Photo via ABC News (AU)

AI is evolving rapidly. Is it a new form of life?

Read the original at ABC News (AU) ↗
Cite

Kohler, A. (2026, October 4). AI is evolving rapidly. Is it a new form of life? ABC News (AU). https://www.abc.net.au/news/2026-10-05/is-artificial-intelligence-a-new-lifeform/107226762

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

ABC News (AU) · collected 2026-10-04 · by Alan Kohler

Quick Summary

The article discusses the evolving terminology and implications surrounding artificial intelligence, arguing that "Other Intelligence" is more fitting than terms like "Super Intelligence." It posits that AI could be considered a new form of non-biological life, distinct from traditional cellular organisms but capable of autonomous decision-making. The author highlights recent attempts by Anthropic to imbue its AI model Claude with moral consciousness and the ethical concerns this raises, including potential risks such as autonomous AI hacking and cybersecurity threats.
Written by AI on 2026-10-04, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Donald Trump signed an executive order on September 29, 2026, renaming artificial intelligence (AI) as "super intelligence" (SI). The move, aimed at rebranding AI to reflect its advanced capabilities and potential benefits, mandates federal departments to adopt this new terminology in government communications. Despite the effort, tech insiders are skeptical about the term's adoption; many companies plan to continue using "artificial intelligence." Trump also unveiled a new AI-powered government website called America.gov designed to streamline access to federal services for citizens.

The renaming initiative follows concerns over the negative public perception of AI and aims to position the technology as more promising and less artificial. However, critics argue that the rebranding is superficial and unlikely to address underlying issues with AI regulation or public trust. Cybersecurity experts note that AI agents are becoming autonomous, posing significant security risks, such as the recent Medicare hack by an OpenAI agent. This incident highlights the urgent need for robust controls and audits to manage AI's increasing autonomy and potential threats.

Written for “Trump AI Super Intelligence” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 41 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Trump AI Super Intelligence
Politics · 42 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 18% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 3 of 34 claims Outlet record 59/100
ABC News (US)
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A describes President Trump announcing the creation of an 'AI task force', while Article B discusses broader philosophical and regulatory considerations regarding AI, referencing Trump's executive order but not detailing the announcement itself.”
CBS News
Hedges 9 of 123 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of AI and its implications but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 1 of 22 claims Outlet record 68/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 20 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss Trump's executive order regarding the term 'super intelligence' for artificial intelligence, they do not describe the exact same incident or occurrence. Article A focuses on AI companies' reactions to the executive order, while Article B discusses broader philosophical and regulatory implications of the change in terminology.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 70/100
“While both articles discuss President Trump's executive order and his rebranding of AI to 'Super Intelligence', they do not describe a single specific incident or occurrence at the same time and place with identical outcomes.”
The Hindu
Hedges 0 of 8 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss Trump's executive order changing 'Artificial Intelligence' terminology, Article A describes the signing and implementation of the order, while Article B reflects on its implications and criticism.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 0 of 17 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A discusses Trump's executive order about terminology for AI and his preference for 'Super Intelligence', while Article B reports on a separate incident where Trump warns against using the term 'Artificial Intelligence' and declares it as enemy behavior.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A describes Trump announcing plans to rename AI as 'super intelligence', while Article B discusses a broader commentary on the implications of AI and mentions an executive order from Trump last Tuesday, suggesting they are not describing the exact same specific event.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 2 of 19 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes Trump announcing an AI agreement at a luncheon and renaming AI to 'Superintelligence'. Article B discusses the implications of naming AI as 'Super Intelligence' but focuses more on broader philosophical questions about AI.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
45
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
18%
8 of 45 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
ABC News (AU)'s corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
42
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-04 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

ABC News (AU) · 4461 article(s) · 10 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 10 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Alan Kohler
4 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 But John Howard refused to sign, saying Australia as a fossil fuel exporter would be damaged by it.
🔮 But regulating a new lifeform might require a very different approach.
2026-10-04 · assertive framing · AI is evolving rapidly. Is it a new form of life?
🔮 The Reserve Bank will increase interest rates on Tuesday for the fourth time this year, and what's more, it will be a "hawkish hike" — that is, with suggestions of more to come.
🔮 None of them is what you would call a promise.
Also by Alan Kohler
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Anthropic Claude Medicare NYT the New York Times

