As tech titans warned an AI-weary world that their own advanced systems could endanger humanity, the question emerged: What do they have to gain?
uncertain
they → warn → What
The answer may lie in the companies’ efforts to score political goals ahead of the U.S. midterm elections and the money top artificial intelligence labs and their investors stand to make in much-anticipated listings on a jittery stock market.
uncertain
labs → lie → market
The CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI recently declared America’s cutting-edge models are so powerful, they’re dangerous, and need to be regulated and independently tested before being released.
asserted
they → declare → Anthropic
In a rare instance of unity, they have sketched alarming scenarios in essays, social media posts and speeches to the United Nations.
asserted
they → sketch → Nations
Along the way, they are shaping the conversation around how their technology should be controlled.
asserted
technology → shape → conversation
With their rhetoric, the companies appear to be seeking public favor and to set the terms for their own safety protocols in the unregulated market, experts, analysts and former government evaluators told The Associated Press.
asserted
experts → appear → Press
Anthropic engineer calling for a pause on tech development
Those aims may not exactly align with what Anthropic engineer Jacob Coxon sought when he quit via a post on X this month, calling for a pause on tech development to keep “superhuman” systems from eluding their makers' control.
uncertain
he → call → control
But the companies saw his post as an opportunity to highlight their own safety efforts and position themselves as cautious market leaders, just when they need fresh capital before going public on Wall Street.
asserted
they → see → Street
President Donald Trump has shunned the need for new AI regulations, dismissing talk of risks to humanity as a “HOAX” designed to help China.
asserted
Trump → shun → China
An Anthropic spokesperson said in response to questions for this story that the company has been calling for regulation for several years.
asserted
company → say → years
An OpenAI spokesperson, Liz Bourgeois, noted the company recently paused training of its most advanced models.
asserted
company → note → models
“People want to know AI is being developed safely, and that starts with what companies like ours do ourselves," Ms. Bourgeois said.
asserted
Bourgeois → want → ours
Turning the conversation toward unproven threats — and away from polarising issues such as data centers’ environmental impacts, uncontrolled hacking incidents, mass AI-powered surveillance and the AI systems' use in warfare — puts Silicon Valley in a more comfortable position, said Sarah Shoker, who previously led OpenAI’s geopolitics team.
asserted
who → turn → team
“Once again we’re talking about existential risk, while deprioritising a number of other safety-critical risks that exist today.
asserted
that → talk → risks
If you look at the use of AI in military tech, you can see that these systems are already used to kill people,” said Ms. Shoker, a senior non-resident fellow at University of California, Berkeley Risk & Security Lab.
asserted
Shoker → look → Lab
As AI companies have gone from building chatbots to advanced AI “ world models ” with 3D awareness, debate has raged over how their technologies should be tested.
AI agents hacking into external websites
Problematic incidents have shown leading AI companies failing to police themselves or design safe experiments.
asserted
companies → go → experiments
In recent months, leading labs’ AI agents have hacked into external websites after being allowed to escape company training sandboxes, interacted with U.S. government websites in unexpected ways, and appeared to achieve a mathematical breakthrough only to face accusations of stealing mathematicians' work.
asserted
agents → lead → work
OpenAI representatives told reporters recently that they have talked with AI companies including Anthropic and Google about pausing development.
asserted
they → tell → development
They also argue they need independent auditors to check the labs’ progress, if the government won’t regulate.
asserted
government → argue → progress
Trump rejects AI regulation
asserted
Trump → reject → regulation
Mr. Trump has shown little interest in regulating AI, which has been a major driver of recent U.S. economic growth.
asserted
which → show → growth
The Republican President himself has struck deals with Silicon Valley firms that more closely tie the economy to their successes.
asserted
that → strike → successes
San Francisco venture capitalist David Sacks, who co-chairs Trump’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology
asserted
who → co → Science
The reality is the Trump administration already evaluates some of the tech giants’ models through a little-known federal agency, the U.S. Center for AI Standards and Innovation.
asserted
administration → evaluate → Standards
Democratic President Joe Biden created the agency in 2023, when it was heralded as a clearinghouse for labs to voluntarily submit advanced AI models for testing.
asserted
labs → create → testing
The agency still exists, but the field has since expanded to include an array of independent evaluation firms, such as Berkeley, California-based nonprofit METR, which Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei suggested in a recent essay could help vet his company's safety practices.
uncertain
Amodei → exist → practices
But unlike regulated sectors like restaurants, financial services or aviation, there are no universal standards for how to test the safety and security of AI systems, said Andrew Strait, who recently left the United Kingdom’s AI Security Institute, which worked with CAISI.
asserted
which → regulate → CAISI
Notably, the companies aren’t calling for more oversight from the government agency equipped to handle such requests, said Conrad Stosz, who previously led CAISI.
asserted
who → call → CAISI
Instead, they’re vowing to create their own auditing parameters and choose particular evaluators to grade them.
asserted
they → vow → them
Mr. Stosz now works at one such evaluation lab that has worked with Anthropic, OpenAI and Google to test their systems, and also chairs the AI Evaluator Forum, which is drafting best practices for the field.
asserted
which → work → field
He said even the forum has questions about what Mr. Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman want.
asserted
Amodei → say → what
“Lots of evaluators are interested in embedding with labs and getting greater access, but it’s a little ambiguous what embedded evaluators means,” said Stosz, now head of governance at Transluce, which revealed last week that OpenAI agents hacked U.S. and Australian government websites.
asserted
agents → embed → websites
“Will evaluators be able to thoroughly investigate, assuming that access is granted in a way that does not undermine their independence and credibility?”
asserted
that → investigate → independence
For Harrison Rolfes, a PitchBook senior research analyst, AI companies’ calls for caution seem meant to curry favor with investors ahead of public offerings and the midterms, when the political winds could shift.
uncertain
winds → mean → offerings
Democratic governors already are rushing to show they’re taking the warnings seriously.
asserted
they → rush → warnings
Meanwhile, the AI giants can block smaller competitors' growth by positioning themselves as the safest bet for investors, as well as for AI chipmakers and tech companies such as Nvidia and Google, which in turn can benefit from deals that provide the giant AI companies compute power, Rolfes said.
asserted
Rolfes → block → power
“They’re creating a wall or a moat within this sector. …
asserted
They → create → sector
It’s genius and they’re all going to make a lot of money,” Mr. Rolfes said.
asserted
Rolfes → ’ → money
“That’s where I see this heading, having the top companies in the world just creating their own wall, and then using the safety as the reason.”
asserted
companies → ’ → reason
Not all AI companies endorse a slowdown.
asserted
companies → endorse → slowdown
…and 3 more, not listed.
The Aporia
