Photo via Washington Examiner

Your landlord doesn’t care if you hate Trump: The brutal cost of revenge voting

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Martindale, S. (2026, October 11). Your landlord doesn’t care if you hate Trump: The brutal cost of revenge voting. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4753515/anti-trump-revenge-vote-cost-of-living-vote-based-on-policies-rewarding-earnest-effort/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-10-11 · by Scott Martindale

Quick Summary

This article urges voters to consider candidates based on policy merits rather than personal feelings towards President Trump. It argues against voting solely out of dislike for the president, highlighting potential negative economic impacts from progressive policies such as increased regulation and higher taxes. The author warns that these measures can lead to inflation and limit affordability in key sectors like housing and healthcare.
Written by AI on 2026-10-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Scott Martindale warns voters against revenge voting in the upcoming midterm elections, urging them to vote based on policy alignment rather than disdain for President Trump. He emphasizes that voting Democratic out of dislike for the president could revive policies detrimental to economic growth, safety, and law enforcement. Martindale contrasts today’s Democratic Party with former President Bill Clinton's moderate approach, highlighting current progressive wing policies such as expanding regulation, imposing high taxes, advocating an AI moratorium, decarbonization, defunding the police, and supporting open immigration. These positions diverge sharply from what he considers pro-American capitalism.

Written for “Election Influence Politics” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Election Influence Politics
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 8% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 2 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the upcoming midterm elections but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
26
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
8%
2 of 26 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3820 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Scott Martindale
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 And as the Wall Street Journal editorial board recently opined, “Americans may choose to vote for Democrats to send a message to President Trump, but expecting daily life to become more affordable under their policies is indulging hope over expensive experience.”
🔮 Mid-September brought the convergence of three big issues for investors: oil prices over $100/barrel (keeping headline inflation sticky), surging bond yields (with the 10-year Treasury over 5%), and sudden apocalyptic warnings that unbridled AI could “kill us all by the end of the decade.”
🔮 When geopolitical disruptions remove supply, prices rise — even though the cost of extracting an existing barrel of oil may change very little.
Also by Scott Martindale
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

California Democratic Party Democrats Republicans pro-American

Subjects

Democrats NORP · 2× Adam Smith PERSON · 1× Americans NORP · 1× Bill Clinton PERSON · 1× California GPE · 1× Democratic Party ORG · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× Trump PERSON · 1× Wall Street Journal ORG · 1× pro-American NORP · 1×

Narrative

History has proven that the best outcomes arise from a system of smaller, more efficient government (with low regulation and entitlements) focused predominantly on the rule of law, public safety, and national security, and with an unleashed private sector adept at expansionary, profit-seeking, high-ROI capital allocation that encourages citizens to acquire marketable skills, work hard, and invest in their future, leading not just to individual success but ultimately to robust national economic growth, greater supply and demand for goods and services, lower debt, deficits, and inflation, and broad-based prosperity.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-11
🔮 And as the Wall Street Journal editorial board recently opined, “Americans may choose to vote for Democrats to send a message to President Trump, but expecting daily life to become more affordable under their policies is indulging hope over expensive experience.”
2026-10-11 · Washington Examiner
Your landlord doesn’t care if you hate Trump: The brutal cost of revenge voting · assertive framing

Claims (26 extracted, 2 hedged)

