Photo via New York Post

AI safety ‘doomers’ pouring cash into Minnesota’s Senate race for Sanders-backed lefty Peggy Flanagan

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Barrabi, T. (2026, October 12). AI safety ‘doomers’ pouring cash into Minnesota’s Senate race for Sanders-backed lefty Peggy Flanagan. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/12/business/ai-safety-doomers-pouring-cash-into-minn-senate-race-for-sanders-backed-lefty-peggy-flanagan/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-12 · by Thomas Barrabi

Quick Summary

Silicon Valley-based individuals concerned about AI safety, often referred to as "doomers," have contributed over $41,000 to Democrat Peggy Flanagan's campaign for Minnesota's US Senate seat. This donation comes amid a closely contested race between Flanagan and Republican Michelle Tafoya, where the outcome could influence national debates on AI regulation. Flanagan, who has expressed concern about AI’s potential dangers, is backed by Senator Bernie Sanders and other progressive figures, emphasizing her commitment to stringent oversight of AI technology.
Written by AI on 2026-10-12, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Silicon Valley-based AI safety advocates, concerned about the risks posed by artificial intelligence, have donated at least $41,000 to Peggy Flanagan, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate in Minnesota who is backed by Senator Bernie Sanders and endorsed as an existential threat to humanity by some within the tech industry. The donations came from 12 individuals working in AI between July 13 and August 12. Flanagan, currently serving as lieutenant governor of Minnesota, faces Republican challenger Michelle Tafoya for the seat vacated by retiring Senator Tina Smith. This race is seen as crucial in determining which party will control a closely divided Senate, where lawmakers are debating how to regulate AI. Local GOP officials argue that if Flanagan wins, she could push for stricter regulations on AI development.

Written for “AI Safety Debate Influences Politics” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 AI Safety Debate Influences Politics
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Fox News
Hedges 0 of 32 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the Minnesota Senate race and do not describe the same specific incident.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 9 of 21 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A focuses on donations in Minnesota's Senate race specifically for Peggy Flanagan, while Article B discusses broader tech money involvement in midterms across multiple races and political action groups.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
43
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
5 of 43 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-12 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16741 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Thomas Barrabi
20 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “I know what survivor parents expect, which is a governor who will take on this industry as if their children’s lives depend on it.
🔮 Conservative groups are urging a Manhattan federal court not to allow AI giants to ‘recklessly crawl the internet’ without compensating news outlets and other content providers — warning that it could create an information monopoly and even jeopardize national security, The Post has learned.
🔮 Sam Altman’s OpenAI is reportedly wrapping up a fundraising round that would value the company well above $1 trillion as it mulls when to go public.
🔮 In a bizarre twist, Gonzalez Rogers also shot down a request by Meta’s Simonsen to use an AI model to speed up review of the withheld documents – asserting that the court couldn’t trust the model to be reliable without more information.
🔮 Sources close to Hochul say the governor is in “advanced talks” with Solidigm, the US arm of South Korean chip giant SK Hynix, and that the firm is scouting sites near Utica, Oneida County, for a semiconductor manufacturing facility that could create hundreds of jobs if approved.
🔮 OpenAI has been warning employees to beware of foreign spies who could try to seduce them in order to steal company secrets, according to a bombshell report.
🔮 Zola will operate as a standalone business for the time being under The Knot Worldwide’s umbrella of brands, which already includes The Knot, WeddingWire, WeddingPro, Hitched and several others, the companies said in a press release.
🔮 “New Yorkers and the public at large deserve to hear directly from the companies developing this powerful technology about the safeguards they are putting in place to protect people from harm and how they will be held accountable when those safeguards fail,” she said in a statement.
🔮 Local GOP officials allege that a win for Flanagan – who said in an interview last month that she was “concerned about the catastrophic nature of AI” – would add another voice in the Senate that would try to hamstring AI development with burdensome regulations.
🔮 “If OpenAI were serious about protecting young people, it would support strong, enforceable laws that hold AI companies accountable for how they design their products,” he added.
Also by Thomas Barrabi
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 20 articles by Thomas Barrabi →

