Photo via Toronto Star

Appeals court weighs fate of judge's contempt probe over Trump administration deportation flights

Read the original at Toronto Star ↗
Cite

Kunzelman, M. (2026, September 29). Appeals court weighs fate of judge's contempt probe over Trump administration deportation flights. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/world/united-states/appeals-court-weighs-fate-of-judge-s-contempt-probe-over-trump-administration-deportation-flights/article_bcd2eb75-2f2f-5ee9-99d0-d38e43cd215e.html

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Toronto Star · collected 2026-09-29 · by Michael Kunzelman

Quick Summary

A U.S. Court of Appeals is considering whether to allow Judge James Boasberg to continue his contempt probe into alleged violations of a restraining order by the Trump administration regarding deportation flights for Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador. The Justice Department argues that only prosecutors, not judges, should investigate potential crimes, while Judge Patricia Millett questions why Boasberg shouldn’t be permitted to determine if other government officials may have committed criminal contempt. The case highlights tensions between the judiciary and executive branches over enforcement of court orders during the Trump presidency.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In April, U.S. District Judge James Boasberg initiated a criminal contempt investigation into Trump administration officials for allegedly violating an order halting the deportation of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador. The Justice Department argued that Judge Boasberg lacks authority to conduct such an inquiry, stating it is "unlawful." On Tuesday, 11 U.S. Circuit Court judges from the D.C. Circuit heard arguments on whether to allow Boasberg's investigation to continue. During the hearing, many judges appeared skeptical of the Justice Department’s case against Boasberg, questioning why he should not be allowed to gather more information before deciding if a criminal referral is necessary. The full bench’s decision could have significant implications for judicial oversight and enforcement of court orders in immigration cases.

Written for “Judge Contempt Probe Over Deportations” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Judge Contempt Probe Over Deportations
Crime & Law · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 15% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 17 claims Outlet record 70/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 5 of 31 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles describe different aspects of ongoing legal proceedings related to Venezuelan migrants, but they do not appear to be reporting on the exact same hearing or incident.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 10 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different stages of legal proceedings related to deportation orders, not the same specific incident.”
Fox News
Hedges 4 of 44 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different legal disputes related to immigration and deportation policies, not the same specific incident.”
NPR
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 3 of 16 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different aspects of related legal actions concerning immigration policies, but they do not appear to be reporting on the exact same court hearing or decision.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of legal proceedings related to Trump's deportation policy but describe separate events occurring on the same day.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 5 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different judicial proceedings related to the Trump administration's deportation policy but do not refer to the same specific incident or time.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 5 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe two different legal proceedings related to immigration policies under the Trump administration, but they are not reporting on the exact same incident at the same time.”
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss related legal proceedings regarding deportation policies under the Trump administration, but describe distinct court actions and timelines.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 6 of 20 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different legal proceedings related to immigration policies under the Trump administration but are not referring to the same specific court hearing or ruling.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
34
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
15%
5 of 34 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
64/100
Toronto Star's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Toronto Star · 10860 article(s) · 28 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 28 correction(s)
2026-10-26
Correction
2026-10-24
Correction
2026-10-07
Correction
2026-09-24
Correction

Who wrote this

Michael Kunzelman
17 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Lawyers for former FBI Director James Comey will ask a federal judge on Friday to block the Justice Department from pursuing its third criminal case against the outspoken critic of President Donald Trump and frequent target of Republican outrage.
🔮 But the judge noted that the administration can “moot this process at any time” by filing a notice indicating that it will not engage in the election-related conduct the Democratic plaintiffs sued to challenge.
🔮 Cole Tomas Allen’s trial is scheduled to start with jury selection on Sept. 7 in Washington, D.C., and is expected to last approximately three to four weeks.
🔮 Cole Tomas Allen's trial is scheduled to start with jury selection on Sept. 7 in Washington, D.C., and is expected to last approximately three to four weeks.
🔮 The high court, granting a request by President Donald Trump’s administration, will hear arguments on whether Izuchukwu Ozurumba’s cooking job for leaders of the Unknown Gunmen qualifies as providing “material support” for a terrorist group.
🔮 Issuing a preliminary injunction at ABC’s request would mean “allowing them to sidestep” the path that Congress has set up for regulatory action appeals, Georgiev-Remmel said.
🔮 The nation's highest court will listen to oral arguments in the coming months in its latest religious rights legal dispute.
🔮 But the questions posed at Tuesday’s hearing suggest that the full court could give Boasberg a green light to proceed with his inquiry.
🔮 “It may have been carried out in a bizarre manner, but the threat of violence was a serious one.”
🔮 A three-judge panel from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit didn’t indicate how soon they would rule after hearing arguments from attorneys for the government and the migrants who were flown to El Salvador without any notice or opportunity to challenge their removals from the U.S.
Also by Michael Kunzelman
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 17 articles by Michael Kunzelman →

Topics

D.C. Circuit El Salvador Justice Department Venezuelan WASHINGTON

Subjects

Boasberg PERSON · 7× Shumate PERSON · 4× El Salvador GPE · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Venezuelan NORP · 3× D.C. Circuit ORG · 2× Justice Department ORG · 2× U.S. Court of Appeals ORG · 1× WASHINGTON GPE · 1× the District of Columbia Circuit ORG · 1×

Narrative

A federal judge must end his “unlawful, unnecessary and futile” contempt investigation into whether the Trump administration ignored an order blocking the deportation of planeloads of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador, a Justice Department attorney argued Tuesday before an appeals court that often appeared to be deeply skeptical of the government’s case.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 But the questions posed at Tuesday’s hearing suggest that the full court could give Boasberg a green light to proceed with his inquiry.

