Photo via New York Post

Trump cancels nearly $1B in funding for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs in new ‘pocket’ rescission

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Nelson, S. (2026, September 25). Trump cancels nearly $1B in funding for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs in new ‘pocket’ rescission. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/25/us-news/trump-cancels-nearly-1b-in-funding-for-illegal-immigrants-and-race-focused-programs-in-new-pocket-rescission/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-25 · by Steven Nelson

Quick Summary

President Trump ordered the cancellation of nearly $810 million in congressionally appropriated funds across various federal departments. This includes significant amounts meant for illegal immigrants and initiatives focusing on diversity, equity, and inclusion. The move, known as a "pocket rescission," is aimed at reducing executive-branch expenses and takes advantage of the late timing to bypass potential legislative opposition. The largest portion, $567 million, was allocated by HHS for social services for illegal immigrants and other grants that drew criticism over political connections and alleged tolerance of child abuse.
Written by AI on 2026-09-25, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

President Trump ordered the cancellation of $810 million in congressionally approved funding on Friday, marking the second use of a "pocket rescission" in 49 years. This controversial move zeroes out funds for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs across seven federal departments, including HHS, Education, and Homeland Security. Key cuts include $10 million from minority business grants, $10 million for legal services aiding illegal immigrants, and $70 million allocated to "woke" international education initiatives. Critics argue the move undermines Congress's constitutional authority over spending; Republican Senator Susan Collins called it an "illegal action."

Written for “Trump Pocket Rescission Spending” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump Pocket Rescission Spending
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 21% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
NPR
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 69/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 21 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right further left than this Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
Hedges 0 of 23 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Guardian
Hedges 0 of 22 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 9 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
NBC News
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 1 of 34 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
24
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
21%
5 of 24 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-25 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15525 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Steven Nelson
50 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The probe was closed in 2021 by the Biden administration — two years after she entered Congress — after authorities determined the alleged crime was outside a five-year statute of limitations, meaning it would have had to have been charged in 2014 at the latest.
🔮 “They thought they could get away with their crimes.
🔮 WASHINGTON — President Trump on Friday hosted the recently released American inmate Stephen Hubbard at the White House — with the retired English teacher and veteran telling Trump he “wouldn’t have lasted another year” in Russian custody.
🔮 After moving to the more conservative suburban Will County, he requested Republican primary ballots in 2012, 2014 and 2016.
🔮 Vance announced last month that 750,000 enrollees would be booted from Obamacare for suspected fraudulent enrollment, with another 450,000 put under review.
🔮 President Trump has publicly said that he may renew attacks on Iran following the election. We may do another little Epic Fury,” Trump said at a Friday rally in Fort Myers, Fla.
🔮 “Anybody reporting Voter Fraud in the past Elections, or the upcoming 2026 Midterm Election, will be paid $1,000,000 upon the arrest and conviction of those that created the Fraud!” Trump wrote in a social media post shortly before departing the White House for a pre-midterms rally in Mississippi.
🔮 LaCivita, who co-led Trump’s 2024 presidential campaign, and Blair, who served as a deputy chief of staff at the White House until May, likely will still have to pay income taxes on the revenue, which sources said was more than $100,000 apiece. Trump had raged earlier this month after the New York Times reported that the duo, who hold top roles at the MAGA Inc super pac, had taken a trip to back a political party in the ethnically Serbian Republika Srpska, where they advised the victorious ruling party, led by Milorad Dodik, in the region’s election.
🔮 The president asked Musk to reverse any changes that may have slowed Starshield, a military version of Starlink, impeding Ukraine’s war drones and battlefield communications.
🔮 But I will tell you, when he was investigated the next year, we forbade him from working with youth or children anymore.
Also by Steven Nelson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 50 articles by Steven Nelson →

Topics

HHS House Post WASHINGTON the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 5× Congress ORG · 2× DHS ORG · 2× HHS ORG · 2× Departments of Commerce ORG · 1× House ORG · 1× La. GPE · 1× Mike Johnson PERSON · 1× Post ORG · 1× WASHINGTON GPE · 1×

Narrative

Smaller amounts being zeroed out include $10 million from the Minority Business Development Agency, which makes grants to business owners based on their race, $10 million from another DHS program funding legal services for illegal immigrants, and $5 million from the HHS Office of Minority Health.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-25
🔮 The use of pocket rescissions, however, is controversial and the latest action could spur legal challenges.

