Photo via Times of India

Can't hastily deport to a third country: What US appeals court ruling says

Read the original at Times of India ↗
Cite

TOI World Desk. (2026, September 19). Can't hastily deport to a third country: What US appeals court ruling says. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/cant-hastily-deport-to-a-third-country-what-us-appeals-court-ruling-says/articleshow/134360265.cms

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Times of India · collected 2026-09-19 · by TOI World Desk

Quick Summary

A US federal appeals court has ruled that immigrants facing deportation to countries with no ties must receive adequate notice and an opportunity to contest their removal, striking down a Department of Homeland Security policy allowing hasty deportations. The ruling affects about 25,000 people deported under the Trump administration's immigration policies, which included agreements with several African nations like Liberia and Ghana. Judge Seth Aframe emphasized that individuals must be informed of their deportation destination and given a chance to raise concerns regarding potential harm or persecution in the receiving country before being sent away.
Written by AI on 2026-09-19, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 18, 2026, a three-judge panel of the Boston-based U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit rejected a policy initiated by President Donald Trump's administration that allowed authorities to rapidly deport migrants to countries other than their own without providing them an opportunity to raise safety concerns or contest deportation. The ruling largely upheld a February decision by US District Judge Brian Murphy, declaring the Department of Homeland Security’s third-country removal policy unlawful. Under this policy, over 25,000 migrants were deported to at least 29 countries, often Mexico, without due process. Trina Realmuto from the National Immigration Litigation Alliance stated that the decision confirms the necessity for due process and protection against persecution or torture, regardless of diplomatic assurances from receiving nations. The Trump administration is expected to appeal this ruling, potentially taking the case to the US Supreme Court.

Written for “US Court Rejects Deportation Policy” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 6 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 US Court Rejects Deportation Policy
Crime & Law · 7 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 6% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 12 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBS News
Hedges 3 of 20 claims Outlet record 66/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 1 of 12 claims Outlet record 70/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 5 of 33 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A reports on the experiences of Latino immigrants who have been deported to a third country, while Article B discusses a legal ruling against such deportation practices.”
Al Jazeera
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 35 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses a specific court ruling on third-country deportation policies, while Article B provides an overview and background of Trump's administration's third-country deportation policy.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A reports on a US federal appeals court ruling, while Article B discusses the administration's response to seek Supreme Court intervention after this ruling. They describe different stages of the legal process.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
16
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
6%
1 of 16 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
Times of India's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
7
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-19 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Times of India · 3982 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

TOI World Desk
1379 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Origins of the emergency relief campaign The project started in early 2020 when Dozier realised that federal emergency support money could take months to reach low-income workers who were at immediate risk of losing their homes.
🔮 Before that, visitors could participate in organised activities such as guided hikes, birdwatching, educational programmes and public hunts.
🔮 While their decision to buy an abandoned French hamlet might appear like an unexpected adventure, Yip and Paul's official website reveals that their story together began decades earlier.
🔮 Hundreds of polar bears are expected to gather near the Canadian town of Churchill in Manitoba as temperatures fall and the animals wait for Hudson Bay to freeze.
🔮 Together they would support the reforestation of Mutuba trees in Uganda for three years.
🔮 In the letter, he apologised for forgetting to send his greetings earlier and expressed hope that they would meet the following year again.
🔮 Meeker told Signal Akron that the sculpture contained details that people could continue discovering over time.
🔮 The possibility that the farm could eventually reach another generation now seems less remote.
🔮 According to his plea agreement, he repeatedly gave investors false information about how their money would be used.
🔮 The couple challenged the move in court, and a judge subsequently ordered that the fence could not be removed or relocated while the legal dispute continued.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by TOI World Desk
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 1379 articles by TOI World Desk →

Topics

Department of Homeland Security Liberia the Central African Republic the First Circuit the US Court of Appeals

Subjects

the Central African Republic GPE · 2× Department of Homeland Security ORG · 1× Ghana GPE · 1× Liberia GPE · 1× Seth Aframe PERSON · 1× Sierra Leone GPE · 1× The Washington Post ORG · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× the First Circuit ORG · 1× the US Court of Appeals ORG · 1×

Narrative

“An individual's right to contest removal to a country based on a fear of persecution in that country means little if one does not receive prior notice of the intended removal destination and a meaningful opportunity to contest that destination,” Circuit Judge Seth Aframe wrote in the ruling.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-19
🔮 The administration has cited diplomatic assurances from receiving countries that deported immigrants will not be mistreated.
2026-09-19 · Times of India
Can't hastily deport to a third country: What US appeals court ruling says · assertive framing

Claims (16 extracted, 1 hedged)

A US federal appeals court has ruled that immigrants facing deportation to countries where they have no ties must receive sufficient notice and a meaningful opportunity to challenge their removal before being sent there. asserted
they → rule → removal
A three-judge panel of the US Court of Appeals for the First Circuit unanimously struck down a Department of Homeland Security policy that allowed the administration to deport immigrants to so-called third countries with little or no advance notice. asserted
administration → strike → notice
The ruling means migrants must be allowed to raise concerns if they fear persecution or other harm in the country to which they are being deported. asserted
they → mean → which
“An individual's right to contest removal to a country based on a fear of persecution in that country means little if one does not receive prior notice of the intended removal destination and a meaningful opportunity to contest that destination,” Circuit Judge Seth Aframe wrote in the ruling. asserted
Aframe → contest → ruling
A third-country deportation involves removing an immigrant to a country that is neither their country of citizenship nor necessarily a country where they have family or other ties. asserted
they → involve → family
The Trump administration has expanded the practice in recent months after reaching agreements with dozens of countries, including Liberia, Ghana, the Central African Republic and Sierra Leone. asserted
administration → expand → Liberia
About 25,000 people have been deported to third countries during the administration's immigration crackdown. asserted
people → deport → crackdown
The administration has cited diplomatic assurances from receiving countries that deported immigrants will not be mistreated. asserted
administration → cite → immigrants
But the lawsuit challenging the policy argued that migrants were sometimes given little or no opportunity to object before being put on flights to countries where they could face persecution or other serious harm. uncertain
they → challenge → persecution
The appeals court agreed that prior notice and an opportunity to challenge the destination were required. asserted
notice → agree → destination
The Washington Post reported that the court found the government had not adequately shown which countries had provided the diplomatic assurances relied upon by the administration. asserted
countries → report → administration
The case follows reports of immigrants being deported to countries they had never visited. asserted
they → follow → countries
ABC News recently reported on a group of Latin American men sent to the Central African Republic who said they were not told their destination until hours into the flight. asserted
they → report → flight
The latest ruling does not eliminate the government's ability to deport immigrants to third countries. asserted
ruling → eliminate → countries
Instead, it requires the administration to provide the procedural protections migrants need to challenge removal to a particular destination before sending them there. asserted
migrants → require → them
The ruling is the latest development in a broader legal battle over the Trump administration's expanded use of third-country deportations. asserted
ruling → expand → deportations
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support