Photo via Washington Examiner

Why internet culture is turning Lindsay Clancy into a victim

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Cookson, M. (2026, September 20). Why internet culture is turning Lindsay Clancy into a victim. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/op-eds/4732683/lindsay-clancy-trial-toxic-empathy-accountability/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-20 · by Matt Cookson

Quick Summary

The article discusses the controversial mistrial in Lindsay Clancy's murder case, where she confessed to killing her children. Despite evidence and admission of guilt, one juror's resistance led to an inability to reach a verdict. Online support for Clancy has been substantial, with many viewing her as a victim rather than a perpetrator. This shift highlights concerns about the public’s empathy potentially undermining justice and legal consequences, raising fears about copycat crimes if such leniency continues.
Written by AI on 2026-09-20, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

In early 2023, Lindsay Clancy confessed to murdering her two young children in California. Despite her confession and lack of an insanity defense, a jury deliberated for over a week before the judge declared a mistrial due to one juror refusing to vote guilty. This unexpected turn has sparked debate online, with many internet users questioning the case's outcome and advocating for Clancy’s innocence. Some women on social media are raising funds through GoFundMe to support her defense, challenging traditional views that murder is unequivocally wrong. The unusual public reaction highlights a shift in how society perceives and discusses high-profile criminal cases online.

Written for “Lindsay Clancy Victim” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Lindsay Clancy Victim
Crime & Law · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly right and hedges 9% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 6 of 48 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles discuss different aspects and perspectives on the Lindsay Clancy case rather than describing the same specific incident.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 8 of 61 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses the societal implications and beliefs regarding Lindsay Clancy's murder case, while Article B reports on a fundraiser for Michael Desronvil, a juror in the same case who was subjected to threats.”
NBC News
Hedges 7 of 65 claims Outlet record 78/100
“Article A discusses the societal implications and moral questions raised by Lindsay Clancy's case, while Article B covers Patrick Clancy's interview regarding his grief after Lindsay's mistrial. They describe different aspects of the overall situation but not the same specific event.”
New York Post
Hedges 0 of 4 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses the general context and societal implications of Lindsay Clancy's case, while Article B focuses on Patrick Clancy's interview about conversations with Lindsay after the murders. They describe different aspects and times within the same broader event.”
Daily Mail
Hedges 1 of 9 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A discusses societal reactions and moral questions around Lindsay Clancy's case, while Article B focuses on legal proceedings after a mistrial was declared in her trial.”
Reason
Hedges 7 of 44 claims Outlet record 67/100
“Article A discusses the mistrial in Lindsay Clancy's trial due to a jury deadlock, while Article B focuses on internet reactions and the perceived shift in public opinion regarding her case.”
New York Post
Hedges 3 of 35 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of cases related to Lindsay Clancy and Corie Walsh, but do not appear to be describing the exact same incident occurring at the same time.”
Fox News
Hedges 10 of 62 claims Outlet record 68/100
“Article A discusses societal reactions to Lindsay Clancy's confession of murder, while Article B focuses on Patrick Clancy's interview regarding his experience and the aftermath of the trial.”
BBC News
Hedges 5 of 40 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss Lindsay Clancy's case, they describe different aspects: Article A focuses on internet culture's reaction to the murder case and legal implications, while Article B covers Patrick Clancy's personal perspective on forgiving his ex-wife after the killings.”
CBS News
Hedges 5 of 138 claims Outlet record 65/100
“While both articles discuss Lindsay Clancy's case, Article A focuses on internet culture surrounding the case and its implications, while Article B mentions a murder trial that has become a national obsession. They do not describe the same specific event or incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
44
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
9%
4 of 44 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly right
of the writing, not the subject · beta estimate
Publisher signals
69/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Crime & Law
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-20 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 4136 article(s) · 8 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 8 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Matt Cookson
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 If China leverages the Huawei deal into greater access to NATO intelligence, that will result in greater losses in Ukraine and a more dangerous security situation for Europe.
🔮 If this situation isn’t handled properly, it’s hard to say where this rabbit hole will lead.
Also by Matt Cookson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

GoFundMe NFL The French Revolution WWE

Subjects

Clancy PERSON · 17× Benoit PERSON · 2× Lindsay Clancy PERSON · 2× WWE ORG · 2× Belcher PERSON · 1× Chris Benoit PERSON · 1× GoFundMe ORG · 1× Jovan Belcher PERSON · 1× NFL ORG · 1× Paul Heyman PERSON · 1×

Narrative

There was a time when the Lindsay Clancy case would have been a slam dunk: a mother brutally murders her own children, and the aforementioned mother confesses to the crime.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-20
🔮 If this situation isn’t handled properly, it’s hard to say where this rabbit hole will lead.
2026-09-20 · Washington Examiner
Why internet culture is turning Lindsay Clancy into a victim · assertive framing