Topics

Democratic Minnesota Post Senate Washington

Subjects

Flanagan PERSON · 8× Minnesota GPE · 3× OpenAI ORG · 3× Senate ORG · 3× Bernie Sanders PERSON · 2× Democratic NORP · 2× GOP ORG · 2× Peggy Flanagan PERSON · 2× Post ORG · 2× Sanders PERSON · 2×

Narrative

“Peggy Flanagan is a socialist doomer who wants to kill innovation and give China the upper hand by pushing effective altruism dogma and fighting alongside the likes of Bernie Sanders to unleash crippling government regulations on artificial intelligence,” said Nick Puglia, regional press secretary for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-12
🔮 Local GOP officials allege that a win for Flanagan – who said in an interview last month that she was “concerned about the catastrophic nature of AI” – would add another voice in the Senate that would try to hamstring AI development with burdensome regulations.

Claims (43 extracted, 5 hedged)

Silicon Valley-based AI safety “doomers” have waded into Minnesota’s US Senate race with thousands of dollars’ worth of donations to Democrat Peggy Flanagan – a Sen. Bernie Sanders-backed candidate who has called AI an “existential threat” to humanity, The Post has learned. asserted
Post → base → humanity
Flanagan, the current lieutenant governor of Minnesota, is facing off against Republican challenger Michelle Tafoya for retiring Democratic Sen. Tina Smith’s seat. asserted
Flanagan → face → seat
The race, currently rated as a toss-up by RealClearPolitics, is poised to help determine which party wins a razor-thin majority in the Senate – at a time when lawmakers from both sides of the aisle are wrestling over how the AI industry should be regulated. asserted
industry → rat → aisle
The far-left Flanagan, who is endorsed by AI doomsayers like Sanders of Vermont and Sen. Elizabeth Warren of Massachusets, received at least $41,000 in donations from 12 individuals who work in the AI industry between July 13 and Aug. 12, according to campaign finance records reviewed by The Post. uncertain
who → endorse → Post
Local GOP officials allege that a win for Flanagan – who said in an interview last month that she was “concerned about the catastrophic nature of AI” – would add another voice in the Senate that would try to hamstring AI development with burdensome regulations. asserted
that → allege → regulations
Her ally Sanders, for example, has called for a government-ordered pause of advanced AI development. asserted
ally → call → development
“Peggy Flanagan is a socialist doomer who wants to kill innovation and give China the upper hand by pushing effective altruism dogma and fighting alongside the likes of Bernie Sanders to unleash crippling government regulations on artificial intelligence,” said Nick Puglia, regional press secretary for the National Republican Senatorial Committee. asserted
Puglia → want → Committee
On the campaign trail, Flanagan has taken a critical stance toward tech. asserted
Flanagan → take → tech
She made headlines over the summer for accusing a super PAC supporting her centrist primary opponent Angie Craig of “using an AI deepfake of me to mislead voters.” asserted
She → make → voters
Flanagan said in an interview last month that she was “concerned about the catastrophic nature of AI,” contending it was “moving much faster than the speed of government” – a clear nod toward strict regulation. asserted
it → say → regulation
Flanagan’s website touts endorsements from Democratic Reps. Ilhan Omar and Ayanna Pressley of Minnesota, along with Rep. Pramila Jayapal of Washington – prominent members of the Democratic Party’s progressive “Squad.” asserted
website → tout → Squad
A Flanagan campaign spokesperson said it’s “past time for Washington to take action on AI.” asserted
Washington → say → AI
The candidate “believes Congress needs to act now to establish mandatory independent safety testing, real enforcement authority for regulators, and legal accountability when these systems cause harm – product liability exists for everywhere else and should here, too,” the spokesperson said. asserted
spokesperson → believe → harm
“Until then, she believes we should seriously consider a pause on further advanced AI development, without it the consequences could have catastrophic implications.” uncertain
consequences → believe → implications
