Photo via Daily Mail

Jack Smith fires back at Trump as explosive Senate hearing begins

Read the original at Daily Mail ↗
Cite

Deppisch, B. (2026, September 29). Jack Smith fires back at Trump as explosive Senate hearing begins. Daily Mail. https://www.dailymail.com/news/us-politics/article-16169451/Trump-special-counsel-Jack-Smith-senate-testimony.html?ns_mchannel=rss&ns_campaign=1490&ito=1490

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Daily Mail · collected 2026-09-29 · by Breanne Deppisch

Quick Summary

Jack Smith, former special counsel investigating Donald Trump’s actions to overturn the 2020 election and retain classified documents, testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, defending his decisions and stating he developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt regarding serious crimes against the nation. Republican Senator Chuck Grassley accused Smith of casting an overly broad net in his investigation, including subpoenaing records from Republican groups and obtaining communications involving members of Congress, which Grassley argued was unconstitutional. In response, Smith insisted that his work adhered to Department of Justice policies without political influence.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Tuesday, former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Chuck Grassley to defend his two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump. Republicans accuse Smith of abusing authority and politically targeting Republicans, while Democrats support him for standing up against Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. The hearing, titled "Oversight of Jack Smith’s Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans," also involves scrutiny over subpoenas issued by Smith's office, which were aimed at disrupting certification of Joe Biden's victory in 2020, ultimately leading to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Smith has insisted his decisions were made without political bias and said he would not be silenced despite threats from Trump's Justice Department.

Written for “Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 34 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate
Politics · 35 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
CBS News
Hedges 4 of 43 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 70/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 39 claims Outlet record 59/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 70/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Daily Mail's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
35
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Daily Mail · 8628 article(s) · 21 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 21 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Breanne Deppisch
35 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The Cook Political Report ranks Alaska's Senate race as a toss-up, and the crucial seat could determine the balance of power in Congress.
🔮 Trump blasted a federal judge who blocked his planned overhaul of a Washington, DC, golf course - calling the venue 'disgusting,' and vowing to hold the judge 'fully responsible' for any liabilities that might occur at the site.
🔮 Some election officials have cited the incendiary rhetoric President Donald Trump, warning that his repeated claims of voter fraud could expose people to additional threats. Arizona Secretary of State Adrian Fontes blamed Trump for 'ginning up' divisiveness ahead of the midterms, describing the president's actions in a CNN interview as 'wholly and completely irresponsible.' 'Unfortunately, the president has a very broad reach and his audience takes him very seriously,' Fontes said.
🔮 But unlike his other picks, Trump jokingly predicted, Cruz would have a much easier path to confirmation.
🔮 This is a breaking news story and will be updated.
🔮 Today’s action makes clear that no one is above the law, and we will hold accountable all who obstruct the truth,' she added. The news comes just 11 days before the Nov. 3 elections - timing that is all but certain to add additional scrutiny to a politically loaded case. This is a developing story and will be updated.
🔮 A Cooper win would also be a notable victory for Democrats, who have not won a US Senate seat in North Carolina since 2008.
🔮 Though Clinton often waits until later in the race to support a candidate, some have speculated that the eleventh-hour appearance might have more to do with his age.
🔮 - Sign up HERE for our weekly DC Insider newsletter - your guide to what's rocking Washington, rattling the White House and setting tongues wagging on Capitol Hill A group of current and former US national security officials has reportedly been warning that the Trump administration may interfere in the midterm elections.
🔮 The report comes as Democrats on the House Oversight Committee and Senate Judiciary Committee have already sent a flurry of letters to Trump administration officials and others in the president's inner circle in recent months, providing an early sign as to what the probes might entail.
Also by Breanne Deppisch
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 35 articles by Breanne Deppisch →

Topics

Capitol Hill Republican Washington the Senate Judiciary Committee the White House

