Photo via Times of India

Rhode Island federal judge orders revival of $7 billion Solar for All program canceled in 2025

Read the original at Times of India ↗
Cite

TOI World Desk. (2026, September 28). Rhode Island federal judge orders revival of $7 billion Solar for All program canceled in 2025. Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/us/rhode-island-federal-judge-orders-revival-of-7-billion-solar-for-all-program-canceled-by-trump-administrations-epa-in-august-2025-rules-agency-overstepped-its-authority/articleshow/134525381.cms

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Times of India · collected 2026-09-28 · by TOI World Desk

Quick Summary

A federal judge in Rhode Island has ordered the revival of a $7 billion Solar for All program that was canceled by the EPA in August 2025 due to new legislation. The ruling came after union laborers, solar companies, and nonprofit advocates challenged the EPA's decision. Judge Mary S. McElroy determined that the EPA overstepped its authority when it terminated the program, which aimed to help approximately 900,000 households save $350 million annually on energy bills and create about 200,000 jobs nationwide. Rhode Island was allocated around $49.3 million for the initiative but had already spent about $89,000 preparing to administer its share of the grants before the funding was rescinded.
Written by AI on 2026-09-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In August 2025, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under President Trump terminated a $7 billion Solar for All program, aimed at making solar power accessible to over 900,000 lower-income Americans. The decision was made following the passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act (OBBBA), which Congress believed would repeal the program's authorization and funding. However, on Friday, a federal judge in Rhode Island ruled that the EPA acted illegally by terminating the grants already awarded under the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Fund, established during the Biden administration as part of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Judge Mary McElroy, a Trump appointee, determined that Congress intended for the EPA to continue administering the Solar for All grants and vacated the termination. The ruling was supported by a coalition including labor unions, environmental groups like the Conservation Law Foundation, and nonprofits such as Rhode Island Center for Justice and Solar United Neighbors, who argued that thousands of union jobs would be created if the program resumed.

While the judge's decision does not immediately guarantee the release of funds, it could lead to significant changes in how clean energy initiatives are funded and implemented across the U.S., impacting both environmental goals and job creation in disadvantaged communities.

Written for “Solar Program Revival Judgment” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 3 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Solar Program Revival Judgment
Environment · 4 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 25% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 22 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
25%
8 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
59/100
Times of India's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
4
Environment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Times of India · 4073 article(s) · 4 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 4 correction(s)

Who wrote this

TOI World Desk
1406 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Speaking to Fox News on Tuesday, the POTUS claimed he had a 99 per cent approval rating in Israel and suggested he could pursue a political career there if his popularity in the United States declined.
🔮 The Brennan Center's 2026 survey also found that more than half of local election officials were concerned that threats, harassment and intimidation could make it harder to recruit and retain election workers.
🔮 These videos may depict candidates taking part in unpopular activities or appearing alongside controversial public figures.
🔮 Chutkan further warned that beginning construction or demolition before the National Park Service issues its final authorization, or proceeding without the required 14-day notice, could violate earlier court orders, AP News reported.
🔮 As votes are counted, three main outcomes could shape the future of Congress.
🔮 "It is back to the way Abraham Lincoln would have wanted it."
🔮 As reported by The Salt Lake Tribune, he began considering whether similar infrastructure could work on his Utah property.
🔮 On 30 May 2024, the court held that the transactions qualified as donationes mortis causa, a legal term for gifts made in anticipation of death.
🔮 James Patterson is best known as one of the world’s most successful thriller writers, but his most consequential work may be happening far from the bestseller lists.
🔮 The money will benefit After-School All-Stars, a non-profit organisation that works with children and young people through free after-school programmes.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by TOI World Desk
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 1406 articles by TOI World Desk →

Topics

EPA Rhode Island Rhode Island Current Solar for All the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency

Subjects

Rhode Island GPE · 7× EPA ORG · 5× Solar for All ORG · 4× McElroy PERSON · 2× Rhode Island Current ORG · 2× Mary S. McElroy PERSON · 1× Office of Energy Resources ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1× the U.S. District Court ORG · 1× the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency ORG · 1×

Narrative

The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Mary S. McElroy of the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island, comes in a lawsuit filed by union laborers, solar installation companies, a homeowner and nonprofit advocates who challenged the EPA’s August 2025 decision to terminate the Solar for All program, as reported by Rhode Island Current.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-28
🔮 However, the ruling does not immediately mean the money will begin flowing again.

