Photo via New York Post

Jack Smith’s team got texts of dozens of reporters, bank info from thousands of Americans: Grassley

Read the original at New York Post ↗
Cite

Christenson, J. (2026, September 29). Jack Smith’s team got texts of dozens of reporters, bank info from thousands of Americans: Grassley. New York Post. https://nypost.com/2026/09/29/us-news/jack-smiths-team-got-texts-of-dozens-of-reporters-bank-info-from-thousands-of-americans-grassley/

Dated when The Aporia collected the article, usually within hours of publication. Check the original for its exact date and byline.

New York Post · collected 2026-09-29 · by Josh Christenson

Quick Summary

Sen. Chuck Grassley claimed that former special counsel Jack Smith and his team obtained communications from reporters at over a dozen media outlets and financial information from thousands of Americans during their investigation into former President Trump. This included text messages from journalists and lawmakers, as well as bank account details and home addresses of Republican donors who contributed to Trump’s political campaigns between September 2019 and August 2023. Grassley argued that Smith’s actions may have violated the Constitution's Speech and Debate Clause, while Smith maintained his decisions were impartial.
Written by AI on 2026-09-29, from this article's own text only (the story summary below draws on all the coverage).

AI analysis

Story summary

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) alleged that Jack Smith’s team, during their "Arctic Frost" probe leading to Donald Trump's indictment, obtained communications from reporters of more than a dozen national news outlets and financial information from 4,782 Americans who donated to Trump’s campaigns between September 2019 and August 2023. The subpoena issued in June 2023 sought text messages from phones used by officials in the first Trump administration, inadvertently gathering communications from journalists covering those officials. Grassley claimed Smith's team also reviewed bank account numbers and home addresses of Republican donors. Republicans argue that these actions may have violated the Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause, but Smith denied this during a hearing.

Written for “Smith's Investigation Methods” on 2026-11-03, grounded in this article and the 1 other(s) covering the same event.

Story

📰 Smith's Investigation Methods
Politics · 2 article(s) covering the same event. See how they differ ↓

Compared with similar articles

This article reads unscored and hedges 38% of its claims. Each row says how that neighbour differs.
Washington Examiner
Hedges 2 of 18 claims Outlet record 70/100
Daily Mail
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 1 of 14 claims Outlet record 69/100
“The articles cover related aspects of Jack Smith's investigation but describe different specific events and details.”
The Bulwark
⚖️ Leans strongly left Hedges 5 of 71 claims
“Article A discusses Sen. Grassley's claims about Jack Smith obtaining communications from reporters and financial information from Americans, while Article B describes Jack Smith's testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee and the Republicans' reaction to it.”
The Sydney Morning Herald
Hedges 1 of 44 claims Outlet record 61/100
“The articles describe different events: one about the alleged acquisition of reporters' and Americans' information by Jack Smith's team, and another about a Senate hearing attempting to incriminate Jack Smith.”
The Independent
⚖️ Leans left Hedges 4 of 22 claims Outlet record 59/100
“Article A describes Senator Grassley's claims about Jack Smith obtaining communications from reporters and financial information from Americans, while Article B discusses a separate incident where Senator Schmitt was warned his facts were unvetted before attempting to discredit Jack Smith during a congressional hearing.”
New York Post
Hedges 2 of 14 claims Outlet record 66/100
“The articles discuss related aspects of Jack Smith's investigation but do not describe the same specific incident.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 0 of 3 claims Outlet record 70/100
“Article A reports on Jack Smith's live testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee, while Article B discusses a claim by Sen. Grassley about information obtained during the Arctic Frost investigation.”
New York Post
Hedges 1 of 15 claims Outlet record 66/100
“While both articles discuss accusations against Jack Smith by Senator Grassley on the same day, Article A focuses on broader claims of illegal targeting and undermining the rule of law, while Article B specifically details the scope of data collected from reporters and Americans during the Arctic Frost probe.”
Washington Examiner
Hedges 6 of 54 claims Outlet record 70/100
“The articles describe different aspects related to Jack Smith's investigation but do not clearly report on the same specific incident.”
How this article was measured signals, leaning charts, publisher record, byline, topics and claims

Signals How these are calculated →

Claims extracted
13
sentences that state something as happening or true
Uncertain
38%
5 of 13 hedged ("reportedly", "may", "according to")
Leaning
withheld
no quote in the article backed the model's score
Publisher signals
66/100
New York Post's corrections and hedging, across everything collected from it. Not a measure of accuracy.
Outlets on this story
2
Politics
Same framing elsewhere
1
articles that frame the event the way this one does
Analyzed 2026-09-29 · how these are computed

How this is being covered How these are calculated →

Article leaning vs. publisher reliability
Source leaning vs. consistency

Publisher

New York Post · 16258 article(s) · 35 correction(s) detected
Running correction rate · 35 correction(s)