Meanwhile, of the 12 AI workers who donated to Flanagan’s campaign, eight work at Anthropic, which has drawn criticism from both AI industry leaders and the Trump administration over CEO Dario Amodei’s frequent warnings about a potential AI doomsday. asserted
which → donate → doomsday
Donors included William Saunders – a former OpenAI employee who told a Senate panel in 2024 that he quit “because I lost faith that, by themselves, [the company] will make responsible decisions about AGI.” asserted
company → include → AGI
Another donor was Jan Leike, the ex-head of OpenAI’s so-called “Super Alignment” team, who quit in May 2024 while warning that safety had “taken a backseat to shiny products.” uncertain
safety → call → products
The cluster of donations is the latest sign that safety-obsessed AI researchers at frontier labs – who stand to earn millions when companies like Anthropic and OpenAI go public – will soon have vast resources to influence the debate on how to regulate AI, according to one GOP strategist. uncertain
companies → obsess → strategist
“It’s a reflection of how the doomer community is starting to activate and organize in politics – beyond just the executives distributing money to super PACs,” said the GOP strategist, who spoke to The Post on condition of anonymity. asserted
who → ’ → anonymity
“They’re going to become incredibly wealthy after these IPO pops. asserted
They → go → ?
On July 23, Anthropic staffers Steven Bills and Daniel Ziegler donated a combined $14,000 to Flanagan’s campaign. asserted
Bills → donate → campaign
A day later, Anthropic technical staff member Evan Hubinger donated $4,500. asserted
Hubinger → donate → 4,500
Hubinger made waves on Sept. 8 for voicing support of whistleblower Jacob Coxon, who went viral after accusing Anthropic and OpenAI of “gambling with our lives” by building advanced AI. asserted
who → make → AI
“Jacob is correct here—we really do earnestly believe AI could kill all humans! uncertain
AI → believe → humans
I personally think it is >10% within the next decade,” Hubinger wrote on X. asserted
Hubinger → think → X.
“I believe Anthropic is trying its best, but we do not yet have a plan to solve alignment for superintelligence and are not clearly on track to.” asserted
we → believe → track
Saunders, who joined Anthropic’s AI alignment team in 2025, made a maximum donation of $3,500 to Flanagan’s campaign on July 30. asserted
who → join → July
That same day, two other Anthropic employees, Adly Templeton and Tao Lin, also gave $3,500. asserted
employees → give → 3,500
Lin has claimed that AI has a 20% of causing human extinction. asserted
AI → claim → extinction
Leike, also now an Anthropic staffer, maxed out with $3,500 on Aug. 6. asserted
Leike → maxe → Aug.
That same day, Anthropic recruiting analytics staffer Eliza Geeslin gave $50. asserted
Geeslin → give → 50
Outside of Anthropic, Jibran Jahshan, a vice president of software engineer at Nvidia, gave $1,000 to the Flanagan campaign on July 13. asserted
Jahshan → give → July
Jahshan has also donated extensively to lefty Rep. Ro Khanna of California, who supports Sanders’ proposal to ban artificial superintelligence from being developed and has also endorsed Flanagan. asserted
who → donate → Flanagan
Dylan Mavrides, a quantitative data analyst at Jane Street, a trading firm known for its informal ties to the cult-like Effective Altruism movement and disgraced crypto kingpin Sam Bankman-Fried, donated $3,500 on July 30. asserted
Mavrides → know → July
Mavrides and Anthropic’s Ziegler also gave hundreds of thousands of dollars total to the Dream NYC Super PAC, which spent heavily to support Manhattan Assemblyman Alex Bores in his failed congressional run. asserted
which → give → run
Bores ran on a promise to pursue heavy regulations on AI companies. asserted
Bores → run → companies
Kate Woolverton, a software engineer at Google, donated $4,500 to Flanagan on July 23. asserted
Woolverton → donate → July
She previously gave a jaw-dropping $250,000 to the Anthropic-backed, pro-AI regulation super PAC Public First Action. asserted
She → give → PAC
Woolverton was also one of many Google and OpenAI employees who signed an amicus brief last March backing Anthropic after the Trump administration labeled the company a supply chain risk. asserted
administration → sign → company
Adam Breon, a software engineer at Fiddler AI, gave $50 to Flanagan’s campaign on Aug. 12. asserted
Breon → give → Aug.
…and 3 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support