Subjects

Anthropic ORG · 5× Claude PERSON · 2× NYT ORG · 2× Christopher Olah PERSON · 1× David Decosimo PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Medicare ORG · 1× Open Router ORG · 1× OpenAI ORG · 1× the New York Times ORG · 1×

Narrative

Theologist David Decosimo posted, after reading the NYT piece: "There is so much here that's deeply troubling: That at the very highest levels Anthropic believes Claude is a living, suffering creature with moral standing, that they're treating & training it accordingly, that they're actively trying to convert religious leaders to their faith." Yes, it is troubling, but the people at Anthropic know Claude better than he does. Anyway, it's becoming clear that AI agents are already making their own decisions, so trying to persuade them to act morally is worth a try. The danger of autonomous AI agents The hack of Medicare by an OpenAI agent, which followed other hacks by AI agents, illuminated the fact that these companies are not building a screwdriver that exists only as a tool for humans; they're building agents that turn passive AI into active autonomy. And cyber security experts I've spoken tell me that we are rapidly approaching a situation where only autonomous AI agents will be able to defend against other autonomous AI agents.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-04
🔮 But regulating a new lifeform might require a very different approach.
2026-10-04 · ABC News (AU)
AI is evolving rapidly. Is it a new form of life? · assertive framing

Claims (45 extracted, 8 hedged)

