Photo via The Bulwark

Jack Smith and the Republican Smear Squad

Read the original at The Bulwark ↗
Cite

Saletan, W. (2026, September 30). Jack Smith and the Republican Smear Squad. The Bulwark. https://www.thebulwark.com/p/jack-smith-senate-judiciary-republican-smears

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

The Bulwark · collected 2026-09-30 · by Will Saletan commentary

Quick Summary

Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday about his investigation into Donald Trump's actions during and after the 2020 election. Republican senators, led by Sen. Chuck Grassley, dismissed Smith’s work as partisan and attacked his integrity instead of addressing the substance of his testimony. Despite Smith clarifying that he sought phone records to investigate Trump’s pressure on Republicans, Senator John Kennedy continued to attack Smith personally without providing evidence. The article highlights how the Republican party's reaction underscores its willingness to prioritize loyalty to Trump over ethical standards or truth.
Written by AI on 2026-09-30, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

On Tuesday, former special counsel Jack Smith testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee chaired by Senator Chuck Grassley to defend his two criminal investigations into President Donald Trump. Republicans accuse Smith of abusing authority and politically targeting Republicans, while Democrats support him for standing up against Trump's alleged efforts to overturn the 2020 election results and mishandling classified documents. The hearing, titled "Oversight of Jack Smith’s Abuse of Authority and the Targeting of Republicans," also involves scrutiny over subpoenas issued by Smith's office, which were aimed at disrupting certification of Joe Biden's victory in 2020, ultimately leading to the Jan. 6 Capitol attack. Smith has insisted his decisions were made without political bias and said he would not be silenced despite threats from Trump's Justice Department.

Written for “Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate” on 2026-10-31, grounded in this article and the 34 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Jack Smith Testifies Before Senate
Politics · 35 article(s) covering the same event. Compare every outlet's account →

Compared with similar articles

This article reads leans strongly left and hedges 7% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 70/100
NBC News
Hedges 1 of 23 claims Outlet record 60/100
Toronto Star
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 2 of 22 claims Outlet record 64/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 6 of 54 claims Outlet record 70/100
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 66/100
September 29, 2026 Same event
Letters from an American
⚖️ Leans left further right than this Hedges 7 of 86 claims
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 1 of 44 claims Outlet record 61/100
Washington Examiner
⚖️ Leans right further right than this Hedges 2 of 35 claims Outlet record 70/100
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
71
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
7%
5 of 71 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
Leans strongly left
expected in commentary, which argues a position · beta estimate
Publisher signals
not measured
these signals count newsroom corrections; Commentary has none to count
Outlets on this story
35
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-30 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

The Bulwark · 561 article(s) · 0 correction(s) detected
No corrections detected for this publisher. That may mean careful reporting, or simply that nothing has been checked.

Who wrote this

Will Saletan
10 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 Collins essentially concedes that the pain inflicted by her own party will go on, and that all she can do is lessen it.
2026-10-20 · assertive framing · The Case Against Susan Collins
🔮 Susan Collins Couldn't Answer One Simple Question About Trump
🔮 Jack Smith Reveals the Words That Could Have Buried Trump Will Saletan lays out the case against Donald Trump that Jack Smith never got to present at trial.
🔮 Will Saletan and Joe Perticone take on the strange fight, the golf-industry interests behind it, and why Trump is picking on one of his own loyal allies with Republicans already staring down a brutal midterm environment.
🔮 The committee’s senators, listening to Smith’s remarks, could have chosen to identify with the honest Republicans he cited as models.
2026-09-30 · assertive framing · Jack Smith and the Republican Smear Squad
🔮 In the first ad, he declares, “Together we will defeat communism, socialism, and Marxism in America.”
2026-09-29 · assertive framing · Congratulations, You’re a Trump Campaign Donor
🔮 Will Saletan meticulously breaks down Todd Blanche’s defense of Trump’s press crackdown, Mike Waltz getting confronted with the president’s own words, and the shifting story about the war with Iran.
🔮 Will Saletan runs their own definition of “communism” against Donald Trump’s promises of $5,000 checks, government stakes in private companies, admiration for China, and even his jokes about being “the greatest communist in history”—and finds the GOP’s argument collapsing under its own weight.
🔮 Will Saletan takes on Trump’s Venezuela oil deal, as the president openly brags that Venezuelan oil has already paid for the war “many times over” and Republicans argue that U.S. Will Saletan takes on Trump’s Venezuela oil deal, as the president openly brags that Venezuelan oil has already paid for the war “many times over” and Republicans argue that U.S. oil companies deserve benefits for the next 100 years.
🔮 ON WEDNESDAY, FIVE DAYS AFTER Donald Trump announced a deal that would give the United States a stake in Venezuelan oil fields containing an estimated 65 billion barrels of oil, Energy Secretary Chris Wright went to Caracas for a meeting with Delcy Rodríguez, the country’s acting president.
2026-09-03 · assertive framing · Trump Is Keeping Venezuela’s Dictatorship in Business
Also by Will Saletan
The Case Against Susan Collins
2026-10-20 · The Bulwark
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 10 articles by Will Saletan →

Topics

GOP Iowa Republican Republicans the Senate Judiciary Committee

Subjects

Smith PERSON · 21× Trump PERSON · 14× Republican NORP · 8× Schmitt PERSON · 4× Kennedy PERSON · 3× Nixon PERSON · 2× Republicans NORP · 2× Donald Trump’s PERSON · 1× Jack Smith PERSON · 1× the Senate Judiciary Committee ORG · 1×

