Photo via Washington Examiner

Jack Smith dodges questions about spying on Republican lawmakers

Read the original at Washington Examiner ↗
Cite

Deese, K. (2026, September 29). Jack Smith dodges questions about spying on Republican lawmakers. Washington Examiner. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/senate/4747100/jack-smith-dodges-questions-spying-republicans/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

Washington Examiner · collected 2026-09-29 · by Kaelan Deese

Quick Summary

Jack Smith, the former special counsel, appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee to defend his investigation into President Donald Trump and Republican lawmakers. During the hearing, it was revealed that Smith’s team had obtained phone records of at least 4,782 donors contributing to Trump’s campaign and affiliated groups from September 2019 through August 2023. Senator Chuck Grassley questioned Smith about whether these subpoenas also included geolocation data for lawmakers’ physical locations, but Smith could not definitively confirm or deny this detail.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Tuesday, former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Chuck Grassley to defend his two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump. Republicans accuse Smith of abusing authority and politically targeting Republicans, while Democrats support him for standing up against Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. The hearing, titled "Oversight of Jack Smith’s Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans," also involves scrutiny over subpoenas issued by Smith's office, which were aimed at disrupting certification of Joe Biden's victory in 2020, ultimately leading to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Smith has insisted his decisions were made without political bias and said he would not be silenced despite threats from Trump's Justice Department.

Written for “Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate” on 2026-11-01, grounded in this article and the 34 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate
Politics · 35 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 11% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 70/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 70/100
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 1 of 16 claims Outlet record 70/100
The Bulwark
Hedges 0 of 5 claims
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
September 29, 2026 Same event
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 7 of 86 claims
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 71 claims
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
54
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
11%
6 of 54 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
70/100
Washington Examiner's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
35
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

Washington Examiner · 3879 article(s) · 7 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 7 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Kaelan Deese
44 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 A federal judge grilled former FBI Director James Comey’s attorneys on Friday over whether their effort to dismiss the Justice Department’s latest criminal case could become “a great exercise in futility” if a grand jury returns an indictment alleging more recent conduct.
🔮 Alaska Democratic Senate nominee Mary Peltola’s campaign could face demands for records revealing who financed an effort to recruit a second Dan Sullivan to enter the race as the Justice Department seeks discovery in its Alaska election lawsuit — and now accuses her campaign committee and national Democrats of misleading the court about the operation.
🔮 The campaigns could offer lessons for anti-abortion groups, which have struggled to win statewide abortion votes since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade in 2022.
🔮 U.S. District Judge David Carter, an appointee of former President Bill Clinton, rejected the department’s request to require election officials to hold the flagged voters’ ballots until their citizenship could be verified.
🔮 Voters in six states will soon decide whether to impose or expand voter identification requirements, including rules requiring mail voters to provide part of a driver’s license or Social Security number.
🔮 Just hours after issuing what a Trump administration lawyer called an “untenable” command from the bench, a federal judge withdrew her order that would have forced the Department of Justice to refile a court brief with the names of career attorneys who agreed with it, reversing course Monday after a court hearing about golf course renovations stretched beyond six hours.
🔮 The defense argued that the prosecution relies on a novel interpretation of the law and that Van Dyke lacked fair notice that trading on the information could violate federal law.
🔮 His petition arrives as Democrats in Washington are preparing investigations for a possible return to House control in January 2027, while President Donald Trump’s allies are organizing legal defenses for officials who could be called to testify or produce records.
🔮 He warned that the proposal would damage the Public Integrity Section’s reputation, adding that officials “might as well rename the damn thing the Anti-MAGA Task Force.”
🔮 “I’m not even sure that we need to reinvent the wheel,” Delangue said at Politico‘s Decoded Summit on Sept. 16, arguing that existing cybersecurity laws may still be effective at handling mishandled or out-of-control agentic models.
2026-10-04 · assertive framing · Does rogue AI require a new rulebook?
Also by Kaelan Deese
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 44 articles by Kaelan Deese →

Topics

Americans Republican Republicans The Senate Judiciary Committee White House

Subjects

Smith PERSON · 14× Trump PERSON · 6× Grassley PERSON · 4× Congress ORG · 3× Republican NORP · 2× White House ORG · 2× Donald Trump PERSON · 1× Jack Smith PERSON · 1× Republicans NORP · 1× The Senate Judiciary Committee ORG · 1×

Narrative

The Senate Judiciary Committee marked Smith’s first time testifying to its members about the nature of his investigations into President Donald Trump prior to Trump’s reelection, as Republicans confronted Smith with records showing how far those investigations extended beyond the president.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 Former special counsel Jack Smith defended secretly obtaining Republican lawmakers’ phone records, but he could not say on Tuesday whether his subpoenas sought their physical locations, nor could he recall key details about his demands for conservative fundraising information.
2026-09-29 · Washington Examiner
Jack Smith dodges questions about spying on Republican lawmakers · assertive framing

Claims (54 extracted, 6 hedged)