Claims (32 extracted, 8 hedged)

More than a year after federal regulators canceled a $7 billion solar energy grant program, a Rhode Island federal judge has ordered the government to revive the initiative, ruling that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency overstepped its statutory authority when it terminated the program. asserted
it → cancel → program
The ruling, issued by U.S. District Judge Mary S. McElroy of the U.S. District Court for Rhode Island, comes in a lawsuit filed by union laborers, solar installation companies, a homeowner and nonprofit advocates who challenged the EPA’s August 2025 decision to terminate the Solar for All program, as reported by Rhode Island Current. asserted
who → issue → Current
However, the ruling does not immediately mean the money will begin flowing again. asserted
money → mean → ?
The EPA said it is reviewing the decision and considering its options for appeal, while attorneys for the plaintiffs say they do not yet know how the administration will respond. asserted
administration → say → plaintiffs
$49.3 million was allocated to Rhode Island Solar for All was created under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act to expand access to solar power among low- and moderate-income households and disadvantaged communities. asserted
million → allocate → households
The EPA awarded and obligated the full $7 billion in grants in 2024 to states, local governments, nonprofits and tribal organizations. asserted
EPA → award → states
Rhode Island was allocated approximately $49.3 million through the state Office of Energy Resources. asserted
Island → allocate → Resources
Rhode Island had already begun preparing to administer its grant before the funding was terminated. asserted
funding → begin → grant
The state had spent about $89,000 on administrative preparation when the money was clawed back, according to state officials cited in the lawsuit coverage. uncertain
money → spend → coverage
Nationwide, the five-year program had been projected by the Biden administration to help approximately 900,000 households save $350 million annually on energy bills and create about 200,000 jobs. asserted
households → project → jobs
EPA cited new federal legislation The Trump administration’s EPA ended Solar for All in August 2025, several months after President Donald Trump took office. asserted
Trump → cite → office
Federal regulators argued that the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed into law on July 4, 2025, had rescinded congressional authority for the program and allowed the government to claw back unspent funds. asserted
government → argue → funds
Judge McElroy rejected that interpretation. asserted
McElroy → reject → interpretation
In her ruling, she determined that funds already obligated under the program were not automatically transformed into unrestricted money simply because Congress repealed the statutory provision underlying the program. asserted
Congress → determine → program
Plaintiffs say the program could still create jobs uncertain
program → say → jobs
The Rhode Island AFL-CIO was among the plaintiffs challenging the cancellation. asserted
CIO → challenge → cancellation
Its president, Patrick Crowley, said the program could significantly expand solar deployment in the state while creating work for electricians, ironworkers and other skilled tradespeople. uncertain
program → say → electricians
“We already have trained tradespeople to start doing this work,” Crowley said, according to Rhode Island Current. uncertain
Crowley → train → Current
The program’s cancellation had also disrupted preparations by nonprofits and businesses involved in solar installation, financing and education. asserted
cancellation → disrupt → installation
Kevin Hubbard, executive director of the Lawyers’ Committee for Rhode Island and an attorney representing the plaintiffs, said the ruling leaves uncertainty over what happens next. “The result is maddeningly difficult to talk about what happens next because we just don’t know what they’ll do,” Hubbard said. asserted
Hubbard → represent → what
Rhode Island cannot yet move ahead with its grant asserted
Island → move → grant
Although McElroy rejected the cancellation, she did not specify exactly how federal administrators must restart Solar for All. asserted
administrators → reject → All
One possibility would be allowing existing grant recipients to continue with the awards they had already received. asserted
they → allow → awards
Another could involve requiring recipients to reapply for the competitive funding, potentially causing additional delays. uncertain
Another → involve → delays
Rhode Island officials are also waiting for clarity before moving forward with the state’s $49.3 million allocation. asserted
officials → wait → allocation
Robert Beadle, a spokesperson for the Rhode Island Office of Energy Resources, said the state needs to know the outcome of the legal challenge before proceeding with the grant. asserted
state → say → grant
Solar for All was intended to expand access to clean energy The legal battle centers on a program designed to make residential solar more accessible to households that might otherwise struggle to afford installation. uncertain
that → intend → installation
The original program was part of the federal government's broader effort under the Inflation Reduction Act to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions while expanding clean-energy access in low-income and disadvantaged communities. asserted
program → reduce → communities
Jennifer L. Wood, executive director of the Rhode Island Center for Justice, another plaintiff, said the ruling could help restore an avenue for lower-income Rhode Islanders facing high housing and utility costs. uncertain
ruling → say → costs
The Southern Environmental Law Center, Lawyers for Good Government and the Conservation Law Foundation also represented the plaintiffs. asserted
Center → represent → plaintiffs
For now, the future of the $7 billion Solar for All program remains tied to the federal government's next legal move. asserted
future → tie → move
The EPA is reviewing Judge McElroy's ruling, meaning the dispute could continue through an appeal before the funding is fully restored or projects resume. uncertain
projects → review → appeal
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support