Photo via ABC News (US)

Appeals court weighs Missouri congressional map despite Supreme Court block

Read the original at ABC News (US) ↗
Cite

DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press. (2026, September 17). Appeals court weighs Missouri congressional map despite Supreme Court block. ABC News (US). https://abcnews.com/Politics/wireStory/appeals-court-weighs-trump-backed-missouri-congressional-map-136534521

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

ABC News (US) · collected 2026-09-17 · by DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press

Quick Summary

A federal appeals court panel is reviewing Missouri’s attempt to implement new congressional district maps backed by former President Donald Trump, despite a previous Supreme Court decision blocking their use for the November election. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments on Thursday in the ongoing dispute over whether these Republican-drawn districts should be used, but state election officials argue that changing them now is impractical and costly. Local elections administrators assert they are already printing ballots based on existing district boundaries due to federal deadlines for mailing absentee ballots.
Written by AI on 2026-09-17, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Thursday, a federal appeals court panel in Missouri considered an attempt to revive new congressional districts that favor Republicans and were backed by President Donald Trump, despite a previous U.S. Supreme Court decision blocking their use for the November election. The dispute involves whether Missouri should adopt the newly drawn Republican map from 2025 or revert to the old Democrat-leaning map from 2022. Earlier, the Missouri Supreme Court ordered that the new map face a referendum and directed the state to conduct the upcoming November elections using the older map. Despite attempts by Missouri officials to appeal this decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which blocked enforcement of a lower court order favoring the new map, the legal battle remains unresolved. This ongoing saga could potentially send the case back to the U.S. Supreme Court for a third time, further complicating the electoral process in Missouri ahead of the November elections.

Written for “Congressional Map Legal Battle Missouri” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Congressional Map Legal Battle Missouri
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Independent
Hedges 8 of 36 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes the appeals court hearing regarding Missouri's congressional map, while Article B discusses broader national efforts by President Trump to gerrymander districts in multiple states.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different rulings by different courts at distinct points in time regarding Missouri's congressional map.”
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 61/100
“Article A discusses a debate about a blocked congressional map and related legal articles, while Article B reports on an appeals court considering the same blocked map in a separate legal proceeding.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 23 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The first article describes a hearing where an attempt is made to revive congressional districts, while the second article reports on a court order that reverses previous Supreme Court decisions and mandates the use of a specific map. These appear to be different points in time involving distinct legal actions.”
Toronto Star
Hedges 5 of 44 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A describes the appeals court considering arguments, while Article B reports on a ruling in favor of Trump-backed districts made by the same panel later.”
NBC News
Hedges 0 of 14 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different dates of court hearings or decisions regarding Missouri's congressional map, not a single identical incident.”
UPI
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 1 of 13 claims Outlet record 56/100
“The first article describes the appeals court hearing arguments about the congressional map, while the second article details a ruling by the appeals court to implement the map despite previous blocks.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Centre further left than this Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the court considering arguments, while Article B reports on a ruling in favor of Trump-backed maps, indicating different stages or outcomes.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
12
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
1 of 12 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
70/100
ABC News (US)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-17 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (US) · 1270 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

DAVID A. LIEB Associated Press
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But it wasn't immediately clear what the impact would be, even if the panel rules in favor of the new map.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Nothing else under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

Missouri Republican Supreme Court U.S. House the U.S. Supreme Court

Subjects

Missouri GPE · 5× Donald Trump PERSON · 2× Republican NORP · 2× U.S. House ORG · 2× the U.S. Supreme Court ORG · 2× JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. GPE · 1× Supreme Court ORG · 1× U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1× U.S. Supreme Court ORG · 1× the Missouri Supreme Court ORG · 1×

Narrative

A federal appeals court panel on Thursday was considering an attempt to resurrect new Missouri congressional districts backed by President Donald Trump, even though the U.S. Supreme Court blocked those districts from being used in the November election.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-17
🔮 But it wasn't immediately clear what the impact would be, even if the panel rules in favor of the new map.
2026-09-17 · ABC News (US)
Appeals court weighs Missouri congressional map despite Supreme Court block · assertive framing

Claims (12 extracted, 1 hedged)

Appeals court weighs Missouri congressional map despite Supreme Court block asserted
court → weigh → block
A federal appeals court panel is considering an attempt to revive Missouri congressional districts backed by Donald Trump JEFFERSON CITY, Mo. -- asserted
panel → consider → Trump
A federal appeals court panel on Thursday was considering an attempt to resurrect new Missouri congressional districts backed by President Donald Trump, even though the U.S. Supreme Court blocked those districts from being used in the November election. asserted
Court → consider → election
A three-judge panel of the 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals heard arguments in the long-running dispute over whether the state should use the new Republican-drawn U.S. House districts, just as the state did in its August primary. asserted
state → hear → primary
But it wasn't immediately clear what the impact would be, even if the panel rules in favor of the new map. asserted
panel → rule → map
That's because the U.S. Supreme Court previously blocked the enforcement of a lower court order favoring the map pending a potential appeal and eventual decision by the high court. asserted
Court → block → court
Missouri currently is set to run its November election with the same congressional districts it used in 2024 and 2022, following prior decisions by both the Missouri Supreme Court and U.S. Supreme Court. asserted
it → set → Court
Local elections officials said in a court filing that they already are printing ballots with those districts and face a Friday deadline under federal law to mail absentee ballots to overseas citizens and military voters. asserted
they → say → citizens
State law requires absentee ballots to be available to all other voters by next Tuesday. asserted
law → require → Tuesday
To try to change districts at this late date would be “practically impossible” and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars, according to the filing by the Missouri Association of County Clerks and Election Authorities. uncertain
try → try → Clerks
Missouri’s redistricting battle has been the longest, most complex and confusing among roughly a dozen states that sought to change their U.S. House districts over the past year. asserted
that → seek → year
Trump spurred the unusual spate of mid-decade redistricting when he urged Republican-led states to redraw districts to gain an edge in the midterm elections that will determine control of Congress and affect his agenda. asserted
that → spur → agenda
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support