Claims (44 extracted, 4 hedged)

Since the beginning of humanity, one of the few things that has remained consistent is the belief that murder is wrong. asserted
murder → remain → things
Yet the Lindsay Clancy situation is calling that dynamic into question. asserted
situation → call → question
If this situation isn’t handled properly, it’s hard to say where this rabbit hole will lead. asserted
hole → handle → ?
There was a time when the Lindsay Clancy case would have been a slam dunk: a mother brutally murders her own children, and the aforementioned mother confesses to the crime. asserted
mother → be → crime
Clancy did not argue insanity to explain her actions; she knew what she was doing. asserted
she → argue → what
In normal times, this kind of crime would bring back a conviction by the jury. asserted
kind → bring → jury
Yet we do not live in normal times. asserted
we → live → times
After more than a week of deliberations, the judge in Clancy’s trial declared a mistrial. asserted
judge → declare → mistrial
Reportedly, one man on the 12-person jury was the lone holdout insisting on Clancy’s guilt. uncertain
man → insist → guilt
Much to the chagrin of Clancy’s lawyer, this one juror refused to let Clancy off the hook. asserted
juror → refuse → hook
How could only one person of the 12 be convinced of Clancy’s guilt? uncertain
person → convince → guilt
Some women on social media not only think she is innocent, but they also say that Clancy, not her three children, is the victim here. asserted
Clancy → think → media
Not only is there a flurry of social media content defending Clancy, but Clancy’s supporters have given thousands of dollars to a GoFundMe for her legal defense. asserted
supporters → defend → defense
This case, and the public’s response, demonstrates the dangers of empathy reaching toxic levels. asserted
empathy → demonstrate → levels
For much of human history, the focus has been on punishing the guilty. asserted
focus → punish → guilty
The French Revolution is a good example of how this goes too far, sending people to the guillotine for crimes as simple as holding unpopular political beliefs. asserted
this → go → beliefs
Only recently has the aim shifted to “reforming” the guilty so they can rejoin society once they have served their punishment. asserted
they → shift → punishment
Even newer is the idea that perpetrators deserve empathy, even when they are guilty of heinous crimes like the murder of their children. asserted
they → deserve → children
It’s bad enough that thousands are casting their lots with a murderer, but what are the consequences of not convicting Clancy for her crimes? asserted
consequences → ’ → crimes
We may be seeing the early signs. uncertain
We → see → signs
In the aftermath of the trial, we have seen potential examples of copycat murders. asserted
we → see → murders
If the hammer of justice does not fall on Clancy, who knows how many more similar cases we’ll see. asserted
we → fall → cases
Critics may dismiss criticism of Clancy as grounded in sexism or an inability to sympathize with mental illness. uncertain
Critics → dismiss → illness
However, women aren’t the only ones who commit acts of violence due to mental illness. asserted
who → commit → illness
Former NFL player Jovan Belcher and former WWE wrestler Chris Benoit suffered from CTE, which resulted in murder suicides. asserted
which → suffer → suicides
Their suffering from CTE is indisputable but so is their guilt over the murders they committed. asserted
they → commit → murders
As WWE personality Paul Heyman said about Benoit, three people died that night, but only one of them had a choice. asserted
one → say → choice
The law couldn’t hold Belcher and Benoit accountable for their crimes, but society still had a chance to do so with Clancy. asserted
society → hold → Clancy
None of this is to deny that Clancy was not suffering from postpartum depression or that it doesn’t exist. asserted
it → deny → depression
It very much does. asserted
It → do → ?
However, that does not mean we need to lead someone off with literal murder because of it. asserted
we → mean → it
Mental health is a serious issue, and not treating it properly can sometimes be a matter of life and death. asserted
treating → treat → life
As a society, we need to empower mothers to seek the help they need. asserted
they → need → help
That means being open about your feelings and not using them as an excuse to indulge your darkest thoughts. asserted
That → mean → thoughts
Postpartum depression is indeed common, with almost 1 in 5 new mothers suffering from it. asserted
mothers → suffer → it
Even more common are intrusive thoughts of harm to themselves or others, including children. asserted
thoughts → include → children
Clancy supporters, and even some of the jury members, would have you believe that because these thoughts are common, violent actions taken as a result are excusable. asserted
actions → have → result
The right response is to identify these thoughts and act before anything happens. asserted
anything → identify → thoughts
This responsibility lies with mothers, but fathers, friends, and other family members need to be aware as well. asserted
fathers → lie → mothers
The Lindsay Clancy murder case is a horrible situation; that much we agree on. asserted
we → agree → much
…and 4 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support