Photo via Daily Mail

JAN MOIR: I just can't accept that Prince Charles practically revelled in the death of his former wife

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Moir, J. (2026, September 21). JAN MOIR: I just can't accept that Prince Charles practically revelled in the death of his former wife. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/debate/article-16146745/JAN-MOIR-Prince-Charles-accept-revelled-death-wife.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-21 · by Jan Moir analysis

Quick Summary

JAN MOIR criticizes Prince Charles for allegedly reveling in Princess Diana’s death according to extracts from Earl Spencer's book "Swan Song: Diana, My Sister." The article claims that Spencer writes Charles sounded elated when calling to express condolences shortly after Diana died. However, the palace disputes these claims and suggests that grief may have distorted Spencer's memory.
Written by AI on 2026-09-21, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Jan Moir wrote an article for Mail Online criticizing Prince Charles, suggesting that he did not mourn the death of his former wife, Princess Diana, but instead rejoiced in it. The piece references comments from Charles Spencer, Diana's brother, who claims Prince Charles was more concerned about marrying his lover than mourning Diana. According to Spencer, Charles sounded "giddily elated" when he called after the accident that killed Diana in Paris. This narrative has sparked controversy and a broader debate about the royal family’s relationship with Harry on the day of Diana's funeral, among other issues.

Written for “Prince Charles Reaction To Diana Death” on 2026-11-02, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Prince Charles Reaction To Diana Death
Entertainment · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 22% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 1 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on Princess Diana's death and its aftermath through two distinct authors' analyses of Charles Spencer's book, rather than a single specific incident.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 2 of 13 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles refer to Earl Spencer's book and comments about Prince Charles regarding Princess Diana, Article A focuses on the palace response to a specific claim made in the book, whereas Article B is an opinion piece criticizing the claims and tone of the book.”
National Post
Hedges 6 of 21 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A reports on King Charles issuing a statement in response to claims by Princess Diana's brother, while Article B discusses an opinion piece about Charles Spencer's hatred towards King Charles based on his book.”
CBS News
Hedges 5 of 16 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Princess Diana's legacy and her brother's book but do not describe the same specific incident or time.”
NBC News
Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss Earl Spencer's book and comments about Prince Charles regarding Princess Diana's death, they describe different aspects of this topic over a period of time rather than a single specific incident.”
Evening Standard
Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of Prince Charles and Princess Diana's relationship and reactions to recent claims, but do not describe the same specific incident or moment in time.”
South China Morning Post
Hedges 2 of 5 claims Outlet record 63/100
“The articles discuss different aspects related to Princess Diana and Prince Charles but do not describe the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 6 of 48 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the controversy surrounding Princess Diana's death and Prince Charles' reaction, but they are not reporting on the exact same incident or occurrence.”
Fox News
Hedges 7 of 52 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss Earl Charles Spencer's memoir and its contents, they describe different aspects of the situation: one focuses on Spencer's hatred towards King Charles, while the other covers Spencer responding to Buckingham Palace's questioning of his recollection.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 7 of 62 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different perspectives on Prince Charles and Charles Spencer but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
46
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
22%
10 of 46 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Entertainment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-21 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8751 article(s) · 21 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 21 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Jan Moir
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 'This is out of the realms of my contemplation,' he would say.
🔮 ‘For us, when certain stars align, and it’s clear that this should or probably will end up being the case, then we lean into that,’ Prince Harry blathered to GQ magazine this week, explaining why he shifted continents and moved his family back from California to the Cotswolds on what seemed to be a whim long divulged to no one, least of all his father.
🔮 'Charming all who had queued in the cold to say hello and wish her well, she could engage, talk about the weather, admire babies and even smile when people told her repeatedly that 'Diana would have loved you'.' I went on to describe this 'dazzling and confident debut' from 'a remarkable young woman… who was not born to be a princess but moves with ease in her brave new world'.
🔮 The offences relate to six women, with the trial expected to last for nearly two months.
🔮 She is dismayed at being found guilty of stealing three lambs from King Charles after climbing into a field on his Sandringham estate in Norfolk back in 2023.
🔮 Television, radio, podcasts, broadcasts, newspapers and mags – our hero is ready, willing and able to appear on them all, to sing his song of royal woe and to give his former brother-in-law a kicking at every opportunity, for this unedifying War of the Charleses is far from over.
🔮 ‘I suspect the prince’s first reaction must have been to think more of how this event might free him to marry the woman he loved, rather than appreciating the loss of one he did not,’ writes Spencer.
Also by Jan Moir
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Jan Moir →

Topics

Palace Paris the Daily Mail

Subjects

Charles PERSON · 7× Spencer PERSON · 7× Diana PERSON · 5× Charles Spencer PERSON · 2× Earl Spencer PERSON · 2× Charles Spencer’s PERSON · 1× Earl Spencer’s PERSON · 1× Paris GPE · 1× Princess Diana PERSON · 1× the Daily Mail ORG · 1×

Narrative

Read more: - AN WILSON: An anecdote that Earl Spencer told me years ago makes me 100% sure that HE is telling us the truth - Part one of our exclusive serialisation of Swan Song: Diana, My Sister - the searing memoir that has started a war of words with the King - Part two: Earl Spencer criticises the royals' 'lack of obvious care' for Prince Harry on the day of his mother Diana's funeral
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-21
🔮 ‘I suspect the prince’s first reaction must have been to think more of how this event might free him to marry the woman he loved, rather than appreciating the loss of one he did not,’ writes Spencer.

