Photo via The Straits Times

US Senate to vote on advancing landmark crypto bill

Read the original at The Straits Times ↗
Cite

The Straits Times. (2026, September 15). US Senate to vote on advancing landmark crypto bill. The Straits Times. https://www.straitstimes.com/world/us-senate-to-vote-on-advancing-landmark-crypto-bill

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Straits Times · collected 2026-09-15 · by The Straits Times

Quick Summary

On September 15, the U.S. Senate plans to vote on advancing the Clarity Act, a bill aimed at creating regulatory clarity for digital assets. Crypto companies have spent hundreds of millions campaigning for it, but analysts doubt it will secure the necessary 60 votes. The revised bill includes provisions addressing conflicts of interest for public officeholders and concerns from the banking sector, though these changes haven't satisfied all critics.
Written by AI on 2026-09-15, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On September 15, the U.S. Senate was set to vote on advancing the Clarity Act, a bill that aims to establish federal regulations for digital assets like cryptocurrency. The House had already passed the legislation, but disagreements persisted over ethics and regulatory concerns. Key opponents included Senator Mike Rounds (R-SD) and Senator Thom Tillis (R-NC), who warned it was unlikely to pass due to unresolved issues regarding President Donald Trump's conflicts of interest in crypto investments. Despite support from industry groups that spent $451 million on lobbying, significant hurdles remained, with some Democrats demanding stronger ethics provisions to prevent financial conflicts for the president and his family. The vote was seen as a critical test for both the cryptocurrency market and political forces ahead of the November midterm elections.

Written for “Crypto Regulation Debate” on 2026-10-30, grounded in this article and the 13 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Crypto Regulation Debate
Politics · 14 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 29% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
CBS News
Hedges 2 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
NPR
Hedges 4 of 55 claims Outlet record 60/100
Semafor
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 6 claims Outlet record 60/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 34 claims Outlet record 70/100
Semafor
Hedges 1 of 7 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 64/100
The Intercept
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 62 claims Outlet record 97/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the crypto bill vote; Article A covers the general context and vote, while Article B focuses on Sen. Gillibrand's flip-flop hours before the vote.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 3 of 15 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses the Senate vote on advancing the crypto bill, while Article B reports on Trump agreeing to a new ethics provision in the bill. These are related but distinct events.”
The Hindu
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 10 of 39 claims Outlet record 60/100
“While both articles discuss aspects related to the crypto bill, they describe different stages and specifics of the process - Article A focuses on the Senate vote, while Article B reports on Trump's agreement to new ethics rules.”
Semafor
Hedges 8 of 114 claims Outlet record 60/100
“Article A focuses on the US Senate's upcoming vote to advance a crypto bill, while Article B discusses Trump's adviser warning about the timing of getting the crypto legislation passed. Although related, they describe different specific events.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
29%
4 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
The Straits Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
14
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-15 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Straits Times · 4019 article(s) · 5 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 5 correction(s)

Who wrote this

The Straits Times
2506 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 "In no case will there be a family photo with European partners and Mr. Lavrov together because ... there is no normalcy with Russia," German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul told reporters earlier on Friday.
🔮 The two parties are set to unveil a series of deals – from critical minerals to artificial intelligence – and lay the groundwork for a broader alliance open to other democracies seeking to better navigate global trade tensions.
🔮 The restaurant flap is the latest offbeat detour in a campaign in which Trump has warned darkly about communism, commented on the physique of men's bodies and joked that the $5,000 payments he is promising Americans if Republicans keep Congress would barely cover a meal at his Mar-a-Lago club in Florida.
🔮 Neither side wants to be blamed by Trump for something going wrong in Oleshky, an event that could burnish his self-professed credentials as a peacemaker before US midterm legislative elections. But the two sides remain far apart on potential terms for ending the conflict in Ukraine, and there appears to be no immediate prospect of it ending.
🔮 In a statement announcing the demolitions, Israel's military said it would "continue to operate proactively and offensively" to thwart attacks in the West Bank and "protect residents in the area".
🔮 He registered to vote in Illinois under his birth name Robert Francis Prevost and requested a ballot on October 3, the Chicago Sun-Times reported on Thursday, citing the Will County Clerk's office.
🔮 Meta, TikTok and X argued the notices create unprecedented regulatory burdens, with X claiming that what it described as “the most burdensome information request X has received from any regulator” would cost it millions of pounds.
🔮 President Trump loves his supporters, and in addition to nearly 20 tele-rallies, he will hold back-to-back rallies in Kansas and Iowa on Sunday," the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.
🔮 Over the past decade or so, G-7 countries would at least “have agreed a coordinated platform before they came to the G-20, but now we don’t even really have that,” she added.
🔮 Given the web of interconnected conflicts in the Horn of Africa, with neighbouring countries and powers further afield backing their respective proxies, experts have warned that war in Ethiopia could trigger a broader conflict in the region.
Also by The Straits Times
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 2506 articles by The Straits Times →

