Photo via NPR

What to know about the $810 million in spending canceled by President Trump

Read the original at NPR ↗
Cite

McDaniel, E. (2026, September 28). What to know about the $810 million in spending canceled by President Trump. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2026/09/28/nx-s1-5982739/what-to-know-about-the-810-million-in-spending-canceled-by-president-trump

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

NPR · collected 2026-09-28 · by Eric McDaniel

Quick Summary

President Trump is withholding $810 million in federal spending, including $567 million allocated for services to refugees and other non-citizens. This action, known as a pocket rescission, circumvents Congress's authority by not providing the required 45 days' notice, leading to criticism from lawmakers who argue it undermines constitutional checks on executive power. Democrats such as Senator Patty Murray have called this move illegal theft, while Republicans like Senator Susan Collins assert that the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) is overstepping its bounds by deciding which programs receive funding.
Written by AI on 2026-09-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

President Trump ordered the cancellation of $810 million in congressionally approved funding on Friday, marking the second use of a "pocket rescission" in 49 years. This controversial move zeroes out funds for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs across seven federal departments, including HHS, Education, and Homeland Security. Key cuts include $10 million from minority business grants, $10 million for legal services aiding illegal immigrants, and $70 million allocated to "woke" international education initiatives. Critics argue the move undermines Congress's constitutional authority over spending; Republican Senator Susan Collins called it an "illegal action."

Written for “Trump Pocket Rescission Spending” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Pocket Rescission Spending
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 64/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
18
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
2 of 18 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
60/100
NPR's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

NPR · 973 article(s) · 3 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 3 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Eric McDaniel
7 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Those involved worry that the administration will point to normal, but poorly understood, parts of American election infrastructure, including slow vote counting in California and Alaska, as evidence of fraudulent behavior.
🔮 The top Democrats on the House and Senate intelligence committees say they are operating under the presumption that President Trump and his allies will allege fraud related to this year's midterms in order to justify election interference.
🔮 According to a statement from Louisiana Secretary of State spokesperson Trey Williams, an employee who opened a letter sent to the office on Tuesday was not injured but was taken to the emergency room as a precaution.
🔮 With the end of the fiscal year less than a week away, the announcement means the funds will go unspent and Congress can't respond.
🔮 The House Freedom Caucus has to transform — it could preview the GOP's post-Trump era
🔮 It's the last week both chambers are expected to be in until after the midterm election in November.
🔮 Inside the Democratic task force preparing for if Trump interferes in the midterms Congressional Democrats are preparing for a new kind of midterm challenge: the risk that President Trump will attempt to undermine November's elections by claiming fraud or interfering in the voting process.
Also by Eric McDaniel
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 7 articles by Eric McDaniel →

Topics

Congress Democrat OMB the Senate Appropriations committee the White House

Subjects

Congress ORG · 10× OMB ORG · 3× Trump PERSON · 3× Democrat NORP · 2× the Senate Appropriations committee ORG · 2× the White House ORG · 2× Susan Collins PERSON · 1× asylees NORP · 1× the Government Accountability Office ORG · 1× this Office of Management and Budget ORG · 1×

Narrative

The administration also says it withheld $15 million to a Justice Department team tasked with "preventing and resolving racial and ethnic tensions, incidents, and civil disorders, and in restoring racial stability and harmony," $70 million to "programs provide grants and fellowships to support institutions bringing foreign students and faculty to the United States to study or teach language," and tens of millions to various research and non-profit grant programs that target climate change or racial and gender minority work.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-28
🔮 With the end of the fiscal year less than a week away, the announcement means the funds will go unspent and Congress can't respond.

Claims (18 extracted, 2 hedged)

What to know about the $810 million in spending canceled by President Trump asserted
know → know → Trump
Each year, Congress passes laws which allocate money to the federal government's various programs and agencies. asserted
which → pass → programs
Trump, for the second year in a row, is refusing to send some of that money to the places that Congress says it has to go, setting off a fresh battle with lawmakers over who controls federal spending. asserted
who → refuse → spending
Of the $810 million being withheld, $567 million comes from programs that "provided services to refugees, asylees, and other non-citizens," according to a memo from the White House. uncertain
that → withhold → House
The move, called a pocket rescission, is illegal, according to the Government Accountability Office, an independent, non-partisan watchdog agency charged with providing federal agencies fact-based information. uncertain
move → call → information
Article 1 of the Constitution gives Congress the power to levy taxes and decide how federal funds are spent — known as power of the purse. asserted
funds → give → purse
If the president disagrees, he or she can send a request to Congress to cancel the fund, but that is supposed to happen with 45 days notice in order to let Congress agree or disagree. asserted
Congress → disagree → notice
A pocket rescission happens when the president decides to cancel funds without ample time for Congress to weigh in or reallocate the money. asserted
Congress → happen → money
With the end of the fiscal year less than a week away, the announcement means the funds will go unspent and Congress can't respond. asserted
Congress → mean → year
"This is the most recent attempt by this Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to undermine Congress's Constitutional power of the purse," Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, who chairs the Senate Appropriations committee, wrote in a statement posted to X. "OMB is an agency of the executive branch. asserted
OMB → undermine → branch
It does not get to decide which programs are worth funding." asserted
programs → get → ?
The canceled funds are fueling anger from Democrats who say OMB director Russell Vought is violating the separation of powers and undermining Congressional authority. asserted
Vought → cancel → authority
"This is theft from the American people, plain and simple," wrote Washington Sen. Patty Murray, the top Democrat on the Senate Appropriations Committee on X. asserted
Murray → write → X.
"Every Republican who voted for these bills should be furious, because Vought is saying their votes don't count." asserted
votes → vote → bills
"Donald Trump knows he can't get these cuts through Congress, so he is illegally making them through the back door," Rep. Brendan Boyle, the top Democrat on the House Budget committee, said in a statement. asserted
Boyle → know → statement
The White House did not respond to a request for comment. asserted
House → respond → comment
The administration also says it withheld $15 million to a Justice Department team tasked with "preventing and resolving racial and ethnic tensions, incidents, and civil disorders, and in restoring racial stability and harmony," $70 million to "programs provide grants and fellowships to support institutions bringing foreign students and faculty to the United States to study or teach language," and tens of millions to various research and non-profit grant programs that target climate change or racial and gender minority work. asserted
that → say → change
A detailed accounting provided by the administration can be found here. asserted
accounting → provide → administration
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support