Photo via New York Post

Democrats must answer for Jack Smith’s politically charged prosecutorial abuses

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Post Editorial Board. (2026, October 3). Democrats must answer for Jack Smith’s politically charged prosecutorial abuses. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/10/03/opinion/democrats-must-answer-for-jack-smiths-prosecutorial-abuses/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-10-03 · by Post Editorial Board

Quick Summary

The Senate Judiciary Committee revealed that Special Counsel Jack Smith, appointed by the Biden Justice Department to investigate former President Donald Trump, allegedly abused his prosecutorial powers. This abuse includes spying on thousands of Trump donors and journalists, obtaining private information from them, and monitoring the movements of Republican lawmakers around January 6, 2021, which may have violated their constitutional rights under Article I’s “Speech and Debate” clause. The article criticizes Democrats for not condemning these actions, suggesting a broader pattern of disregard for civil liberties among the party.
Written by AI on 2026-10-03, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

The Senate Judiciary Committee recently revealed that Special Counsel Jack Smith, appointed by the Biden Justice Department in 2022 to investigate former President Donald Trump, allegedly overstepped his authority with politically charged actions. According to testimony and evidence presented, Smith targeted thousands of Americans who had donated even small sums to Trump's campaign by obtaining their personal information such as home addresses, bank details, and signatures. Additionally, he reportedly accessed emails from dozens of reporters at major media outlets without cause, showing no bias toward political leaning. This investigation also included surveillance on text messages between Trump officials and 44 lawmakers during a specific timeframe. The committee’s findings raise serious concerns about potential abuses of power within the justice system under Democratic leadership.

Written for “Hunter Biden Investigation Controversy” on 2026-11-04, grounded in this article and the 0 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Hunter Biden Investigation Controversy
Politics · 1 article(s) covering the same event.

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 14% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 71 claims
“The articles describe different aspects and reactions to Jack Smith's testimony and actions related to his investigation of Donald Trump, not the same specific incident or time.”
Up Schmitt Creek Different event
The Dispatch
⚖️ Leans right Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles discuss related themes but cover different specific events and time periods regarding Jack Smith's actions.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 0 of 7 claims
“The articles discuss different aspects of investigations and political implications related to Trump, but do not describe the same specific incident.”
New York Post
Hedges 5 of 13 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related aspects of Jack Smith's investigation but do not describe the same specific incident.”
ABC News (US)
Hedges 3 of 28 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles discuss Jack Smith's investigations and testimony but refer to different aspects and timelines.”
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 69/100
“Article A describes a Senate hearing where Jack Smith defends his actions, while Article B discusses the political implications and alleged abuses by Smith in his investigation against Trump.”
The Guardian
⚖️ Leans strongly right Hedges 3 of 24 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles cover different parts of a broader series of events related to Jack Smith's actions and hearings, not the exact same incident at the same time.”
CBS News
Hedges 0 of 2 claims Outlet record 65/100
“The articles discuss Jack Smith's Senate testimony and investigations into Donald Trump but occur on different dates with distinct focuses.”
Al Jazeera
Hedges 1 of 35 claims Outlet record 60/100
“The articles describe different perspectives on a series of investigations and hearings involving Jack Smith and Donald Trump, but they do not both refer to the exact same singular incident occurring at the same time.”
Fox News
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 0 of 31 claims Outlet record 68/100
“While both articles discuss surveillance activities by the FBI and Jack Smith's office against the Trump family, Article A focuses on broader political implications of Smith's actions, while Article B specifically mentions a codenamed investigation 'Plasmic Echo' that involved tracking the Trump family's travel. These appear to be related but distinct reports.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
14
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
14%
2 of 14 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
1
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-10-03 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16647 article(s) · 36 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 36 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Post Editorial Board
125 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 The paper last month impressed its usual critics by tracking down damning details of how Democratic candidate Mary Peltola’s campaign recruited a strawman candidate sharing the same name as the Republican incumbent, a ploy that, in concert with the state’s ranked-choice-voting rules, could make her the winner even if more people meant to vote for the real Dan Sullivan.
🔮 This “project will gut the heart of the American system of government” and lead us to the brink of a new “Civil War.”
🔮 Mayor Zohran Mamdani gave away the problem with his comments on the Bronx tragedy, first calling it a “horrific reminder of the danger that lithium-ion battery fires can pose” but then simply pleading with New Yorkers to “store any micromobility devices outside rather than inside their homes.”
🔮 The “effort by the liberal establishment to undo populism” will gain new life if “Democrats regain control” of Congress,” argues UnHerd’s Alicia Nieves.
🔮 It looks like Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s getting a wish-granted monkey-paw style: MTA buses are now de-facto free — at the price of making them increasingly dangerous and blowing a disastrous hole in the agency’s finances.
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · MTA bus-fare retreat could doom all NYC public transit
🔮 The recent rumor that Team Trump would push Hungarian ex-PM Viktor Orbán for the job looks to be a trial balloon by fringe MAGA freelancers, not anything President Donald Trump (nor Orbán himself!) is seriously considering — though it should serve as a warning that Trump will keep looking ever-further outside the box if the field remains nothing but business-as-usual “reformers.”
2026-11-02 · assertive framing · Only a real reformer can save the United Nations
🔮 The Democratic machine, which prioritizes winning over morals, will disown her.
🔮 Meanwhile, Gov. Kathy Hochul is clearly signaling tax hikes next year to help fund Mayor Zohran Mamdani’s socialism-in-one-city, not to mention the state’s coming $32 billion budget hole.
🔮 Pandering to the excuse-makers, Banks claimed he urged then-mayor Eric Adams to ditch the test-in standard for five elite schools — but Adams refused to cave.
🔮 It may well be a federal crime, as a conspiracy to deceive and injure the public’s exercise of constitutional voting rights.
Wire or desk byline, not an individual reporter.
Also by Post Editorial Board
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 125 articles by Post Editorial Board →

