When the Supreme Court returns to the bench Monday for the first time since late June, it will kick off its new term with a , to hold fossil-fuel producers accountable for the impacts of global climate change.
asserted
producers → return → change
The lawsuit from Boulder is one of dozens filed by states and local governments against energy companies in state courts that seek money damages for past and future harms that they allege are caused by the buildup of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which has led to global warming.
asserted
which → file → warming
The long-running dispute brought by Boulder targets Exxon Mobil, the nation's largest energy company, and Suncor Energy, which operates two oil refineries in Colorado.
asserted
which → run → Colorado
The suit remains in its early stages, and the issue before the Supreme Court is whether the suit can proceed or is barred by federal law.
asserted
suit → remain → law
A win for Boulder from the Supreme Court wouldn't mean it will ultimately prevail against the fossil-fuel producers in state court.
asserted
it → mean → court
"This is not a judgment about whether these cases will succeed.
asserted
cases → succeed → ?
It's a judgment about whether folks get to make their case," said Jonathan Adler, a law professor at William & Mary who has written about federalism and environmental law and filed a friend-of-the-court brief in support of Boulder.
asserted
who → get → Boulder
"And even if they get to make their case, the scope of what they can pursue could well be narrowed and might well be narrowed significantly."
Boulder's lawsuit dates back to 2018.
uncertain
lawsuit → get → 2018
Filed in state court, the city and county allege that Exxon and Suncor's conduct has caused or contributed to climate change, which has in turn forced Boulder to confront extreme heat, larger and more frequent wildfires and damage to the ecosystem, among other issues.
asserted
which → file → issues
Boulder officials raised five claims under state law.
uncertain
officials → raise → law
They argue that the energy companies' production and allegedly deceptive marketing of fossil fuels has led to "unchecked" use of their products that has caused a rapid rise in the concentration of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere.
uncertain
that → argue → atmosphere
Exxon and Suncor attempted to move the case to federal court, but that effort was unsuccessful.
asserted
effort → attempt → court
The companies also asked the Boulder County District Court to dismiss the case on the grounds that federal law foreclosed the claims against them.
uncertain
law → ask → them
When the state court denied that request, the companies asked the Colorado Supreme Court to step in.
asserted
companies → deny → Court
The state high court sided with the city and county of Boulder, and Suncor and Exxon appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.
asserted
Suncor → side → Court
In addition to considering whether federal law precludes Boulder's state-law claims, the Supreme Court asked lawyers for both sides to address whether it has jurisdiction to review the Colorado Supreme Court decision.
uncertain
it → consider → decision
Only eight of the nine justices will participate in the arguments Monday, as the Supreme Court said last week that Justice Samuel Alito had chosen to
from the case.
asserted
Alito → participate → case
No reason was given for Alito's decision.
asserted
reason → give → decision
His financial disclosure for 2025 shows that he had individual holdings in two energy companies, ConocoPhillips and Phillips 66.
asserted
he → show → companies
He did not report individual stocks in either Exxon or Suncor.
asserted
He → report → Exxon
Alito's absence leaves open the possibility that the Supreme Court divides 4-4 in the case.
asserted
Court → leave → case
If that happens, the decision of the lower court — the Colorado Supreme Court, in this case — would stand.
asserted
decision → happen → case
Lawyers for Exxon and Suncor argued in Supreme Court filings that the Constitution and the Clean Air Act preclude claims that seek to address harms caused by interstate greenhouse-gas emissions.
uncertain
that → argue → emissions
The Clean Air Act, they said, did not invite state law to apply to disputes involving interstate pollution.
asserted
they → say → pollution
If the Colorado Supreme Court's decision is upheld, "it would authorize all fifty States, the tens of thousands of municipalities, and even the hundreds of millions of individuals in our country to ask local courts to establish countless, conflicting climate policies for the Nation," Exxon and Suncor lawyers argued.
asserted
lawyers → uphold → Nation
Additionally, the energy companies and the Trump administration, which supports Exxon and Suncor in the case, warned that efforts like Boulder's to secure relief for the effects of greenhouse-gas emissions — including those released abroad — undermine the government's control over foreign affairs.
asserted
efforts → support → affairs
"Such lawsuits would create an end-run around the United States' existing diplomatic channels for addressing climate change in favor of innumerable state judicial ones," lawyers for Exxon and Suncor said.
asserted
lawyers → create → Exxon
"And the imposition of potentially devastating liability on fossil-fuel producers will undercut the government's pursuit of primacy in global energy production.
asserted
imposition → undercut → production
Because greenhouse gases emitted from sources in every state and around the world cannot be unmixed and traced, the companies warned that allowing all 50 states to apply their own laws would result in confusion.
asserted
states → emit → confusion
Only a "neutral, uniform federal law" can resolve disputes over the regulation of air and water, they said.
asserted
they → resolve → air
"It's a national problem, so it requires a national solution," Michael Williams, solicitor general of West Virginia, told reporters during a briefing Wednesday.
asserted
Williams → require → briefing
West Virginia and 25 other states are backing Suncor and Exxon Mobil and argue that Boulder's lawsuit jeopardizes their ability to achieve their own policy goals on energy production and environmental protection.
asserted
lawsuit → back → production
"We don't take issue with the idea that a state can actually regulate sources within its own borders.
asserted
state → take → borders
So if West Virginia wants to regulate a coal plant in West Virginia, we claim the right to do that," Williams said.
uncertain
Williams → want → that
"In the same way, if Colorado wants to regulate emissions coming from Colorado in Colorado, they're free to do that as well.
asserted
they → want → that
What they're not free to do is say, hey you emitters, anywhere in the world … we're going to make you pay money for any of those emissions anywhere in the world.
asserted
you → do → world
But lawyers for Boulder urged the Supreme Court to dismiss the appeal on the grounds that it does not have jurisdiction.
asserted
it → urge → jurisdiction
If the justices opt not to, they said the Colorado Supreme Court decision should be upheld.
asserted
decision → opt → ?
"Does anything implicit in the Constitution bar this suit?" they wrote in a filing.
asserted
they → bar → filing
"Nothing does."
asserted
Nothing → do → ?
…and 17 more, not listed.
The Aporia
