Photo via Los Angeles Times

More than $200 million spent fighting and supporting billionaire tax measure, and more to come

Read the original at Los Angeles Times ↗
Cite

Mehta, S., & LeMee, G. L. (2026, September 28). More than $200 million spent fighting and supporting billionaire tax measure, and more to come. Los Angeles Times. https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-09-28/200-million-plus-raised-billionaire-tax-measure-november-ballot

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Los Angeles Times · collected 2026-09-28 · by Seema Mehta, Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee

Quick Summary

In California’s upcoming November election, over $200 million has been spent by opponents and supporters of Proposition 40, which aims to impose a one-time 5% tax on billionaires’ assets. Opponents have raised $187 million while supporters have collected $32 million. The proposition is designed to address $100 billion in expected federal healthcare funding cuts, but critics argue it would harm the state’s budget and economy. Polls show voters are divided, with 45% supporting and 42% opposing the measure. Recent campaign finance reports reflect significant spending on both sides and anticipate further increases before the election date.
Written by AI on 2026-09-28, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Opponents of California’s proposed one-time 5% tax on billionaires' assets, known as Proposition 40, have outraised supporters by nearly six times, with $187 million compared to $32 million. This spending comes ahead of the November ballot vote and includes funds for two other measures designed to nullify the wealth tax. Likely voters are split: 45% support the billionaire tax while 42% oppose it. Supporters argue that Proposition 40 would offset federal healthcare cuts, but opponents warn it could harm the state’s budget and economy without safeguards to ensure funding improves patient care or lowers costs. Campaign finance reports show additional millions have been raised since September 19th, with more expected before the November 3rd election date.

Written for “Billionaire Tax Measure Campaign Spen…” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Billionaire Tax Measure Campaign Spen…
Economy/Business · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 12% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 13 of 60 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the same proposed law (Proposition 40) but do not describe the same specific incident or occurrence.”
ABC News (US)
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 5 of 43 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe related events but not the same specific incident: one focuses on the overall spending in the campaign, while the other reports on a rally by top Democrats to support the initiative.”
New York Post
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 5 of 23 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss different aspects of the same broader issue (the California billionaire tax proposal), but they describe distinct events: one focuses on a new poll, while the other reports on spending in the campaign.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
32
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
12%
4 of 32 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
95/100
Los Angeles Times's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Economy/Business
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-28 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Los Angeles Times · 259 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Seema Mehta
11 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Proposed billionaire tax could impact California sports teams
🔮 The billionaire tax, Proposition 40, would levy a one-time, 5% tax on many assets of California billionaires who lived in the state as of Jan. 1.
🔮 Two members of Hilton’s GOP “Golden Ticket” on the Nov. 3 ballot lashed out about the ad’s content. “I emphatically denounce the use of young women as a political tool,” Michael Gates, the Republican candidate for attorney general who has frequently appeared alongside Hilton at campaign events, wrote on X. “California families deserve better, and as AG, I will fight every day to protect our girls, young women, and parental rights.”
🔮 - Proposition 40’s supporters say the tax would offset looming federal healthcare cuts; opponents argue it threatens the state’s budget and economy.
🔮 Companies and special interest groups with some of the diciest issues expected to land on California’s next governor’s desk are among the top financial backers of Democrat Xavier Becerra, the gubernatorial front-runner.
🔮 - The sweeping cuts would slash billions in state revenue, revive memories of Arnold Schwarzenegger’s car-tax rollback and raise new questions about California’s budget, services and political climate.
🔮 - Days before mail-in ballots arrive statewide, Democrat Xavier Becerra and Republican Steve Hilton will face off Sept. 30 in California’s high-stakes governor’s race.
🔮 - A bipartisan coalition is campaigning to undo the top-two system while reform advocates warn repeal would sideline 5.4 million independent voters and reverse efforts to weaken party bosses.
🔮 “We will have debates, and between now and Nov. 3, we will continue to go out there and meet with folks to make sure they have an opportunity to see the candidates,” Becerra told reporters after greeting business owners, community leaders and voters in a walking tour of Little Tokyo.
Also by Seema Mehta
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 11 articles by Seema Mehta →
Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee
3 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 It did not include contributions to party committees or independent committees that could also be spending in these races.
🔮 - Proposition 40’s supporters say the tax would offset looming federal healthcare cuts; opponents argue it threatens the state’s budget and economy.
🔮 Companies and special interest groups with some of the diciest issues expected to land on California’s next governor’s desk are among the top financial backers of Democrat Xavier Becerra, the gubernatorial front-runner.
Also by Gabrielle LaMarr LeMee
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.

Topics

California Californians Proposition 40 Proposition 41 the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West

Subjects

California GPE · 5× Californians NORP · 4× California Medical Assn. ORG · 1× Democratic NORP · 1× Democrats NORP · 1× Gavin Newsom PERSON · 1× Molly Weedn PERSON · 1× René Bravo PERSON · 1× Suzanne Jimenez PERSON · 1× the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West ORG · 1×

Narrative

“The more Californians learn, the more they see Proposition 40 for what it is — a harmful tax scheme that permanently damages the state’s budget and economy with zero accountability or safeguards to ensure funding actually improves care or lowers costs for patients,” said California Medical Assn. President Dr. René Bravo, the leader of one of the groups opposing the billionaire tax.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-28
🔮 - Proposition 40’s supporters say the tax would offset looming federal healthcare cuts; opponents argue it threatens the state’s budget and economy.