Who wrote this

Josh Christenson
61 article(s) here · 1 carrying a prediction
🔮 “I don’t think he’s gonna get fired immediately, but I wouldn’t be surprised if he was eventually pushed out,” the source said.
🔮 DJT will pardon me.”
🔮 Consular services will resume shortly,” Sienik added later.
🔮 Soriano is currently being held without bond, a rep for the Prince William County Adult Detention Center told The Post Friday.
🔮 Moscow’s foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov said that Putin said “in principle” peace talks will continue after Nov. 10, following a meeting with US special envoy Steve Witkoff in St. Petersburg.
🔮 Tuesday’s talks centered on points in a proposal that will be presented to Russia the following day, laying out a framework for peace with Ukraine, security guarantees and “a broader European security architecture,” which could involve Ukraine joining the EU, as well as post-war plans for financial recovery, according to US officials and leaders who participated.
🔮 Given the case is being pursued as a general conspiracy, the evidence will prove useful even if some of the acts fall outside of the statute of limitations. “If you argue a conspiracy, you can allege overt acts in furtherance of the conspiracy that are outside the statute of limitations,” said Neama Rahmini, a former federal prosecutor.
🔮 In December 2025, then-US Attorney Joe Thompson claimed as much as $9 billion in taxpayer funds may have been pilfered from state coffers since 2018 — the same year Democrat Tim Walz was first elected Minnesota governor.
🔮 “I will be transferring from our campaign in New York one million dollars to the state of Michigan to help support you all,” Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) told supporters at an event while stumping for El-Sayed in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula on Thursday.
2026-10-16 · assertive framing · AOC sends $1M to Abdul El-Sayed in Michigan Senate race
🔮 “Our auditors and investigators are zeroing in on this failure, and we will enforce full accountability.
Also by Josh Christenson
Nothing else under this byline is closely related to this article, so these are simply their most recent.
All 61 articles by Josh Christenson →

Topics

Americans Arctic Frost Iowa WASHINGTON White House

Subjects

Smith PERSON · 8× Trump PERSON · 7× Grassley PERSON · 5× Americans NORP · 2× White House ORG · 2× Chuck Grassley PERSON · 1× Fox News ORG · 1× Iowa GPE · 1× Jack Smith PERSON · 1× WASHINGTON GPE · 1×

Narrative

Other whistleblower disclosures made public by Grassley during Tuesday’s hearing showed that at least 4,782 checks written by Americans to fund Trump’s political campaigns between September 2019 and August 2023 were also obtained by Smith’s team. The bank account numbers and home addresses of the Republican donors were all reviewed by the prosecutors.
framing: mixed · carried by 1 article(s) · first seen 2026-09-29
🔮 Grassley and other Republicans have alleged that Smith’s moves to obtain the communications may have run afoul of the Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause — an allegation that Smith rejected in Tuesday’s hearing.

Claims (13 extracted, 5 hedged)

Former special counsel Jack Smith and his investigators obtained communications from reporters for more than a dozen media outlets and financial information from thousands of Americans as part of their “Arctic Frost” probe that resulted in the indictment of President Trump, Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) claimed Tuesday. asserted
Grassley → obtain → Trump
The outlets affected include Fox News, CNN, CBS News, NBC News, CNBC, the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Bloomberg, the Los Angeles Times and New York Magazine. asserted
outlets → affect → News
The Federalist, the Washington Times, the Associated Press, Reuters, National Public Radio, conservative radio host Mark Levin’s syndicated program, and the Media Research Center were also targeted. asserted
Federalist → syndicate → ?
Smith’s office issued a subpoena in June 2023 for text messages from the phones of officials who served in the first Trump administration, which swept up the communications of the journalists, according to Grassley. uncertain
which → issue → Grassley
At least 87 White House phone numbers were listed in the subpoena request, though it’s unclear what time period was covered. uncertain
period → list → request
In addition to journalists, Smith’s office also seized messages between Trump White House officials and 44 lawmakers from both parties between October 2020 and Jan. 20, 2021. asserted
office → seize → October
Grassley and other Republicans have alleged that Smith’s moves to obtain the communications may have run afoul of the Constitution’s Speech and Debate Clause — an allegation that Smith rejected in Tuesday’s hearing. uncertain
Smith → allege → hearing
The ex-special counsel has previously testified he couldn’t “recall” whether he sought the content of text messages from lawmakers and wasn’t asked about reporter communications Tuesday. asserted
he → testify → communications
Grassley and Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.) had demanded the records from the National Archives in May after learning that Smith’s prosecutors received digital communications and had to put a so-called “filter” team in place to review which materials were legally privileged. uncertain
materials → demand → place
Other whistleblower disclosures made public by Grassley during Tuesday’s hearing showed that at least 4,782 checks written by Americans to fund Trump’s political campaigns between September 2019 and August 2023 were also obtained by Smith’s team. The bank account numbers and home addresses of the Republican donors were all reviewed by the prosecutors. asserted
numbers → make → prosecutors
In his opening statement Tuesday, Grassley claimed that Smith “undermined the rule of law and threatened our very political institutions” with his investigation into Trump that resulted in a four-count indictment for allegedly illegally attempting to overturn the 2020 election. uncertain
that → claim → election
“I stand by my decisions as special counsel, including my decision to bring charges against President Trump,” Smith insisted during his opening statement. asserted
Smith → stand → statement
“I made these decisions without regard to President Trump’s political association, activities, beliefs, or candidacy in the 2024 presidential election.” asserted
I → make → election
💬Give feedback
🕘History 🎫Support