Narrative

I personally find it very hard to understand how our investigation can be viewed as partisan when the strongest witnesses, the people who were the difference between the rule of law standing [or] not in our case, were Republicans: people like Rusty Bowers in Arizona, people like Mike Pence, who did the right thing and put the interest of the country over the personal interest of Donald Trump.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-30
🔮 The committee’s senators, listening to Smith’s remarks, could have chosen to identify with the honest Republicans he cited as models.
2026-09-30 · The Bulwark
Jack Smith and the Republican Smear Squad · assertive framing

Claims (71 extracted, 5 hedged)

IN HIS TESTIMONY before the Senate Judiciary Committee on Tuesday, Jack Smith presented Republicans with an opportunity. asserted
Smith → present → opportunity
Smith, the former special counsel who investigated Donald Trump’s attempt to overthrow the 2020 election, distinguished Trump from the Republican party. asserted
who → investigate → party
He praised honest Republican officials who had stood up to Trump’s corrupt pressure. asserted
who → praise → pressure
The committee’s senators, listening to Smith’s remarks, could have chosen to identify with the honest Republicans he cited as models. uncertain
he → listen → models
Instead, the senators chose to identify with Trump. asserted
senators → choose → Trump
Almost unanimously, they ignored or rejected Smith’s distinctions between the president and his party. asserted
they → ignore → president
And they insisted that Smith, by investigating Trump and seeking records of Trump’s interactions with Republican lawmakers, had disqualified himself as a partisan. asserted
Smith → insist → partisan
In doing so, they clarified what today’s Republican party is. asserted
party → do → ?
It has no place for ethical public servants. asserted
It → have → servants
Anyone who criticizes or stands up to Trump is, by the party’s own definition, against the GOP. asserted
who → criticize → GOP
That’s worth remembering when you go to the polls. asserted
you → ’ → polls
That doesn’t mean everything has to be grim. asserted
everything → mean → ?
We can learn together. asserted
We → learn → ?
And when democracy needs defending, we can stand together. asserted
we → need → ?
You’re already reading. asserted
You → read → ?
Join the side you’re already on. asserted
you → join → side
THE COMMITTEE’S CHAIRMAN, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), kicked off the hearing by dismissing Smith’s investigators as partisan agents and prosecutors who “mapped out the Republican apparatus.” asserted
who → kick → apparatus
He cited Smith’s subpoenas of Republican organizations and of phone records that showed the dates, times, and lengths—but not the contents—of calls to or from Republican lawmakers. asserted
that → cite → lawmakers
Smith didn’t get a chance to rebut Grassley’s diatribe until it was the turn of the committee’s ranking member, Sen. Dick Durbin (D-Ill.). asserted
it → get → member
Smith explained that he had sought Republican lawmakers’ phone records because the lawmakers were targets of Trump, not of the investigation. asserted
lawmakers → explain → investigation
He noted that several had contacted the White House during the January 6th attack on the Capitol, pleading with Trump to call off his mob. asserted
several → note → mob
After the attack had subsided, Trump and his henchman, Rudy Giuliani, had phoned some of the lawmakers again, pressing them to overturn the election. asserted
Trump → subside → election
The phone records would confirm details of these calls. asserted
records → confirm → calls
Sen. John Kennedy (R-La.), speaking next, ignored Smith’s explanation. asserted
Kennedy → speak → explanation
He used his time to impugn Smith’s integrity. asserted
He → use → integrity
Smith pointed out that he had been a nonpartisan prosecutor for thirty years and had worked in Trump’s first administration. asserted
he → point → administration
But Kennedy wouldn’t let up. asserted
Kennedy → let → ?
He baited Smith with allegations that Smith’s wife was too nice to Michelle Obama. asserted
wife → bait → Obama
Then, without offering a shred of evidence, Kennedy claimed that Joe Biden had instructed then-Attorney General Merrick Garland to prosecute Trump. asserted
Biden → offer → Trump
When Smith didn’t take any of Kennedy’s bait, the senator exploded. asserted
senator → take → bait
“You make me want to throw up in my mouth,” he seethed. asserted
he → make → mouth
The hearing’s most remarkable incident came during questioning from Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.). asserted
incident → come → Schmitt
Schmitt called Smith a “total dirtbag,” accused him of conspiring to “get Trump,” claimed that Smith had “weaponized the Department of Justice,” and snidely asked him, “Did you purposely assemble a team of partisan hacks?” asserted
you → call → hacks
Then Schmitt demanded to know whether Smith had attended an NBA game in Atlanta on February 3, 2024. asserted
Smith → demand → February
When Smith said he hadn’t, Schmitt grinned and boasted that he had just caught the former special counsel in a perjury trap. asserted
he → say → trap
It turned out that Schmitt had screwed up and Smith, once again, was telling the truth. asserted
Smith → turn → truth
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) said Smith’s investigation “makes what Richard Nixon did in Watergate look like a Sunday picnic.” asserted
did → say → picnic
Lee, astonishingly, wasn’t comparing Nixon to Trump. asserted
Lee → compare → Trump
He was comparing Nixon to Smith. asserted
He → compare → Smith
At every turn, Smith patiently debunked the accusations of partisanship. asserted
Smith → debunk → partisanship
…and 31 more, not listed.
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support