Photo via The Sydney Morning Herald

Why Iran could choose to escalate the war

Read the original at The Sydney Morning Herald ↗
Cite

Kristof, N. (2026, October 4). Why Iran could choose to escalate the war. The Sydney Morning Herald. https://www.smh.com.au/world/middle-east/why-iran-could-choose-to-escalate-the-war-20261004-p612ng.html?ref=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_source=rss_feed

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Sydney Morning Herald · collected 2026-10-04 · by Nicholas Kristof

Quick Summary

The article discusses how President Donald Trump's approach to the war with Iran is viewed as ineffective and counterproductive. Despite claims of success, the conflict has led to increased oil prices, costing American families approximately $1000 each, and has resulted in significant military expenditures exceeding $43 billion according to Pentagon estimates. The piece argues that economic pressure on Iran might lead to escalation rather than capitulation, with experts warning of potential Iranian attacks on shipping and oil infrastructure if tensions continue to rise.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In early March, President Donald Trump announced his "military success" against Iran, claiming victory and predicting lower oil prices. However, this conflict with Iran has escalated instead of diminishing, costing the US over $43 billion thus far. Ali Vaez from the International Crisis Group warns that the war is far from over, noting it as a prime example of how hubris can lead to disastrous foreign policy decisions. Despite the financial toll and ongoing hostilities, the Trump administration continues to assert success in its pressure campaign against Iran. This ongoing conflict has also contributed to increased military power for Iranian hard-liners and heightened tensions in the Persian Gulf region, impacting global oil markets negatively; diesel prices in California have reached a staggering $9.99 per gallon as an example of rising fuel costs.

Written for “Iran War Escalation” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Iran War Escalation
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 16% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 2 of 41 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses political sentiments related to President Trump's actions towards Iran and their impact on voter behavior, while Article B critiques the consequences of Trump's military action against Iran and its broader implications for foreign policy.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 53 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different phases or aspects of a broader situation involving Iran and potential U.S. involvement, rather than a single specific incident.”
Dawn
Hedges 1 of 18 claims Outlet record 72/100
“Article A reports on a US response to Iran's proposal regarding Iraq and the Gulf ceasefire, while Article B discusses broader critiques of Trump's war policies with Iran.”
The Free Press
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 96/100
“Article A describes claims of victory made by both Trump and IRGC on September 29, while Article B discusses a news conference held in early March where Trump claimed military success.”
The Independent
Hedges 6 of 46 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses Trump's reasons for starting a war with Iran, while Article B analyzes why Iran could escalate the ongoing war. They are discussing different aspects of the broader conflict.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 4 of 47 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses recent security incidents possibly linked to Iran without confirmed evidence, while Article B critiques a hypothetical war scenario against Iran and its negative outcomes.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 4 of 60 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss the military operations between the US and Iran under President Trump's administration, they describe different aspects of the ongoing situation. Article A focuses on the reluctance to call it a war despite significant casualties, while Article B discusses potential escalation and broader strategic consequences.”
National Post
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 60/100
Dawn
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 72/100
“The articles describe different stages or aspects of a larger ongoing conflict rather than the same specific incident. One focuses on President Trump's declaration of success in early March, while the other reports Iran's stance against military solutions in October.”
Semafor
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Iran situation under Trump's presidency, with Article A focusing on the consequences and nature of the war, while Article B focuses on potential actions by Iran before midterms.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
43
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
16%
7 of 43 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
61/100
The Sydney Morning Herald's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Sydney Morning Herald · 5640 article(s) · 15 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 15 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Nicholas Kristof
2 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “We’re winning very decisively,” he claimed, and “the result will be lower oil prices”.
2026-10-04 · assertive framing · Why Iran could choose to escalate the war
🔮 “I have also seen UN staff members remain in places after everyone else has left, doing work no one else is willing to do,” Murad said.
Also by Nicholas Kristof
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

American Foreign Affairs Iran Iranian the International Crisis Group

Subjects

Iran GPE · 17× Trump PERSON · 8× American NORP · 3× Iranian NORP · 3× Ali Vaez PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Foreign Affairs ORG · 1× Treasury ORG · 1× Trumpian NORP · 1× the International Crisis Group ORG · 1×

Narrative

The capstone in this “march of folly,” to borrow a phrase from historian Barbara Tuchman, was Trump’s war on Iran this year, which has bolstered military hard-liners in Tehran and enabled them to project greater power over the Persian Gulf and global oil markets.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 “We’re winning very decisively,” he claimed, and “the result will be lower oil prices”.
2026-10-04 · The Sydney Morning Herald
Why Iran could choose to escalate the war · assertive framing

Claims (43 extracted, 7 hedged)