Claims (34 extracted, 5 hedged)

A federal judge must end his “unlawful, unnecessary and futile” contempt investigation into whether the Trump administration ignored an order blocking the deportation of planeloads of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador, a Justice Department attorney argued Tuesday before an appeals court that often appeared to be deeply skeptical of the government’s case. asserted
that → end → case
Judges from the full U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit heard three hours of arguments in the latest chapter of a case that has been a recurring flashpoint in President Donald Trump’s escalating conflict with the federal courts. asserted
that → hear → courts
Justice Department attorney Brett Shumate argued District Court Chief Judge James Boasberg has no basis or authority to continue with his inquiry because a prosecutor — not a judge — is responsible for investigating crimes. asserted
prosecutor → argue → crimes
“What’s gone off the rails in this case is that the district court has purported to investigate,” Shumate said. asserted
Shumate → go → case
In April, a divided panel of three D.C. Circuit judges ruled that Boasberg must end his “intrusive” contempt investigation of the Trump administration. asserted
Boasberg → rule → administration
But the questions posed at Tuesday’s hearing suggest that the full court could give Boasberg a green light to proceed with his inquiry. uncertain
court → pose → inquiry
The judges didn’t indicate how soon they would rule. asserted
they → indicate → ?
Judge Patricia Millett questioned why Boasberg shouldn’t be allowed to continue with his inquiry so he can determine if other government officials merit additional scrutiny for possible criminal contempt. asserted
officials → question → contempt
“Are district courts allowed to decide if people have engaged in contempt in front of them?” asked Millett, who was nominated to the court by Democratic President Barack Obama. asserted
who → allow → Obama
“The district court loses the authority to investigate,” Shumate said. asserted
Shumate → lose → authority
“That’s not my question,” Millet interjected, raising her voice. asserted
Millet → ’ → voice
“This is all about wordplay here on which you mean by the word ‘investigate.’” asserted
you → mean → word
On March 15, 2025, Boasberg issued a temporary restraining order barring the administration from transferring groups of Venezuelan migrants to El Salvador under an 18th century law. asserted
Boasberg → issue → law
After the order was entered, two planeloads of migrants protected by the order departed from the U.S. on their way to El Salvador, where they were locked up in one of the world’s most violent prisons. asserted
they → enter → prisons
Boasberg gave a verbal order for the aircraft to turn around. asserted
aircraft → give → order
The administration denied violating it or a subsequent written order, but Boasberg has said the Trump administration may have acted in bad faith by trying to rush Venezuelan migrants out of the country. uncertain
administration → deny → country
The administration has said then- Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was responsible for the transfer decision. asserted
Noem → say → decision
On Tuesday, however, D.C. Circuit judges suggested that Boasberg should be able to identify other possible targets for a contempt investigation before referring the matter to a prosecutor. uncertain
Boasberg → suggest → prosecutor
The case represents a major front in an escalating conflict between Trump and the federal judiciary, which has often blocked some of the president’s most ambitious and legally dubious initiatives. asserted
which → represent → initiatives
In case after case, the administration has demonstrated an unprecedented willingness to skirt or even defy court orders. asserted
administration → demonstrate → orders
Judge Cornelia Pillard, also an Obama nominee, said it undermines courts’ authority if the executive branch treats judicial orders as “optional” and is allowed to ignore them “with impunity.” asserted
branch → say → impunity
“The separation of powers respects the separate and co-equal authority of the different branches,” she said. asserted
she → respect → branches
Pillard asked Shumate if he could help her “feel more comfortable” about the administration’s perspective on that issue. uncertain
her → ask → issue
Shumate said the department is “always advising our clients to comply with court orders.” asserted
department → say → orders
“It’s also the right thing to do,” he said. asserted
he → ’ → ?
“We have to respect court orders, and the government in this case did comply with the order. asserted
government → have → order
I know there may be disagreement on that.” uncertain
I → know → that
The Justice Department says it didn’t violate Boasberg’s order “as it was best construed” and accuses the Obama-nominated judge of pursuing the contempt inquiry “with myopic and single-minded determination.” asserted
it → say → determination
American Civil Liberties Union attorneys say the government’s decision to ignore Boasberg’s order had “devastating consequences” for the migrants who were flown to El Salvador and held for months in a mega-prison known as the Terrorism Confinement Center, or CECOT. asserted
who → say → Center
“Plaintiffs’ four months at CECOT were nothing short of barbaric,” ACLU attorneys wrote. asserted
attorneys → write → CECOT
“They were subjected to horrific physical and psychological abuse, and deprived of food, water, and medical care. asserted
They → subject → food
They were regularly severely beaten by guards and subjected to other physical abuse, including being shot at close range with rubber bullets.” asserted
They → beat → bullets
Trump has called for impeaching Boasberg, and the Justice Department filed a misconduct complaint accusing Boasberg of making improper public comments about Trump and his administration. asserted
Department → call → Trump
In a rare rebuke, Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts publicly rejected calls for Boasberg’s impeachment. asserted
Roberts → reject → impeachment
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support