Former special counsel Jack Smith defended secretly obtaining Republican lawmakers’ phone records, but he could not say on Tuesday whether his subpoenas sought their physical locations, nor could he recall key details about his demands for conservative fundraising information. uncertain
he → defend → information
The Senate Judiciary Committee marked Smith’s first time testifying to its members about the nature of his investigations into President Donald Trump prior to Trump’s reelection, as Republicans confronted Smith with records showing how far those investigations extended beyond the president. asserted
investigations → mark → president
At the outset of the hearing, Chairman Chuck Grassley (R-IA) disclosed that investigators obtained at least 4,782 donor checks, including for contributions to Trump as small as $1. asserted
investigators → disclose → 1
The previously unreported extension of Smith’s sprawling investigation concerned checks covering donations to Trump’s campaign and Trump-aligned groups from September 2019 through August 2023 by Americans across all 50 states, Washington, D.C., and Puerto Rico. asserted
extension → sprawl → states
They contained home addresses, bank account and routing numbers, and signatures. asserted
They → contain → addresses
The records were routed to former FBI agent Walter Giardina. asserted
records → rout → Giardina
“Every member on this committee ought to be outraged for what happened to their constituents,” Grassley said. asserted
Grassley → happen → constituents
A sweeping investigation of the conservative movement Grassley for months has released records showing the surveillance by Smith’s team extended to a large number of Republican lawmakers as well. asserted
surveillance → release → lawmakers
Those discoveries led Grassley to delay Smith’s appearance before the committee to ensure maximum oversight over his handling of the cases. asserted
discoveries → lead → cases
Smith previously testified before the House counterpart committee in January. asserted
Smith → testify → January
Sen. Mike Lee (R-UT) pressed Smith on whether the collection of lawmakers’ phone toll records also extended to tracking their whereabouts. asserted
collection → press → whereabouts
“Do you define toll records to include geolocation data?” Lee asked. asserted
Lee → define → data
“I would have to look at the subpoena,” Smith replied. asserted
Smith → have → subpoena
Smith said investigators primarily wanted to establish who communicated with who, when calls occurred, and their duration, rather than what was said on the calls. asserted
what → say → calls
He could not recall whether the demands included other information. uncertain
demands → recall → information
As part of Smith’s surveillance sweep, he obtained communications between Trump White House officials and members of Congress through National Archives records. asserted
he → obtain → records
Grassley has said subpoenas for 87 White House phones yielded communications involving 44 lawmakers, including the contents of personal conversations, not just phone tolls. asserted
subpoenas → say → conversations
Smith said he consulted with the Department of Justice’s Public Integrity Section before seeking congressional toll records. asserted
he → say → records
“My recollection is that they approved of the subpoenas,” he said. asserted
he → approve → subpoenas
That defense was telling, in part because new disclosures made public Tuesday morning about his top prosecutors, J.P. Cooney and Molly Gaston, showed they discussed desires to curtail congressional protections almost two years before joining Smith’s team. asserted
they → make → team
In a Jan. 5, 2021, message, Cooney, who is now running as a Democrat for Congress, advocated repealing the speech or debate clause while acknowledging prosecutors remained bound by it, the Washington Examiner first reported on Tuesday. asserted
Examiner → run → Tuesday
The speech or debate clause gives members of Congress special protections from the other two branches of government for their legislative activities. asserted
clause → give → activities
Sen. Darline Graham Nordone (R-SC) challenged the secrecy surrounding investigators’ acquisition of her late brother Lindsey Graham’s records. asserted
Nordone → challenge → records
“How the hell was Lindsey going to tamper with evidence he didn’t even have in his possession?” she asked, emphasizing that Verizon was the third party in possession of the records. asserted
Verizon → go → records
Smith had sought to conceal the fact that he obtained lawmakers’ phone records by arguing that he was worried that members would destroy evidence if they had known about the subpoenas. asserted
they → seek → subpoenas
Smith called Graham “a patriotic public servant” but said he likely would have been a potential witness in a trial against Trump, saying the late senator had investigated and rejected Trump’s election claims, a point he made earlier in the hearing as well for figures such as former Vice President Mike Pence and former Republican Arizona House Speaker Rusty Bowers. uncertain
he → call → Pence
Pressed on why the nondisclosure order cited evidence destruction, Smith pointed to possible witness intimidation by Trump. asserted
Smith → press → Trump
He offered no explanation of how Graham could have tampered with or destroyed Verizon’s phone tolls concerning his name. uncertain
Graham → offer → name
“I think you’re just trying to bully my brother and other allies of President Trump,” Graham Nordone said. asserted
Nordone → think → Trump
Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX) encountered similar memory lapses from the former special counsel. asserted
Cruz → encounter → counsel
Smith could not recall whether his team subpoenaed records concerning the Republican National Committee or Turning Point USA, but remembered that his team sought records from the Conservative Partnership Institute. uncertain
team → recall → Institute
“OK, good. We found one,” Cruz replied. asserted
Cruz → find → one
Asked about donor and fundraising information, Smith said he had not seen the subpoenas “in a very long time.” asserted
he → ask → time
He argued that investigators needed to determine whether people or organizations illegally attempted to block the peaceful transfer of power, although records used in that prosecution contained no evidence that any of the targeted groups were involved with criminal activity. asserted
any → argue → activity
Critics have characterized the sweep of conservative groups as overly broad. asserted
Critics → characterize → groups
Grassley also released records challenging aspects of Smith’s classified documents prosecution. asserted
Grassley → release → prosecution
According to the chairman, NARA’s inspector general initially requested DOJ assessment and guidance about Trump’s retention of some classified documents from his first term, rather than making a criminal referral. uncertain
general → accord → referral
Internal communications described the FBI’s early assessment that the classified information “spillage” issue was unlikely to become a criminal matter. asserted
issue → describe → assessment
Separately, Grassley said former NARA general counsel Gary Stern edited DOJ court filings, challenging Smith’s representations about the archive agency’s limited role. asserted
Stern → say → role
Democrats pushed to obtain more details about Smith’s account that are still under seal due to a federal court order issued by U.S. District Judge Aileen Cannon, a Trump appointee, in the classified documents case. asserted
that → push → case
…and 14 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support