Photo via Washington Examiner

Trump administration using border money to pay for for taxpayer-funded ads

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Bullis, H. (2026, September 29). Trump administration using border money to pay for for taxpayer-funded ads. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/4747260/trump-administration-using-border-money-to-pay-for-for-taxpayer-funded-ads/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-29 · by Hailey Bullis

Quick Summary

Democrats have accused the Trump administration of using $20 million from federal funds allocated for Customs and Border Protection to pay for political advertisements promoting President Trump. Senate appropriators Susan Collins and Patty Murray confirmed that these funds, part of the One Big, Beautiful Bill, were intended for CBP but were redirected towards the ads, which include messages like “The Country He Loves” and “Celebrating The Enduring Spirit.” Democrats argue this is an illegal use of taxpayer money, while the White House defends the advertisements as educational public service announcements.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In mid-October 2018, the Trump administration began airing a series of ads on major networks like Fox News and CBS that praised President Trump's achievements. These ads were funded by taxpayer money and included phrases such as "Paid for by the U.S. Government." The first ad aired on Fox News, denouncing communism while highlighting domestic manufacturing, tax cuts, and law enforcement support.

The ad featured images of Trump at various events with patriotic music in the background and text stating, “America will never be a communist country.” It drew criticism from Democrats like Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-MD), who accused it of violating federal rules against using government funds for political campaigns. Raskin said such use could constitute "felony criminal theft" and violate the Hatch Act.

By October 19, AdImpact reported that spending on these ads had increased from $14,000 to $430,000 over three days, running in markets across the country. The White House defended the ad as a "public service announcement," arguing it was educational and patriotic rather than political.

Critics argue that with midterm elections approaching, these ads blur the line between government messaging and campaign propaganda, raising concerns about ethical violations and misuse of taxpayer dollars.

Written for “Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 43 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Taxpayer Funded Pro-Trump Ads
Politics · 44 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBC News
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 18 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different actions by the Trump administration: one involves cutting nearly $1B in Congress-approved spending, while the other involves redirecting border money for taxpayer-funded ads.”
The Straits Times
Hedges 0 of 10 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses Trump withholding $1 billion in Congress-approved funds for various purposes, while Article B reports on the use of border protection funds for political ads.”
Fox News
Hedges 1 of 19 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles describe different actions by the Trump administration: one involves rescinding funds for certain programs, and the other involves using border security funds for political ads.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 29 claims Outlet record 59/100
CBC News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 36 claims Outlet record 74/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 3 of 19 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
⚖️ Centre Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 7 of 37 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the appropriation and use of CBP funds for political ads, while Article B discusses potential legal implications of those ads under the Hatch Act.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
1 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
44
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3836 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Hailey Bullis
31 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The 2026 election cycle now in its final days will be the most expensive midterm ever, according to figures tabulated by tracking firm AdImpact.
🔮 Maine’s local AFL-CIO President Cynthia Phinney called it “mystifying and insulting” that Collins would campaign with Manchin, citing his work as an adviser for the private equity firm Apollo Global Management, which Phinney claimed is responsible for “killing hundreds of Maine jobs.”
🔮 House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) isn’t buying the flurry of polls forecasting a potential blue wave in next month’s midterm elections, instead attributing the GOP’s standing to difficulty in reaching their own voters.
🔮 House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) insisted GOP leadership is “totally united” amid speculation over who will lead Republicans if the party loses its slim majority in November.
🔮 Rep. Ilhan Omar (D-MN) said she will “not be silenced” following a raid on her home earlier on Monday by federal agents as part of a criminal investigation.
🔮 Tisch, who was appointed by former New York Mayor Eric Adams, was kept on by Mayor Zohran Mamdani when he took office last year as an olive branch to business leaders and those skeptical he might wholly overhaul the department.
🔮 Johnson has previously been bullish in interviews that Republicans will keep the House majority, telling the Washington Examiner in September he predicted Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries would remain as opposition leader next year.
🔮 When asked by moderator Gregg Lagerquist, a veteran news anchor, if she would stand with Trump if he visits Maine ahead of the general election, Collins said she did not believe the president would visit the state at all.
🔮 The pair will face off in the general election for Arizona’s 6th Congressional District, which is located in the southeastern part of the state.
🔮 Zahn has voted in two Iowa elections after voting in Michigan for most of his life: the 2024 general election and the 2026 primary, meaning he likely would have voted for Miller-Meeks just once, in the 2024 election.
Also by Hailey Bullis
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 31 articles by Hailey Bullis →

