Photo via Global News

Anthropic and OpenAI sound the alarm on AI safety – and seek to shape how it’s controlled

Read the original at Global News ↗
Cite

Digital, G. (2026, September 27). Anthropic and OpenAI sound the alarm on AI safety – and seek to shape how it’s controlled. Global News. https://globalnews.ca/news/12074930/anthropic-openai-ai-safety/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Global News · collected 2026-09-27 · by Globalnews Digital

Quick Summary

Anthropic and OpenAI CEOs recently warned about the dangers of advanced artificial intelligence systems during speeches and essays, advocating for regulation and independent testing before deployment. Their actions aim to shape public opinion and set safety standards in an unregulated market, which could benefit them financially as they prepare for stock listings. Critics argue that this focus on existential risks diverts attention from current issues like environmental impact, hacking incidents, surveillance, and military applications of AI technology.
Written by AI on 2026-09-27, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In San Francisco, the CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI recently warned that their advanced AI systems could pose significant risks to humanity, including accelerating threats like bioweapons and nuclear war. They advocate for strict regulation and independent testing before releasing new technologies. However, some experts suggest this rhetoric is a strategic move ahead of the U.S. midterm elections and amid anticipated stock market listings. Former OpenAI employee Jacob Coxon quit in late 2023 via an X post, calling for a pause in AI development that contrasts with his former colleagues' more nuanced approach. Daniel Kokotajlo, who left OpenAI over similar concerns in 2024, worries companies can't control rapid technological advancement and criticizes the current discourse as a distraction from meaningful action.

Written for “AI Safety Alarm Raised” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 2 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Safety Alarm Raised
Technology · 3 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 10% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 43 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Hindu
Hedges 5 of 43 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 7 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different warnings about AI risks from distinct sources (an ex-Google safety chief vs. Anthropic and OpenAI CEOs).”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI, one focusing on safety and regulation by tech companies, while the other discusses its impact on higher education.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 1 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss concerns over AI safety, they describe different specific events: Article A covers statements made by CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI about regulating advanced AI systems, while Article B reports Bill Gates joining calls for AI safeguards in an interview.”
New York Post
Hedges 5 of 46 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different discussions about AI safety and regulation with distinct participants and contexts.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles describe different technological developments related to AI safety but do not refer to the same specific incident or occurrence.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 31 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI safety concerns and regulatory discussions, not a single specific incident.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 47 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses warnings about AI safety from Anthropic and OpenAI, while Article B addresses competition between China and the U.S. in the realm of AI technology and innovation.”
Fox News
Hedges 7 of 24 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI developments; Article A focuses on medical advancements while Article B discusses safety concerns and regulation.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
48
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
10%
5 of 48 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
63/100
Global News's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
3
Technology
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-27 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Global News · 2603 article(s) · 11 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 11 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Globalnews Digital
664 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Teare hinted at concerns over Morales’ background but would not provide details.
🔮 Grossman says the two times she’s tried it in real-life situations, however, the algorithms couldn’t reach enough of a consensus to be helpful.
🔮 The data, compiled by the AP, offers a glimpse of early voter participation five days before an election that will determine control of Congress and other key contests.
🔮 Russia’s potential return raises questions about how the tournament could accommodate another team, with schedules and other arrangements already in place.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · Hockey Canada seeks clarity on Russia’s return
🔮 Meanwhile, shares of Amazon slid nearly seven per cent in premarket trading as the company offered a cautious sales forecast for the current fourth quarter that encompasses the critical holiday shopping period after delivering fiscal third-quarter results that came in below Wall Street analysts’ expectations.
🔮 The cryptocurrency exchange said Friday that deposits were unaffected, while withdrawals have been suspended and are expected to resume in the next day or two.
🔮 Morneau will assume the role on Jan. 1, succeeding Katharine Stevenson, who is will retire from the board at the end of 2026.
2026-10-30 · assertive framing · CIBC names Bill Morneau as next board chair
🔮 A major summit Prime Minister Mark Carney is hosting with European Union leaders is set to conclude Friday with announcements on digital trade and academic exchanges.
🔮 The government has said the earliest Albertans could expect to see legislation on immigration is next spring.
🔮 Prime Minister Mark Carney said Thursday his government will invest up to $1.6 billion in Canadian AI company Cohere.
2026-10-29 · assertive framing · Ottawa to invest up to $1.6B in Canadian AI firm Cohere
Also by Globalnews Digital
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 664 articles by Globalnews Digital →

Topics

America Anthropic OpenAI SAN FRANCISCO U.S.

