Photo via The Dispatch

How AI Is Driving Both Parties Back to Their Roots

Read the original at The Dispatch ↗
Cite

Smith, K. (2026, September 24). How AI Is Driving Both Parties Back to Their Roots. The Dispatch. https://thedispatch.com/newsletter/dispatch-markets/artificial-intelligence-reindustrialization-political-alignment/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Dispatch · collected 2026-09-24 · by Karl Smith

Quick Summary

Dispatch Markets explores how artificial intelligence is polarizing American politics along traditional lines. The Pentagon’s chief technology officer recently tweeted a controversial message linking AI development with patriotic duty, criticizing those advocating for stricter regulation of AI as being anti-American. This tweet reflects an ideological divide where Republicans support rapid AI advancement to compete with China, while some Democrats express skepticism and opposition towards the industry. The article suggests that these political stances are reverting to historical party alignments: Republicans championing business interests and Democrats questioning corporate motives.
Written by AI on 2026-09-24, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Last week, the Pentagon's chief technology officer shared a photo of former President Donald Trump with a tweet emphasizing "Americanism, Not Effective Altruism," garnering over 2.8 million views. The post highlighted skepticism towards effective altruism—a movement promoting rational and efficient charity—among certain circles, particularly those skeptical of Silicon Valley values and the artificial intelligence (AI) industry. This stance has deepened ideological divisions within U.S. politics, with Republicans largely supporting AI advancements while Democrats have become increasingly critical or even opposed to it. The tweet reflects a broader political narrative where Republicans view AI as key to American technological leadership, whereas some Democrats see potential risks and downsides, aligning with concerns about effective altruism's impact on societal values and ethics.

Written for “AI And Politics” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI And Politics
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 4% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 9 of 70 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different aspects of President Trump's stance on AI regulation and his broader political messaging, not a single specific incident.”
The Free Press
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 7 claims Outlet record 96/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI in relation to politics and economic growth, not the same specific incident.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI's impact on politics without describing the same specific incident or occurrence.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 5 of 30 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss AI's impact on politics but describe different events: one mentions Bernie Sanders and Steve Bannon speaking at a group meeting against AI, while the other discusses a Pentagon official's tweet about President Trump.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 25 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A describes Trump's speech at the U.N. General Assembly about AI leadership, while Article B refers to a tweet from the Pentagon’s chief technology officer featuring a photo of Trump.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
113
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
4%
5 of 113 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
61/100
The Dispatch's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-24 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Dispatch · 397 article(s) · 1 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 1 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Karl Smith
1 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The post itself said, “The United States will NEVER be an effective altruist country.”
2026-09-24 · assertive framing · How AI Is Driving Both Parties Back to Their Roots
The only article under this byline in the corpus.

Topics

China Democrats Dispatch Markets Republicans U.S.

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 4× Trump PERSON · 4× U.S. GPE · 3× China GPE · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× The Republican Party ORG · 2× Dispatch Markets ORG · 1× Karl Smith PERSON · 1× Kyla Scanlon PERSON · 1× Scott Lincicome PERSON · 1×

Narrative

Beyond that, however, the undersecretary’s office was formalizing the ideological battle lines between Republicans, whom the president expects to support all things AI, and Democrats, who are increasingly vocal in their skepticism—and in certain cases outright opposition—to the AI industry.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-24
🔮 The post itself said, “The United States will NEVER be an effective altruist country.”
2026-09-24 · The Dispatch
How AI Is Driving Both Parties Back to Their Roots · assertive framing

Claims (113 extracted, 5 hedged)