In early March, nine days after starting his war with Iran, President Donald Trump held a news conference to crow about his “military success, the likes of which people haven’t seen”. asserted
people → start → which
“We’re winning very decisively,” he claimed, and “the result will be lower oil prices”. asserted
result → win → ?
Instead, Trump’s Iran war should be taught for decades as a model of how not to conduct either war or foreign policy. asserted
war → teach → war
It’s an example of how hubris can swamp a presidency and lead it to military solutions for difficult global problems – and, in the process, make everything worse. asserted
everything → ’ → process
“The unsettling reality is that the conflict is nowhere near over,” Ali Vaez of the International Crisis Group writes in a Foreign Affairs essay titled The New Forever War. asserted
Vaez → write → essay
Still, the Trumpian myopia persists, with the administration continuing to claim that its pressure on Iran is a smashing success. uncertain
pressure → persist → Iran
“The blockade is working; it’s working like nothing we’ve ever seen,” Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent told Fox News in September. asserted
Bessent → work → September
Diesel prices at a few places in California have hit $US9.99 ($14.40) a gallon, the maximum price those pumps can display. asserted
pumps → hit → US9.99
The United States has already spent more than $43 billion on the war, by a lowball Pentagon estimate. asserted
States → spend → estimate
Higher prices caused by the war have cost the typical American family about $US1000, according to economist Mark Zandi. uncertain
prices → cause → Zandi
More broadly, the US has depleted its arsenal, cost American and Iranian lives, possibly committed war crimes, exposed American vulnerabilities, effectively lost access to some bases and weakened US military credibility as far away as East Asia. uncertain
US → deplete → Asia
Against that, the Trump administration believes it has the upper hand because of the economic pressure the blockade is creating for Iran. asserted
blockade → believe → Iran
It’s true that the Iranian economy is a catastrophe and that ordinary Iranians – the people we are supposed to be helping – are suffering greatly. asserted
we → ’ → ?
Yet Washington doesn’t seem to understand that instead of surrendering, Iran may choose to escalate. uncertain
Iran → seem → ?
“They’ve come to the conclusion that the only way they survive is to shoot their way out,” said Vali Nasr, an Iran expert at the Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies. asserted
Nasr → come → Studies
He suggested that Iran could increase attacks on shipping and, especially if it is attacked, strike oil infrastructure around the Persian Gulf. uncertain
it → suggest → Gulf
I fear that Esfandyar Batmanghelidj, an Iran watcher at a British think tank, is right when he says: “Iran did not wage a scorched-earth campaign – but it may yet do so if the current situation persists for too long. uncertain
situation → fear → campaign
That is what everyone who actually follows this region and its dynamics is worried about.” asserted
who → follow → region
It’s difficult to see a deal being reached, partly because both Trump and Iran have a history of overreaching. asserted
Trump → ’ → overreaching
It doesn’t help that Trump’s chief negotiators, Jared Kushner and Steve Witkoff, are real estate investors chosen for their closeness to Trump rather than for, er, their diplomatic savvy. asserted
negotiators → help → savvy
Iranian leaders also seem cocky. asserted
leaders → seem → ?
Ahmad Vahidi, the commander in chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guard, boasted in August that Iran had brought the US “to its knees.” asserted
Iran → boast → knees
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi told NBC’s Meet the Press that Iran was fully prepared for a new round of fighting, “even if it comes to a doomsday war”. asserted
it → tell → war
One rare issue on which I agree with Trump is the paramount importance of preventing Iran from acquiring nuclear weapons. asserted
I → agree → weapons
In Trump’s speech to the United Nations – the one in which he mused about whether he should “annihilate the Islamic Republic and do it quickly” – he insisted that “Iran will never have a nuclear weapon”. asserted
Iran → muse → weapon
That’s easy to say. asserted
That → ’ → ?
But Trump’s war may have actually increased the likelihood of Iran’s making a drive towards a nuclear weapon. uncertain
Iran → increase → weapon
Trump’s war began by killing the previous supreme leader, who had issued a fatwa saying that Iran would not develop nuclear weapons. asserted
Iran → begin → weapons
The new supreme leader, his son, does not inherit that fatwa and has not issued his own, so now “there’s a serious conversation in Iran” about pursuing nuclear weapons, Nasr said. asserted
Nasr → inherit → weapons
A new measure before the Iranian parliament proposes withdrawing from the Nuclear Nonproliferation Treaty, and 32 Iranian figures have called on the country to do so. asserted
figures → propose → country
“Any other country but Iran would have pulled out of the NPT if treated the same way,” Araghchi told reporters. asserted
Araghchi → pull → reporters
We should take these warnings seriously. asserted
We → take → warnings
One reason professors will teach Trump’s war as an example of military malpractice is that it fits neatly into a larger pattern of counterproductive American policies towards Iran. asserted
it → teach → Iran
I deplore the brutality, corruption and economic incompetence of Iran’s rulers – so it’s infuriating that America has repeatedly empowered Iranian extremists asserted
America → deplore → extremists
First, the US helped topple a democratically elected prime minister in 1953, energising nationalists and souring Iranians on the West. asserted
US → help → West
Then in the 1960s and ’70s, the US gave Iran a nuclear reactor, backed an increasingly autocratic shah and overstepped in ways that helped allow Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini to become a national force by denouncing American imperialism. asserted
Khomeini → give → imperialism
President George W. Bush’s 2003 Iraq War toppled Saddam Hussein, an enemy of Iran, and empowered Shiite militias that support Iran. asserted
that → topple → Iran
In 2018, Trump announced his withdrawal from the Obama nuclear pact with Iran. asserted
Trump → announce → Iran
The capstone in this “march of folly,” to borrow a phrase from historian Barbara Tuchman, was Trump’s war on Iran this year, which has bolstered military hard-liners in Tehran and enabled them to project greater power over the Persian Gulf and global oil markets. asserted
which → borrow → Gulf
That’s what I find particularly worth studying: How is it that for three-quarters of a century, Americans have so bungled our foreign policy that we have systematically empowered Iranian extremists? asserted
we → ’ → extremists
…and 3 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support