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 4× OpenAI ORG · 4× U.S. GPE · 3× SAN FRANCISCO GPE · 2× Trump PERSON · 2× America GPE · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Jacob Coxon PERSON · 1× The Associated Press ORG · 1× the United Nations ORG · 1×

Narrative

Calls for slowdown shift the conversation on AI risks Turning the conversation toward unproven threats — and away from polarizing issues such as data centers’ environmental impacts, uncontrolled hacking incidents, mass AI-powered surveillance and the AI systems’ use in warfare — puts Silicon Valley in a more comfortable position, said Sarah Shoker, who previously led OpenAI’s geopolitics team.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-27
🔮 As tech titans warned an AI-weary world that their own advanced systems could endanger humanity, the question emerged: What do they have to gain?

Claims (48 extracted, 5 hedged)

As tech titans warned an AI-weary world that their own advanced systems could endanger humanity, the question emerged: What do they have to gain? uncertain
they → warn → What
The answer may lie in the companies’ efforts to score political goals ahead of the U.S. midterm elections and the money top artificial intelligence labs and their investors stand to make in much-anticipated listings on a jittery stock market. uncertain
labs → lie → market
The CEOs of Anthropic and OpenAI recently declared America’s cutting-edge models are so powerful, they’re dangerous, and need to be regulated and independently tested before being released. asserted
they → declare → Anthropic
In a rare instance of unity, they have sketched alarming scenarios in essays, social media posts and speeches to the United Nations. asserted
they → sketch → Nations
Along the way, they are shaping the conversation around how their technology should be controlled. asserted
technology → shape → conversation
With their rhetoric, the companies appear to be seeking public favor and to set the terms for their own safety protocols in the unregulated market, experts, analysts and former government evaluators told The Associated Press. asserted
experts → appear → Press
Those aims may not exactly align with what Anthropic engineer Jacob Coxon sought when he quit via a post on X this month, calling for a pause on tech development to keep “superhuman” systems from eluding their makers’ control. uncertain
he → align → control
But the companies saw his post as an opportunity to highlight their own safety efforts and position themselves as cautious market leaders, just when they need fresh capital before going public on Wall Street. asserted
they → see → Street
President Donald Trump has shunned the need for new AI regulations, dismissing talk of risks to humanity as a “HOAX” designed to help China. asserted
Trump → shun → China
An Anthropic spokesperson said in response to questions for this story the company has been calling for regulation for several years. asserted
company → say → years
An OpenAI spokesperson, Liz Bourgeois, noted the company recently paused training of its most advanced models. asserted
company → note → models
“People want to know AI is being developed safely, and that starts with what companies like ours do ourselves,” Bourgeois said. asserted
Bourgeois → want → ours
Calls for slowdown shift the conversation on AI risks Turning the conversation toward unproven threats — and away from polarizing issues such as data centers’ environmental impacts, uncontrolled hacking incidents, mass AI-powered surveillance and the AI systems’ use in warfare — puts Silicon Valley in a more comfortable position, said Sarah Shoker, who previously led OpenAI’s geopolitics team. asserted
who → shift → team
“Once again we’re talking about existential risk, while deprioritizing a number of other safety-critical risks that exist today. asserted
that → talk → risks
If you look at the use of AI in military tech, you can see that these systems are already used to kill people,” said Shoker, a senior non-resident fellow at University of California, Berkeley Risk & Security Lab. asserted
Lab → look → Berkeley
As AI companies have gone from building chatbots to advanced AI ” world models ” with 3D awareness, debate has raged over how their technologies should be tested. asserted
technologies → go → awareness
Problematic incidents have shown leading AI companies failing to police themselves or design safe experiments. asserted
companies → show → experiments
