Photo via The Straits Times

US appeals court rejects Trump policy allowing swift deportations to third countries

Read the original at The Straits Times ↗
Cite

The Straits Times. (2026, September 18). US appeals court rejects Trump policy allowing swift deportations to third countries. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/united-states/us-appeals-court-rejects-trump-policy-allowing-swift-deportations-to-third-countries

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Straits Times · collected 2026-09-18 · by The Straits Times

Quick Summary

On September 18, a US federal appeals court in Boston rejected President Trump's policy allowing rapid deportation of migrants to third countries without due process, upholding a previous ruling by Judge Brian Murphy. The decision follows a lawsuit challenging the legality of deporting individuals to countries unrelated to their origin or asylum claims, a practice that has affected over 25,000 migrants under agreements with at least 29 countries since Trump's administration. The court ruled that such practices undermine protections against persecution and torture, affirming that migrants must be given a chance to voice safety concerns before being deported.
Written by AI on 2026-09-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 18, 2026, a three-judge panel of the Boston-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit rejected a policy initiated by President Donald Trump's administration that allowed authorities to rapidly deport migrants to countries other than their own without providing them an opportunity to raise safety concerns or contest deportation. The ruling largely upheld a February decision by US District Judge Brian Murphy, declaring the Department of Homeland Security’s third-country removal policy unlawful. Under this policy, over 25,000 migrants were deported to at least 29 countries, often Mexico, without due process. Trina Realmuto from the National Immigration Litigation Alliance stated that the decision confirms the necessity for due process and protection against persecution or torture, regardless of diplomatic assurances from receiving nations. The Trump administration is expected to appeal this ruling, potentially taking the case to the US Supreme Court.

Written for “US Court Rejects Deportation Policy” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 6 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Court Rejects Deportation Policy
Crime & Law · 7 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBS News
Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 70/100
Times of India
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 59/100
Dawn
Hedges 3 of 25 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A discusses a court ruling on a policy allowing swift deportations, while Article B reports on a secret deportation program and associated deals with other countries.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
Hedges 3 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different policies and legal actions: one is about states suing over green card benefits policy, the other is about an appeals court rejecting a deportation policy.”
Times of India
Hedges 0 of 11 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles describe two different policies and lawsuits related to immigration under Trump's administration, not the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different occurrences: one is about the expansion of the policy, and the other reports on a court decision rejecting it.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
17
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
3 of 17 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Straits Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
7
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Straits Times · 4126 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

The Straits Times
2665 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If not for the “economic funk” engulfing most voters, the National Party would have a much easier route back to office, said political commentator Grant Duncan.
🔮 Explainer-How Trump’s noncitizen voter lists could affect the midterms
🔮 “It’s been a hell of a year – analogue astronauts living in captivity of our own free will,” Ellen Ellis, the medical officer on the Crew Health and Performance Exploration Analog, or CHAPEA, mission, said in remarks at Johnson Space Center after emerging with her three crewmates on Oct 31. The four entered the 1,700-square-foot (158sq m) 3D-printed habitat on Oct 19, 2025, and performed tasks such as growing crops in simulated Martian soil and interfacing with NASA officials with delays recreating those inherent in interplanetary communications.
🔮 Races in some areas are so tight, that turnout from the Indian community may change the outcomes, rally organisers say.
🔮 Initial complaints were expected to be filed on Nov 1.
🔮 Final results are due in coming days and not expected to change the outcome.
🔮 The head of a student group said a campaign of high school blockades would restart from Nov 2, adding the government’s proposals did not go far enough.
🔮 “Evidence is being reviewed and further action will be taken as appropriate.”
🔮 The head of Germany’s far-left Die Linke (The Left) party, Ines Schwerdtner, told the Rheinische Post daily that the demands made by those “demonstrating peacefully will not disappear because small angry groups followed up with acts of vandalism”.
🔮 Pope Leo says he hopes Oleshky truce could spur Ukraine-Russia peace efforts VATICAN CITY, Nov 1 - Pope Leo said on Sunday he hoped cooperation between Russia and Ukraine in implementing a ceasefire in the Russian-occupied Ukrainian town of Oleshky would pave the way for broader peace efforts. Ukraine and Russia said on October 23 they had agreed to a ceasefire in Oleshky, brokered by US first lady Melania Trump with the additional involvement of Pope Leo, to allow aid deliveries and evacuations from the frontline town, which has been suffering acute food and medicine shortages. "
Also by The Straits Times
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 2665 articles by The Straits Times →