You’re reading Dispatch Markets, a weekly dive into the forces driving economic growth—and those holding it back—featuring Scott Lincicome, Kyla Scanlon, Karl Smith, Marian Tupy, and Adam Ozimek. asserted
You → read → Lincicome
Last week the Pentagon’s chief technology officer tweeted out a photo of President Donald Trump pumping his fist, with overlaid text saying, “Americanism, Not Effective Altruism.” asserted
officer → tweet → Altruism
The post itself said, “The United States will NEVER be an effective altruist country.” asserted
States → say → ?
It’s safe to say that most of the 2.8 million viewers who saw it were left bewildered, a tiny fraction were outraged, and I was, as they say, shocked but not surprised. asserted
they → ’ → it
Let’s catch everyone up. asserted
’s → catch → everyone
Effective altruism is a community that began taking shape in the late 2000s around the premise that we not only have a duty to give to those in need but to do so in the most rationally effective way possible. asserted
we → begin → way
The community’s membership was, from the beginning, I think it’s fair to say, nerd-heavy and extremely online. asserted
it → think → beginning
Over time, it morphed into a label for a certain Silicon Valley-centric subculture and the particular values it held dear. asserted
it → morph → subculture
One of those values regarded the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence. asserted
One → regard → intelligence
This is where Trump comes in. asserted
Trump → come → ?
Effective altruists were the earliest and most vocal proponents of heavily regulating and even banning AI altogether. asserted
altruists → regulate → AI
These proposals are anathema to the Trump administration, which considers AI the central front in a growing cold war against China. asserted
AI → consider → China
Trump believes any attempt to restrict or slow the growth of U.S. AI capabilities plays into China’s hands. asserted
attempt → believe → hands
Hence, Trump’s Defense Department, and especially its Office of the Undersecretary for Research and Engineering, view effective altruists as thoroughly unpatriotic if not outright anti-American. asserted
Department → view → altruists
Last week’s tweet was a product of the increasing attention that AI safety has received in the media over the last few weeks, after a former employee of OpenAI and later Anthropic blew the whistle on what he considered the reckless safety policies of both companies. asserted
he → increase → companies
Beyond that, however, the undersecretary’s office was formalizing the ideological battle lines between Republicans, whom the president expects to support all things AI, and Democrats, who are increasingly vocal in their skepticism—and in certain cases outright opposition—to the AI industry. asserted
who → formalize → industry
As odd as all of this is—and it is odd—there is something predictable, even quixotically comforting, about watching the politics of AI play out like this. asserted
politics → be → this
In a real way, Republicans and Democrats are gravitating toward their roots. asserted
Republicans → gravitate → roots
This dichotomy, more than any other, has defined the two parties’ relative positions through thick and thin. asserted
dichotomy → define → thick
And it arises from foundational socioeconomic facts about the U.S. economy. asserted
it → arise → economy
Something strange started to happen around the turn of the millennium that softened this dichotomy. asserted
that → start → dichotomy
It didn’t break down completely, but it weakened to the point that most major corporations were siding with Democrats on the most controversial issues of the day and that the electoral power of the Republican Party was grounded in working-class voters. asserted
power → break → voters
It’s not entirely clear when this softening first began, but I think the last few years of the second Clinton administration are as good a place as any to mark the start. asserted
years → ’ → start
That administration presided over a record surge in stock prices thanks to the dot-com boom, and the stocks that surged most belonged to tech companies largely concentrated in the Bay Area, long a bastion of left-of-center politics. asserted
that → preside → politics
Notably, then-Vice President Al Gore, an early promoter of the internet, had a unique relationship with the very type of tech companies at the center of this boom. asserted
Gore → have → boom
Gore was also a famously early voice on the dangers of climate change, which he argued, even then, would require new green technology. asserted
he → argue → technology
This coziness between the fastest-growing business sector in the country and the soon-to-be Democratic nominee for president was more than a product of Gore’s eccentricities. asserted
coziness → grow → eccentricities
It reflected a deeper shift in the politics of profit: from an economy ruled by thermodynamically powered atoms to one dominated by electrically powered bits. asserted
It → reflect → bits
Since the mid-1800s, business—big business particularly—was associated with industrialization. asserted
business → associate → industrialization
By their very nature, industrial businesses attracted certain enemies. asserted
businesses → attract → enemies
As it turned out, the Republican Party emerged as the party protecting industrialists’ interests, while the Democratic Party evolved into the party advocating for their opponents. asserted
Party → turn → opponents
By the late 1800s, long before anyone ever heard of climate change, Americans were becoming increasingly alarmed by the quantities of smoke, soot, and sludge that industry poured into the air and water as a necessary byproduct of normal operations. asserted
industry → hear → operations
People varied in their level of alarm, with one end of the spectrum viewing pollution as a noxious but necessary evil and the other end as plain evil. asserted
end → vary → evil
The latter were the precursors of what we now think of as environmentalism. asserted
we → think → environmentalism
Environmentalism as a force to be reckoned with exploded in the mid-20th century, but the movement’s more storied institutions date back almost a century. asserted
institutions → reckon → century
And, as Breakthough Insitute founder and author Ted Nordhaus convincingly argues, the central organizing principle of core environmentalists has been, and remains to this day, opposition to the growth of heavy industry. asserted
principle → argue → industry
That made it structurally impossible, Nixon notwithstanding, for environmentalism as a political movement to build a home in the Republican Party. asserted
environmentalism → make → Party
And so, almost by default, it evolved into a core Democratic constituency. asserted
it → evolve → constituency
After environmentalists, the natural opponents of industry are readily identifiable core constituencies in the Democratic Party: labor unions, economic progressives, and what, for lack of a better word, might be called technocrats. uncertain
opponents → call → word
Few people doubt the enduring animus between these groups and big business, or find their central position in the Democratic coalition surprising. asserted
position → doubt → coalition
…and 73 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support