Photo via New York Post

Cheer this latest strike against NY pols’ climate posturing

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Post Editorial Board. (2026, September 28). Cheer this latest strike against NY pols’ climate posturing. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/27/opinion/cheer-this-latest-strike-against-ny-pols-climate-posturing/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-28 · by Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

A federal judge has struck down New York's Climate Superfund law, which aimed to extract $75 billion from fossil-fuel companies for their greenhouse gas emissions since 2000. The ruling follows another recent dismissal by Judge Brenda Sannes and underscores the legal challenges faced by similar climate-related legislation. Critics argue that such laws are unconstitutional and economically harmful, with costs eventually passed on to consumers. The article dismisses these initiatives as political posturing rather than practical solutions to climate change.
Written by AI on 2026-09-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Judicial rulings in New York during Climate Week have struck down the state's controversial Climate Change Superfund Act, which aimed to hold fossil fuel companies financially accountable for billions of dollars in damages related to climate change. Passed in 2024, the law sought to levy a $75 billion charge against fossil fuel companies over 25 years to fund climate adaptation and infrastructure projects. However, federal judges P. Kevin Castel and Brenda Sannes ruled that the legislation was unconstitutional due to it being preempted by the Clean Air Act, which falls under federal jurisdiction rather than state control. This decision follows similar rulings in other states like Washington, Minnesota, and Connecticut, where laws designed to combat climate change have been challenged on grounds of overstepping state authority and interfering with federal governance. Critics argue that the law would ultimately burden consumers as companies passed on costs, while supporters see it as a necessary step for addressing environmental damage without federal intervention.

Written for “Climate Law Challenges” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Climate Law Challenges
Environment · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 0% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 1 of 30 claims Outlet record 64/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of climate policy and activism in New York, but they do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 33 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different legal cases related to climate lawsuits, not the same specific incident.”
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 9 of 73 claims Outlet record 95/100
Mother Jones
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 49 claims Outlet record 95/100
“The articles discuss different legal aspects of climate change cases but do not describe the same specific incident.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 3 of 27 claims Outlet record 66/100
“Article A discusses judicial rulings against New York's Climate Superfund law, while Article B introduces a new tool linking carbon emissions to environmental and economic damage in Australia. The events are distinct and occur in different contexts.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 33 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different court rulings related to climate legislation and a pied-a-terre tax in New York, not the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 12 of 56 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses judicial rulings against New York’s Climate Superfund law, while Article B mentions a Supreme Court case that will hear arguments next week regarding states' ability to sue oil and gas firms over climate change.”
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 1 of 29 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A discusses judicial rulings against New York's Climate Superfund law, while Article B mentions concerns about energy reliance and fossil fuels without directly referring to a specific ruling or event.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
17
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
0%
0 of 17 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Environment
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 15411 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Post Editorial Board
109 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 She’s also used an “immigration specialist” to help frame “dispositions that will prevent unwanted immigration consequences.”
🔮 The rioting — a black-bloc assault on the Colosseum! — should be a wakeup call, prompting Macron & Co. to rally the sensible center against the anarchists, crypto-communists and Islamists. Stand up for civilization, or the assault will redouble.
🔮 Credible sources discredit the notion that her father could “rise to the rank of colonel with no role in that military’s massive-scale genocide.”
🔮 If the US Supreme Court hadn’t stepped in to stop them, Albany Democrats would have happily erased NYC’s lone Republican Rep. Nicole Malliotakis’ district off the map entirely.
🔮 New Mexico Attorney General Raúl Torrez’s big win against Meta last week means huge risks for every successful company in America; if this decision holds up, the same garbage-lawsuit model could destroy any business.
🔮 Debt patrol: Stop the All-Consuming Fraud Blob Our “monstrous national debt” has turned into a “quickly growing blob [that] is consuming everything in its path and will destroy America” unless government overspending is curbed, warns Deborah Collier at The Hill.
🔮 Democratic victories in November could yield a Congress committed to the same greensanity, likely hobbling Trump’s drive for prosperity — thereby putting energy abundance, and America’s future fortunes, at risk.
🔮 Mind you, the giant Micron plant near Syracuse she announced four years ago is still years off, after repeated delays — and where its power will come from remains a mystery, too.
🔮 Don’t forget: That summer was also when another FITF member, Elvis Chan, was warning social-media companies such as Facebook and Twitter that the Bureau suspected Moscow would launch a disinfo op centered on Hunter — priming them to censor The Post’s reporting long before it broke.
🔮 And she just can’t stop sucking up to Mayor Zohran Mamdani and his fellow socialists, to the point that some regard him as New York’s real governor.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 109 articles by Post Editorial Board →

