Photo via The Guardian

Labour figures rule out working with Greens after ‘Zionism is racism’ vote

Read the original at The Guardian ↗
Cite

Walker, P., & Adu, A. (2026, October 6). Labour figures rule out working with Greens after ‘Zionism is racism’ vote. The Guardian. https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/oct/06/labour-figures-rule-out-working-with-greens-after-zionism-is-racism-vote

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Guardian · collected 2026-10-06 · by Peter Walker, Aletha Adu

Quick Summary

Senior Labour party figures are unlikely to cooperate with the Greens following the latter’s adoption of a policy equating Zionism with racism at their conference on Sunday. Bridget Phillipson, Labour chair, called this move "shameful," while some within the Jewish labour movement argue that it could breach equality law and call for Labour to formally rule out any future coalition or arrangement with the Greens. This stance is seen as a strategic political move by Labour to counter the growing influence of the Green Party among left-leaning voters ahead of upcoming elections, including the Holborn and St Pancras byelection where both parties are competing.
Written by AI on 2026-10-06, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Senior Labour party figures ruled out working with the Green Party after it adopted a policy treating Zionism as racism. The Green members voted at their conference on Sunday to adopt this binding policy, which also calls for a single Palestinian state in place of Israel. Bridget Phillipson, the Labour chair, called the move "shameful," highlighting the importance of tackling antisemitism within political parties. Sarah Ludford, a peer and former MEP, criticized Green Party deputy leader Victor Chamberlain on X (formerly Twitter), urging him to distance his party from the policy. Some senior Liberal Democrats also pushed for their party to end its coalition with the Greens in Southwark, south London. Labour ministers indicated that they could not foresee future cooperation between their parties and suggested formally ruling out any alliances or coalitions.