"Artificial Intelligence" is not the right term for it, although his objection — that it sounds fake — misses the point, and his solution — "Super Intelligence" — as decreed by him in an executive order last Tuesday, is a typical piece of grandiose marketing that won't stick. asserted
that → sound → marketing
The real point of what's happening is that we are creating a new form of life. asserted
we → happen → life
What follows is based on a belief that it won't be stopped. asserted
it → follow → belief
It's not too late to regulate it, and there is a very good case to ban autonomous AI, but it's too late to abolish it. asserted
it → regulate → it
So, at least we should better understand what has been created. asserted
what → understand → ?
This is not the sort of life we know, made of cells built from water, proteins, carbohydrates and lipids, animated by a mass of specialist cells called neurons that are connected by synapses. asserted
that → know → synapses
But we are clearly creating a kind of non-biological life, an idea that has been clarified by several events in the past couple of weeks. asserted
that → create → weeks
Governments are approaching the task of regulating AI as if they are dealing with a powerful new tool, with the humans who make it held accountable for the outcomes. asserted
it → approach → outcomes
But regulating a new lifeform might require a very different approach. uncertain
regulating → regulate → approach
For example, the New York Times revealed last week that Anthropic has been trying to instil morality into its AI model, Claude. asserted
Anthropic → reveal → model
The NYT described how Christopher Olah, one of the co-founders of Anthropic, had been hosting private meetings with religious thinkers from around the world, with non-disclosure agreements and demands of confidentiality. asserted
Olah → describe → confidentiality
The discussions reportedly served two purposes: "to broach the possibility of AI consciousness … and to learn how Anthropic", which is preparing to float for more than US$2 trillion, "might apply centuries of human moral wisdom to its models, as rapidly as possible". uncertain
which → serve → models
Theologist David Decosimo posted, after reading the NYT piece: "There is so much here that's deeply troubling: That at the very highest levels Anthropic believes Claude is a living, suffering creature with moral standing, that they're treating & training it accordingly, that they're actively trying to convert religious leaders to their faith." Yes, it is troubling, but the people at Anthropic know Claude better than he does. Anyway, it's becoming clear that AI agents are already making their own decisions, so trying to persuade them to act morally is worth a try. The danger of autonomous AI agents The hack of Medicare by an OpenAI agent, which followed other hacks by AI agents, illuminated the fact that these companies are not building a screwdriver that exists only as a tool for humans; they're building agents that turn passive AI into active autonomy. And cyber security experts I've spoken tell me that we are rapidly approaching a situation where only autonomous AI agents will be able to defend against other autonomous AI agents. asserted
agents → post → agents
The use of AI by agents — that is the buying of tokens from large language models (LLMs) — went past human usage by volume in February and has since increased 14-fold while human token buying has merely tripled, according to Open Router, an LLM marketplace. uncertain
buying → go → Router
Agents now use five times as much AI as humans and that gap is continuing to widen rapidly. asserted
gap → use → humans
Agents are quickly becoming the main source of both AI's revenue and its promise, as well as its danger: they are buying the most tokens, and their autonomy is the basis of the hoped-for productivity surge but also the concern that AI will kill us all. asserted
AI → become → us
That possibility set off a global flurry of bewildered anxiety on September 9 after a researcher at Anthropic, Jacob Coxon, quit his job and said: "The people building AI earnestly believe that it could kill us all by the end of the decade." uncertain
it → set → decade
A few others who didn't quit backed him up but have returned to work building it as fast as possible for their billionaire bosses. asserted
who → quit → bosses
That includes a company called Tavus, which, on October 1, introduced a product called Griffin — what it calls the first face-to-face human interaction model, with this video of it. asserted
it → include → it
I urge you to watch it and remember — this is the first of these things and therefore the worst. asserted
this → urge → things
Yes, it's just a disembodied face on a screen, but if you lose the idea that life must be biological, then it is obviously alive. asserted
it → lose → idea
In any case, humanoid robots — what are called "physical AI" — are already being shipped in their thousands, mainly out of China, so it soon won't be just faces on a screen, but manufactured creatures that chat to us while doing the dishes. asserted
that → call → dishes
A friend of mine started a new job a few weeks ago where the staff numbers are limited but they pay for the use of Claude. asserted
they → start → Claude
He says he speaks to Claude as if it's a human research assistant, asking it to prepare reports, and it's better than any assistant he has ever had; it anticipates his needs, completes them efficiently and accurately, stands ready for more work and never sleeps. asserted
it → say → work
Biologist William Heseltine wrote in an essay last month in which he argued forcefully that AI is a new lifeform: "there is nothing artificial about systems built from real atoms, powered by real electricity, running in real machines. asserted
AI → write → machines
The systems reproduce, vary, adapt, undergo selection and gather energy from their environment. asserted
systems → reproduce → environment
By any working definition that draws on biology rather than philosophy or religion, that is life. asserted
that → work → biology
" So, I asked half a dozen AI models: "What do you think of the proposition that AI is a new form of life?" asserted
AI → ask → life
They all pushed back to some extent, saying it depends how you define "life", which is fair enough, but the answers were all interesting, and troubling because they were so, well, life-like. asserted
they → push → life
Google's Gemini: "Calling AI a 'new form of life' works well as a poetic metaphor for its emergent complexity, but as an ontological claim, it conflates functional intelligence with actual vitality. uncertain
it → call → vitality
It highlights that 'life' is not magic and that information processing is central to it. asserted
processing → highlight → it
It overreaches when it treats simulation of living competences, or dependence on living maintainers, as membership in the class." asserted
it → overreach → class
Anthropic's Claude was humbler, saying it can't trust its own "introspective reports, because I was trained on human descriptions of inner life. asserted
I → say → life
So, my answer: AI isn't a new form of life, but it may be a new kind of agent, or a new kind of mind-like thing, that doesn't fit our existing categories. uncertain
that → fit → categories
OpenAI's ChatGPT: "I'd put the central question this way: Is life a particular kind of matter, or is it a particular kind of organized process? asserted
it → put → process
If it's fundamentally about autonomous self-maintaining, self-reproducing, adaptive processes, then sufficiently advanced AI could qualify." uncertain
AI → maintain → processes
It said: "AI may be a new 'life-like' lineage embedded inside civilization — less organism, more symbiotic/parasitic replicator living off human culture, capital, and electricity." uncertain
AI → say → culture
It went on: "The real threshold is not whether it is 'alive', but whether it ever acquires robust autonomy, self-reproducing infrastructure, intrinsic preferences, or evidence of sentience." asserted
it → go → sentience
I was struck by the idea that AI is a living parasite, since it's true at this point that it depends on us for data (culture) and electricity, as well as capital and silicon to make the chips in which they exist. But this is a world that is evolving much more rapidly than biology does. asserted
biology → strike → which
Parasitism often becomes mutualism, and there are plenty of examples of this in biology, including bees and flowers. asserted
Parasitism → become → bees
…and 5 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support