Topics

Democrats Republicans Reuters Senate the Clarity Act

Subjects

Senate ORG · 5× Democrats NORP · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Reuters ORG · 2× Can-Luca Köymen PERSON · 1× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Republican NORP · 1× Sygnum ORG · 1× The U.S. Senate ORG · 1× U.S. GPE · 1×

Narrative

Although passage of the Clarity Act would be positive for the crypto ecosystem — and has been broadly supported by the crypto industry — investors and analysts have said that the crypto market had mostly priced in that the bill would not be passed into law in the foreseeable future, Reuters reported on Monday.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-15
🔮 The U.S. Senate is set to vote on Tuesday on whether to advance once-in-a-generation cryptocurrency legislation, potentially determining the fate of the bill as Republican Senate leaders grapple with a limited calendar in a busy election year.
2026-09-15 · The Straits Times
US Senate to vote on advancing landmark crypto bill · mixed framing

Claims (14 extracted, 4 hedged)

US Senate to vote on advancing landmark crypto bill asserted
Senate → vote → bill
The U.S. Senate is set to vote on Tuesday on whether to advance once-in-a-generation cryptocurrency legislation, potentially determining the fate of the bill as Republican Senate leaders grapple with a limited calendar in a busy election year. asserted
leaders → set → year
The bill, dubbed the Clarity Act, would create a regulatory framework for digital assets, which crypto companies say would put them on more solid legal footing. asserted
companies → dub → footing
The deep-pocketed industry has spent hundreds of millions of dollars campaigning to advance the bill. asserted
industry → spend → bill
But it remained unclear if the legislation could garner the 60 votes it needs to advance, even after Senate Republicans on Sunday released a new text in an effort to address concerns from the banking industry and some Democrats. uncertain
Republicans → remain → industry
The Senate is set to hold its vote shortly after 2 p.m. EDT (1800 GMT). asserted
Senate → set → EDT
Although passage of the Clarity Act would be positive for the crypto ecosystem — and has been broadly supported by the crypto industry — investors and analysts have said that the crypto market had mostly priced in that the bill would not be passed into law in the foreseeable future, Reuters reported on Monday. asserted
Reuters → support → Monday
"Another delay would be negative but probably not a new regime shock, whereas passage would reduce legal uncertainty and could unlock additional institutional activity," said Can-Luca Köymen, investment strategist at digital asset bank Sygnum. uncertain
Köymen → reduce → Sygnum
While the vote is procedural, it is seen as a key test and little time on the calendar remains for Senate Republicans to try to revive the bill if the vote fails, according to analysts. uncertain
vote → see → analysts
OFFICEHOLDER CONFLICTS IN FOCUS Democrats have been pushing for the bill to include stricter limits on public officeholders profiting off their own crypto ventures, a push in part aimed at U.S. President Donald Trump's meme coin and World Liberty Financial, a crypto company that is run by his sons. asserted
that → push → sons
Trump in June disclosed that he had made $1.4 billion off his crypto ventures. asserted
he → disclose → ventures
The new text of the bill gives state attorneys general more power to enforce the restrictions on public officeholders, and would require political officials to divest any existing significant financial interests in crypto-focused companies or place those assets in a blind trust. asserted
text → give → trust
The revised version of the bill also looks to address long-held concerns from the banking sector about a provision of the legislation that would allow certain crypto tokens known as stablecoins to compete with bank deposits, potentially harming lending. asserted
tokens → look → lending
Banking groups on Monday panned the new draft, saying that the new language did little to ease their fears that stablecoin rewards could eventually hinder the ability of banks to extend credit. uncertain
rewards → pan → credit
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support