Claims (32 extracted, 4 hedged)

More than $200 million spent fighting and supporting billionaire tax measure, and more to come - Click here to listen to this article - asserted
million → spend → article
- Opponents of California’s proposed one-time 5% tax on billionaires’ assets and measures designed to block it have raised $187 million, compared with $32 million for supporters. asserted
Opponents → propose → supporters
- Proposition 40’s supporters say the tax would offset looming federal healthcare cuts; opponents argue it threatens the state’s budget and economy. asserted
it → say → budget
- Likely voters are divided: 45% said they support the billionaire tax and 42% oppose it. asserted
% → divide → it
Opponents of the billionaire tax on the November ballot have vastly outraised the proposal’s supporters, with the anti-Proposition 40 effort and the backers of two other ballot measures crafted to nullify it raising $187 million compared to the $32 million raised by boosters of the wealth tax, according to campaign finance documents filed with the state. uncertain
effort → outraise → state
The reports, filed Thursday, account for donations through Sept. 19 and do not include several million dollars that have poured into campaign coffers in recent days. asserted
that → file → days
The numbers are expected to vastly increase before the Nov. 3 election. asserted
numbers → expect → election
The bulk of the money raised by the proponents of Proposition 40, which would enact a one-time 5% tax on California billionaires’ assets, appears to have been spent on gathering signatures to qualify the measure for the November ballot. asserted
which → raise → ballot
The campaign had only $207,000 in the bank, according to the latest campaign finance reports. uncertain
campaign → have → reports
A leader of the union that crafted the proposal accused wealthy Californians who are spending heavily against the measure of lying to voters. asserted
who → craft → voters
The measure is designed to offset $100 billion in impending federal healthcare funding cuts expected to impacts millions of Californians. asserted
measure → design → Californians
“The billionaires take and take — tax break after tax break — and now they’re spending that money to deceive voters and avoid paying their fair share,” said Suzanne Jimenez, the chief of staff of the Service Employees International Union-United Healthcare Workers West. asserted
Jimenez → take → Union
“Voters want their money back from the billionaires and want local emergency rooms to stay open. asserted
rooms → want → billionaires
California does not need more tax breaks for billionaires. asserted
California → need → billionaires
California needs emergency rooms for patients, hospitals that stay open, and healthcare people can access and afford.” asserted
people → need → patients
Opponents of the billionaire tax argue that it would do more harm than good. asserted
it → argue → harm
“The more Californians learn, the more they see Proposition 40 for what it is — a harmful tax scheme that permanently damages the state’s budget and economy with zero accountability or safeguards to ensure funding actually improves care or lowers costs for patients,” said California Medical Assn. President Dr. René Bravo, the leader of one of the groups opposing the billionaire tax. asserted
Bravo → learn → tax
Proposition 41 would nullify the billionaire tax if, in the event that both measures are approved, it receives more “yes” votes. asserted
it → nullify → votes
Proposition 41 would prohibit any new state tax from being excluded from a voter-approved cap that restricts how much tax revenue the state can spend each year. asserted
state → prohibit → revenue
“Californians deserve better results for their hard-earned tax dollars,” said Molly Weedn, a spokesperson for the Proposition 41 campaign. asserted
Weedn → deserve → campaign
Proposition 42 would prohibit new taxes on personal property, intellectual property, retirement accounts and other assets, and would limit situations in which a ballot measure or state lawmakers can impose or raise taxes retroactively — both of which are essential parts of Proposition 40. asserted
both → prohibit → Proposition
If both measures pass and Proposition 42 receives more “yes” votes, it would nullify the wealth tax. asserted
it → pass → tax
The proposed billionaire tax has divided California Democrats, with Gov. Gavin Newsom opposing it while the state Democratic party supports it. asserted
party → propose → it
In recent polling, a majority of likely voters did not support any of the three proposals. asserted
majority → support → proposals
While 45% of likely voters supported the billionaire tax, 42% opposed it, according to a poll released Friday by UC Berkeley’s Institute of Governmental Studies and co-sponsored by the Los Angeles Times. uncertain
% → support → Times
Voters also are torn about the two ballot measures designed to nullify it. asserted
Voters → tear → it
The other measure receiving great attention, Proposition 39, which would require voters to show government-issued ID to cast ballots, faces a similar financial disparity. asserted
which → receive → disparity
Opponents to the measure have raised $39.3 million compared to $15.6 million garnered by supporters. asserted
Opponents → raise → supporters
Fifty-two percent of likely California voters oppose the voter ID proposal, while 39% support it and 9% are undecided, according to the Berkeley poll. uncertain
% → oppose → poll
In the race to replace Newsom, Democratic former Biden cabinet member Xavier Becerra has raised $35.8 million, while his GOP rival, conservative strategist and television commentator Steve Hilton, has raised $22.3 million. asserted
rival → replace → million
Becerra remains the front-runner in the governor’s race, which is not surprising since Democratic voters outnumber Republicans nearly 2 to 1. asserted
voters → remain → Republicans
In last week’s Berkeley poll, the Democrat had the support of 58% of likely voters, while 33% backed the Republican. asserted
% → have → Republican
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support