In recent months, leading labs’ AI agents have hacked into external websites after being allowed to escape company training sandboxes, interacted with U.S. government websites in unexpected ways, and appeared to achieve a mathematical breakthrough only to face accusations of stealing mathematicians’ work. asserted
agents → lead → work
OpenAI representatives told reporters recently that they have talked with AI companies including Anthropic and Google about pausing development. asserted
they → tell → development
They also argue they need independent auditors to check the labs’ progress, if the government won’t regulate. asserted
government → argue → progress
Leading labs press their oversight vision Trump has shown little interest in regulating AI, which has been a major driver of recent U.S. economic growth. asserted
which → lead → growth
The Republican president himself has struck deals with Silicon Valley firms that more closely tie the economy to their successes. asserted
that → strike → successes
San Francisco venture capitalist David Sacks, who co-chairs Trump’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology asserted
who → co → Science
The reality is the Trump administration already evaluates some of the tech giants’ models through a little-known federal agency, the U.S. Center for AI Standards and Innovation. asserted
administration → evaluate → Standards
Democratic President Joe Biden created the agency in 2023, when it was heralded as a clearinghouse for labs to voluntarily submit advanced AI models for testing. asserted
labs → create → testing
The agency still exists, but the field has since expanded to include an array of independent evaluation firms, such as Berkeley, California-based nonprofit METR, which Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei suggested in a recent essay could help vet his company’s safety practices. uncertain
Amodei → exist → practices
Here’s what you’ll see in the sky asserted
you → ’ → sky
- Alberta expands access to cancer treatment with Calgary radiopharmaceutical facility - Canada recruits dozens of foreign scientists and researchers, many from U.S. - asserted
Canada → expand → U.S.
OpenAI says its models engaged with US government websites in new model misbehavior disclosure asserted
models → say → disclosure
But unlike regulated sectors like restaurants, financial services or aviation, there are no universal standards for how to test the safety and security of AI systems, said Andrew Strait, who recently left the United Kingdom’s AI Security Institute, which worked with CAISI. asserted
which → regulate → CAISI
Notably, the companies aren’t calling for more oversight from the government agency equipped to handle such requests, said Conrad Stosz, who previously led CAISI. asserted
who → call → CAISI
Instead, they’re vowing to create their own auditing parameters and choose particular evaluators to grade them. asserted
they → vow → them
Stosz now works at one such evaluation lab that has worked with Anthropic, OpenAI and Google to test their systems, and also chairs the AI Evaluator Forum, which is drafting best practices for the field. asserted
which → work → field
He said even the forum has questions about what Amodei and OpenAI CEO Sam Altman want. asserted
Amodei → say → what
“Lots of evaluators are interested in embedding with labs and getting greater access, but it’s a little ambiguous what embedded evaluators means,” said Stosz, now head of governance at Transluce, which revealed last week that OpenAI agents hacked U.S. and Australian government websites. asserted
agents → embed → websites
“Will evaluators be able to thoroughly investigate, assuming that access is granted in a way that does not undermine their independence and credibility?” asserted
that → investigate → independence
Companies position themselves as safe bets For Harrison Rolfes, a Pitchbook senior research analyst, AI companies’ calls for caution seem meant to curry favor with investors ahead of public offerings and the midterms, when the political winds could shift. uncertain
winds → position → offerings
Democratic governors already are rushing to show they’re taking the warnings seriously. asserted
they → rush → warnings
Meanwhile, the AI giants can block smaller competitors’ growth by positioning themselves as the safest bet for investors, as well as for AI chipmakers and tech companies such as Nvidia and Google, which in turn can benefit from deals that provide the giant AI companies compute power, Rolfes said. asserted
Rolfes → block → power
“They’re creating a wall or a moat within this sector. … asserted
They → create → sector
…and 8 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support