Topics

Congress Customs and Border Protection Democrats The White House the Appropriations Committee

Subjects

Trump PERSON · 6× Democrats NORP · 3× Americans NORP · 2× Congress ORG · 2× Customs and Border Protection ORG · 2× The White House ORG · 2× U.S. GPE · 2× the Appropriations Committee ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Susan Collins PERSON · 1×

Narrative

A White House spokesperson referred to the advertisements as “public service announcements” and said that the ads are “educational and unapologetically patriotic.” TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SPENT $300,000 OF TAXPAYER MONEY ON ADS DURING COLLEGE AND NFL GAMES “These public service announcements are about reminding Americans to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders, and abroad,” the spokesperson said House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) said in a statement that if Democrats hold the House majority next Congress, the Appropriations Committee will “work to uncover and reverse misuses of taxpayer money like this and hold those who abused their power accountable.”
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 With you at my side, we will demolish the deep state, we will expel the warmongers from our government … we will liberate America from these villains once and for all.”
2026-09-29 · Washington Examiner
Trump administration using border money to pay for for taxpayer-funded ads · assertive framing

Claims (14 extracted, 1 hedged)

The White House has tapped a pot of federal taxpayer dollars meant for Customs and Border Protection to fund advertisements promoting President Donald Trump. asserted
Protection → tap → Trump
Sen. Susan Collins (R-ME), who chairs the Appropriations Committee, confirmed that the money was earmarked for CBP after Democrats accused the Trump administration of using taxpayer dollars to fund political ads. asserted
Democrats → chair → ads
“It came from the One Big, Beautiful Bill,” Collins said. asserted
Collins → come → Bill
“It was taken out of funding that was supposed to be for Customs and Border Protection.” asserted
that → take → Protection
Earlier Tuesday, Senate Appropriations Committee Vice Chair Patty Murray (D-WA) and Homeland Security Subcommittee ranking member Chris Murphy (D-CT) accused the Department of Homeland Security of using “hard-earned tax dollars to bankroll the obscene political ads celebrating President Trump.” asserted
Murray → accuse → Trump
In a letter sent Tuesday to Homeland Security Secretary Markwayne Mullin, the senators alleged the department reserved $20 million of funds provided to U.S. Customs and Border Protection by Congress in Trump’s OBBBA for “commemorative events relating to border security.” asserted
department → send → security
“This administration’s defense of using Americans’ tax dollars to air these ads is as absurd as it is offensive,” the Democrats wrote. asserted
Democrats → use → ads
“These ads need to immediately come off the air, taxpayers need to be paid back for this theft, and everyone responsible needs to be held accountable for this corrupt and illegal propaganda.” asserted
everyone → need → propaganda
Three U.S. government-funded political advertisements have been released since last week, with the federal government spending topping $2 million as of Tuesday afternoon, according to AdImpact, which tracks ad reservations. uncertain
which → fund → reservations
The White House has defended the adverts by claiming that they are “clearly not political,” that Trump is not on the ballot, and that the ads do not feature a call to action. asserted
ads → defend → action
The advertisements, titled “The Country He Loves,” “Celebrating The Enduring Spirit,” and “Final Battle,” feature voiceovers from Trump and text saying the U.S. government paid for them. asserted
government → title → them
In “Final Battle,” Trump can be seen walking down a hallway and telling viewers that this “is the final battle. asserted
this → see → viewers
With you at my side, we will demolish the deep state, we will expel the warmongers from our government … we will liberate America from these villains once and for all.” asserted
we → demolish → all
A White House spokesperson referred to the advertisements as “public service announcements” and said that the ads are “educational and unapologetically patriotic.” TRUMP ADMINISTRATION SPENT $300,000 OF TAXPAYER MONEY ON ADS DURING COLLEGE AND NFL GAMES “These public service announcements are about reminding Americans to love their country and understand what makes it worth defending, at home, at our borders, and abroad,” the spokesperson said House Appropriations Committee Ranking Member Rosa DeLauro (D-CT) and Rep. Henry Cuellar (D-TX) said in a statement that if Democrats hold the House majority next Congress, the Appropriations Committee will “work to uncover and reverse misuses of taxpayer money like this and hold those who abused their power accountable.” asserted
who → refer → power
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support