Written for “Labour Figures Reject Greens Over Vote” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Labour Figures Reject Greens Over Vote
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans right and hedges 17% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left further left than this Hedges 9 of 85 claims Outlet record 66/100
Evening Standard
Hedges 5 of 24 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Article A discusses a planned debate at the Green Party conference about Zionism, while Article B reports on Labour figures' reaction to the Green Party's adoption of a policy treating Zionism as racism after the event.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 3 of 18 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles cover different points in time regarding a 'Zionism is racism' motion within the Green party: Article A discusses the initial reaction and debate at the conference, while Article B reports on Labour figures ruling out future cooperation after the vote.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 5 of 29 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes an internal conflict within the Green Party over a policy vote, while Article B reports on Labour and Liberal Democrat responses to that already-held vote.”
The Straits Times
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 18 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the Green Party's vote on Zionism, while Article B reports reactions from Labour party figures regarding potential future cooperation after the vote.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 1 of 17 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss the Green Party's vote classifying Zionism as a form of racism, Article B covers the reaction and consequences for Labour party relations, which is a separate event that occurred later.”
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 17 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A describes the Green Party's vote and declaration at their conference, while Article B reports on reactions from Labour figures regarding potential future cooperation with the Greens due to the earlier vote.”
The Guardian
Hedges 8 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss a vote by the Green Party regarding Zionism and racism, Article A focuses on the head of Jewish Greens potentially leaving the party over this decision, while Article B discusses Labour figures ruling out future cooperation with the Greens due to the same policy. These are different but related events.”
BBC News
Hedges 2 of 25 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss a motion passed by the Green Party regarding Zionism, they describe different aspects of the situation: one focuses on Polanski's response and stance, while the other reports on Labour figures ruling out future cooperation with the Greens.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans strongly right further right than this Hedges 2 of 32 claims Outlet record 69/100
“While both articles discuss the political fallout from the Green Party's 'Zionism is racism' vote, they describe different aspects and timelines of the event. Article A focuses on Labour figures ruling out cooperation with Greens, while Article B highlights Tony Blair's pressure on Andy Burnham in response to the same vote.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
23
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
17%
4 of 23 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
66/100
The Guardian's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-06 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Guardian · 2862 article(s) · 6 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 6 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Peter Walker
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The prime minister said he hoped to have all four UK nations moving at the same pace on devolution, particularly on efforts outlined in Wednesday’s budget to give mayors in England more powers over tax revenues.
🔮 Healey’s opening remarks John Healey starts by saying that his budget is “delivered at a time when global uncertainties and pressures are swirling worldwide and hitting people here at home”. He says the administration will have a new approach to steer us through global economic storms and give people fresh hope for Britain’s future.
2026-10-28 · assertive framing · Budget 2026: key points at a glance
🔮 The UK government has approved the controversial Jackdaw gasfield in the North Sea, a widely expected move that will nonetheless dismay environmental campaigners and a number of Labour MPs.
2026-10-21 · assertive framing · UK approves Jackdaw gasfield in North Sea
🔮 While the result was broadly as predicted, Labour strategists were buoyed up by the party’s relatively straightforward route to victory in a diverse inner-city area of the sort the Greens have been targeting with recent success.
🔮 “Your viewers will know that sometimes you have a football team that’s disappointing,” the Tory leader told GB News.
🔮 Senior Labour party figures said it is very unlikely their party would cooperate with the Greens in the future after they adopted a policy treating Zionism as a form of racism.
🔮 The English and Welsh Greens are facing international ostracism after adopting a policy declaring Zionism as a form of racism, which has drawn dismay from the group representing European Greens.
🔮 The Greens have formally adopted a policy which equates Zionism with racism, a move that will dismay the bulk of the party’s MPs and has alarmed some Jewish members.
🔮 After Trump savaged the three-way plan as “a terrible deal” during a meeting with Andy Burnham at the UN general assembly, the prime minister said he was “confident” the UK would be able to find a solution to revive the idea.
🔮 When he addresses the faithful on the final day of the gathering in Brighton, the party leader will call for a global pause on super-intelligent AI, comparing it to a nuclear arms race that could result in technology that could “destroy us all”. Davey is expected to lay out plans in his speech on Tuesday for a new international AI safety agency – modelled on the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) and headquartered in the UK, after numerous warnings from AI researchers that artificial intelligence could wipe out humanity within the decade.
Also by Peter Walker
Budget 2026: key points at a glance
2026-10-28 · The Guardian
UK approves Jackdaw gasfield in North Sea
2026-10-21 · The Guardian
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Peter Walker →
Aletha Adu
5 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Next week a high court judge will decide whether two former personnel, Steven Stewart, 55, and Mark Shephard, 49, can proceed with a judicial review of the government’s LGBT financial recognition scheme that was established in 2024 under Keir Starmer’s premiership.
🔮 Senior Labour party figures said it is very unlikely their party would cooperate with the Greens in the future after they adopted a policy treating Zionism as a form of racism.
🔮 The English and Welsh Greens are facing international ostracism after adopting a policy declaring Zionism as a form of racism, which has drawn dismay from the group representing European Greens.
🔮 He said that the US was confident in the security of all its bases and “with the Brits, we’ve worked very closely a long time, including on this investigation, and they couldn’t be more cooperative”.
🔮 After Trump savaged the three-way plan as “a terrible deal” during a meeting with Andy Burnham at the UN general assembly, the prime minister said he was “confident” the UK would be able to find a solution to revive the idea.
Also by Aletha Adu
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

Greens Jewish Labour Southwark Zionism

Subjects

Greens ORG · 13× Labour ORG · 11× Polanski PERSON · 7× Southwark GPE · 5× Green ORG · 4× Zionism NORP · 4× Jewish NORP · 3× Lib Dem NORP · 2× Palestinian NORP · 2× some senior Lib Dems NORP · 2×

Narrative

Tagging Victor Chamberlain, the Lib Dem deputy leader of Southwark, Sarah Ludford, a peer and former MEP for the party, wrote on X that she did not understand “how you think this greenwash is an adequate response to the Greens’ antisemitic ‘Zionism is racism’ motion, from which I believe you should entirely distance yourselves”.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-06
🔮 Senior Labour party figures said it is very unlikely their party would cooperate with the Greens in the future after they adopted a policy treating Zionism as a form of racism.