Topics

Congress Democrats The Senate Judiciary Committee Trump White House

Subjects

Smith PERSON · 9× Trump PERSON · 6× Democrats NORP · 4× Biden PERSON · 3× Congress ORG · 2× White House ORG · 2× Jack Smith PERSON · 1× The Biden ORG · 1× The Senate Judiciary Committee ORG · 1× the Executive Branch ORG · 1×

Narrative

Then again, the national party seems to be built around contempt for the civil rights of its political enemies: Look at Biden administration efforts to set up a “Disinformation Governance Board” or Attorney General Merrick Garland siccing the FBI on school-board protestors. To say nothing of Democrats’ open talk now of packing the Supreme Court. Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley’s done the republic a service by bringing Smith’s outrages to light.
framing: assertive · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-10-03
🔮 Smith also obtained emails of dozens of reporters at major media outlets — targets who fell across the partisan spectrum, by the way, in case left-leaning journos thought their political allegiances might spare them. What was their crime?

Claims (14 extracted, 2 hedged)

The Senate Judiciary Committee last week dropped evidence that Biden-ers special counsel Jack Smith savagely abused prosecutorial powers for purely political purposes — an outrage Democrats as of now seem sure to repeat when next they run the Executive Branch. asserted
they → drop → Branch
The Biden Justice Department in 2022 tasked Smith with creating a federal case against then-ex-President Donald Trump to hobble (or better still prevent) his third White House run. asserted
Department → task → run
Now we know that Smith, in his Capt. Ahab pursuit of Trump, went after complete innocents — spying on thousands of average Americans, obtaining their home addresses, bank account and routing numbers, and signatures. asserted
Smith → know → addresses
Smith also obtained emails of dozens of reporters at major media outlets — targets who fell across the partisan spectrum, by the way, in case left-leaning journos thought their political allegiances might spare them. What was their crime? uncertain
crime → obtain → them
All this comes atop Smith’s already-revealed spying on text messages between Trump officials and 44 lawmakers from October 2020 to Jan. 20, 2021. asserted
this → come → Jan.
Again: The victimized legislators come from both parties. asserted
legislators → victimize → parties
And the seizure of their texts seems a clear violation of Article I’s “Speech and Debate” clause, which protects members of Congress from civil and criminal prosecution over their official activity. asserted
which → seem → activity
Plus, Smith spied on the whereabouts of 10 Republican lawmakers in the days before and after Jan. 6 using phone geolocation —surveillance ruled clearly unconstitutional in a landmark 2018 Supreme Court decision, Carpenter v. United States. asserted
Smith → spy → States
Democrats love to bemoan the “chilling effect” of Trump’s perfectly legal actions on everything from budget cuts to immigration enforcement: Where are they on Biden’s favorite special prosecutor illegally going after small-dollar political donors and reporters? asserted
prosecutor → love → donors
Then again, the national party seems to be built around contempt for the civil rights of its political enemies: Look at Biden administration efforts to set up a “Disinformation Governance Board” or Attorney General Merrick Garland siccing the FBI on school-board protestors. To say nothing of Democrats’ open talk now of packing the Supreme Court. Judiciary Chairman Charles Grassley’s done the republic a service by bringing Smith’s outrages to light. asserted
Grassley → seem → light
Too bad Sen. Eric Schmitt (R-Mo.) gave the deniers an out with his an embarrassing marquee moment, confusing a text message to level a baseless perjury claim. uncertain
Schmitt → give → claim
That unforced error obscured Sen. Josh Hawley’s far more credible perjury charge: Smith was lying when he said in previous House testimony that he couldn’t remember seeking a search warrant for text messages of members of Congress. asserted
he → obscure → Congress
Democrats will come back into power someday; if this habit of running roughshod over the rights of anyone who stands in their way politically remains unchecked, it will cause a constitutional crisis of the kind Smith et al have spent the past decade charging Trump with causing. asserted
al → come → Trump
That’s why Smith and his former masters must be held accountable for the sake of their party’s future — and America’s. asserted
Smith → ’ → future
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support