Photo via The Guardian

Trump cancels nearly $1bn in funding approved by Congress

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Guardian staff. (2026, September 26). Trump cancels nearly $1bn in funding approved by Congress. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2026/sep/25/trump-cancels-congress-funding

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-09-26 · by Guardian staff

Quick Summary

President Donald Trump is canceling nearly $1 billion in funding approved by Congress, using his authority to rescind money for immigrant services and diversity-focused initiatives. The White House justifies these cuts as focusing on "the most harmful government spending," citing reduced illegal border crossings. Critics such as Senator Susan Collins argue that the move undermines Congress's power over federal budgeting; it comes with little notice or consultation, effectively preventing congressional oversight due to timing near the end of the fiscal year.
Written by AI on 2026-09-26, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

President Trump ordered the cancellation of $810 million in congressionally approved funding on Friday, marking the second use of a "pocket rescission" in 49 years. This controversial move zeroes out funds for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs across seven federal departments, including HHS, Education, and Homeland Security. Key cuts include $10 million from minority business grants, $10 million for legal services aiding illegal immigrants, and $70 million allocated to "woke" international education initiatives. Critics argue the move undermines Congress's constitutional authority over spending; Republican Senator Susan Collins called it an "illegal action."

Written for “Trump Pocket Rescission Spending” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Pocket Rescission Spending
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 64/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
NPR
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
New York Post
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 60/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 69/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
22
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 22 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-26 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 1946 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Guardian staff
76 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Zelenskyy said the Russians could not have been unaware that residents remaining in Komyshuvakha gathered each week to pick up humanitarian packages from the site.
🔮 It added: “We are continuing to review the circumstances surrounding this incident and will take appropriate action based on the findings of that review.
🔮 If Democrats win back the US House of Representatives or the Senate in the midterm elections on Tuesday, the final two years of Donald Trump’s presidency will look markedly different from the first half.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · What can Democrats actually do if they win Congress?
🔮 Burnham wants to lock in deals on food and drink, emissions trading and a youth mobility scheme at a summit with the bloc next month, but told ministers that the period beyond that would be to “explore options” for the long-term relationship.
🔮 The remaining 10% of tokens are less liquid, meaning they may take longer to buy, the company said in a post on X on Saturday.
🔮 The US has approved the sale of 500 Patriot PAC-3 missiles to Ukraine for an estimated $2.1bn, but Volodymyr Zelenskyy has warned deliveries could take years and stockpiles were needed now to counter Russian ballistic missile attacks.
🔮 In his first comments since recently being released from a Russian prison, a retired Michigan teacher said he only believed he would be freed when he got new clothes.
🔮 The boon for oil companies has simultaneously been a major pain point for consumers, who say the higher cost of living, especially gas prices, will affect how they vote in the upcoming midterm elections that will determine control of Congress.
🔮 Lawyers for the former FBI director James Comey will ask a federal judge on Friday to block the US justice department from pursuing its third criminal case against him.
🔮 The leaderless movement started peacefully in May, with rallies against a luxury hotel project in a nature reserve, backed by US president Donald Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Guardian staff
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 76 articles by Guardian staff →

Topics

Congress Democratic OMB Republican the White House

Subjects

Congress ORG · 8× Trump PERSON · 6× Collins PERSON · 3× Democratic NORP · 2× OMB ORG · 2× Republican NORP · 2× Barack Obama PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× White House ORG · 1× the White House ORG · 1×

Narrative

The administration has also fired federal workers, imposed a historic increase in tariffs, and started the war in Iran without going through Congress, putting the burden on the judicial branch to determine the limits of presidential power.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-26
🔮 She also said she would work to address with colleagues “these illegal actions”.
2026-09-26 · The Guardian
Trump cancels nearly $1bn in funding approved by Congress · assertive framing

Claims (22 extracted, 0 hedged)

Donald Trump is canceling nearly $1bn in spending approved by Congress, the White House announced on Friday, using a rare and contested power to axe funding for immigrant services and diversity-focused initiatives. asserted
House → cancel → services
Trump’s office of management and budget described the funding cut as focused on “the most harmful government spending”. asserted
office → describe → spending
Most of the cuts are focused on services for immigrants, including non-profits that serve refugees and unaccompanied minors accused of being in the country illegally. asserted
that → focus → country
The administration says the funds are no longer necessary because illegal border crossings have diminished considerably. asserted
crossings → say → ?
A White House press release announcing the funding rescissions notes that some of the organizations are led by people who worked in the administration of Democratic president Barack Obama. asserted
who → announce → Obama
Trump’s move was condemned by senator Susan Collins, a Republican in a tough re-election campaign and chair of the Senate appropriations committee. asserted
move → condemn → committee
Collins said in a statement the action came without warning or consultation. asserted
action → say → warning
She also said she would work to address with colleagues “these illegal actions”. asserted
she → say → actions
“Not only is the delay itself an impoundment that was not reported to Congress, but also it is a usurpation of Congress’s appropriations powers,” Collins said. asserted
Collins → report → powers
It does not get to decide which programs are worth funding.” asserted
programs → get → ?
“This is theft from the American people, plain and simple,” Patty Murray, the Washington Democratic senator, who is vice-chair of the appropriations committee said in a statement. asserted
who → say → statement
“These are funds Congress has delivered on a bipartisan basis and should be helping people – not cut off by a president more focused on building a ballroom than investing in families. asserted
Congress → deliver → families
Every Republican who voted for these bills should be furious, because [Russell] Vought is saying their votes don’t count.” asserted
votes → vote → bills
Typically, Congress can review the president’s proposed spending cuts before they take effect. asserted
they → review → effect
But Trump made that all but impossible by announcing them with just five days left in the federal fiscal year. asserted
that → make → year
The government accountability office has called the maneuver, known as a “pocket rescission,” illegal. asserted
office → call → rescission
Collins called it the latest attempt by OMB to “undermine Congress’s constitutional power of the purse”. asserted
Collins → call → purse
A year ago, Trump issued a pocket rescission for the first time in 50 years by blocking $4.9bn in congressionally approved foreign aid. asserted
Trump → issue → aid
The US supreme court declined to block those rescissions, saying that Trump’s authority over foreign affairs weighed heavily in its decision. asserted
authority → decline → decision
This year, Trump is targeting domestic spending. asserted
Trump → target → spending
The use of a pocket rescission fits part of a broader pattern by the Trump administration to exact greater control over the US government, eroding the power of Congress. asserted
use → fit → Congress
The administration has also fired federal workers, imposed a historic increase in tariffs, and started the war in Iran without going through Congress, putting the burden on the judicial branch to determine the limits of presidential power. asserted
administration → fire → power
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support