With the imminent midterm election and arrival of mail-in ballots at your house, I implore you to vote for a candidate only if you truly believe in the party’s and its candidate’s policies. asserted
you → mail → policies
Please don’t vote for them just because you hate the president, especially if it means bringing back bad policies that degrade our economy, safety, and rule of law. asserted
that → vote → law
You must keep a level head and vote for the policies that are in your and the country’s best interests. asserted
that → keep → interests
Unifying and engaging, he espoused a moderate, somewhat-bigger-government brand of free-market capitalism in contrast to the Republicans’ conservative, smaller-government brand. asserted
he → unify → brand
The Democrats’ increasingly influential progressive wing advocates growth-crushing, anti-business, state-control policies, vast new entitlements, an expanded regulatory state, and punitive levels of taxation to ensure “equity and the collective good.” asserted
wing → advocate → equity
Many support an AI moratorium, decarbonization, decriminalization, defundment of police and immigration enforcement, and a “look-away” approach to government fraud, waste, and inefficiency. asserted
Many → support → fraud
Such an approach limits supply while increasing demand for goods and services — which is a highly inflationary combination. asserted
which → limit → goods
In fact, as I explained in an earlier op-ed, they are gaslighting the public on the “affordability” issue when the reality is that blue states have the nation’s worst affordability, with California worst of all. asserted
California → explain → all
Just because they keep wielding the word doesn’t mean they have effective solutions for it through more government involvement and regulation. asserted
they → keep → involvement
Indeed, the biggest cost burdens on disillusioned young people today are higher education, housing, and healthcare, which also happen to be some of the most heavily regulated industries. asserted
which → happen → industries
The better test of an affordability agenda is whether the policies they advocate expand the supply of housing, energy, goods, and services faster than they stimulate demand. asserted
they → advocate → demand
And as the Wall Street Journal editorial board recently opined, “Americans may choose to vote for Democrats to send a message to President Trump, but expecting daily life to become more affordable under their policies is indulging hope over expensive experience.” uncertain
life → opine → experience
If a political movement truly believes its goals are virtuous — such as protecting the downtrodden and oppressed from the wealthy oppressors — there is no limit to how much power it will seize to achieve its mission. asserted
it → believe → mission
As Adam Smith opined, “Virtue is more to be feared than vice, because its excesses are not subject to the regulation of conscience.” asserted
excesses → opine → conscience
Indeed, the true solution is allowing market forces to work through Adam Smith’s “invisible hand,” i.e., self-interest and competition leading to win-win deals (by necessity, for long-term success), supply/demand pricing signals, and a market equilibrium of optimal resource utilization and societal benefit — which government intervention only tends to mess up. asserted
intervention → allow → which
Scottish historian Alexander Fraser Tytler famously said, “A democracy cannot exist as a permanent form of government. asserted
democracy → say → government
It can only exist until the voters discover that they can vote themselves largesse from the public treasury.” asserted
they → exist → treasury
This is why our country’s founders created a constitutional republic rather than a pure democracy — to protect us from ourselves. asserted
founders → create → ourselves
History has proven that the best outcomes arise from a system of smaller, more efficient government (with low regulation and entitlements) focused predominantly on the rule of law, public safety, and national security, and with an unleashed private sector adept at expansionary, profit-seeking, high-ROI capital allocation that encourages citizens to acquire marketable skills, work hard, and invest in their future, leading not just to individual success but ultimately to robust national economic growth, greater supply and demand for goods and services, lower debt, deficits, and inflation, and broad-based prosperity. asserted
that → prove → goods
So, how could the solution to today’s problems be to double down on bigger and bolder government programs that encourage more non-expansionary, make-work, low-ROI capital allocation, inefficiency, waste, fraud, and suppression of innovators, risk takers, and job creators? uncertain
that → double → innovators
It all just leads to less private investment, slower economic growth, and higher public debt, deficits, and inflation, not to mention public sloth, malaise, and misery. asserted
It → lead → investment
Don’t allow yourself to be duped. asserted
yourself → allow → ?
Let’s not vote solely based on tribal affiliation or hatred for the president. asserted
’s → let → president
Try to objectively examine every candidate’s policies and vote for those that are in your and the country’s best interests. asserted
that → try → interests
To me, this means policies that encourage, incentivize, and reward earnest effort. asserted
that → mean → effort
Policies that embrace the foundational principles of American exceptionalism, self-reliance, capitalism, meritocracy, entrepreneurship, property rights, the rule of law, and the can-do spirit that have created such breathtaking innovation, broad prosperity, and a rising standard of living for all. asserted
that → embrace → all
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support