Claims (24 extracted, 5 hedged)

President Trump on Friday ordered the cancellation of $810 million in congressionally appropriated funding, including large sums meant for illegal immigrants and race-focused programs, in the second “pocket” rescission in 49 years, The Post has learned. asserted
Post → order → years
The action eliminates 11 pools of unspent money at seven federal departments and agencies as part of a drive by fiscal hawks to whittle down executive-branch expenses. asserted
action → eliminate → expenses
“In accordance with… the Congressional Budget and Impoundment Control Act of 1974, I herewith report 11 rescissions of budget authority, totaling $810 million,” Trump wrote in a notice to House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-La.). asserted
Trump → report → Johnson
“The proposed rescissions affect programs of the Departments of Commerce, Education, Health and Human Services, Homeland Security, Housing and Urban Development, and Justice, as well as for International Assistance Programs. asserted
rescissions → propose → Programs
A pocket rescission is a proposed cancelation of congressionally mandated spending that occurs so late in the federal fiscal year that it takes effect regardless of legislative pushback. asserted
it → propose → pushback
It is legally controversial because Congress otherwise has 45 days to consider the action. asserted
Congress → have → action
With just five days before the fiscal year ends on Sept 30, the White House Office of Management and Budget identified areas where funding arguably is no longer needed or contrary to Trump’s policies. asserted
funding → end → policies
The largest pot of funds — $567 million appropriated for HHS to provide social services to illegal immigrants, including through grants to non-government organizations — was deemed to be no longer necessary because of the near-elimination of illegal border crossings in the past year. asserted
pot → appropriate → year
Some of the organizations that had received funds through the program drew controversy due to their political connections to Democrats and their alleged tolerance of child abuse. asserted
that → receive → abuse
The next-largest sum being eliminated, $70 million, was allocated to fellowships and grants for foreign academics and students in the US. asserted
sum → eliminate → US
Some of that funding drew conservative qualms when it was discovered to be flowing to transgender-focused projects. asserted
it → draw → projects
Another $56 million is being yanked from a Department of Housing and Urban Development program to fund outside organizations that provide housing counseling, which instead allegedly fueled “DEI-centric” agendas of Democrat-linked racial advocacy groups such as UnidosUS and the National Urban League. uncertain
which → yank → UnidosUS
A sum of $28 million is being withdrawn from HHS grants deemed “wasteful, duplicative, and sometimes outright harmful and blatantly ideological.” asserted
sum → withdraw → grants
The precise grants that are impacted are unclear. uncertain
that → impact → ?
A further $25 million is being yanked from the Department of Education’s subsidies for migrant students initiative, which funded organizations that allegedly encouraged participants to avoid law enforcement. uncertain
that → yank → enforcement
The rescissions yank $15 million apiece from the Justice Department’s Community Relations Services, an all-but-shuttered office focused on race relations, and from a DHS program that subsidized cultural orientation, healthcare and legal advice for illegal immigrants and asylum seekers. asserted
that → yank → immigrants
Smaller amounts being zeroed out include $10 million from the Minority Business Development Agency, which makes grants to business owners based on their race, $10 million from another DHS program funding legal services for illegal immigrants, and $5 million from the HHS Office of Minority Health. asserted
which → zero → Health
Trump also cut $9 million from the Department of Treasury’s Tropical Forest and Coral Reef Conservation Act Program, which offered debt forgiveness to countries for actions intended to address climate change. asserted
which → cut → change
Trump has used rescission powers twice before, including last year requesting that congressional Republicans end federal funding for NPR and PBS and gut USAID programs. asserted
Republicans → use → programs
Congress approved. asserted
Congress → approve → ?
The use of pocket rescissions, however, is controversial and the latest action could spur legal challenges. uncertain
action → spur → challenges
The legislative Government Accountability Office has deemed the practice illegal, contrary to the opinion of the administration. asserted
practice → deem → administration
The president won a 6-3 ruling from the Supreme Court last September allowing him to proceed on the grounds that his prerogative to conduct foreign affairs was more important than the alleged procedural issue. asserted
prerogative → win → issue
OMB Director Russ Vought and General Counsel Mark Paoletta have pointed to instances where Presidents Gerald Ford and Jimmy Carter arguably made pocket rescissions in the 1970s and the latest action could test — and potentially expand — further use of the practice. uncertain
action → point → practice
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support