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 11× Smith PERSON · 9× Jack Smith PERSON · 3× Republican NORP · 3× the Senate Judiciary Committee ORG · 3× Capitol Hill ORG · 2× Chuck Grassley PERSON · 2× Senate Judiciary Committee ORG · 2× Washington GPE · 2× the White House ORG · 2×

Narrative

Former Special Counsel Jack Smith arrives to testify during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking Democrat Senator Dick Durbin appear at a Senate hearing on Capitol Hill Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith is seated before he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee at the Capitol in Washington, Dc Grassley argued Smith sought phone toll records for 16 members of Congress and obtained the contents of messages involving more than lawmakers through records from Trump White House phones. Toll records show details such as when calls took place and which numbers were involved, but do not reveal conversations.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois said that Trump, in the weeks following the 2020 election, ‘demonstrated a wanton disdain for the laws of the United States, the will of the people, and our national security.
2026-09-29 · Daily Mail
Jack Smith fires back at Trump as explosive Senate hearing begins · assertive framing

Claims (14 extracted, 1 hedged)

- Sign up HERE for our weekly DC Insider newsletter - your guide to what's rocking Washington, rattling the White House and setting tongues wagging on Capitol Hill Former special counsel Jack Smith defended the actions he took in probing Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and allegedly retain classified documents - telling lawmakers his team 'developed proof beyond a reasonable doubt' that Trump 'engaged in serious crimes against our nation. uncertain
Trump → sign → nation
‘I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump,’ Smith said in his opening remarks before the Senate Judiciary Committee Tuesday, adding that he made those decisions ‘without regard to President Trump's political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.’ The hearing comes as Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and other Republicans have accused Smith and his team of casting an ‘unjustifiably’ broad net in their investigation, centered on Trump’s alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results, and Trump’s retention of classified documents after he left the White House. asserted
he → stand → House
Smith was appointed as special counsel in 2022, and stepped down shortly after Trump's reelection to a second presidential term in 2024. asserted
Smith → appoint → 2024
In prepared opening remarks, Grassley argued that Smith’s election probe went 'far' beyond Trump’s attempts to overturn his 2020 defeat. asserted
probe → prepare → defeat
He argued that that Smith sought to ‘map out the Republican apparatus’ by subpoenaing records from Republican groups and obtaining communications involving members of Congress. asserted
Smith → argue → Congress
Former Special Counsel Jack Smith arrives to testify during a hearing before the Senate Judiciary Committee Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Chuck Grassley and ranking Democrat Senator Dick Durbin appear at a Senate hearing on Capitol Hill Former Justice Department special counsel Jack Smith is seated before he testifies before the Senate Judiciary Committee at the Capitol in Washington, Dc Grassley argued Smith sought phone toll records for 16 members of Congress and obtained the contents of messages involving more than lawmakers through records from Trump White House phones. Toll records show details such as when calls took place and which numbers were involved, but do not reveal conversations. asserted
numbers → arrive → conversations
The Iowa Republican argued that investigators failed to screen the separate messages for material protected by the Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause. asserted
investigators → argue → Clause
Smith, for his part, has insisted their work was carried out in line with DOJ policy and was not influenced by politics. asserted
work → insist → politics
Smith has defended the special counsel’s work, and argued that lawmakers’ phone records were relevant to the special counsel ‘s probe into efforts aimed at stopping certification of the 2020 election results. asserted
records → defend → results
The committee's top Democrat, meanwhile, argued Smith was acting well within his authority as special counsel in probing Trump's misconduct. asserted
Smith → argue → misconduct
Senator Dick Durbin of Illinois said that Trump, in the weeks following the 2020 election, ‘demonstrated a wanton disdain for the laws of the United States, the will of the people, and our national security. asserted
Trump → say → people
' 'Malfeasance by government officials is sadly not a new phenomenon,' Durbin said. asserted
Durbin → say → officials
'But President Trump's misconduct was egregious, differing in kind and scale from what we had seen by any president before him.’ ‘I hope that that never happened before in American history, and I hope it never happens again,' Durbin said. asserted
Durbin → differ → history
This is a developing news story. asserted
This → develop → ?
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support