Topics

1st US Circuit Court of Appeals BOSTON DHS Massachusetts the Supreme Court

Subjects

DHS ORG · 4× Trump PERSON · 4× Murphy PERSON · 3× Aframe PERSON · 2× BOSTON GPE · 2× the Supreme Court ORG · 2× 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Massachusetts GPE · 1× the Department of Homeland Security’s ORG · 1×

Narrative

Ruling in a case that is likely headed to the Supreme Court, a three-judge panel of the Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals largely upheld a February decision by a lower-court judge that declared the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) policy unlawful.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-19
🔮 “This decision confirms that due process and the protections Congress enacted against persecution and torture cannot be circumvented by putting someone on a plane to a country that was never part of their removal proceedings,” Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said Under Trump, the administration has entered into a series of agreements that have allowed it to send more than 25,000 migrants to at least 29 third countries, in many cases Mexico, according to Third Country Deportation Watch, a project run by Refugees International and Human Rights First. The Trump administration is expected to appeal.

Claims (17 extracted, 3 hedged)

US appeals court rejects Trump policy allowing swift deportations to third countries BOSTON, Massachusetts – asserted
court → reject → countries
A US federal appeals court rejected on Sept 18 a policy adopted by US President Donald Trump’s administration that allows the authorities to rapidly deport migrants to countries other than their own without giving them a chance to raise safety concerns. asserted
authorities → reject → concerns
Ruling in a case that is likely headed to the Supreme Court, a three-judge panel of the Boston-based 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals largely upheld a February decision by a lower-court judge that declared the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) policy unlawful. asserted
policy → rule → Security
The ruling came in a class-action lawsuit filed by migrants subject to deportation orders that has become a key test of what due process protections the government must provide before removing people to countries with which they have no connection. asserted
they → come → connection
“This decision confirms that due process and the protections Congress enacted against persecution and torture cannot be circumvented by putting someone on a plane to a country that was never part of their removal proceedings,” Trina Realmuto, a lawyer for the plaintiffs at the National Immigration Litigation Alliance, said Under Trump, the administration has entered into a series of agreements that have allowed it to send more than 25,000 migrants to at least 29 third countries, in many cases Mexico, according to Third Country Deportation Watch, a project run by Refugees International and Human Rights First. The Trump administration is expected to appeal. uncertain
administration → confirm → International
Earlier in the same case, the administration twice convinced the Supreme Court to lift a preliminary injunction protecting migrants’ due process rights, clearing the way for eight men to be deported to South Sudan. asserted
men → convince → Sudan
DHS had no immediate comment. asserted
DHS → have → comment
Under the third-country deportation programme, DHS adopted a policy in March 2025 that would allow migrants to be sent to such countries if immigration authorities have credible diplomatic assurances they will not be persecuted or tortured there. asserted
they → adopt → assurances
The policy called for only minimal notice before a migrant could be sent to a third country that had not given the State Department such assurances. uncertain
that → call → assurances
Third country deportations US District Judge Brian Murphy, an appointee of former US Democratic president Joe Biden, set aside the policy and concluded that it failed to protect migrants’ due process rights and could lead to their swift deportation to unfamiliar and potentially dangerous countries, without notice. uncertain
it → set → notice
On appeal, the Trump administration contended that Murphy’s order if left intact would usurp its authority to execute potentially thousands of valid orders of deportation to third countries. asserted
order → contend → countries
But US Circuit Judge Seth Aframe, writing for the panel on Sept 18, said Murphy adopted a “sensible” interpretation of the immigration law requiring migrants be given a “meaningful” chance to raise any concerns before they are deported. asserted
they → write → concerns
“DHS’s proposed interpretation would deny access to that protection to a substantial swath of noncitizens who are sent to third countries with no notice of their destination,” Aframe wrote. asserted
Aframe → propose → destination
“We decline to adopt such an interpretation.” asserted
We → decline → interpretation
The panel included two Biden appointees, including Aframe, and a judge appointed by a Republican president. asserted
panel → include → president
However, the 1st Circuit overturned one part of Murphy’s ruling on procedural grounds. asserted
Circuit → overturn → grounds
That part of the ruling concerned whether the government must first try to deport migrants to countries they have ties to before sending them to third countries. asserted
they → concern → countries
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support