Topics

Climate Superfund New York New York’s Superfund the Clean Air Act

Subjects

New York GPE · 3× Brenda Sannes PERSON · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Michigan GPE · 1× New York City’s GPE · 1× New York’s GPE · 1× Obama PERSON · 1× P. Kevin Castel PERSON · 1× Robert S. Smith PERSON · 1× the Second Circuit Court of Appeals ORG · 1×

Narrative

For example, the Environmental Protection Agency revealed Thursday that less than 40% of electric school buses purchased under multibillion-dollar Biden-era program have been delivered. “In essence, American taxpayer dollars vanished into thin air, and our children were left without school buses,” fumed EPA boss Lee Zeldin.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-28
🔮 And the public would’ve paid in the end, as those companies passed the new costs on to consumers.
2026-09-28 · New York Post
Cheer this latest strike against NY pols’ climate posturing · assertive framing

Claims (17 extracted, 0 hedged)

Judicial rulings against New York’s bogus Climate Superfund law marks yet another well-deserved blow to politicians’ global-warming posturing. asserted
rulings → mark → posturing
The 2024 legislation sought to swipe a whopping $75 billion from fossil-fuel companies it deemed responsible for more than a billion tons of greenhouse-gas emission since 2000. asserted
it → seek → 2000
Or as Robert S. Smith, a former top state judge, put it, lawmakers “needed some money — $75 billion, to be exact — for ‘comprehensive adaptation to the effects of climate change in New York’” and thought they had “a good way” to get it: Just take it. asserted
they → put → it
That was patently unconstitutional for numerous reasons, starting with the fact that the federal government oversees environmental regulation under the Clean Air Act, not states. asserted
government → start → Act
And the public would’ve paid in the end, as those companies passed the new costs on to consumers. asserted
companies → pay → consumers
But passing the Superfund law let Democratic lawmakers pander to climate extremists by slapping Big Bad Oil, so they saw it as a win-win. asserted
they → pass → win
Note that Judge P. Kevin Castel struck down that law just days after another federal jurist, Obama appointee Brenda Sannes, declared the “unusual and sweeping statute” wholly unenforceable. asserted
statute → note → law
Their rulings add to climate crazies’ mounting courtroom losses: In 2021, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals struck down New York City’s wild bid to collect damages for climate change. asserted
Court → add → change
And on Tuesday, a federal judge dismissed still another nutty lawsuit, filed by Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel, claiming oil companies created a cartel that slowed the development of renewable energy. asserted
that → dismiss → energy
How fitting that such crazy laws, and lawsuits, grow out of a movement that’s itself based on insanity: the idea, essentially, that man-made global warming will destroy the world in just a few years unless we trash the economy and live like cavemen. asserted
we → grow → cavemen
In New York, that’s produced a climate agenda that’s done nothing to mitigate climate change but only driven energy costs through the roof and boosted the chances of power outages. asserted
that → produce → outages
It’s brought plenty of bad policy at the federal level, too, including billions burned on green giveaways. asserted
It → bring → giveaways
For example, the Environmental Protection Agency revealed Thursday that less than 40% of electric school buses purchased under multibillion-dollar Biden-era program have been delivered. “In essence, American taxpayer dollars vanished into thin air, and our children were left without school buses,” fumed EPA boss Lee Zeldin. asserted
Zeldin → reveal → buses
On energy issues, of course, even Republicans can be lured to nonsense, as their recent suggestion to ban diesel exports attests: The ban would mess with the entire oil-refining industry, rapidly yielding higher prices in America — not just for diesel but regular gasoline as well. asserted
ban → lure → diesel
Pushback and reality checks appear, finally, to be reining in climate lunacy. asserted
Pushback → appear → lunacy
In New York, sky-high electric bills forced Gov. Kathy Hochul to push through a slight delay to the state’s climate-change mandates, at least until she gets through November’s elections. asserted
she → force → elections
Pray such sanity keeps spreading and spares us yet more economic pain from the climate-change kooks. asserted
sanity → pray → kooks
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support