Claims (46 extracted, 10 hedged)

Something profound and elemental emerges from Charles Spencer’s book, Swan Song: Diana, My Sister. asserted
Something → emerge → book
It is not how much he mourns his sister Princess Diana, from whom he was estranged at the time of her death. asserted
he → mourn → death
It is how much he utterly despises King Charles, a hatred that has roared away, a bitter furnace in his soul, for more than 30 years. asserted
that → despise → years
In the extracts published by the Daily Mail, Spencer’s undimmed malice burns off the page, a heartless corrosion that is awful to behold. asserted
that → publish → page
In his version of events, we are encouraged to believe that the then-Prince Charles practically revelled in the death of his former wife. asserted
Charles → encourage → wife
Indeed, he appeared to be quite pleased that 36-year-old Diana, the beloved mother of his two young sons, met her end in a convenient car crash in Paris. asserted
Diana → appear → Paris
‘I suspect the prince’s first reaction must have been to think more of how this event might free him to marry the woman he loved, rather than appreciating the loss of one he did not,’ writes Spencer. uncertain
Spencer → suspect → one
He recalls that, unlike others who telephoned to give their condolences in the days and hours after Diana’s death, Charles sounded ‘giddily elated – like a lottery winner’. asserted
Charles → recall → winner
Yet, according to Spencer, the prince also sounded ‘strangely matter-of-fact, given the enormity of the disaster’. uncertain
prince → accord → disaster
Earl Spencer recalls that, unlike others who telephoned to give their condolences in the days and hours after Diana’s death, Charles sounded ‘giddily elated – like a lottery winner’ asserted
Charles → recall → winner
By Earl Spencer’s account, while his own grief was profound, the brutish prince seemed to regard the death of Diana with all the detachment of a man who has just witnessed a bug being squashed on a windscreen. asserted
bug → seem → windscreen
That is the mood Charles Spencer ascribes to his former brother-in-law at this tragic moment of global import and personal bereavement in both their lives. asserted
Spencer → ascribe → lives
Spencer also writes that Charles said the following to him, delivered in true Bond-villain fashion, perhaps while stroking a cat: ‘Rest assured,’ he hissed, ‘we’ll forget her soon enough!’ asserted
we → write → her
Not only does it not sound like King Charles, but it is also a remark you could surely put any number of interpretations upon. uncertain
you → sound → interpretations
It is also a remark that could easily be misheard. uncertain
that → misheard → ?
Isn’t it far more likely that Charles said ‘they’ll forget her soon enough’ – meaning the public, who were going crazy? asserted
who → say → public
Isn’t it far more likely that Spencer’s own heightened emotional state meant he could have misinterpreted or misunderstood what was coming down the phone line from the royal residences as his own world fell apart? uncertain
world → heighten → residences
The Palace responded to this latter allegation by saying: ‘While we do not comment on books as a matter of principle, His Majesty is mindful that the pain of fraternal grief can cloud reason, affect judgment and colour memory in ways others do not recognise, even many years after such a loss.’ asserted
others → respond → loss
Recollections may vary, Mark II. uncertain
Recollections → vary → ?
Some argue that the King should not have commented on Spencer’s words – yet I believe that he had to. asserted
he → argue → words
The slur is so terrible, the smear so profound, that he simply could not let it lie unchallenged. uncertain
it → let → ?
In writing these incendiary words, Charles Spencer meant to wound and harm, to thrust a dagger deep into the royal ribs, to cause as much damage as possible, to make a 77-year-old man, not in the best of health, look like a heartless, weak adulterer who simply did not care about the tragic death of his ex-wife. asserted
who → write → wife
Spencer’s judgment is thunderous and cruel for many reasons but most of all because it does not acknowledge a speck of humanity within the prince, or that at the worst moment in life, many of us do not behave at our best. asserted
many → acknowledge → best
Earl Spencer and Prince Charles at the official opening of a fountain built in memory of Diana, in London's Hyde Park, in 2004 Ultimately, it all boils down to a choice that seems medieval – which Charles do you believe? asserted
you → build → Charles
Well, I know who I think is the better man – and it is not Earl Spencer. asserted
it → know → ?
Is this a choice Prince Harry must also make? asserted
Harry → make → ?
One wonders how he can remain on close terms with his fuming uncle while his father is being so viciously traduced and the monarchy attacked. asserted
monarchy → wonder → uncle
It seems impossible that he can remain neutral, a gingery Switzerland of calm in this bloody war of attrition. asserted
he → seem → attrition
In later chapters, for example, the earl also recounts his version of the row regarding Prince William and Prince Harry walking behind Diana’s coffin at her funeral procession. asserted
William → recount → procession
This is an issue Harry has bemoaned, too, as further evidence of the moral futility and chronic failings of monarchy. asserted
Harry → bemoan → monarchy
No doubt it was an ordeal; two young boys in their smart suits and neat hair, trying not to cry in front of the whole world. asserted
boys → try → world
It still breaks my heart just to think about it. asserted
It → break → it
Yet there is a price to pay for the trappings and advantages of being a member of the Royal Family – and here it was, being marched out in funeral lockstep across a city and a nation in mourning. asserted
it → be → mourning
Perhaps, with hindsight, they could all look at it another way: that walking behind the coffin was a privilege, it was an honour, it was what was expected of them as heirs to a throne that stretches back more than 1,000 years. uncertain
that → look → years
She was their mother, this was their destiny – and in the end, what did it have to do with Charles Spencer? asserted
it → have → Spencer
He was an uncle, a man whose views were welcomed – but surely those views could only be secondary to the wishes of the boys’ father? uncertain
views → welcome → father
From that day onwards, all four of these men had to learn how to live without a mother, without a sister and without a first wife. asserted
four → have → wife
Some of them, of course, have done so better than others. asserted
Some → do → others
Spencer and Harry have much in common, for both of them are caught in the amber of three decades of hurt and resentment, unable to move on. asserted
both → have → hurt
Compare this to Prince William, whose burden grows heavier by the day but who never complains. asserted
who → compare → day
…and 6 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support