Photo via Washington Examiner

Democrats could actually kill the Electoral College

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Concha, J. (2026, November 11). Democrats could actually kill the Electoral College. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/in_focus/4799354/democrats-could-actually-kill-electoral-college/

Dated from the outlet's own feed. Check the original for its byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-11-11 · by Joe Concha

Quick Summary

The National Popular Vote Compact aims to allocate electoral votes from participating states to the nationwide popular vote winner rather than the state-level winner, a shift that 22 states have endorsed, including California with its significant 54 electoral votes. The article argues against this change by highlighting concerns about small states being overlooked in favor of large urban areas if presidential elections were based solely on the national popular vote.
Written by AI on 2026-11-11, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

As of November 11, 2026, Democrats are pushing to abolish the Electoral College through the National Popular Vote Compact, which has been adopted by 22 states, including California with its 54 electoral votes. This compact would require participating states' electors to cast their votes for the national popular vote winner instead of the state's popular vote winner. Currently, presidential elections are still decided by the Electoral College as originally intended in 1787. Critics argue that without the Electoral College, candidates would focus solely on large cities and ignore small states and rural areas, such as Iowa and South Carolina, where farmers' needs might be neglected.

Written for “Democrats Propose Ending Electoral College” on 2026-11-11, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.
Why this leaning score
The article's own words the score was based on. Each is quoted verbatim and was checked against the article text before being stored, so you can find it in the original.
Reading Leans strongly right (beta estimate) Confidence high
Leaning: leans strongly right for article 144550 (high confidence, 3 verified quotes) · logged 2026-11-11

Story

Democrats Propose Ending Electoral College
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Leans strongly left further left than this Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 68/100
“The articles discuss related political strategies and sentiments but describe different timeframes and contexts for changing the Electoral College system.”
Blaze Media
Hedges 7 of 29 claims Outlet record 95/100
“Both articles discuss the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact but do not describe a single specific event occurring at a particular time and place. They provide background information and long-term trends rather than reporting on an immediate incident.”
The Independent
Leans left further left than this Hedges 7 of 45 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact but do not describe a single specific occurrence or development of it happening on the same day.”
Toronto Star
Leans left further left than this Hedges 6 of 48 claims Outlet record 64/100
“Both articles discuss the National Popular Vote Compact but describe different aspects of it over time.”
The Daily Wire
Leans left further left than this Hedges 2 of 16 claims Outlet record 59/100
“The articles discuss related topics but do not describe the same specific event; Article A is from November 8 and focuses on immediate plans after a midterm election, while Article B is from November 11 and provides context about the National Popular Vote Compact's progress.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
7
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 7 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
68/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-11-11 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4638 article(s) · 9 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 9 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Joe Concha
12 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
Their argument was and is a pragmatic one: Without the Electoral College, small states and their needs would be completely ignored.
2026-11-11 · assertive framing · Democrats could actually kill the Electoral College
But this execution will be by firing squad of Major Nidal Hasan, the Army psychiatrist who killed 13 people and wounded 32 in a terrorist attack at Fort Hood in 2009.
Eventually, despite the passing of the Inflation Reduction Act earlier that year, inflation would skyrocket to 9.1%, its highest level since 1982.
“I don’t intend to be having a lot of folks from out of state campaigning with me over these next 40 days,” progressive House candidate Sam Forstag told Axios when asked if Ocasio-Cortez would be welcomed back on the campaign trail after stumping for him before the primaries.
The overall premise is simple: You may not like me, but the alternative is infinitely worse.
After the Novig backlash, Sweeney responded with a social media post showing a photo of her in the ad, juxtaposed with covers of past ESPN body issues featuring female athletes, including Serena Williams, Ronda Rousey, Sue Bird, Megan Rapinoe, and Caroline Wozniacki.
Also by Joe Concha
The Left melts down over Haley Stevens
2026-11-03 · Washington Examiner
Democrats have a 2028 problem: Their candidates
2026-10-28 · Washington Examiner
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 12 articles by Joe Concha →

Topics

California Constitution Iowa the Electoral College the National Popular Vote Compact

Subjects

the Electoral College ORG · 3× California GPE · 1× Chicago GPE · 1× Iowa GPE · 1× Los Angeles GPE · 1× New York GPE · 1× South Carolina GPE · 1×

Narrative

Never again would a presidential candidate talk with farmers in Iowa or South Carolina, opting for rallies in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, among other large cities.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-11-11
Their argument was and is a pragmatic one: Without the Electoral College, small states and their needs would be completely ignored.
2026-11-11 · Washington Examiner
Democrats could actually kill the Electoral College · assertive framing

Claims (7 extracted, 0 hedged)

Have you heard of the National Popular Vote Compact? asserted
you → hear → Compact
It calls for votes from the Electoral College from participating states to pledge their electors to the popular vote winner instead of the winner of their state. asserted
votes → call → state
As of today, 22 states have signed on, including California and its 54 electoral votes. asserted
states → sign → California
At least for now, presidential elections are still decided by the Electoral College as the founders intended back in 1787 when the Constitution was drafted. asserted
Constitution → decide → 1787
Their argument was and is a pragmatic one: Without the Electoral College, small states and their needs would be completely ignored. asserted
states → ignore → College
Never again would a presidential candidate talk with farmers in Iowa or South Carolina, opting for rallies in New York, Los Angeles, and Chicago, among other large cities. asserted
candidate → talk → cities
Rural voters in general would be forgotten. asserted
voters → forget → ?
Give feedback · no sign-in needed

No sign-in needed for now. Your note is sent without a name, so it cannot be answered.

History Support