Claims (23 extracted, 4 hedged)

Senior Labour party figures said it is very unlikely their party would cooperate with the Greens in the future after they adopted a policy treating Zionism as a form of racism. asserted
they → say → racism
One Labour minister said they could not foresee how the two parties could work together, while a government official said Labour should formally rule out a future coalition or other arrangement. uncertain
Labour → say → coalition
There is also pressure within the Liberal Democrats for them to end existing arrangements with Zack Polanski’s party, with some senior Lib Dems calling on the party to end its coalition with the Greens in Southwark, south London. asserted
Dems → be → Southwark
Green members voted at the party’s conference on Sunday to adopt a binding policy that says Zionism should be treated by the party as racism, and which calls for a single Palestinian state in place of Israel. asserted
which → vote → Israel
After the vote, Bridget Phillipson, the Labour chair, called the move “shameful”, saying it highlighted how vital it had been for her party to tackle antisemitism under the leadership of Jeremy Corbyn. asserted
party → call → Corbyn
While Phillipson’s statement was backed by her fellow ministers, there was debate as to whether Labour should go further and formally rule out any ties with the Greens, for example if a future general election delivered a hung parliament. asserted
election → back → parliament
A source linked to the Jewish labour movement said Labour should “absolutely” rule out governing with the Greens, arguing the policy raised serious questions about whether its treatment of Jewish members could breach equality law. uncertain
treatment → link → law
It follows months of speculation of possible cooperation between the parties. asserted
It → follow → parties
Polanski said earlier this year that the Greens could consider an electoral pact with Labour under Andy Burnham or Angela Rayner, while ruling out one under the former prime minister Keir Starmer. uncertain
Greens → say → minister
Labour views the Zionism motion, and the criticism that has followed, as a means to simplify its political argument against the Greens at a time when Polanski’s party has increasingly sought to attract disillusioned Labour voters on the party’s left. asserted
party → view → left
A major test of this will come on Thursday, with voting in the Holborn and St Pancras byelection, where Polanski is seeking to win Starmer’s former seat from Labour. asserted
Polanski → come → Labour
The Greens have poured huge resources into the contest, with Polanski telling the Guardian that it is “really on a knife-edge”. asserted
it → pour → edge
Despite the Greens’ campaigning efforts, helped by their massively increased membership, Labour are considered the favourites to win. asserted
Labour → help → membership
The Lib Dems and Greens already govern together in Southwark after May’s local elections, with the Greens as the senior partner. uncertain
Dems → govern → partner
Following the Zionism motion, both Southwark parties released a “joint administration statement against antisemitism”. asserted
parties → follow → antisemitism
Without mentioning the new Green policy, it said they would “continue to work with Jewish community organisations to make sure they know they have a place in Southwark”. asserted
they → mention → Southwark
It brought a scathing response from some senior Lib Dems. asserted
It → bring → Dems
Tagging Victor Chamberlain, the Lib Dem deputy leader of Southwark, Sarah Ludford, a peer and former MEP for the party, wrote on X that she did not understand “how you think this greenwash is an adequate response to the Greens’ antisemitic ‘Zionism is racism’ motion, from which I believe you should entirely distance yourselves”. asserted
you → tag → yourselves
Another Lib Dem peer, Lynne Featherstone, who was formerly an MP, replied to a post by Chamberlain to say: “I would ditch them. asserted
I → reply → them
The policy was adopted at the Green party conference in Brighton on Sunday by 1,022 votes to 813, despite being opposed by four of the party’s five MPs. asserted
policy → adopt → MPs
Polanski, who left the Green conference early on Friday to campaign, stopped short of endorsing or criticising the motion. asserted
who → leave → motion
In a statement on Monday night after the European Greens and German Greens distanced themselves from the policy, Polanski said antisemitism and criticism of the Israeli state “are and must always be completely distinct”. asserted
antisemitism → distance → state
Polanski said he remained proud of the party’s stance on Palestinian rights. asserted
he → say → rights
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support