committee Chair Sam Graves reminded him how ferociously he’d opposed the same idea when the Biden administration had sought one in 2022. asserted
administration → want → 2022
This went over poorly. asserted
This → go → ?
Harris started shouting and banging the desk: “This is fucking war!” asserted
This → start → desk
Then he and his allies stormed out of the room. asserted
he → storm → room
Later, one of them took to Twitter to call Graves an “Establishment elitist” who was “fighting hard” to bring “the swamp” back. asserted
who → take → swamp
Here come those midterms! asserted
midterms → come → ?
Congress Just Gave Trump a Bigger Tariff Hammer. asserted
Congress → give → Hammer
The House of Representatives is getting out of Dodge early today, Speaker Mike Johnson’s last small favor to Donald Trump of the year—and perhaps of his speakership.2 asserted
House → get → speakership.2
But on their way out the door yesterday, the House passed one last piece of major legislation: a strong new sanctions bill on Russia that was the baby of the late Sen. Lindsey Graham. asserted
that → pass → Graham
It’s an unambiguously pro-Ukraine piece of legislation that will punish Russia hard for its war of aggression. asserted
that → ’ → aggression
Last year, when Trump and JD Vance were delivering their infamous Oval Office sandbagging of Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump was routinely parroting talking points Vladimir Putin was whispering in his ear, it would have seemed absurdly Pollyannaish to think the administration would eventually back such a pro-Ukrainian package. asserted
administration → deliver → package
The bill doesn’t just place mandatory sanctions on Russia’s leadership and energy and defense industries. asserted
bill → place → leadership
It also grants Trump sweeping new powers to indulge in his favorite hobby: tariffing the shit out of international trade. asserted
It → grant → trade
When Trump signs the bill, he will acquire the discretionary authority to place tariffs of up to 100 percent on countries that are top importers of Russian energy. asserted
that → sign → energy
If you want to know how Trump was wheedled into backing unambiguously pro-Ukraine, anti-Russia legislation, these shiny new tariff powers surely have a lot to do with it. asserted
powers → want → it
Now, you could make the argument that this is a useful geostrategic tool—that choking off Russia’s war economy is a worthy aim and any tariffs Trump might deploy to that end are at least partially to the good. uncertain
Trump → make → good
But for starters, as Catherine Rampell noted last month, the bill “doesn’t force Trump to use his existing sanction powers” because of the mile-wide exceptions—and it doesn’t give him any new sanctions powers, either. asserted
it → note → powers
Moreover, the tariffs-as-sanctions logic completely ignores the way Trump has actually deployed his tariff powers so far. asserted
Trump → ignore → powers
Over and over, the president has taken tariff authorities that are supposedly narrow in scope and used them to wage his personal Maximum Trade War around the world. asserted
that → take → world
Ever since the Supreme Court slapped down his “liberation day” tariffs, ruling that he couldn’t simply place any tariff on any country for any reason, he’s been trying to recreate his sweeping protectionist trade regime piecemeal, using any tariff authority he can reach. asserted
he → slap → authority
Many of these have been obviously pretextual: In July, with one temporary authority expiring, Trump grabbed another, imposing tariffs on 60 countries supposedly due to forced-labor concerns. asserted
Trump → expire → concerns
For years now, Trump has been exploiting a simple fact: The lawmakers who created our various tariff authorities over the last century never dreamed that a tariff-crazed president would try to stitch them into a patchwork quilt heavy enough to smother global trade. asserted
president → exploit → trade
Today’s Congress has no such excuse; they’ve seen Trump’s tariff crusade. asserted
they → have → crusade
The fact that they just handed him yet another suite of broad tariff powers is nothing short of insane. asserted
they → hand → powers
To their credit, many House Democrats realized all this. asserted
Democrats → realize → this
While Senate Democrats backed the sanctions bill en masse, Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries spearheaded his party’s opposition in the lower chamber, arguing that the good end of Russia sanctions did not outweigh the perils of the bill’s tariff provisions. asserted
end → back → provisions
Even some Republicans were getting antsy about them as the vote approached: CNN reported yesterday that more than a dozen GOP House members were lobbying at the eleventh hour to strip the tariff provisions from the bill. asserted
members → get → bill
Now, look: I’m not saying this was an easy call. asserted
this → look → ?
I can at least see how some lawmakers, Republicans and Democrats alike, weighed up the tradeoffs and decided that placing a few more arrows in Trump’s tariff quiver was worth it to get him onside on Ukraine. asserted
him → see → Ukraine
That’s probably why some Democrats voted for it—the bill won 86 votes in the Senate and 262 in the House. asserted
bill → ’ → House
But I can’t help recoiling from how ludicrous it all is. asserted
it → help → ?
Didn’t we all just live through 2025? asserted
we → live → 2025
Don’t we all remember Liberation Day? asserted
we → remember → Day
Haven’t we seen how eager Trump is to throttle the U.S. economy while chasing fantasies of “trillions of dollars coming into our country” in hallucinated foreign investment? asserted
trillions → see → investment
It’s like Trump’s recent appetite for real war has led us to forget how insatiable his appetite is for trade war. asserted
appetite → ’ → war
I’d long since resigned myself to the fact that Congress wasn’t going to bring Trump’s tariff powers to heel. asserted
Congress → resign → heel
But even I didn’t think they would actually gear up—on a bipartisan basis!—to give him even more. asserted
they → think → more
The numbers don’t tell the whole story, argues MARK HERTLING. asserted
HERTLING → tell → story
Here’s Who Trump Should Blame for the Rate Hike… asserted
Trump → ’ → Hike
He promised lower prices and lower interest rates. asserted
He → promise → prices
…and 26 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support